Setting up a paediatric balance laboratory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Setting up a paediatric balance laboratory

Description:

... No studies in children directly comparing clinical postural control tests with quantitative vestibular testing Vestibular ... cochlear implantation, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:173
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Mama97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Setting up a paediatric balance laboratory


1
Setting up a paediatric balance laboratory
  • Ewa Raglan
  • GOSH and St Georges Hospitals, London
  • PAIG/BSA meeting, Sheffield
  • May 2009

2
Paediatric Vestibular Laboratory
  • Why do we need it?
  • Which patients should we refer for further
    testing to the vestibular laboratory?
  • Dizziness/imbalance?
  • Symptoms of vestibular dysfunction?
  • Where/how many do we need?
  • DH Good Practice Document on Paediatric
    Audiovestibular Services, Jan 2009
  • Staff? Skills?
  • Equipment?

3
Epidemiology Dizziness in paediatric population
  • Underestimated, but less frequent than in adults
  • Children with HL (30-70, Huygen 1993)
  • Profound HL (30-40, Moller 2002)
  • Age 1-15 (8 vertigo, Niemensivu et
    al 2006)
  • Correlation between HI and vest function (Selz
    1996)
  • Greater HL greater incidence of vest
    abnormalities ( Soundberg 1965)
  • With increased prevalence of hearing imp. with
    age there is an increase of prevalence of vest.
    disorders
  • (severe/profound 11000 neonates, 51000
    10-14yrs old) (Parving1996)

4
Reasons for vestibular assessment in HI child and
child with normal hearing
  • Aids aetiological diagnosis
  • (syndromes, metabolic dis, congenital structural
    anomalies, congenital infection)
  • Helps genetic counselling
  • Cochlear implantation
  • Delayed motor development
  • Recurrent unexplained falling
  • Suspected malformation of the inner ear
  • Ototoxicity
  • Post meningitis
  • Dizziness (migraine, MD, BPPV)

5
Clinical examination vs instrumental vestibular
testing
  • Not every dizzy patient requires quantitative
    vestibular assessment
  • Clinical exam. provides some qualitative
    information about vest. System
  • The need to quantify vest. function for
    validation, establishment of prognosis, planning
    and evaluation of treatment
  • Sometimes suspected vestibular abnormalities not
    shown by clinical evaluation may be shown by
    instrumental vestibular testing.
  • There are no studies which would compare
    sensitivity and specificity of clinical
    vestibular examination to quantitative vestibular
    testing (caloric, rotation)
  • No studies in children directly comparing
    clinical postural control tests with quantitative
    vestibular testing

6
Vestibular system maturation
  • Anatomically developed functionally responsive
    by birth
  • but, vestibular responses can be variable
  • VOR normalise by 2mths of age, and mature further
    in first 2yrs of life
  • OKN usually present at 3-6mths of age
  • Smooth pursuit is normal by 5yrs old
  • Majority of normal children demonstrate
    vestibular responses to caloric and rotational
    stimuli by 2mths old
  • Lack of VOR response by 10mths is abnormal
  • Technical modification of vestibular testing in
    children
  • Broader range of normal in young children so the
    results should be compared with age-matched
    control subjects

7
Bedside vestibular examination
  • To detect unilateral vestibular dysfunction
  • Obs for SN
  • (suppressed by visual fixation) but visible by
    fundoscopy or Frenzels glasses
  • Head thrust
  • (catch-up saccade with quick turns towards the
    unilateral loss)
  • Head shaking nystagmus
  • (N beats away from lesioned side), absent in
    normal subjects
  • Vibration induced nystagmus
  • (mastoid vibration -nyst beating away from the
    unilateral loss
  • Dynamic visual acuity
  • (3 line decrease in visual acuity during rapid
    head turns)- bil vestibular loss
  • Hyperventilation
  • accentuates the downbeating nystagmus in
    patients with cerebellar lesions

