Title: Labor Relations
1Chapter 23
2Objectives
- Provide examples of typical and unusual
provisions found in collective bargaining
agreements covering the corrections jurisdictions - Explain why bargaining toward a master agreement
in a corrections jurisdiction can be prolonged - Outline the components of a sound management and
supervisor training program on labor relations
and staff management
3Introduction
- All corrections administrators, whether employed
by a prison or jail, must become involved in the
plethora of labor management relations activities - They must learn the vocabulary of labor relations
4Relevant Acts and Laws
- 1935 National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)
formally recognized employees right to form
and join labor organizations - 1947 NLRA amended with Taft-Hartley Act which
prohibited labor unions from engaging in certain
activities - States, in turn, developed their own collective
bargaining laws
5Issues that are Driven by the Union
- Bargaining Issues
- Management meeting with employee organizations is
well established in law and is a routine practice
in most jurisdictions - Meet and confer is a phase meaning to bargain
- Parties exchange information, opinions, and
proposals and endeavor to reach agreement - Master agreement is the contract to which other
later agreements are added
6Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
- Grievances
- Dispute between the employee organization and the
employers - Grievance process is usually specified within the
collective bargaining agreement - Normally, only contract grievances can be
arbitrated
7Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
- Unfair Labor Practice Charges
- Action or decision by an employer that interferes
with the organizational rights of employees - An unfair labor practice is adjudicated before
the administrative body that is empowered to
oversee the administration of collective
bargaining law
8Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
- Unfair Labor Practice Charges (cont.)
- Actions that are unlawful for the employer
- Imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on
employees - Discriminating or threatening to discriminate
against employees - Interfering with, restraining, or coercing
employees because of the exercise of their
guaranteed rights under collective bargaining law - Refusing to meet or confer in good faith with a
recognized organization
9Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
- Unfair Labor Practice Charges (cont.)
- Decisions that may be unlawful for the union
- Causing or attempting to cause the employer to
violate a collective bargaining law - Imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on
employees - Discriminating or threatening to discriminate
against employees - Interfering with, restraining, or coercing
employees because of the exercise of their
guaranteed rights under collective bargaining law - Refusing to meet or confer in good faith with the
employer - Refusing to participate in the mediation process
10Issues that are Driven by the Union (cont.)
- Issues of Importance
- Employee organizations frequently bring up other
matters of concern during informal or formal
meetings with administrators - Union may take every available opportunity to
redirect its efforts in dealing with an issue - If the issue that is raised appears to be a
significant issue to the union, it would be
helpful for the manager to communicate this to
the labor relations officer
11Successful Labor Relations
- Labor relations office provides resources to its
departmental management staff - Labor relations office is charged with
representing management in all areas of labor
management relations - Training is the key to success of an effective
labor relations program - Working with an employee organization requires
treating the representative with integrity and
respect
12Successful Labor Relations (cont.)
- Taking care of problems on a day-to-day basis is
the key to effective labor organization - Management must know how to separate frivolous
issues from serious ones - Managements response should be a well thought
out course of action to take care of the problem
13Developing the Management Team
- Corrections administrators should share the
routine as well as the unusual occurrences
involving the union with the departments labor
relations staff. - The management team consists of all
administrators, managers, and supervisors
14Ethics and Labor Relations
- Ethics refers to standards of conduct standards
that indicate how one should behave based on
moral duties and virtues - Pillars of character in labor relations
- Trustworthiness
- Loyalty
- Respect
- Responsibility
- Fairness
- Caring
15Politics in Public Sector Labor Relations
- Political oversight of correctional facilities
brings opportunities for politically sensitive
public sector labor organizations - Political interest in the correctional
environment may be heightened for a variety of
reasons - Labor unions may draw public attention to the
operating practices in correctional environments
16Conclusion
- Labor relations issues in any correctional
environment are always affected by the
perceptions of both parties - While labor management relations can be
contentious, both sides should remember that they
are working for the same agency and share the
goal of operating safe and effective correctional
facilities.
17Chapter 24
18Objectives
- Describe public service corruption and
differentiate between public corruption and
prison corruption - Determine characteristics of professionalism
- Define acts of misfeasance and distinguish acts
of malfeasance from acts of nonfeasance.
