Labor Relations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Labor Relations

Description:

Chapter 23 Labor Relations Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct (cont.) NIC defines staff sexual misconduct as: Staff sexual misconduct includes, but is not limited to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: Caro1216
Learn more at: https://faculty.uml.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Labor Relations


1
Chapter 23
  • Labor Relations

2
Objectives
  • Provide examples of typical and unusual
    provisions found in collective bargaining
    agreements covering the corrections jurisdictions
  • Explain why bargaining toward a master agreement
    in a corrections jurisdiction can be prolonged
  • Outline the components of a sound management and
    supervisor training program on labor relations
    and staff management

3
Introduction
  • All corrections administrators, whether employed
    by a prison or jail, must become involved in the
    plethora of labor management relations activities
  • They must learn the vocabulary of labor relations

4
Relevant Acts and Laws
  • 1935 National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)
    formally recognized employees right to form
    and join labor organizations
  • 1947 NLRA amended with Taft-Hartley Act which
    prohibited labor unions from engaging in certain
    activities
  • States, in turn, developed their own collective
    bargaining laws

5
Issues that are Driven by the Union
  • Bargaining Issues
  • Management meeting with employee organizations is
    well established in law and is a routine practice
    in most jurisdictions
  • Meet and confer is a phase meaning to bargain
  • Parties exchange information, opinions, and
    proposals and endeavor to reach agreement
  • Master agreement is the contract to which other
    later agreements are added

6
Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
  • Grievances
  • Dispute between the employee organization and the
    employers
  • Grievance process is usually specified within the
    collective bargaining agreement
  • Normally, only contract grievances can be
    arbitrated

7
Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
  • Unfair Labor Practice Charges
  • Action or decision by an employer that interferes
    with the organizational rights of employees
  • An unfair labor practice is adjudicated before
    the administrative body that is empowered to
    oversee the administration of collective
    bargaining law

8
Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
  • Unfair Labor Practice Charges (cont.)
  • Actions that are unlawful for the employer
  • Imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on
    employees
  • Discriminating or threatening to discriminate
    against employees
  • Interfering with, restraining, or coercing
    employees because of the exercise of their
    guaranteed rights under collective bargaining law
  • Refusing to meet or confer in good faith with a
    recognized organization

9
Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
  • Unfair Labor Practice Charges (cont.)
  • Decisions that may be unlawful for the union
  • Causing or attempting to cause the employer to
    violate a collective bargaining law
  • Imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on
    employees
  • Discriminating or threatening to discriminate
    against employees
  • Interfering with, restraining, or coercing
    employees because of the exercise of their
    guaranteed rights under collective bargaining law
  • Refusing to meet or confer in good faith with the
    employer
  • Refusing to participate in the mediation process

10
Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
  • Issues of Importance
  • Employee organizations frequently bring up other
    matters of concern during informal or formal
    meetings with administrators
  • Union may take every available opportunity to
    redirect its efforts in dealing with an issue
  • If the issue that is raised appears to be a
    significant issue to the union, it would be
    helpful for the manager to communicate this to
    the labor relations officer

11
Successful Labor Relations
  • Labor relations office provides resources to its
    departmental management staff
  • Labor relations office is charged with
    representing management in all areas of labor
    management relations
  • Training is the key to success of an effective
    labor relations program
  • Working with an employee organization requires
    treating the representative with integrity and
    respect

12
Successful Labor Relations (cont.)
  • Taking care of problems on a day-to-day basis is
    the key to effective labor organization
  • Management must know how to separate frivolous
    issues from serious ones
  • Managements response should be a well thought
    out course of action to take care of the problem

13
Developing the Management Team
  • Corrections administrators should share the
    routine as well as the unusual occurrences
    involving the union with the departments labor
    relations staff.
  • The management team consists of all
    administrators, managers, and supervisors

14
Ethics and Labor Relations
  • Ethics refers to standards of conduct standards
    that indicate how one should behave based on
    moral duties and virtues
  • Pillars of character in labor relations
  • Trustworthiness
  • Loyalty
  • Respect
  • Responsibility
  • Fairness
  • Caring

15
Politics in Public Sector Labor Relations
  • Political oversight of correctional facilities
    brings opportunities for politically sensitive
    public sector labor organizations
  • Political interest in the correctional
    environment may be heightened for a variety of
    reasons
  • Labor unions may draw public attention to the
    operating practices in correctional environments

16
Conclusion
  • Labor relations issues in any correctional
    environment are always affected by the
    perceptions of both parties
  • While labor management relations can be
    contentious, both sides should remember that they
    are working for the same agency and share the
    goal of operating safe and effective correctional
    facilities.