8
Bedside Examination
  • Otolith dysfunction
  • Skew deviation, head tilt
  • Subjective visual vertical tilted 10-30 deg
    towards the site of lesion. May be present after
    vest. compensation took place
  • Oculomotor testing
  • Smooth pursuit tracking (of a moving target)
  • Optokinetic response (OKN stimulus)
  • Saccades testing (velocity accuracy, latency from
    one target to another)
  • Dix-Hallpike test

9
Quantitative vestibular testing
  • Recording eye movements
  • to be able to reliably interpret the VOR response
  • Help to localise neurological abnormalities
  • EOG measures change in corneoretinal potential
    using electrode placed around the inner and outer
    canthi of the eyes allows recording of the
    direction, amplitude and velocity of eye
    movements
  • VNG determines eye movements, using infrared
    cameras to detect eye movements in darkness
  • Horizontal and vertical eye movements recorded by
    EOG
  • Horizontal, vertical and torsional recorded by VNG

10
Vestibular Tests VOR
VOR - compensates for changes in head position
allowing images to be fixed on the retina when
head is moving
11
Diagnostic Tests of VOR
Caloric Test (low frequency)0.001Hz VAT
(active rotation) 2-6Hz Whole body
passive rot 0.05-0.6-1Hz
A
H
OVAR
Otolith
P
VAT active rot 2-6Hz
VEMP
12
Methods of vestibular stimulation
  • Horizontal semi circular canal
  • Caloric irrigation -equivalent to single very low
    frequency (0.003Hz)
  • Rotational testing allows precise application of
    multiple frequencies of stimuli, but stimulates
    both ears simultaneously (active high frequency
    and passive low frequency)
  • Stimuli for rotational testing
  • Impulsive (rapid acceleration 100º/s/s to a
    constant speed)
  • Sinusoidal (body side-to-side rotation)
  • Measurement of VOR in rotational testing
  • Gain SVC eye/head velocity
  • Phase offset in timing of eye movement relative
    to head movement
  • Asymmetry (in unilateral vestibular
    hypofunction)
  • Caloric
  • Interindividual variability of responses
    determines unilateral vestibular hypofunction

13
Rotational Testing
  • Clinical use
  • Presence of bilateral peripheral vestibular loss
  • More specific than caloric testing for bilateral
    vestibular hypofunction
  • Good correlation between low frequency VOR gain
    reduction, increase phase lead, reduced caloric
    responses
  • Limitations
  • Not sensitive in detection of chronic unilateral
    vestibular hypofunction

14
Modifications of Vestibular Testing Techniques in
Younger Children
  • To improve calibration, ocular motor recordings
  • Use flashlight, blinking toy for pursuit tracking
    in under 4 yrs
  • Have a child look at the stars in gaze testing
    (Busis 1995)
  • Make testing a game whenever possible
  • Consider using a blindfold to help remove the
    effects of visual fixation in children who are
    unable to keep their eyes closed
  • Converse with the child to keep him alert
  • Use full field optokinetic stimulation

15
Modifications of Vestibular Testing Techniques in
Younger Children
  • To reduce fearfulness
  • Use warm water or air calorics of available
  • Show an enlarged picture of a child wearing
    electrodes
  • Allow parents to be present and to aid in testing
  • Permit small children to sit in their parents
    lap
  • Consider rotational testing is child becomes
    afraid of caloric
  • To enable completion
  • Test the most important element first and work as
    quickly and efficiently as possible eg if doing
    rotation, consider limiting testing to 0.01, 0.04
    0.16hz (Staller 1986)
  • Shorten the duration of caloric irrigation

16
Consensus of Opinion (Fife et al 2000)
  • Caloric (air, water) and rotational chair testing
    are considered established techniques for testing
    vestibular function in children
  • In small children (3 yrs or below), rotational
    testing is more convenient
  • In children 5yrs or over, either caloric or
    rotational testing can be performed
  • Published studies raise no safety concerns in
    children undergoing caloric/rotational testing
  • Children can be tested using any of the
    techniques used on adults with modifications
  • There is more variability in the range of normal
    children

