Title: Post LSCS Pregnancy Management protocols
1Post LSCS PregnancyManagement protocols
2- Dr. Geetha Balsarkar,
- Associate Professor and Unit incharge,
- Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital,
- Seth G.S. Medical college, Parel , Mumbai
- Joint Asst. Secretary to the Editor,
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India,
- Secretary, AMWI, Mumbai branch
3Plan of Discussion
- Comparison of Trial of labour vs Planned Repeat
Caesarean - Selection of patients for VBAC
- Management of patients undergoing VBAC
- Check list for patients planned for Trial of
labour
4Delivery Outcomes
- Planned repeat caesarean delivery (PRCD)
- - Maternal morbidity 3.6
- Trial of labour after caesarean
- Emergency repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD)
- - Maternal morbidity 14.1
- Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC)
- - Maternal morbidity 2.4
5Maternal Consequences of PRCD
- Anesthesia risks high spinal, Mendelsons
syndrome, gastro intestinal symptoms - ? risk of short term maternal morbidity
increased bleeding, wound healing - Placenta praevia in future pregnancies
- Morbid adhesions of placenta in future pregnancies
6Advantages of VBAC over PRCD
- ? febrile morbidity (OR 0.7)
- ? blood transfusion (OR 0.6)
- ? rates of Hysterectomy (OR 0.4)
- ? venous thrombo- embolism (OR 0.4)
7Neonatal Risks of PRCD
- Neonatal respiratory morbidity
- ? admission to NICU (7 vs 4.6 for attempted
VBAC) - Healthy cohort selection bias
8Neonatal / Fetal advantages of PRCD
- ? incidence of neonatal trauma, intra-cranial
haemorrhage Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
(vs attempted VBAC) - ? incidence of unexplained antepartum stillbirth
9Maternal Risks of VBAC
- Perineal / Vaginal lacerations
- Emergency caesarean delivery
- Uterine rupture
- PRCD 1.6 / 1000
- Spontaneous labour 5.2 / 1000
- Induction with oxytocin 7.7 / 1000
- Induction with prostaglandins 24.5 / 1000
10Long Term Maternal Consequences of VBAC
- Urinary incontinence (prevalence 21 vs 15.9 for
PRCD) - Uterovaginal prolapse
11Fetal / Neonatal Risks of VBAC
- Fetal death following uterine rupture
- Neonatal sepsis following failed VBAC
- ? incidence of perinatal death (OR 1.7) (Absolute
risk 0.6) - Women with a previous caesarean have a two to
three fold ? incidence of unexplained stillbirth
after 39 weeks gestation (Absolute risk 0.1)
12Risks of Failed VBAC
- Intra-operative injury during emergency LSCS
(1.3 vs 0.6 for PRCD) - Non significant trend towards increased maternal
mortality
13Prediction of Success
- Maternal age
- Maternal obesity
- Indication of previous CS
- Previous vaginal delivery
- Gestational diabetes
- Birth weight
- Spontaneous or induced labour
- Progress in early labour
14Prediction of rupture
- Previous non lower segment incision
- Number of previous caesareans (2 3 fold
increase in women with two previous caesareans as
compared to only one previous caesarean) - Previous rupture
- No previous vaginal birth
- Single layer closure (4 fold increase)
- Interval between previous caesarean and next
pregnancy (3 fold increase with interdelivery
interval lt 18 months) - Use of prostaglandins (RR 4.7)
15Influence of Patient intentions
- Patient willingness to undergo VBAC (Informed
consent) - Future reproductive intentions
16Prerequisites to Attempting VBAC
- Obstetrician available continuously to monitor
labour - Availability of emergency anaesthesia, neonatal
and blood banking services - Availability of continuous electronic fetal
monitoring - Institutional capability of decision to incision
interval of lt 30 minutes for performing emergency
surgery
17Management During Attempted VBAC
- Absolute risk of uterine rupture 1100 to 1200
- Continuous electronic fetal monitoring
- Epidural analgesia is not contraindicated
- Use of Intra-uterine pressure catheters is not
necessary - Partogram to assess progress
- Oxytocin for augmentation to be used with caution
and only for inadequate uterine activity - Second stage to be shortened
- Exploration of the uterine scar after delivery
not necessary
18CHECK LIST FOR SELECTING VBAC
19Are there any contraindications to VBAC ?
- Number of previous lower segment caesareans
- J shaped / Inverted T scar on uterus
- A scar other than on the lower uterine segment
- Past H/O uterine rupture / dehiscence of scar
- Presence of an obstetric indication for LSCS
- Doubtful adequacy of the pelvis / suspicion of
feto-pelvic disproportion - Institutional policy on induction of labor in a
scarred uterus - Lack of capability to provide continuous
supervision during trial of labour - Lack of institutional capability to undertake
expeditious operative delivery
20Assessment of prognostic factors for a successful
VBAC
- Indication of previous caesareans (Dystocia / Non
dystocia) - Past H/O vaginal birth
- Maternal age
- Maternal obesity
- Post datism
- Station and attitude of vertex
- Favourability of cervix
- Spontaneous or induced labour
21Assessment of Prognostic Factors for Uterine
Rupture During Trial of Labour
- Unknown uterine scar
- Uterine closure during previous caesarean (Single
/ Double layer closure) - Post operative recovery following previous
caesarean - Inter delivery interval
- Fetal macrosomia
- Thickness of the lower uterine segment (if
possible to assess) - Spontaneous or induced labour
- Delay in progress of labour
- Augmentation of labour
22Patients intention
23Thank you