Group Research Project Grades 1-3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Group Research Project Grades 1-3

Description:

Group Research Project Grades 1-3 Elise Baker Ellen Nguyet Nguyen Richard Falsetti Theoretical Framework Basil Bernstein * invisible and visible pedagogies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Ell279
Learn more at: https://www.sjsu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Group Research Project Grades 1-3


1
Group Research ProjectGrades 1-3
  • Elise Baker
  • Ellen Nguyet Nguyen
  • Richard Falsetti

2
Theoretical Framework
  • Basil Bernstein
  • invisible and visible pedagogies
  • quality of education is class based
  • Ray Rist
  • labeling
  • - deviant
  • - self fulfilling prophecy
  • - teacher expectation

3
Research Question
  • Why is there such a vast difference in API scores
    when the student population demographics are so
    similar?

4
Goal
  • - figure out which schools used visible vs.
    invisible pedagogy and if labeling practices have
    an effect on students test scores
  • - Our question is relevant because if we can
    figure out what the best practices classroom
    practices are, then it will give us a better idea
    of how to structure our own future classrooms in
    order to ensure quality pedagogic practices,
    fairness, and high student achievement rates.

5
Demographics
  • George Mayne
  • 60 Hispanic
  • 81 eligible for
    free/reduced lunch
  • 48 considered ELLs
  • Lowell
  • 85 Hispanic
  • 84 eligible for
    free/reduced lunch
  • 68 considered ELLs
  • Horace Mann
  • 74 Hispanic
  • 73 eligible for
    free/reduced lunch
  • 54 considered ELLs

6
  • George Mayne 816
  • Lowell 798
  • Horace Mann 727

7
Methodology
  • Direct observation within classroom
  • - non participant
  • - involved observer

8
Classroom Overview
  • Examples of pedagogic practices labeling
  • - George Mayne
  • - Lowell
  • - Horace Mann

9
Emergent Findings
  • In viewing the anecdotal findings from each
    school, we speculated how the amount of invisible
    and visible pedagogies and the amount and kind of
    labeling correlated with each of our schools
    APIs scores.

10
  • George Mayne (816) - mostly invisible pedagogic
    techniques only positive labeling
  • Lowell (798) about 50/50 visible and invisible
    pedagogic practices positive and negative
    labeling
  • Horace Mann (727) mostly visible pedagogic
    practices negative labeling

11
Implications
  • Invisible pedagogic practices that involve open
    ended projects, freedom of choice within the
    classroom, smaller student to teacher ratios, and
    less specific criteria for student groups should
    not be class based but should be provided for all
    students, regardless of family income or past
    test performance.
  • Children need to be taught by quality teachers
    who value each child rather than seeing them as a
    test score.
  • Invisible pedagogic techniques need to be
    employed in all schools, especially in schools
    where many children come from low income
    families, rather than the already privileged
    students of privileged families.

12
  • In regards to Kozol and Darling-Hammond

13
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com