Understanding the World of Academically - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

Understanding the World of Academically

Description:

Understanding the World of Academically & Intellectually Gifted Watson School of Education AIG Mini-Conference Angela Housand, Ph.D. housanda_at_uncw.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:207
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: uncwEdue3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Understanding the World of Academically


1
Understanding the World of Academically
Intellectually Gifted
  • Watson School of Education
  • AIG Mini-Conference
  • Angela Housand, Ph.D.
  • housanda_at_uncw.edu

2
A Practical Guide to Differentiation
3
How do you differentiate?
4
They Are All So Different
  • Children come to us in a variety of shapes,
    sizes, intellectual abilities, creative
    abilities, inter/intra personal skills, and a
    myriad more characteristics that makes each child
    we deal with unique and special. Carol Ann
    Tomlinson

5
(No Transcript)
6
Diversity in students can include
  • Ability (aptitude) differences
  • Achievement differences
  • Academic background differenceslower achievement
    can be due to poor preparation and limited
    exposure
  • Cultural differencessecond language acquisition,
    interaction style differences
  • Differences in affect (enthusiasm level and
    personality) and effort (effort vs. ability
    issues)
  • Differences in styles of learning style (visual,
    auditory, concrete, abstract, hands-on, written)
  • Differences in interests
  • Differences in preferences for products and
    processes
  • Differences in self-regulation and study skills
  • Sally Reis

7
The success of education depends on adapting
teaching to individual differences among learners.
  • Yuezheng,
  • in 4th century B. C. Chinese treatise, Xue Ji

8
  • Why Arent Some Students Challenged?

9
Classroom Practices Study
  • Teachers reported that they never had any
    training in meeting the needs of gifted students.
  • 61 public school teachers
  • 54 private school teachers

Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown,
S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., Zhang,
W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with
gifted students Results of a national survey of
classroom teachers (Research Monograph 93102).
Storrs, CT The National Research Center on the
Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
10
Classroom Practices Observational Study
  • Students experienced no instructional or
    curricular differentiation in 84 of the
    activities in which they participated
  • Reading Language Arts
  • Mathematics Social Studies
  • Science

Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns,
S. M., Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational
study of instructional and curricular practices
used with gifted and talented students in regular
classroom (Research Monograph 93104). Storrs,
CT The National Research Center on the Gifted
and Talented, University of Connecticut.
11
Types of Differentiation in Which Target Gifted
Students Were Involved
No Differentiation Advanced Content Advanced
Process Advanced Product Indep. Study w/
Assigned Topic Indep. Study w/ Self-selected
Topic Other Differentiation
12
The Five Dimensions of Differentiation
Content (Knowledge)
Process (Pedagogy)
Yourself
Classroom Organization and Management
Products (Expression Styles)
13
What is differentiated instruction?
  • Its teaching with student variance in mind.
  • Its starting where the kids are rather than with
    a standardized approach to teaching that assumes
    all kids of a given age or grade are essentially
    alike.
  • Its responsive teaching rather than one-size
    fits-all teaching.

14
Ways to Differentiate Content
  • Varied Texts
  • Accelerated Coverage of Material
  • Varied Supplementary Materials
  • Independent Projects
  • Tiered Lessons
  • Interest Development Centers
  • Compacting

15
  • Approximately 40-50 of traditional classroom
    material could be eliminated for targeted
    students.

Reis, S. M., Westberg, K.L., Kulikowich, J.,
Caillard, F., Hébert, T., Plucker, J., Purcell,
J.H., Rogers, J.B., Smist, J.M. (1993). Why
not let high ability students start school in
January? The curriculum compacting study
(Research Monograph 93106). Storrs, CT The
National Research Center on the Gifted and
Talented, University of Connecticut.
16
Compacting
  • Assesses what a student knows and what content is
    not yet mastered
  • Content not yet mastered becomes part of learning
    goals
  • Previously mastered content is not required
    thereby freeing up time for enriched,
    accelerated, or interest driven activities

Renzulli Reis (1997) Tomlinson (1995)
17
  • When teachers eliminated as much as 50 of the
    curriculum, no differences were found between
    treatment and control groups in most content
    areas. In fact, students whose curriculum was
    compacted scored higher than control group
    students in some areas.

