Cutaneous toxicity EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs) cutaneous side effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Cutaneous toxicity EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs) cutaneous side effects

Description:

CUTANEOUS TOXICITY EGFR INHIBITORS (EGFRIS) CUTANEOUS SIDE EFFECTS Paolo Amerio, MD, PhD p.amerio_at_unich.it Matteo Auriemma, MD matteo.auriemma_at_gmail.com – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:584
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: msoCinbo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cutaneous toxicity EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs) cutaneous side effects


1
Cutaneous toxicityEGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs)
cutaneous side effects
  • Paolo Amerio, MD, PhD p.amerio_at_unich.it
  • Matteo Auriemma, MD matteo.auriemma_at_gmail.com
  • Dermatologic Clinic, G. D'Annunzio University
    Chieti

2
EGFRIs drugs
  • Unlike standard chemotherapy, which affects most
    replicating cells, EGFR inhibitors (EGFRIs)
    target pathways that are crucial for cancer cell
    growth and survival.
  • Treatment with EGFRIs is associated with a
    decreased incidence of systemic side effects
    compared with standard chemotherapeutic drugs.
  • The increasing clinical use of EGFRIs have led to
    the identification of a commonly occurring range
    of EGFRI-specific side effects, resulting in
    decreased quality of life as well as a decrease,
    interruption or discontinuation of EGFRI
    treatment.
  • These reactions are most evident in tissues that
    are crucially dependent on EGFR signaling for
    normal function, such as the skin.

Lacouture ME. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006
Oct6(10)803-12.
3
EGF, EGFR and skin
  • EGFR is crucial for the normal development and
    physiology of the epidermis
  • There exist a number of compound in the EGF
    family (TGF-?, anfiregulin, heparin binding-EGF,
    epiregulin) involved in cellular proliferation
    and differentiation.
  • Those molecules act through atocrine and
    paracrine mechanisms
  • Numerous molecules can activate EGFR (cyitokines,
    UV-ray, integrins), being this receptor involved
    in numerous functions proliferation, toumor cell
    mobility, skin inflammation.

Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariani V, Girolomoni G. The
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor System in Skin
Repair and Inflammation. J Invest Dermatol. 2007
Nov 29
4
EGF, EGFR and skin
  • The skin is composed of three layers the
    epidermis, the dermis and the hypodermis
    (adipose tissue).
  • Epidermis is primarily composed of keratinocytes
    (approximately 90 of cells), expressing EGFR at
    the highest concentration in the basal and
    suprabasal layers.
  • The basal layer and the bulge of the hair
    follicle contain proliferating stem cells, which
    give rise to terminally differentiating
    keratinocytes.
  • The outer root sheath of the hair follicle is
    contiguous with the basal layer, sharing
    biochemical properties and high EGFR expression.

Lacouture ME. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006
Oct6(10)803-12.
5
EGF, EGFR and skin
  • EGFR is primarily expressed in undifferentiated,
    proliferating keratinocytes in the basal and
    suprabasal layers of the epidermis and the outer
    layers of the hair follicle
  • Expression of EGFR is lost as keratinocytes exit
    the basal layer
  • Activation of EGFR by its ligands EGF,
    amphiregulin and HBEGF (heparin-binding EGF)
    regulates normal keratinocyte proliferation,
    differentiation, migration and survival
  • EGFR-driven proliferation is mediated by the
    PI3KAkt and MAPK pathways, which regulate genes
    that contribute to growth and the
    undifferentiated state
  • Treatment of cultured normal human keratinocytes
    with EGFRIs inhibits DNA synthesis and
    progression from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle

Jost, M., Kari, C. Rodeck, U. Eur. J. Dermatol.
10, 505510 (2000). Nanney, L. B. et al. J.
Invest. Dermatol. 94, 742748 (1990). Miettinen,
P. J. et al. Nature 376, 337341 (1995).
Murillas, R. et al. EMBO J. 14, 52165223
(1995). Pasonen-Seppanen. S. et al. J. Invest.
Dermatol. 120, 10381044 (2003). Peus, D., et al.
J. Invest. Dermatol. 109, 751756
(1997) Kobayashi, T., et al. J. Invest. Dermatol.
111, 616620 (1998).
6
EGF, EGFR and skin
  • Inhibition of EGFR signalling induces apoptosis
    in normal keratinocytes
  • No effect on melanocytes or fibroblasts ?
    keratinocytes are the primary target in
    EGFRI-mediated cutaneous toxicities
  • EGF addition to cultured keratinocytes
    downregulates the expression of
    terminal-differentiation markers and inhibits the
    formation of the cornified envelope
  • EGFR inhibition induces the expression of
    terminal differentiation markers, such as KRT1
    (keratin 1) and KRT10, in normal cultured
    keratinocytes and contribute to keratinocyte
    apoptosis
  • Premature hair keratinization and maturation of
    the inner root sheath is seen in EGFR-null mice

