Using Data to Reduce Error, Standardize Practice and Improve Patient Outcomes

About This Presentation
Title:

Using Data to Reduce Error, Standardize Practice and Improve Patient Outcomes

Description:

James H. Nichols, Ph.D., DABCC, FACB Associate Professor of Pathology Tufts University School of Medicine Director, Clinical Chemistry Baystate Health System –

Number of Views:314
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: Path183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using Data to Reduce Error, Standardize Practice and Improve Patient Outcomes


1
Using Data to Reduce Error, Standardize Practice
and Improve Patient Outcomes
  • James H. Nichols, Ph.D., DABCC, FACB
  • Associate Professor of Pathology
  • Tufts University School of Medicine
  • Director, Clinical Chemistry
  • Baystate Health System
  • Springfield, Massachusetts
  • james.nichols_at_bhs.org

2
Baystate Health System
3
Baystate Health System
  • Baystate Medical Center - tertiary care
  • ?572 beds, 3rd largest acute care in NE
  • 40,000 discharges/200,000 inpatient days (4.7
    mean LOS)
  • 600,000 ambulatory visits
  • Western Campus of Tufts School of Medicine
  • Franklin and Mary Lane Hospitals
  • Over 40 Ambulatory Care Practices (1 million
    visits)
  • Home nursing and assisted care (156,000 visits)
  • Reference Lab (BRL) - 4 million tests/year
  • Clin Chemistry - Core 1 Roche TLA (2500/day)

4
(No Transcript)
5
Medical Errors
  • Institute of Medicine of the National Academies
    report 1999
  • Medical errors kill 44,000 - 98,000 patients in
    US hospitals each year.
  • Number one problem facing health care Lucien
    Leape, Harvard Professor of Public Health

6
Medical Errors
  • 2002 Commonwealth Fund report estimated that 22.8
    million people have experienced a medical error,
    personally or through at least one family member
  • Reinforces the 1999 IOM report, To Err is Human
  • Annual costs estimated at 17 29 billion
  • US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    (AHRQ) estimate medical errors are the 8th
    leading cause of death in the US higher than
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents (43,458)
  • Cancer (42,297)
  • AIDS (16,516)

7
Laboratory Errors
  • Typically think patient, tube or aliquot mix-up.
  • Other, more insidious errors to consider
  • Overutilization of testing fishing
  • Inappropriate use of testing method selection
    or test for symptoms, screening vs management
  • Misunderstanding wrong test, assume test is a
    test
  • Delays ordering, receipt of result, clinical
    action

8
Laboratory Errors
  • A minireview of the literature found the majority
    of errors occur in the pre and post analytical
    phases.
  • Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Clin
    Chem 200248691-698.
  • Many mistakes are referred to as lab error, but
    actually due to poor communication, actions by
    others involved in the testing process, or poorly
    designed processes outside the labs control.
  • Medical errors occur in prevention, diagnosis and
    drug treatment occur. Among errors in diagnosis
    50 were failure to use indicated tests, 32 were
    failure to act on results of tests, and 55
    involved avoidable delay in diagnosis. Leape LL,
    Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. N Eng J Med
    1991324377-84.

9
Man
A creature made near the end of the week when God
was tired.
Mark Twain
10
Medical Errors
  • The Person
  • Easier to blame a person than an institution for
    errors.
  • In aviation, 90 of quality lapses are judged to
    be blameless.
  • The System
  • Active failures due to personal interaction with
    system
  • Latent conditions, weaknesses in system due to
    design flaws or heirarchical decisions
  • Need to engineer systems that prevent dangerous
    errors and are able to tolerate errors and
    contain their effects
  • Reason J. BMJ 2000320768-770.

11
Automation
  • Collects raw data and processes to information
    (trends)
  • Reduces practice variability (device prompts)
  • Consolidates operator interactions (barcoding)
  • Assists decision-making (internal checks for QC
    pass, expiration dates, operator ID)
  • When linked to information management and data
    algorithms can warn of possible errors (delta
    checks, device flags like inadequate sample,
    analyzer interferences)

12
Improvement
13
Hemolysis in the ED
  • Coagulation specimens must be rejected if
    hemolyzed and recollected
  • Inpatient rates of hemolysis are typically lt1
  • ED had rates approaching 20 or more
  • Related to implementation of a flexible catheter
    and practice of collecting blood through lines
  • Manufacturer even distributed a customer warning
    against collecting blood through this catheter
  • Yet, ED unwilling to change practice customer
    satisfaction issue and comfort level of IV lines
  • Number of redraws and delays of ED patients led
    to elimination of practice.