Reis, S. M., Westberg, K.L., Kulikowich, J.,
Caillard, F., Hébert, T., Plucker, J., Purcell,
J.H., Rogers, J.B., Smist, J.M. (1993). Why
not let high ability students start school in
January? The curriculum compacting study
(Research Monograph 93106). Storrs, CT The
National Research Center on the Gifted and
Talented, University of Connecticut.
18
What is Curriculum Compacting?
  • Modifying or streamlining the regular curriculum
  • Eliminating the repetition of previously mastered
    material
  • Upgrading the challenge level of the regular
    curriculum

19
Family Circus
20
  • When once the child has learned that four and two
    are six, a thousand repetitions will give him no
    new information, and it is a waste of time to
    keep him employed in that manner.
  • J.M. Greenwood
  • Principles of Education Practically Applied, 1888

21
Student Behaviors Suggesting that Compacting May
Be Necessary
22
  • Finishes tasks quickly
  • Completes homework in class
  • Appears bored during instruction time
  • Brings in outside reading material
  • Creates puzzles, games, or diversions in class

23
  • Tests scores consistently excellent
  • Asks questions that indicate advanced familiarity
    with material
  • Sought after by others for assistance
  • Daydreams

24
For Students, Compacting
  • Eliminates boredom resulting from unnecessary
    drill and practice.
  • Provides challenge leading to continuous growth.

25
How to Compact
Step One Identify the objectives in a given
unit and pre-test students to ascertain mastery
level.
26
How to Compact
Step Two Eliminate or Streamline instruction for
students who demonstrate mastery.
27
(No Transcript)
28
How to Compact
Step Three Keep records of the process and
instructional options available to compacted
students.
29
(No Transcript)
30
Inconceivable
Should every student have an Individualized
Education Plan?
31
Ways to Differentiate Content
  • Varied Texts
  • Accelerated Coverage of Material
  • Varied Supplementary Materials
  • Independent Projects
  • Tiered Lessons
  • Interest Development Centers
  • Compacting

32
Tiered Lessons
  • Varied level of activities
  • Designed to ensure that students explore ideas at
    a level that builds on prior knowledge
  • Prompts continued growth

33
Why use tiered instruction?
  • Maximizes the likelihood that
  • Each student comes away with key skills and
    understandings.
  • Each student is appropriately challenged.
  • Each student avoids work that is
    anxiety-producing (too hard) or boredom-producing
    (too easy)

34
Developing Tiered Instruction
  • Think about the students who will be using the
    activity
  • Readiness
  • Interests
  • Learning Profile
  • Create one activity that is interesting, requires
    high-level thinking and is clearly focused on the
    key concept, skill or generalization.

35
Developing the Tiers
  • Create an activity or use a successful activity
    from the past
  • The activity should
  • Be interesting
  • Engender high level thinking and problem solving
  • Cause students to utilize target skills to
    understand key ideas or concepts

36
Developing the Tiers
  • Chart the complexity of the activity
  • Is it high skill complexity or low skill
    complexity?
  • Who will be challenged by this activity
  • Advanced students?
  • On grade-level students?
  • Struggling learners?

37
Developing the Tiers
  • Based on where the activity falls on the ladder,
    you can define who needs more or less challenging
    versions of the same assignment
  • Clone the activity along the ladder
  • How many versions will you need?

38
All Tiers Should
  • build understanding
  • challenge students
  • be interesting and engaging
  • be respectful

39
Group sizes may vary
  • The number of groups per tier will vary
  • The number of students per group will vary
  • For Example
  • Tier One Two groups of three
  • Tier Two Five groups of four
  • Tier Three One group of two

40
What can be tiered?
  • Experiments
  • Materials
  • Assessments
  • Writing
  • Prompts
  • Assignments
  • Activities
  • Homework
  • Learning Centers

41
Sample Tiered Math Game
  • Use two dice.
  • One person at a time, roll the dice.
  • Add or multiply totals.
  • The goal is to reach but not exceed 36.

42
First cast of the dice
3
1 2
3
2
1 x 2
43
Second cast of the dice
3 12 15
3 4
7
12
3 x 4
44
Third cast of the dice
15 6 21
5 1
6
5 x 1
5
45
Fourth cast of the dice
21 18 39
21 9 30
3 6
9
3 x 6
18
46
Modifications for Advanced Students
  • Play to 100
  • Disallow paper for calculations or remembering
    numbers
  • Use powers
  • Use subtraction
  • Allow negative numbers
  • What about fractions?