Mimeault, M. et al. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 17,
153166 (2004) Sayama, K. et al. J. Biol. Chem.
276, 9991004 (2001) Threadgill, D. W. et al.
Science 269, 230234 (1995).
Pasonen-Seppanen. S. et al. J. Invest. Dermatol.
120, 10381044 (2003). Peus, D.et al. J. Invest.
Dermatol. 109, 751756 (1997).
7
ACNEIFORM ERUPTION PATHOGENESYS
  • EGFR, through its ligand TGF-a, modulates
    cytokines production thus regulating skin
    inflammation in vivo
  • EGFR blockade enhance inflammatory cells
    migration
  • EGFR blockade enhance chemokines production
    MCP-1, RANTES, TARC, eotaxin-3, CCL27.
  • EGFR blockade reduces the expression of IP-10,
    MIP-3a and IL-8.
  • EGFR blockade reduces the expression of
    ß-defensin 1 (hBD1) and 2 leading to
    Stappylococcus Aureus hyper-proliferation.

Mascia F. ... Amerio P et al. J Invest
Dermatol. 2010 Mar130(3)682-93
8
EGFRIs
Blockade of EGFR results in growth arrest and
apoptosis in cells that are dependent on EGFR for
survival, through the inhibition of the MAPK
pathway, the PI3K (phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase)Akt pathway, the stress-activated
proteinkinase pathway that involves protein
kinase C, and the Janus kinase (Jak)STAT (signal
transducer and activator of transcription) pathway
Mendelsohn, J. Baselga, J. J. Clin. Oncol. 21,
27872799 (2003).
Inhibition of the EGFR-mediated signaling
pathways affects keratinocytes by inducing growth
arrest and apoptosis, decreasing cell migration,
increasing cell attachment and differentiation,
and stimulating inflammation, all of which result
in distinctive cutaneous manifestations.
Kari, C. et al. Cancer Res. 63, 15 (2003).
9
EGFRIs
In clinical practice two types of EGFRIs exists
Monoclonal antibodies (Cetuximab and
Panitumumab) competitive inhibition of the
binding of ligands to the extracellular region
Low-molecular-weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors
(TKIs) (Gefitinib and Erlotinib) blocking
cytoplasmic-domain phosphorylation2
10
Side effects
  • Cutaneous toxicities that result from treatment
    with EGFRIs are common, affecting 45100 of
    patients.
  • Rarely life-threatening, cause significant
    physical and psycho-social discomfort? QoL and
    the modification or discontinuation of anticancer
    therapy.
  • No established guidelines to prevent or manage
    these reactions.

Perez-Soler R, Saltz L. J Clin Oncol
2005235235-5246. Segaert S, Van Cutsem E. Ann
Oncol 2005161425-1433.
11
Skin toxicities to egfris
  • Papulopustular rash (face and upper trunk)
    45-100
  • Dry , desquamating and itchy skin 4-35
  • Paronichia (onicolysis, piogenic granuloma)
    6-16
  • Hypersensitivity reactions (anaphylaxis,
    orticaria) 2-3
  • Alopecia of the scalp, tricomeglaia of the
    eyelashes facial hair 21

Perez-Soler R, Saltz L. J Clin Oncol
2005235235-5246. Segaert S, Van Cutsem E. Ann
Oncol 2005161425-1433. Lacouture ME. Nat Rev
Cancer. 2006 Oct6(10)803-12.
12
Skin toxicities to egfris
Acneiform rash
Dry skin
Fissures
Relative intensity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14
Weeks
Paronychia
13
Acneiform eruption and patients QoL
  • The importance of skin toxicity is underscored by
    the patients psyco-phisic distress moreover
    rash severity could predict clinical outcome of
    EGFRIs treatment
  • Perez-Soler R. Oncology 20041723-28
  • Perez-Soler R et al. J Clin Oncol
    2005223238-3247.

