Improving the Care of the Chronically Ill - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving the Care of the Chronically Ill

Description:

Ed Wagner, MD, MPH, FACP MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation Center for Health Studies Group Health Cooperative Improving Chronic Illness Care – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:198
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: hpmOrgDow
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving the Care of the Chronically Ill


1
Improving the Care of the Chronically Ill the
Advanced Medical Home
Ed Wagner, MD, MPH, FACP
MacColl Institute for Healthcare
Innovation Center for Health Studies Group Health
Cooperative Improving Chronic Illness Care A
national program of the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation
2
Chronic Illness and Medical Care
  • Primary care dominated by chronic illness care
  • Clinical and behavioral management increasingly
    effective and increasingly complex
  • Inadequate reimbursement and greater demand
    forcing primary care to increase throughputthe
    hamster wheel
  • Unhappy primary care clinicians leaving practice
    trainees choosing other specialties
  • Loss of confidence in primary care by
    policy-makers and funders
  • But, there is a growing interest in changing
    physician payment to encourage and reward quality
  • The Patient-centered Medical Home is the new hope

3
Why are we doing so poorly?
  • The IOM Quality Chasm report says
  • The current care systems cannot do the job.
  • Trying harder will not work.
  • Changing care systems will.

4
Whats Responsible for the Quality Chasm?
  • A system oriented to acute disease that isnt
    working for patients or professionals

5
Toward a chronic care oriented system
  • Reviews of interventions in multiple conditions
    show that practice changes are similar across
    conditions
  • Integrated changes including greater use of
  • non-physician team members in clinical roles
  • planned encounters,
  • modern self-management support,
  • More intensive management of those at high risk
  • guidelines integrated into decision-making
  • registries

6
Chronic Care Model
Health System
Community
Health Care Organization
Resources and Policies
ClinicalInformationSystems
DeliverySystem Design
Self-Management Support
Decision Support
Prepared, Proactive Practice Team
Informed, Activated Patient
Productive Interactions
Outcomes
Improved Outcomes
7
Central Functions of a PCMH
  • Assures communication access to team
  • Monitors health and needs of practice population
    and initiates action
  • Organized practice team meets to plan care and
    assure follow-up
  • Provides care management or outreach services to
    those with higher needs
  • Develops processes to assure care coordination
    with other providers
  • Routinely monitors performance and uses process
    improvement

8
The Evidence Base
Does the CCM Work?
9
Organizing the Evidence
  1. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of
    interventions to improve chronic care
  2. Studies of the relationship between
    organizational characteristics and quality
    improvement
  3. Evaluations of the use of the CCM in Quality
    Improvement
  4. RCTs of CCM-based interventions
  5. Cost-effectiveness studies

10
1 RCTs of interventions to improve chronic care
results
  • Complex, integrated care, multi-component
    programs show most positive effects on quality of
    care
  • Consistently powerful elements include team
    care, care management, self-management support,
    reminders and registries

11
2 Studies of the Relationship between
Organizational Characteristics and Quality
  • Common organizational characteristics across
    studies
  • Organized teams, including physicians, involved
    in quality improvement
  • Patient registries and reminder systems
  • Performance Reporting
  • Formal self-management programs
  • Others Characteristics associated with process
    improvement include
  • Receiving income, recognition, or better
    contracts for quality
  • Improved IT infrastructure
  • Utilizing guidelines supported by academic
    detailing

12
3 Evaluations of the Use of CCM in Quality
Improvement
  • Largest concentration of literature
  • Includes RAND Evaluation of ICI
  • Two evaluations of the Health Disparities
    Initiative
  • Wide variety in quality and type of evaluation
    design
  • Majority of studies focus on diabetes

13
3 RAND Evaluation of Chronic Care Collaboratives
  • Two major evaluation questions1. Can busy
    practices implement the CCM?2. If so, would
    their patients benefit?
  • Studied 51 organizations in four different
    collaboratives, 2132 BTS patients, 1837 controls
    with asthma , CHF, diabetes
  • Controls generally from other practices in
    organization
  • Data included patient and staff surveys, medical
    record reviews

14
3 RAND FindingsImplementation of the CCM
  • Organizations made average of 48 changes in 5.8/6
    CCM areas
  • One year later, over 75 of sites had sustained
    changes, and a similar number had spread to new
    sites or new conditions.

