Costing and Cost Effective Analysis

1
Costing and Cost Effective Analysis

• Group I

2
Project E

• Number of people benefited 500,000
• Cost Benefit Ratio - 100
• DALYs averted 10,000
• Politically Appealing

3
Project D

• Number of people benefited - 20
• Cost Benefit Ratio - 4000
• DALYs averted 1000
• Focused and importance given to special focused
  groups
• Second cost benefit ratio

4
Project A

• Number of people benefited 100,000
• Cost Benefit Ratio - 5000
• DALYs averted - 1000
• Emphasis on Primary Health Care
• Community Appealing

5
Conclusions

• Appropriate selection of the projects was due to
  
• 12, 000 DALYs were averted
• Allotted amount was utilized fully
• Benefited 600,020 people
• Project F was very cost ineffective since it
  averted only 40 DALYs and only 20 beneficiaries
• Eliminated Project C since it spends 10 million
  and one only averts only 2000 DALYs
• We selected the most cost effective projects