Bonner J et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
200872(Suppl)Abstract LB3
14
Acneiform eruption and patients QoL
  • EGFRIs skin toxicity could profoundly impact QoL
    and be determinant for treatment withdrawal
  • Molinari E et al. Dermatology 2005211330-3.
  • Psycological distress lead to praecox treatment
    withdrawal
  • Journagan S et al. J Am Acad Dermatol
    200654358-60.
  • The correct treatment setting is influenced by an
    accurate starting evaluation

15
Adverse events prevention
  • Are EGFRIs side effects a multidisciplinary task,
    in which dermatologists can play a role?
  • YES usually EGFRIs are withdrawal due to their
    side effects a dermatological consult could
    reduce cutaneous side effects, improving
    treatment adherence
  • A strict collaboration between dermatologists and
    oncologists is needed to ensure treatment
    adherence

Lacouture ME et al. J. Support. Oncol. 4, 236238
(2006)
16
Side effects Prevention Management
  • A correct management of EGFRIs correlated side
    effects depends on an adequate grading.
  • The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity
    Criteria (NCI-CTC) is the more used grading
    scale for EGFRIs side effects.
  • NCI-CTC is a useful tool to evaluate patients
    side effects, to plan a correct therapeutical
    strategy and to evaluate any possible therapies.
  • Skin toxicities evaluation is based on clinical
    distintion of erythema, papulae, pustolae and
    nodules and on subjective evaluation of hitch and
    burning sensation ? specialists experience?

National Cancer Institute (NCI). Common
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0
(CTCAE). Available at http//ctep.cancer.gov/forms
/CTCAEv3.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2007.
17
Assessment of skin involvement
18
STUDY DESIGN
  • TO DEFINE A STANDARDIZED SYSTEM to quantify skin
    toxicities due to EGFRIs therapies, especially of
    the acneiform reaction. An highly specific scale
    is needed for medicians (oncologist or
    dermatologist) for systematic evaluation of skin
    reactions
  • EVALUATION OF A NEW SCALE the Eruption Scoring
    System and its validation compared to the
    NCI-CTCAE scale.

19
MM
  • Patients of the Oncology Department of the SS.
    Annunziata hospital in Chieti, suffering of
    acneiform eruption
  • All patients underwent treatment for lung,
    breast, rectus or cervix cancer
  • Cetuximab (MoAb) or Erlotinib (TKIs)
  • Inclusion criteria
  • M or F gt 18 aa
  • Patients in treatment
  • Informed consent
  • Ethic committee approval
  • 17 patients
  • 11 dermatologists and 2 oncologists performed
    each evaluation
  • Digital pictures evaluation
  • Each picture has been evaluated randomly by each
    specialist to avoid any confounding bias
  • Kendalls coefficent of concordance to evaluate
    results

20
Cetuximab Eruption Scoring System
(CESS)assessment of a new scale
  • Localizzation factor x grade (0-4) local score
  •  
  • I forehead 2
  • II right cheek 2
  • III left cheek 2
  • IV nose 1
  • V chin 1
  • VI upper chest 2
  • VII lower chest 1
  • VIII upper back 2
  • XI lower back 1
  •  
  • Grade 0 no lesions
  • Grade 1 gt 1 erithematous maculae
  • Grade 2 gt 1 papula
  • Grade 3 gt 1pustola
  • Grade 4 gt 1 plaque (fusion of more pustolae) or
    one nodule

21
Cetuximab Eruption Scoring System (CESS)?
  • Global score local score I IIIIIIVVVI
  • Global score legend
  • 0 none
  • 1-18 mild
  • 19-30 moderate
  • 31-38 intense
  • gt 39 severe
  •  

22
Cetuximab Eruption Scoring System (CESS)?
  • Secondary elements worsening the score
  • Hitch
  • Burning sensation
  •  
  • Other manifestations
  • Blefaritis ? mild ? moderate ?severe
  • Paronichia ? mild ? moderate ? severe

23
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology
Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE)?
  • This scale deals only with dry skin, nails
    alterations, hitch, rash/desquamations and
    rash/acneiform eruption not considering
    localization and patient's perceptions.