19Public Service Corruption
- Corruption by public officials is considered more
sinister than by private officials because - Citizens have no choice but to use the available
public services - Public officials take an oath to execute the laws
of the land faithfully and to serve society,
making their failures seem more sinful - Because of their sovereignty, public agencies can
inflict greater damage on unsuspecting citizens
than can officials in the private sector
20Public Service Corruption (cont.)
- Alert and conscientious managers can monitor
several indicators including - Formal and informal complaints against employees
- Disciplinary actions taken against employees for
violating agency rules and regulations - Patterns of depressive episodes or questionable
behavior by workers - Erratic behaviors by workers
- Graffiti on the walls and inside bathrooms
21Prison Corruption
- Prison personnel may experience more resentment
and cynicism than their counterparts in other
public agencies due to the culture of
manipulation and violence they encounter - New rules over the last 20 years have resulted in
the hiring of unprecedented numbers of
correctional officers, making screening and
training difficult - Correctional officers may become dependent on
inmates for completion of some tasks and may
overlook infractions in return
22Standpoints on Prison Corruption
- Sociological corruption is an abuse of power
- Legal corruption involves use of oppression or
extralegal methods to suppress the will of others - Moral failure of staff to demonstrate
compassion or keep a promise - Economic abusing authority for personal gain
23Standpoints on Prison Corruption (cont.)
- Corruption may range from a conflict with a
fellow employee to smuggling contraband - Corruption can include use of force violations
- Inmates can file federal civil lawsuits against
prison officials seeking changes in prison
conditions as well as monetary damages
24Standpoints on Prison Corruption (cont.)
- Misfeasance acts an official is supposed to
know how to do legally, but are willingly
committed illegally for personal gain - Malfeasance acts of misconduct committed by
institution officials in violation of the
criminal laws of the state or agency regulations - Nonfeasance acts of avoidance or failure by an
official
25Prevention of Prison Misconduct
- Ethical institution leaders must be consistent,
reasonable, fair, and sympathetic to the needs of
officers and inmates - Management should articulate its position on
corruption and develop and implement
anticorruption policy - Message must be clear that corruption will not be
tolerated
26Prevention of Prison Misconduct (cont.)
- Role of policy statements
- Articulate activities generally accepted as being
corrupt - Internal affairs division should conduct
investigatory procedures - Penalties should be fair and reasonable
27Prevention of Prison Misconduct (cont.)
- Steps to fight corruption
- Utilize hiring standards to keep out high-risk
applicants - Establish quality-based supervisory techniques
- Strengthen fiscal controls
- Ensure that internal auditors are honest
- Emphasize true ethical training
- Leadership should be visible and active
28Conclusion
- Professionalism is an ideal toward which
correctional personnel should strive - Corruption is a shameful reality they should
eradicate
29Chapter 25
30Objectives
- Identify some of the factors that can contribute
to sexual abuse of inmates by correctional staff - Outline the parameters that define staff sexual
misconduct and permissible behaviors between
staff and inmates - Describe some of the approaches taken by
correctional administrators and legislators to
minimize sexual misconduct
31The Prison Rape Elimination Act
- Signed into law in 2003 by President Bush
- Speaks to staff and inmate sexual abuse and
promotes a zero-tolerance approach to all prison
rape and sexual assault - Responsibilities of federal agencies
- BJS collects, reviews, and analyzes related
statistics - Review panel conducts hearings on prison rape
- NIC offers training and technical assistance
- US Attorney Generals office publishes national
standards for detection, prevention, reduction,
and punishment of prison rape
32Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct
- Variety of definitions, most of which encompass
any type of sexual conduct between staff and
inmates - People in custody cannot leave the presence of
those who have authority over them and therefore,
the concept of welcome advances cannot be
applied to staff sexual misconduct involving
inmates
33Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
- NIC defines staff sexual misconduct as
- Any behavior or act of a sexual nature by an
employee toward - A person under the care or custody of the
department - Any collateral contact of an offender
- Victims or their families
- Any other persons with official contact on behalf
of offenders
34Defining Staff Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
- NIC defines staff sexual misconduct as
- Staff sexual misconduct includes, but is not
limited to, acts or attempts to commit such acts
as - Sexual assault, abuse, or harassment
- Actions designed for sexual gratification of any
party - Conduct of a sexual nature
- Obscenity