17
Chapter 24
  • Preventing Corruption

18
Objectives
  • Describe public service corruption and
    differentiate between public corruption and
    prison corruption
  • Determine characteristics of professionalism
  • Define acts of misfeasance and distinguish acts
    of malfeasance from acts of nonfeasance.

19
Public Service Corruption
  • Corruption by public officials is considered more
    sinister than by private officials because
  • Citizens have no choice but to use the available
    public services
  • Public officials take an oath to execute the laws
    of the land faithfully and to serve society,
    making their failures seem more sinful
  • Because of their sovereignty, public agencies can
    inflict greater damage on unsuspecting citizens
    than can officials in the private sector

20
Public Service Corruption (cont.)
  • Alert and conscientious managers can monitor
    several indicators including
  • Formal and informal complaints against employees
  • Disciplinary actions taken against employees for
    violating agency rules and regulations
  • Patterns of depressive episodes or questionable
    behavior by workers
  • Erratic behaviors by workers
  • Graffiti on the walls and inside bathrooms

21
Prison Corruption
  • Prison personnel may experience more resentment
    and cynicism than their counterparts in other
    public agencies due to the culture of
    manipulation and violence they encounter
  • New rules over the last 20 years have resulted in
    the hiring of unprecedented numbers of
    correctional officers, making screening and
    training difficult
  • Correctional officers may become dependent on
    inmates for completion of some tasks and may
    overlook infractions in return

22
Standpoints on Prison Corruption
  • Sociological corruption is an abuse of power
  • Legal corruption involves use of oppression or
    extralegal methods to suppress the will of others
  • Moral failure of staff to demonstrate
    compassion or keep a promise
  • Economic abusing authority for personal gain

23
Standpoints on Prison Corruption (cont.)
  • Corruption may range from a conflict with a
    fellow employee to smuggling contraband
  • Corruption can include use of force violations
  • Inmates can file federal civil lawsuits against
    prison officials seeking changes in prison
    conditions as well as monetary damages

24
Standpoints on Prison Corruption (cont.)
  • Misfeasance acts an official is supposed to
    know how to do legally, but are willingly
    committed illegally for personal gain
  • Malfeasance acts of misconduct committed by
    institution officials in violation of the
    criminal laws of the state or agency regulations
  • Nonfeasance acts of avoidance or failure by an
    official

25
Prevention of Prison Misconduct
  • Ethical institution leaders must be consistent,
    reasonable, fair, and sympathetic to the needs of
    officers and inmates
  • Management should articulate its position on
    corruption and develop and implement
    anticorruption policy
  • Message must be clear that corruption will not be
    tolerated

26
Prevention of Prison Misconduct (cont.)
  • Role of policy statements
  • Articulate activities generally accepted as being
    corrupt
  • Internal affairs division should conduct
    investigatory procedures
  • Penalties should be fair and reasonable

27
Prevention of Prison Misconduct (cont.)
  • Steps to fight corruption
  • Utilize hiring standards to keep out high-risk
    applicants
  • Establish quality-based supervisory techniques
  • Strengthen fiscal controls
  • Ensure that internal auditors are honest
  • Emphasize true ethical training
  • Leadership should be visible and active

28
Conclusion
  • Professionalism is an ideal toward which
    correctional personnel should strive
  • Corruption is a shameful reality they should
    eradicate

29
Chapter 25
  • Sexual Misconduct

30
Objectives
  • Identify some of the factors that can contribute
    to sexual abuse of inmates by correctional staff
  • Outline the parameters that define staff sexual
    misconduct and permissible behaviors between
    staff and inmates
  • Describe some of the approaches taken by
    correctional administrators and legislators to
    minimize sexual misconduct

31
The Prison Rape Elimination Act
  • Signed into law in 2003 by President Bush
  • Speaks to staff and inmate sexual abuse and
    promotes a zero-tolerance approach to all prison
    rape and sexual assault
  • Responsibilities of federal agencies
  • BJS collects, reviews, and analyzes related
    statistics
  • Review panel conducts hearings on prison rape
  • NIC offers training and technical assistance
  • US Attorney Generals office publishes national
    standards for detection, prevention, reduction,
    and punishment of prison rape

32
Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct
  • Variety of definitions, most of which encompass
    any type of sexual conduct between staff and
    inmates
  • People in custody cannot leave the presence of
    those who have authority over them and therefore,
    the concept of welcome advances cannot be
    applied to staff sexual misconduct involving
    inmates

33
Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
  • NIC defines staff sexual misconduct as
  • Any behavior or act of a sexual nature by an
    employee toward
  • A person under the care or custody of the
    department
  • Any collateral contact of an offender
  • Victims or their families
  • Any other persons with official contact on behalf
    of offenders