24
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology
Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI-CTCAE)?
  • NCI-CTCAE --- in ACNEIFORM ERUPTION 5 degrees
  • I II grade erythema, papulae in lt 50 of skin
    surface no intervention
  • III grade moderate eruption gt 50 of skin
    surface pain, ulceration and/or desquamation
  • IV grade exfoliative dermatitis, ulcers,
    blisters, severe involvement (MOF)
  • V grade death.

25
NationalCancer Institute Common Terminology
Criteria for adverse events
26
Results (1)?
NCI evaluation scale only a slight concordance
among the evaluations
27
Results (2)?
Eruption Scoring System better result
concordance
28
RESULTS (3)
similar results with the OMS scale and CESS scale
29
CONCLUSIONS
  • The OMS score generates high differences among
    the different operators.
  • That result could be due to the low expertise of
    the different evaluator.

30
Conclusions II
  • Results due to the scale itself the evaluation
    of rash/desquamation and nails alteration needs a
    good expertice meanwile the Acneiform scale is
    highly unspecific

National Cancer Institute (NCI). Common
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0
(CTCAE). Available at http//ctep.cancer.gov/forms
/CTCAEv3.pdf
31
Conclusions III
  • CESS scale is highly reproducible being less
    operator dependant
  • CESS scale gives more uniform results among
    operators compared to the OMS scale.
  • CESS scale evaluates the Acneiform Rash, lesions
    type and localization, being more detailed
    compared to the OMS scale.

32
Conclusions IV
  • The Eruption Scorig System (ESS) collects more
    detailed information in a short time compared to
    the OMS scale giving the opportunity of a more
    specific and operator-indipendent evaluation.
  • Those characteristics could enhance patients and
    care management

33
Management
34
Side effects management
35
side effects management
  • Rash (papulae/pustolae)
  • ANTIBIOTICI SISTEMICI
  • Tetracicline 500 mg/die
  • Minociclina 100 mg/die
  • Doxiciclina 100 mg/die
  • TRATTAMENTI TOPICI
  • Eritromicina
  • Clindamicina
  • Acido fusidico
  • Sulfamethoxazolo-trimethoprim
  • Metronidazolo
  • RETINOIDI TOPICI
  • Tretionina crema 0.025, 0.05, 0.1
  • Tazarotene crema/gel 0.05, 0.1
  • BENZOIL PEROSSIDO
  • ZOLFO 6
  • AGENTI ANTINFIAMMATORI
  • Steroidi topici
  • Inibitori della calcineurinaa

36
side effects management
  • Treatment of side effects has to be continued
    although EGFRIs interruption, or reduction skin
    toxicities can last for a long time.
  • As soon as skin toxicities become asymptomatic,
    EGFRIs treatment has to be restarted or enhanced.

37
Other considerations
  • Topical therapies has to be continued for at
    least one week to reduce skin toxicities.
  • Continuous application of steroids could worsen
    the clinical course of the reaction and enhance
    superinfectious risk
  • Topical steroids are suggested as follows 2
    weeks of treatment ... 1 week without treatment
  • Doxiciclin has to be preferred in renal failure
    patients although it has more photo-sensitizing
    properties than minocicline

38
Adverse events managment
  • Whenever skin rush involver more than 50 of skin
    surfaces, EGFRIs has to be tapered or suspended.
  • Periods of treatment can be alternated with
    periods of withdrawal (on/off therapies 2 weeks -
    1 weeks).

39
Adverse events management more than rash
  • Paronichia and other nails alterations usually
    stars 2-4 months after Cetuximab treatment is
    started (12).
  • Topical or systemic antibiotics can be used
    together with FANS to control pain. Those
    therapies will improve symptoms although wont
    prevent paronichia itself.

40
Adverse events management more than rash
  • Paronichia Aluminium acetate,
  • Potassium permanganate KMnO4.
  • Fissurations Ointments.
  • Desquamazione Moisturizing creams.
  • Prurito Anti-Histamin.

41
considerations
  • The EGFRIs are key players in solid tumours
    treatment although its use is afflicted by
    several skin side effect of variable intensity.
  • Usually EGFRIs side effects can be treated
    without reducing or withdrawing anti cancer
    therapies. Unfortunately not every side effect
    can be treated leading to a EGFRIs tapering.
  • Therapeutical algorithms are useful tools.
  • Cooperation between oncologists and
    dermatologists should be mandatory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com