14
Phlebotomy Hemolysis Rates
Implement Practice Change
15
Middleware
  • Data server sits between an analyzer and LIS/HIS
  • POCT servers are a form of Middleware
  • Allows data processing before sending results
    LIS, also functions as data repository for report
    searches
  • Common current uses autoverification, insertion
    of data flags for H/I/L indices
  • More sophisticated functions are limited only by
    imagination of the lab

16
Clinical Alarms
  • Critical pathway ordering practices and variant
    ordering practices
  • Hct level and POCT glucose testing
  • Medication (propofol) and potential test
    interference (i-Stat)
  • Insulin dose, individual response and prediction
    of future dose
  • Disease/medication (high blood pressure/loop
    diuretics) vs predicted lab result (low K) vs
    questionable lab results (high K)
  • Medical devices (flexible catheters) and
    potential for hemolysis and laboratory
    interference

17
POCT Error Management
  • POCT diagnostic testing conducted close to the
    site where clinical care is delivered
  • POCT error rates are not known in literature
  • POCT conducted by nursing but managed by lab
  • Requires considerable interdisciplinary
    communication to deliver effectively
  • POCT QI can be a tool to uncovering ongoing
    errors and addressing system weaknesses

18
Reducing Errors through Automation
  • Newer POCT devices have data management
  • Prompts operator to perform testing same way
    every time
  • Lock-outs act as internal fail-safes to prevent
    a patient result if QC fails, not performed or
    operator is not certified for testing.
  • Feb 2004 CLIAC meeting discussion of possible
    changes to CLIA waived category suggested that
    waived tests have
  • fail-safe or failure alert mechanisms whenever
    possible
  • include QC materials with kits
  • specimens requiring significant manipulation not
    be waived

19
Medical Errors
  • The Person
  • Easier to blame a person than an institution for
    errors.
  • In aviation, 90 of quality lapses are judged to
    be blameless.
  • The System
  • Active failures due to personal interaction with
    system
  • Latent conditions, weaknesses in system due to
    design flaws or heirarchical decisions
  • Need to engineer systems that prevent dangerous
    errors and are able to tolerate errors and
    contain their effects
  • Reason J. BMJ 2000320768-770.

20
Patient Identification Errors
  • POCT results are transmitted to the POCT manager
    when devices are downloaded
  • The data manager orders and results the test in
    the LIS
  • If the test does not match an active patient
    account the data manager holds the result for
    resolution
  • Compliance problems as test cannot be billed, and
    some results transmitted to incorrect patient
    record and inappropriate medical management

21
Failure Mode and Error Analysis
  • FMEA identifies an error
  • Outlines possible steps that could lead to the
    error.
  • Identifies the reasoning behind the various
    pathways, why they exist and ways that paths can
    be improved.
  • Establishes quantitative monitors and the means
    of measuring improvement.
  • FMEA improves motivation by seeking route causes
    of errors rather than placing blame.

22
ICU FMEA
  • Incidence of patient ID errors in our ICU led to
    an administrative demand for improved compliance
    or loss of privileges (3 strike rule)
  • Conducted FMEA analysis
  • ID errors due to multiple issues
  • Long number entry (9 digits), transposition of
    numbers
  • Some devices cant accept leading zeros
  • Patient wristbands are not legible (clin
    engineering)
  • Need for patient care, share operator IDs
    (retraining)
  • Barcoding seen as optimum solution

23
Barcoding
  • In practice, one of the more challenging projects
    to implement in an institution
  • Devices only read specific barcode languages
  • Wristbands vary in durability
  • Ink isnt permanent (thermal vs inkjet)
  • Devices dont require barcode entry!
  • Try to engineer around manual entry by adding
    special characters or digits to ID
  • These work-arounds lengthen the barcode and
    increase read failure if barcode not flat on
    wrist.
  • How to print? Wristbands only or labels that an
    operator can stick onto device or paper towel?
    What about neonates?