17
Bid for vestibular laboratoryBusiness Case
  • Clinician Establish the need (geography, patient
    profile)
  • Compare current situation with recommended
    protocols for services provided
  • Specification for lab
  • Capital/equipment committee (finance)
  • Working party clinician, procurement, business
    manager, engineering dept, works (estates), ICT
    rep - involvement from the beginning
  • Tender (invitation to tender to various
    companies)
  • Choice of company (competitive)
  • Contract, installation of the lab in a
    pre-prepared venue (floor, ceiling, ambient
    noise, supply of power, electricity, water)

18
Business case for the vestibular chair at GOSH-
BID
  • The vest service an integral part of the
    comprehensive AM service crucial for diagnosis
    and management at the tertiary level
  • Available specific vestibular expertise (medical)
  • Recent developments in genetic hearing
    impairment, cochlear implantation, vestibular
    disorders in metabolic/neurological disease -
    need for the vest. service
  • Delayed motor development in hearing impaired
    children and others, iatrogenic loss areas which
    would benefit from the ability to assess in
    detail both vestibular and balance systems (and
    help with rehabilitation)

19
Specification of vest lab for the tender process
  • For children (birth 18yrs)
  • Specification for HARDWARE
  • Rotatory chair assembly to be able to carry
    weight of parent and child up to 250kg
  • Chair-frame and headset with appropriate straps
    for parent child (waist, chest, legs)
  • Chair seat size to accommodate parent and child
  • Facility to fit a baby seat onto the frame for
    testing 0-1 year old
  • cushion to be put on the chair for an older
    child to be able to sit independently
  • Special mother/ child provision to allow the
    chair to be positioned up to 9 inches back from
    on axis to allow for testing of the child while
    in mothers arms, the slide mechanics should have
    a locking position
  • System attached to the chair for assessing
    visual vertical for otolith testing
  • OVAR (angle tilt from 0-30deg for otolith
    testing)
  • Unilateral centrifuge for otolith testing

20
Specification of vest lab for the tender process
II
  • OKN stimulus (spherical stimulus projector
    mounted to the ceiling)
  • Pursuit tracking system - laser mechanics allow
    testing of horizontal/vertical axes, testing
    calibration, pursuit and saccades
  • Caloric stimulus
  • Eye movements recording system EOG and
    biological amplifier
  • VNG
  • Screen half circle facing chair for projection
    of stimuli
  • Infrared camera mounted on the chair to
    visualise patient's face
  • Infrared camera to visualise patient and the
    chair

21
Specification for software
  • User friendly, allowing use of a range of tests
    to be able to make analysis of the response
    within short period of time, be able to operate
    the signal and provide analysis and present in
    graphical form eye movement or video oculographic
    recordings
  • Flexibility of test protocols
  • Analysis based on the best cycles of response
  • A wide range of stimuli parameters available
  • Means and SD of wide selection of normals should
    be used as reference tests
  • Customised test summary
  • Raw eye data to be saved and presented in a no.
    of graphs in relation to the stimulus
  • The user should have the ability to withdraw data
    on particular patients from database
  • Software should be stable with no interference
    if computer should crash

22
Tests enabled by the program detailed
specification
  • Calibration
  • Gaze testing
  • Smooth pursuit
  • Optokinetic
  • Rotational Sinusoidal
  • Rotational impulsive
  • Saccades
  • Safety features
  • (emergency cut-out w/o excessive deceleration DC
    Tungsten lighting for reduced electrical
    interference, patient panic button)

23
Business case for clinical scientist
  • Describe specific expertise
  • (physics engineering computer knowledge)
  • Demand (no. of patients tested/week)
  • Potential income generation (figure)
  • Sources of referrals (internal/external)
  • Threats
  • Strengths

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Collecting meaningful information
Testing
27
ANALYSIS MODE
28
Analysis - Saccades
29
Analysis Smooth Pursuit
30
SHA, Test Parameters (Reference)
  • In US testing typically at octave frequencies
  • 0.01
  • 0.02
  • 0.04
  • 0.08
  • 0.16
  • 0.32
  • 0.64
  • 1.28
  • 2.0 Hz
  • and same velocity
  • Typically 60 deg/sec.

