Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition

Description:

Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition SLA Study Group Yu-Feng Diana Yang, Ph.D. Email: dyang_at_mail.nsysu.edu.tw What is input? Behaviorist: stimulus ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1251
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: zephyrNs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition


1
Input and Interaction and Second Language
Acquisition
  • SLA Study Group
  • Yu-Feng Diana Yang, Ph.D.
  • Email dyang_at_mail.nsysu.edu.tw

2
What is input?
  • Behaviorist stimulus
  • Mentalist trigger
  • Interactionist Theory utterance generated in
    social interaction

3
Interaction Flow
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
4
Interaction Flow
comprehensible input Krashen
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
comprehensible input Long
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
comprehensible output Swain
5
What is going on?
  • Foreigner talk
  • Interlanguage talk

6
Role of Input in SLA
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
7
Role of Input in SLA
  • How does input affect on the development of L2
    (route of development)?
  • what type of input, what input (content), how
    much input (amount frequency)?
  • which part of the L2 development ?

8
How does input affect on the development of L2?
  • how much input (frequency) vs. which part of the
    L2 development

9
How does input affect on the development of L2 ?
  • What if the input is ungrammatical?
  • Gass Lakshmann (1991)
  • Participants
  • Alberto Cheo
  • L1-Spanish L2 Learners of English
  • Method Longitudinal Design Correlation study
  • Result subjectless input correlate with
    subjectless output (over time)
  • Bias Limitations
  • L1 influence
  • Correlation V. S. Causality (causative
    relationship)

10
How does input affect on the development of L2 ?
  • What if the input is comprehensible?
  • Krashen (1981, 1985, 1989) Method Extrapolation
    from L1 studies
  • Results Input Hypothesis

11
Comprehensible Input and SLA
  • Input Hypothesis i1 (Krashen, 1981, 1985, 1989)

Speakingresult of acquisition but not causes
(i1)
simplification contextual and extralinguistic
clues
Natural Learning Order
Intake affectively accepted (1)
Current Competence Level (i)
12
Role of Input in SLA
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
13
Interaction Flow
comprehensible input Krashen
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
comprehensible input Long
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
14
Interactive Input and SLA
  • Long (1983)

Speakingresult of acquisition but not causes
simplification contextual and extralinguistic
clues Interactive Input
Intake affectively accepted
Current Competence Level
15
Interactive Input and SLA
Verbal communication task involving two-way
information
Opportunity for less competent speaker to
provide feedback on his/her comprehension
Negotiated modification of conversation
Comprehensible Input
Language acquisition
(Long, 1983, p.214)
16
Does modified input contribute to SLA?
  • Long (1985) Indirect studies
  • Linguistic/conversational adjustment?
    comprehensible input
  • Comprehensible input ? acquisition
  • Linguistic/conversational adjustments?
    acquisition

17
Does Linguistic/conversational adjustment promote
comprehensible input?
  • Pica, Young Doughty (1987) Comparative study
    interationally modified input resulted in the
    highest levels of comprehension-gtbut we not sure
    if it is because of the greater quantity or
    greater quality
  • Pica (1992) same quality of premodified or
    interactionally modified input make no difference
    in comprehension level

Does interational modifications result in
comprehension? No guarantee !
18
Does comprehensible input lead to SLA?
  • Literature Reviews Long (1983), Larsen-Freeman
    and Long (1991) Krashen (1986, 1989)-see p. 271
  • Critiques
  • Gass (1988) comprehensible input v.s.
    comprehended input
  • Farch Kasper (1986) top-down v.s. bottom-up
  • White (1987) learners do not make
    overgeneralizations unlearned once they receive
    comprehensible input
  • Comprehensible input can facilitate acquisition
    but 1) is not necessary condition of acquisition,
    and 2) does not guarantee that acquisition will
    take place (p. 279)

19
Does Input/Interaction modification lead to
acquisition?
  • Main Focus Vocabulary
  • FL modification helps vocabulary learning
  • Li (1989)
  • Tanaka Yamazaki (1991)

20
Does modified input contribute to SLA?
  • Pellettieris (2000)

21
Role of Modified Output in SLA
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
22
Interaction Flow
comprehensible input Krashen
input
  • NS NNS

feedback/output------gtclarification
meaning negotiation
interactive input/modified input
comprehensible input Long
modified output
interactive input/modified input
modified output
comprehensible output Swain
23
Does comprehensible output contribute to SLA?
  • Swain (1995) Output Hypothesis
  • recognize some linguistics problems, and pay
  • attention to things that they need to discover
  • more (i.e. the noticing/triggering function)

24
Questions for Critical Thinking
  • Some language educators have argued for the
    desirability of using authentic target language
    materials in the classroom. Do you agree with
    this? Why or why not?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com