47
Tiered LessonUsing Powers Option
81
34
3 x 3 x 3 x 3 81
4 x 4 x 4 64
43
48
Tiered LessonExploring Options
2 6 8
2 - 6 -4
6 - 2 4
2 x 6 12
26 64
62 36
49
What about
  • Using a multi-sided die

64
  • Or two?

50
We could really shake things up
  • Try three dice and use the distributive law!

12 (3 x 18) 12 54 66
(12 18) x 3 30 x 3 90
Did you get closer to 100?
51
A Quick Differentiation QUIZ
Did every student do it? NO
Should every student do it? NO
Could every student do it? NO
Would every student want to do it? NO
Did the student do it willingly and zestfully? YES
Did the student use authentic resources and methodology? YES
Was it done for an audience other than (or in addition to) the teacher? YES
52
Avoid the Management Nightmare
53
The Learning Environment
  • The physical classroom
  • (3 basic settings)
  • Whole class meeting
  • Independent stations
  • Teacher-directed small group work

54
The Learning Environment
  • The working environment
  • Provide opportunities for self-directed
    exploration of materials
  • Establish guidelines for cooperative groups
  • Make groups inclusive
  • Ask students to reflect on their performance
  • Intervene when necessary
  • Establish a classroom conducive to student
    risk-taking

55
Learning Contracts
  • An agreement between teacher and student
  • An opportunity for a student to work somewhat
    independently
  • Increases student responsibility for their own
    learning
  • Provides some freedom for the student in
    acquiring skills and understandings

56
Learning Contracts Include
  • A skills component
  • A content component
  • A time line
  • Specification of expectations
  • Behavior
  • Criteria for successful completion and quality
  • Signatures of agreement to terms (Student and
    Teacher)
  • ACSD (1997)
  • Tomlinson (1995)

57
Consequences
  • Learning contracts set positive consequences
  • Example continued freedom
  • They also set negative consequences
  • Example teacher sets work parameters

58
Flexible Grouping
  • Employs several organizational patterns for
    instruction
  • Students are grouped and regrouped according to
  • Specific goals
  • Activities
  • Individual needs
  • Interests
  • Desired outcomes (products)
  • http//www.eduplace.com/science/profdev/articles/v
    alentino.html

59
Grouping Options
  • Teacher-Led Groups
  • Whole class
  • Small group
  • Individual
  • Student-Led Groups
  • Collaborative
  • Performance-based
  • Dyad (Pairs)
  • http//www.eduplace.com/science/profdev/articles/v
    alentino.html

60
More Grouping Options
  • Within Class Grouping
  • Ability
  • Interest
  • Question-Based
  • Readiness
  • Learning Style
  • Beyond Class Grouping
  • Across-Class
  • Multi-Age
  • Team Regrouping
  • Renzulli Reis (1997)
  • Tomlinson (1995)

61
Ways to Differentiate Content in Groups
  • Varied Texts
  • Varied Supplementary Materials
  • Varied Graphic Organizers
  • Independent Study
  • Tiered Questions/Assignments
  • Interest Development Centers

62
Anchor Activities
  • Self-paced, purposeful, content-driven activities
    that students can work on independently
  • Can be done over the course of a unit, grading
    period, or longer
  • Activities that are meaningful, ongoing, and
    appropriate to students learning needs
  • http//wblrd.sk.ca/bestpractice/anchor/

63
The Question of Equity
  • Equity, the quality of being fair, is not
    about offering the exact same thing to every
    student, it is providing individuals with
    suitable challenges and experiences that will
    enable them to be successful and grow beyond
    where they are now or where they have been before.

64
Questions?
65
References and Resources
  • Association for Supervision and Curriculum
    Development (Producer). (1997). Differentiating
    instruction Instructional and Management
    Strategies Motion picture. (Available from the
    Association for Supervision and Curriculum
    Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA,
    22314-1453)
  • Fogarty, E. (2005). Differentiation as the key
    to successful grouping. Presented at Confratute,
    University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  • Renzulli, J. S. Reis, S. M. (1997). The
    schoolwide enrichment model. Connecticut
    Creative Learning Press.
  • Strictland, C. A. (2005). Differentiation of
    Instruction. Presented at Newark, Delaware
    Public Schools.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1995). The differentiated
    classroom. Virginia Association for Supervision
    and Curriculum Development.
  • http//wblrd.sk.ca/bestpractice/anchor/
  • http//www.eduplace.com/science/profdev/articles/
    valentino.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com