31
SHA, Test Parameters, Gain (Reference)
  • Gain
  • How much the eyes move compared to how much the
    chair rotates
  • The eyes move opposite to the chair motion

32
SHA, Test Parameters (Reference)
33
SHA, Test Parameters, Gain (Reference)
  • Test is considered abnormal if two consecutive
    test frequencies of rotation are abnormal
  • Important to test all frequencies
  • Mild reduction in low frequencies of rotation
    (lt.04 Hz) with normal high frequencies of
    rotation
  • Uncompensated peripheral vestibular weakness

34
SHA, Test Parameters, Gain (Reference
  • Abnormally low gain for or most rotational
    frequencies
  • Bilateral peripheral end organ lesion (bilateral
    weakness)
  • Should match your caloric results with some rare
    exceptions
  • Abnormally high gain for all or most rotational
    frequencies
  • Cerebellar lesions
  • Should match ocular motor evaluation (they should
    show cerebellar abnormalities)
  • Also seen in vestibular migraine, vestibular
    hydrops

35
SHA, Test Parameters, Phase (Reference
  • PHASE
  • Timing relationship between head/chair velocity
    and slow phase eye velocity
  • In other words timing difference between the
    head/chair movement and the eyes response to
    that movement
  • This timing difference is called the phase lag.

36
SHA, Phase (Reference)
  • Increased Phase Lead
  • In low rotation frequencies 0.04 Hz and less
  • Suggests peripheral vestibular loss
    (uncompensated)
  • But can also be vestibular nuclei
  • In high frequencies of rotation gt0.04 Hz
  • CNS
  • Example Lateral Medullary Syndrome

37
SHA, Asymmetry (Reference)
  • Compares the VOR slow phase eye velocity response
    to the chair rotation in one direction with those
    in the opposite direction
  • Indicates the presence of an imbalance (bias) in
    the system.
  • Bias usually happens from and uncompensated
    peripheral vestibular lesion
  • Particularly if there is a phase lead in the low
    frequencies of rotation
  • Bias can happen from an uncompensated central
    vestibular lesion
  • Sensitive to patient attention

38
Normal Sinusoidal Harmonic Acceleration
39
Chair Rotation Sinusoidal Test
  • Loaded Data Tab
  • Raw Data

40
SHA, Compensated Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular
Lesion
41
Sinusoidal Harmonic Acceleration Compensated
Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Lesion
42
  • Bilateral Weakness (Horizontal Canal)
  • Decreased Gain (abnormal grey area) for two or
    more frequencies
  • If severe
  • Phase will be unreliable
  • Spectral purity may be unable to be in the normal
    range even with eyes wide open and perfect data
    capture

43
Sinusoidal Harmonic Acceleration Bilateral
Vestibular Weakness
44
Static Subjective Visual Vertical/ Horizontal
  • In complete darkness orient a line vertical or
    horizontal
  • Normal do this within about 1 degree
  • So /- 2 standard deviations is /-2.5 degrees
  • Abnormal patients point the line top to the bad
    utricle side.
  • Need multiple repeat measures (6)

45
Static Subjective Visual Vertical / Horizontal
46
Static Subjective Visual Vertical / Horizontal
  • Set the line consistently (mean with standard
    deviation, low variance)
  • Recommend a minimum of 6 repetitions
  • The top of the line will point to the weak
    otolith
  • Right otolith weakness
  • Line gt 2.5 degrees (more positive than 2.5
    degrees)
  • Left otolith weakness
  • Line gt -2.5 degrees (more negative than -2.5
    degrees)
  • Bilateral otolith weakness
  • Will not detect any different from normal if loss
    is symmetric
  • The line will be straight up and down with in /-
    2.5 deg. or patient can be highly random
  • Patients do show improvement over time --
    compensation

47
Business case for clinical scientist
  • Describe specific expertise
  • (physics engineering computer knowledge)
  • Demand (no. of patients tested/week)
  • Potential income generation (figure)
  • Sources of referrals (internal/external)
  • Threats
  • Strengths

48
Labyrinth
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com