24
Barcoding
  • During implementation, operators continued to
    manually enter patient IDs due to the scanner
    failing on the 1st attempt
  • An investigation was conducted into why scanners
    fail
  • i-Stat scanners failed more frequently than
    glucose
  • Operator interaction with the POCT device was the
    primary determinant in scanner failure

25
Scanner Angle
26
Scanner Distance
27
Scanner Depth of Field
28
Scanner Depth of Field
29
P0.014
P0.0007
30
P0.048
PNS, 0.378
31
Barcoding
  • Barcode acceptance and difficulties in
    implementation lead to lt100 effectiveness
  • Manual entry
  • Barcoding patient with the wrong account or
    patient ID
  • Patients with multiple wristbands
  • Scanning the wrong barcode (lot number instead of
    patient)
  • From the AACC listserv, those successful
    institutions communicate the value of barcoding
    and have operators who have acknowledged the
    advantages and implement strategies to enhance
    success

32
(No Transcript)
33
Communication
  • How best to reach clinicians?
  • Errors are a system weakness and require an
    interdisciplinary system fix, one person is not
    responsible.
  • Utilize available resources
  • Hospital Quality Improvement Teams
  • Peer-Reviewed Literature
  • Practice Guidelines
  • Learn to speak clinicalese Use Clinical
    Protocols

34
Portland Protocol
  • Examined glucose levels and surgical
    complications in 1,585 cardiac surgery patients
    with diabetes (990 preprotocol and 595
    postprotocol)
  • Implemented protocol of postoperative intravenous
    insulin to maintain glucose lt200 mg/dL.
  • Intensive monitoring and insulin therapy on
    hospitalized inpatients lowers blood glucose
    levels in the first 2 postoperative days with
    concomitant decrease in proportion of patients
    with deep wound infections (2.4 vs 1.5, plt0.02)
  • Zerr KJ et al. Ann Thorac Surg 199763356-61.

35
Portland Protocol
  • ACC/AHA Guidelines for CABG Surgery
  • Another patient characteristic that has been
    associated with postoperative mediastinitis is
    the presence of diabetes, especially in patients
    requiring insulin. In addition to the
    microvascular changes seen in diabetic patients,
    elevated blood glucose levels may impair wound
    healing. The use of a strict protocol aimed at
    maintaining blood glucose levels ?200 mg/dL by
    the continuous, intravenous infusion of insulin
    has been shown to significantly reduce the
    incidence of deep sternal wound infection in
    diabetic patients.
  • Eagle KA, Guyton RA. JACC 1999341262-1347.

36
Portland Protocol
Blood Glucose Insulin Unit/hr
lt125 0
125-175 1
175-225 2
gt225 3
  • q1hr until glucose 125-175 with lt15 mg/dL change
    and insulin rate unchanged x4 hrs. Then q2hr.
  • Weaning vasopressors (Adrenalin) check q30min
    until stable
  • Stop q2hr testing on POD 3
  • Test q2hr during the night on telemetry if
    glucose lt200

37
Portland Protocol Operational Issues
  • Which method to utilize? TAT, Accuracy
  • Glucose meter glucose oxidase
  • Blood Gas glucose glucose oxidase
  • Core laboratory glucose - hexokinase
  • Preferred sample? Method, Line Contamination
  • Whole blood or plasma
  • Fingerstick, line draw or venipuncture

38
Unmodified direct-reading biosensor
result relative molality of glucose in plasma
or whole blood (not recommended)
1.18
0.94
Concentration of glucose in plasma (recommended)
Concentration of glucose in whole blood (not
recommended)
1.11
Fig. 1. Conversion factors for different
quantities of glucose.
39
Meter Performance Criteria
  • ADA 87 All Levels 15
  • ADA 94 All Levels 5
  • Agence du Médicament lt 100 mg/dL 20 mg/dL
  • (95 of data) ? 100 mg/dL 20 (CV lt7.5)
  • CSA lt 45 mg/dL 25 (CVlt12.5)
  • ? 90 mg/dL 15 (CV lt7.5)
  • FDA lt 100 mg/dL 20 mg/dL
  • (95 of data) ? 100 mg/dL 20
  • ISO lt 100 mg/dL 20 mg/dL
  • (95 of data) ? 100 mg/dL 20
  • IMSS lt 60 mg/dL 25
  • ? 60 mg/dL 20
  • NCCLS (C30A) lt 100 mg/dL lt 15 mg/dL
  • ? 100 mg/dL 20
  • TNO lt 117 mg/dL 20 mg/dL ? 117 mg/dL
    15 mg/dL (CV lt10)