15
3 RAND Findings (2)Patient Impacts
  • Diabetes pilot patients had significantly reduced
    CVD risk (pilot gt control), resulting in a
    reduced risk of one cardiovascular disease event
    for every 48 patients exposed.
  • CHF pilot patients more knowledgeable and more
    often on recommended therapy, had 35 fewer
    hospital days and fewer ER visits
  • Asthma and diabetes pilot patients more likely to
    receive appropriate therapy
  • Asthma pilot patients had better QOL

16
3 Evaluations of the Health Disparities
Collaboratives
Chin et al. Landon
et al.
  • Studies national group of CHCs
  • Followed patients 1 year post-collaborative
  • Only found process improvements
  • Studied midwest CHCs
  • Followed patients for 2-3 years
    post-collaborative
  • At 1 year improvement in process LDL
  • At 2-3 years improvement in process, LDL, and
    HBA1c

17
4 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) of
CCM-based Interventions
  • 6 RCTs covering asthma, diabetes, bipolar
    disorder, comorbid depression and oncology, and
    multiple conditions
  • 5 in the US disease specific, 1 in Australia
    multiple diseases
  • Practice-level randomization
  • 5 of 6 showed significant improvements in patient
    health

18
5 Cost Effectiveness Study Results
  • Some evidence that improved disease control can
    reduce cost, especially for congestive heart
    failure, asthma (among populations with high ER
    and hospital use) and uncontrolled diabetes
  • Huang et al. found that an HDC diabetic patient
    cost an additional 380/yr but increases QALY by
    4-5 months.

19
Medical home Chronic Care ModelDuplicative,
Complementary or Antagonistic?
  • Both emphasize and support patient role in
    decision-making
  • MH redefines primary care responsibility
  • CCM redesigns care delivery for planned care

20
What are the key features of a PCMH?NCQA Measure
21
What are the key features of a PCMH? ACP, AAFP,
AAP, AOA joint statement
  • Personal Physician 1st contact, continuous,
    comprehensive care
  • Team Care collectively take responsibility for
    ongoing care
  • Whole Person Orientation take responsibility
    for all patient needs by delivering or arranging
    care
  • Coordinated Care across all elements of the
    healthcare system
  • Quality and Safety by implementation of CCM,
    continuous QI, and voluntary recognition process
  • Enhanced access via open scheduling, expanded
    hours and new options for communication
  • Payment recognizes value of the PCMH, pays for
    coordination and electronic communication with
    patients, , supports IT use,

22
Commonwealth Fund Operational Definition of a
Patient-centered Medical Home
  • One has a regular source of care
  • And
  • It is not difficult to contact the providerby
    telephone
  • It is not difficult to get care or advice after
    hours
  • Office visits are generally well organized and
    running on time

23
(No Transcript)
24
Commonwealth Survey of Americans 18-64 Whats
the impact of a MH on getting patient needs met?
Percent of adults always getting the care they
need when they need it.
25
Commonwealth Survey of Americans 18-64 Whats the
impact of a MH on getting preventive care
reminders?
receiving reminders to schedule preventive
visits
26
(No Transcript)
27
What are the barriers?
  • The hamster wheel
  • Limited practice infrastructure clinical staff
    and IT
  • Practice isolation
  • Belief in the quality of ones practice i.e. no
    meaningful measurement
  • Belief that the doctor has to do
    everything(underdevelopment of practice team)
  • Financial disincentives

28
Whats needed to improve chronic illness care for
the population?
  • Leadership
  • Standardized measurement
  • Redesigned physician payment including incentives
    to do whats best for patients
  • Infrastructure helpGuidelinesInformation
    TechnologyNurse Care managementSelf-management
    Support
  • Active program of practice change
  • Networking of professionals

29
Contact us
  • www.improvingchroniccare.org

thanks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com