34
Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
  • NIC defines staff sexual misconduct as
  • Staff sexual misconduct includes, but is not
    limited to, acts or attempts to commit such acts
    as
  • Sexual assault, abuse, or harassment
  • Actions designed for sexual gratification of any
    party
  • Conduct of a sexual nature
  • Obscenity
  • Unreasonable invasion of privacy
  • Inappropriate viewing
  • Conversations or correspondence which suggests a
    romantic or sexual relationship
  • There can be no consensual sex between staff and
    inmates

35
Legal Issues and Evolution of State Law
  • Highly visible cases of misconduct in womens
    prisons have raised awareness of the issues of
    correctional staff engaged in sexual misconduct
    with inmates
  • Highest incidence of staff sexual misconduct is
    that of female staff with male offenders
  • Gaps in protection of offenders result in a lack
    of coverage when an incident involves particular
    types of agency personnel, agencies other than
    prisons and jails, and certain types of conduct

36
Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities
  • PREA raises the urgency of the corrections
    fields response to these issues by viewing the
    problem as widespread
  • Difficult to determine the incidents of such
    behaviors

37
Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
  • Data on incidents have often been documented
    under more general categories
  • Underreporting of incidents when they occur
  • Difficult to investigate
  • Staff may not recognize the signs indicating a
    potential problem
  • Code of silence may prevail among inmates and/or
    staff
  • Effective reporting mechanisms are not in place
  • Investigations may not be objective

38
Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
  • Barriers to accurate reporting
  • Problems in inmate reporting
  • Difficulty obtaining physical evidence
  • Inappropriate approach to inmate interviews
  • Inadequate protocol training on investigation
  • Lack of resources
  • Lack of information on progress of investigation

39
Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
  • Barriers to accurate reporting (cont.)
  • Use of outside investigators with limited
    correctional expertise
  • Lack of coordination among various parties
    involved in process
  • Problems with maintaining confidentiality
  • Lack of support by leadership and relevant
    outside agencies

40
Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
  • PREA requires BJS to develop new national data
    collections
  • At present, there are no reliable estimates of
    the extent of unreported sexual victimization
  • BJS is developing and testing methods that would
    wholly measure the incidence of this problem

41
Influencing Factors
  • Growth of Corrections
  • More supervisors have been needed to operate all
    aspects of prison facilities
  • Supervisors may feel uncomfortable confronting
    sensitive issues such as sexual misconduct
  • Prison and jail crowding, staff shortages, and
    design flaws contribute to sexual violence

42
Influencing Factors (cont.)
  • Cultural Collision
  • Inmates may have very different backgrounds from
    staff
  • Much poorer, less educated, less skilled, and
    more urban than previous prison/jail populations
  • Cultural differences can create a collision of
    perceptions, communication styles, life
    experiences, and values

43
Influencing Factors (cont.)
  • Advocacy Groups
  • Groups and individuals advocating for inmates
    rights are concerned that correctional
    leadership, law, and policies should address
    abuse of any kind
  • National and state groups have served as
    watchdogs in the form of written reports and
    hearings

44
Influencing Factors (cont.)
  • Cross-Gender Supervision
  • Cross-gender supervision may increase likelihood
    of heterosexual sexual misconduct
  • Need to manage ratios carefully within facilities
    that employ both genders
  • Assess staffing in high privacy areas
  • Stay abreast of current practice

45
Influencing Factors (cont.)
  • Public Interest and Increased Awareness of Abuse
    of Power
  • Costly lawsuits combined with general publics
    frustration with crime have contributed to
    increased interest in corrections
  • Growing awareness of sexual violence in prisons
    parallels increasing awareness of domestic
    violence

46
Dynamics of Staff-Inmate Sexual Misconduct
  • Boundaries between staff and inmates can become
    blurred
  • Staff feeling vulnerable in their personal lives
    may have increased vulnerability for crossing the
    lines of appropriate behavior
  • Few correctional training programs address
    feelings and emotional dilemmas of staff when
    inmates become attached to them

47
Dynamics of Staff-Inmate Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
  • Staff and inmate interactions must always be
    understood within the context of a paramilitary
    structure
  • Many male and female inmates have experienced
    significant childhood abuse, which can impact
    adult behavior patterns
  • Sexual misconduct is prevalent among female
    officers with male inmates
  • Many staff fear that inmates will use false
    allegations to manipulate them

48
Approaches to Prevent and Address Staff Sexual
Misconduct
  • Cases must be viewed in the context of an
    organizations culture and practices
  • Need to create strong policy and practice to
    address staff sexual misconduct
  • Institutions are also striving to prevent
    inmate-on-inmate sexual assault

49
Conclusion
  • An understanding of the importance of
    professional boundaries and the role of
    correctional staff in an often emotional
    environment requires knowledge on inmate dynamics
    and institutional culture
  • State and federal laws provide a structural
    framework for identifying sexual misconduct and
    recommending consequences for inappropriate
    behavior
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com