40
Quality Specification Modeling
  • Monte Carlo simulation to generate random true
    and measured glucose based on mathematical
    model of meters having defined imprecision and
    bias. (N10,000 - 20,000 pairs)
  • Analytical error Insulin dose errors
  • 5 8 - 23
  • 10 16 - 45
  • 2x or greater insulin dosage errors gt5 of time
    when analytic error exceeded 10 - 15
  • Total error lt 1 - 2 required to provide
    intended insulin gt95 of time.
  • Boyd JC. Bruns DE. Quality specifications for
    glucose meters Assessment by simulation modeling
    of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem
    200147209-214

41
Portland Protocol
  • Glucose meters may or may not be applicable for
    tight management, as can vary by /-20 in the
    100200 mg/dL range.
  • Blood gas and some analyzers perform better than
    glucose meters, may be more appropriate in these
    cases.
  • Should be a clinical not a laboratory decision,
    role of laboratory to inform not dictate method

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Clinical Protocols
  • Clinical protocols provide a pathway of care to
    manage patients with specific disorders in the
    most effective manner for optimum patient
    outcome.
  • Incorporating laboratory testing into clinical
    protocols standardizes practice, reduces practice
    variability, ensures appropriate ordering of
    tests and can assist the interpretation of test
    results.
  • Clinical protocols are a good means of
    communicating with clinicians and providing
    reminders or important components of
    decision-making

45
2004 National Patient Safety Goals - JCAHO
  • Improve the accuracy of patient identification
  • Improve the effectiveness of communication among
    caregivers
  • Improve the safety of using high-alert
    medications
  • Eliminate wrong-site, wrong patient,
    wrong-procedure surgery
  • Improve the safety of using infusion pumps.
  • Improve the effectiveness of clinical alarm
    systems.
  • Reduce the risk of healthcare-acquired infections.

46
(No Transcript)
47
NACB Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines
Evidence Based Practice for POCT
  • Clinicians, staff and laboratorians need guidance
    to apply POCT in the most effective manner for
    patient benefit.
  • This guidance should be based on a concurrence of
    the scientific evidence to date.
  • This need for evidence-based practice was the
    concept behind the NACB Laboratory Medicine
    Practice Guidelines for POCT

48
Evidence-Based Practice for POCT
  • POCT is an increasingly popular means of
    delivering laboratory testing.
  • When used appropriately, POCT can improve patient
    outcome by providing a faster result and
    therapeutic intervention.
  • However, when over-utilized or incorrectly
    performed, POCT presents a patient risk and
    potential for increased cost of healthcare.
  • This LMPG will systematically review the existing
    evidence relating POCT to patient outcome, grade
    the literature, and make recommendations
    regarding the optimal utilization of POCT devices
    in patient care.
  • Develop liaisons with appropriate professional,
    clinical organizations ACB, ADA, ACOG, CAP, etc.

49
Evidence-Based Practice for POCTFocus Group
Chairs
  • Cardiac Robert H. Christenson, Ph.D.
  • Diabetes Christopher Price, Ph.D.
  • Reproduction Ann M. Gronowski, Ph.D.
  • Infectious Disease Robert Sautter, Ph.D.
  • Coagulation Marcia Zucker, Ph.D.
  • Parathyroid Lori J. Sokoll, Ph.D.
  • Drugs Ian Watson, Ph.D.
  • Bilirubin Screening Steven Kazmierczak , Ph.D.
  • Critical Care Greg Shipp, Ph.D.
  • Renal William A. Clarke, Ph.D.
  • Occult Blood Kent Lewandrowski, M.D.
  • pH James Nichols, Ph.D.
  • Introductory Comments Ellis Jacobs, Ph.D.

50
Evidence Based Practice for POCTpH Guidelines I
  • Does the use of pH paper for assisting the
    placement of nasogastric tubes, compared to
    clinical judgment (air, pressure) improve the
    placement of tubes on inpatient, endoscopy, home
    care and nursing home patients?
  • We recommend the use of pH testing to assist in
    the placement of nasogastric tubes. The choice of
    measuring pH with an intragastric electrode or
    testing tube aspirates with a pH meter or pH
    paper will depend on consideration of the
    clinical limitations of each method, and there is
    conflicting evidence over which method is better.
    (Class II prospective comparative trials and
    expert opinion)

51
Evidence Based Practice for POCTpH Guidelines I
  • Assuring correct NG or NI tube placement
  • Measure length of tube
  • Direct visualization of oropharynx
  • Auscultation of stomach by air insufflation
  • Aspiration of gastric contents
  • Irrigation of tube with 10 to 50 mL water
  • Direct palpation of tube within stomach during
    intra-abdominal procedures
  • Gold Standard - Abdominal roentgenogram to
    confirm position
  • pH may be faster, safer and more economical

