Title: Building a successful argument: Defining and justifying problems
1Building a successful argument Defining and
justifying problems
2Three Goals
- Define your problem
- Justify your problem
- Explain your argument (i.e., what are you going
to do in this paper?)
3Defining Research Problems
- What is a research problem?
- A problem is a statement, not a question.
However, a good problem can be restated in one or
more ways to produce one or more research
questions. - A problem can be something to be explained, to be
further understood, to be addressed, unpacked,
etc. - Characteristics of a good problem
- Should state the concepts to be related clearly
and unambiguously - Solution should be feasible
4Moving a Problem from General to Specific
- Could use of technology X affect society in a
positive way? - If we looked at two populations, one using
technology X and one not using it, would they
differ? - How is the use of technology X related to
productivity and work satisfaction in task groups
within population Y?
5Example Problem
- Social networks play an integral role in the
diffusion of information communication
technologies (ICTs) in the Western world.This
is a trend that becomes especial strong in
impoverished and undereducated regions, given
recent studies showing that lower economic
development correlates with a higher sense of
online community. A key problem for researchers
and policy makers is how to understand and
respond to the differences between developed and
developing regions, especially as it relates to
different structural characteristics of social
networks that facilitate the diffusion of new
information technologies. This is an especially
important problem because many new information
technologies are introduced to developing regions
from more developed regions without any
acknowledgement of the differences between these
areas. As I will explain in more detail, such
disregard for these differences has led to many
failed (and expensive) efforts to diffuse new
ICTs into developing regions. In this paper I
will address this gap by extrapolating several
specific lessons gleaned from the literature on
diffusion networks, virtual communities, and
three case studies of digital initiative in
underprivileged populations.
6Justifying Research Problems
- Explain what is not known about the problem.
- Why does the problem matter?
- Provide documentation that this is actually a
problem. - Available results, findings, statistics, etc from
other studies? - Available literature that shows that this is a
needed area of inquiry? - Remember The simple fact that no one may have
looked at this problem is not sufficient
justification.
7Justification as Significance of the Study (from
Creswell 2003)
- What are the ways that the study will add to the
scholarly research/literature in the field? - How does the study improve practice?
- How might the study improve policy?
- there are othersthe key is to explain why this
problem is actually a problem at all.
8The Justification
- Social networks play an integral role in the
diffusion of information communication
technologies (ICTs) in the Western world.This
is a trend that becomes especial strong in
impoverished and undereducated regions, given
recent studies showing that lower economic
development correlates with a higher sense of
online community. A key problem for researchers
and policy makers is how to understand and
respond to the differences between developed and
developing regions, especially as it relates to
different structural characteristics of social
networks that facilitate the diffusion of new
information technologies. This is an especially
important problem because many new information
technologies are introduced to developing regions
from more developed regions without any
acknowledgement of the differences between these
areas. As I will explain in more detail, such
disregard for these differences has led to many
failed (and expensive) efforts to diffuse new
ICTs into developing regions. In this paper I
will address this gap by extrapolating several
specific lessons gleaned from the literature on
diffusion networks, virtual communities, and
three case studies of digital initiative in
underprivileged populations.
9The Argument
- Social networks play an integral role in the
diffusion of information communication
technologies (ICTs) in the Western world.This
is a trend that becomes especial strong in
impoverished and undereducated regions, given
recent studies showing that lower economic
development correlates with a higher sense of
online community. A key problem for researchers
and policy makers is how to understand and
respond to the differences between developed and
developing regions, especially as it relates to
different structural characteristics of social
networks that facilitate the diffusion of new
information technologies. This is an especially
important problem because many new information
technologies are introduced to developing regions
from more developed regions without any
acknowledgement of the differences between these
areas. As I will explain in more detail, such
disregard for these differences has led to many
failed (and expensive) efforts to diffuse new
ICTs into developing regions. In this paper I
will address this gap by extrapolating several
specific lessons gleaned from the literature on
diffusion networks, virtual communities, and
three case studies of digital initiative in
underprivileged populations.
10Setting up your plan
- After reading in your topic area, try to state
your problem, its justification and what you
think you might want to do about it (the
argument). - Write this up as a paragraph or two, noting that
you will most likely re-write this later. - Develop an outline of all of the major parts of
the paper that you will need in order to support
your argument. - This type of outline should be as detailed as
possible, and have a logical structure that
serves to support the argument.
11Where to find appropriate literature?
- JSTOR.ORG
- GOOGLE SCHOLAR
- THE WEB OF KNOWLEDGE
- THE LIBRARY
12Study Groups
Group 2
Group 1
Group 3
Shawna Hein Ashwin Matthew Felix Morio Ashkan
Soltani
Michael Lee Nick Rabinowitz Luke Rhee Aylin
Selcukoglu
Anuradha Roy Ruchi Kumar Isaac Salier-Hellendag Ch
ristine Zhong
Group 5
Group 4
Group 6
Deepti Chittamuru Shauna Epstein Josh
Gomez Srikanth Narayan
Amanda Coffee Jon Hicks Jim Miller Hazel
Onsrud Pierre Tchetgen
Jon Breitbart Kathleen Lu Travis Pinnick Anirban
Sen Sami Vihavainen