- Unreasonable invasion of privacy
- Inappropriate viewing
- Conversations or correspondence which suggests a
romantic or sexual relationship - There can be no consensual sex between staff and
inmates
35Legal Issues and Evolution of State Law
- Highly visible cases of misconduct in womens
prisons have raised awareness of the issues of
correctional staff engaged in sexual misconduct
with inmates - Highest incidence of staff sexual misconduct is
that of female staff with male offenders - Gaps in protection of offenders result in a lack
of coverage when an incident involves particular
types of agency personnel, agencies other than
prisons and jails, and certain types of conduct
36Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities
- PREA raises the urgency of the corrections
fields response to these issues by viewing the
problem as widespread - Difficult to determine the incidents of such
behaviors
37Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
- Data on incidents have often been documented
under more general categories - Underreporting of incidents when they occur
- Difficult to investigate
- Staff may not recognize the signs indicating a
potential problem - Code of silence may prevail among inmates and/or
staff - Effective reporting mechanisms are not in place
- Investigations may not be objective
38Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
- Barriers to accurate reporting
- Problems in inmate reporting
- Difficulty obtaining physical evidence
- Inappropriate approach to inmate interviews
- Inadequate protocol training on investigation
- Lack of resources
- Lack of information on progress of investigation
39Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
- Barriers to accurate reporting (cont.)
- Use of outside investigators with limited
correctional expertise - Lack of coordination among various parties
involved in process - Problems with maintaining confidentiality
- Lack of support by leadership and relevant
outside agencies
40Determining Prevalence of Sexual Violence in
Correctional Facilities (cont.)
- PREA requires BJS to develop new national data
collections - At present, there are no reliable estimates of
the extent of unreported sexual victimization - BJS is developing and testing methods that would
wholly measure the incidence of this problem
41Influencing Factors
- Growth of Corrections
- More supervisors have been needed to operate all
aspects of prison facilities - Supervisors may feel uncomfortable confronting
sensitive issues such as sexual misconduct - Prison and jail crowding, staff shortages, and
design flaws contribute to sexual violence
42Influencing Factors (cont.)
- Cultural Collision
- Inmates may have very different backgrounds from
staff - Much poorer, less educated, less skilled, and
more urban than previous prison/jail populations - Cultural differences can create a collision of
perceptions, communication styles, life
experiences, and values
43Influencing Factors (cont.)
- Advocacy Groups
- Groups and individuals advocating for inmates
rights are concerned that correctional
leadership, law, and policies should address
abuse of any kind - National and state groups have served as
watchdogs in the form of written reports and
hearings
44Influencing Factors (cont.)
- Cross-Gender Supervision
- Cross-gender supervision may increase likelihood
of heterosexual sexual misconduct - Need to manage ratios carefully within facilities
that employ both genders - Assess staffing in high privacy areas
- Stay abreast of current practice
45Influencing Factors (cont.)
- Public Interest and Increased Awareness of Abuse
of Power - Costly lawsuits combined with general publics
frustration with crime have contributed to
increased interest in corrections - Growing awareness of sexual violence in prisons
parallels increasing awareness of domestic
violence
46Dynamics of Staff-Inmate Sexual Misconduct
- Boundaries between staff and inmates can become
blurred - Staff feeling vulnerable in their personal lives
may have increased vulnerability for crossing the
lines of appropriate behavior - Few correctional training programs address
feelings and emotional dilemmas of staff when
inmates become attached to them
47Dynamics of Staff-Inmate Sexual Misconduct (cont.)
- Staff and inmate interactions must always be
understood within the context of a paramilitary
structure - Many male and female inmates have experienced
significant childhood abuse, which can impact
adult behavior patterns - Sexual misconduct is prevalent among female
officers with male inmates - Many staff fear that inmates will use false
allegations to manipulate them
48Approaches to Prevent and Address Staff Sexual
Misconduct
- Cases must be viewed in the context of an
organizations culture and practices - Need to create strong policy and practice to
address staff sexual misconduct - Institutions are also striving to prevent
inmate-on-inmate sexual assault
49Conclusion
- An understanding of the importance of
professional boundaries and the role of
correctional staff in an often emotional
environment requires knowledge on inmate dynamics
and institutional culture - State and federal laws provide a structural
framework for identifying sexual misconduct and
recommending consequences for inappropriate
behavior