52
Evidence Based Practice for POCTpH Guidelines I
  • Gastric contents more acidic
  • Neuman pH lt 4 can reduce need for x-rays (PPV
    100, Sens 100, Spec 88 for N 46 patients and
    78 placements.) pHgt4 not useful respiratory or
    duodenal.
  • Acid suppressors increase gastric pH and 6.0 may
    be a better cutoff (81 pH 1 4, 88 intestinal
    gt6.0, pulmonary gt6.5). Confounds aspirate pH 4
    6.
  • pH of gastric fluid may replace 85-95 of x-ray
    cases. Significant decrease radiation exposure

53
Evidence Based Practice for POCTpH Guidelines I
  • Method to determine pH controversial
  • Continuous monitor or pH tipped NG tube preferred
    for those patients that are equipped, but
    expensive.
  • Question whether pH probes are measuring gastric
    contents or cell surface pH
  • Aspirate pH may not generate sufficient volume,
    may differ from intragastric pH, as antacid, drug
    salts, protein and bile may interfere with some
    methods.
  • pH meter more accurate than pH paper, but paper
    simpler (0.5 1.0 increments), cheaper, easier
    to use and quality assure, and can be performed
    bedside.
  • X-ray confirmation still the gold standard and
    recommended in indeterminate cases.

54
Question Five Can gastroccult testing of gastric
fluid from a nasogastric tube be used to detect
gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk intensive
care unit patients receiving antacid prophylaxis?
55
Recommendation Five
  • We cannot currently recommend for or against the
    use of gastroccult to detect gastric bleeding in
    intensive care unit patients receiving antacid
    prophylaxis.
  • Grade of Evidence III small study, clinical
    evidence

56
Gastroccult Tests
  • FOBT should not be used to measure occult blood
    in gastric fluid because of interferences from
    low pH, certain medications and metal ions.
  • The presence of occult blood in gastric fluid can
    be useful to detect stress ulcer syndrome, so
    specific gastroccult tests are utilized.

57
Bleeding in ICU Patients
  • A small study with 41 patients showed that 13/14
    patients with positive gastroccult tests had a
    source of upper GI bleeding as seen by upper
    endoscopy.
  • Study suggest gastroccult testing may aid in
    detecting occult bleeding in critically ill
    patients.
  • However, patients with negative gastroccult tests
    did not undergo upper endoscopy which may have
    documented false negative results.

58
Baystate Gastroccult Testing
  • Discontinued without incident
  • Approached Chief of GI and Division of Healthcare
    Quality with clinical utility.
  • Researched literature
  • Developed recommendation and justification
  • Draft letter to medical staff reviewed by select
    clinicians
  • General announcement and test removal

59
Gastroccult Discontinuation
  • No peer-reviewed literature indicating improved
    outcomes based on Gastroccult
  • Use of test after NG tube placement leads to
    positive results solely due to trauma of tube
    insertion
  • Overt bleeding is a medical concern and doesnt
    require test to detect
  • pH is medically useful, pH paper is a better
    alternative because its easier to QC, already
    available on units and lower cost
  • Elimination would reduce hospital burden of
    training and POCT documentation on nursing staff
    and reduce risk of developer mixup with hemoccult.

60
Gastroccult Cost Savings
  • Reagent (12,000 tests/year)
  • Cards 21,000
  • Developer 5,000
  • Labor
  • Nursing (5 min/test, 45K 125d) 22,000
  • Competency (1100 x 15 min) 6,000
  • Lab oversight (4hr x 8 units x 12 mo) 8,500
  • Total Annual Savings Estimate 62,500
  • Total billed previous year 12
  • Cost estimate for pH replacement 250

61
(No Transcript)
62
Summary
  • Medical errors are a significant problem and the
    laboratory should be aware of the many
    opportunities to reduce errors
  • Interdisciplinary teams and positive attitudes
    are important factors in achieving successful
    outcomes and changes to practice
  • Need to engineer systems (not people) that
    prevent dangerous errors and are able to tolerate
    errors and contain their effects
  • Automation, information management and
    communication are effective strategies to reduce
    errors.
  • The next challenge for laboratorians is to better
    integrate the data we have at hand and condense
    the literature into standard practice pathways
    that assist clinicians in appropriate
    decision-making for optimal patient care
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com