Title: Antibody Titer Case Studies
1Antibody Titer Case Studies
CLS 422 Clinical Immunohematology I
- Please work through these 2 case studies. Ask
your site instructor for additional help if
necessary.
2Case One
- A twenty-eight year old woman, Gravida 2 para 1,
is seen by her nurse midwife for a routine
prenatal visit. - The clinician orders a Type and Screen.
- The Transfusion Service performs the screen. The
screen is positive with anti-E being identified. - The Transfusion Service performs an anti-E titer,
with the following results
3Case One Initial Titer
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 4 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Score 12 10 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4Case One Initial Titer
- What is the titer of this sample?
- 16
- What is the score?
- 43
5Case One Initial Titer
- Is this infant at risk of HDFN?
- Yes, anti-E can cause HDFN.
- What test might the clinician order next?
- E antigen typing on the father of the baby.
- How would that information be useful?
- If the father types E negative, the fetus could
not have inherited the gene for E, and would also
be E negative. Therefore, the maternal anti-E
would not destroy the fetal RBCs.
6Case One
- The father of the baby was typed for E with
positive results. - The mother had a repeat titer drawn at her next
prenatal visit, one month later. - The Transfusion Service performed a titer on the
current sample with the following results
7Case One Titer Two
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 4 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Score 12 10 10 8 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
8Case One Titer Two
- What is the titer of this specimen?
- 32
- What is the score?
- 50
9Case One Titer Two
- What additional testing must be done to determine
the significance of this titer? - Repeat the titer on the initial specimen, and
compare results. - The initial sample was titered in parallel, with
the following results
10Case One Parallel Titer
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 4 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Score 12 10 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11Case One Parallel Titer
- What it the titer of this specimen?
- 16
- What is the score?
- 43
- Has there been a significant change in the titer?
- NO. There is not a difference of 2 tubes, or a
change in score of 10 or more.
12Case One
- The mother returned for a prenatal visit in 1
month, and had a titer drawn at that time. - The Transfusion Service performed titers on the
current specimen, and ran the initial specimen in
parallel, with the following results
13Case One Titer Three
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 4 4 4 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
Score 12 12 12 10 10 8 5 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Titer run in parallel
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 4 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Score 12 10 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14Case One Titer Three
- What is the titer and score of the third titer?
- gtE titer is 64, with a score of 69.
- Has there been a significant change from the
original specimen? - Yes, the parallel titer is still 16, with a score
of 43. The new titer has increased by 2 tubes,
and the score has changed by more than 10. - How might the clinician follow the pregnancy from
now on (other than additional titers)?
15Case One
- Ultrasound
- Peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral
artery (MCA PSV) - Amniocentesis
- Bilirubin levels
- Fetal lung maturity
- PUBS (cordiocentesis)
16Case Two
- A 42 year old woman was seen by her obstetrician
at 26 weeks of gestation during a high risk
pregnancy. - An antenatal Rh Immune Globulin evaluation was
drawn at that time. - The laboratory performing the RhIG evaluation got
a positive antibody screen, with anti-D being
identified.
17Case Two
- The physician requested an anti-D titer be
performed. - The results were as follows
Tube 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Reaction Strength 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Score 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18Case Two Titer One
- What is the titer and score?
- Anti-D titer is 2, score 10.
- What question might the technologist ask at this
point? - Has the patient already received Rh Immune
Globulin during this pregnancy? - Anti-D from RhIG rarely titers greater than 4.
19Case Two Titer One
- A review of the womans chart revealed she had
received RhIG following amniocentesis at 18 weeks
gestation. - The anti-D detected at 26 weeks was attributed to
passive anti-D from RhIG. - The patient received an additional dose of RhIG,
and the pregnancy proceeded without complications.
20The End
- How did you do?
- If you had problems, review the titer
presentation.