Title: The Mnemonic Value of Orthography for Vocabulary Learning
1The Mnemonic Value of Orthography for Vocabulary
Learning
- Linnea Ehri
- Program in Educational Psychology
- CUNY Graduate Center
2Environmental Print Research
3The Mnemonic Value of Orthography for Vocabulary
Learning
- Collaborator Julie Rosenthal
- Mnemonic value improving memory
- Orthography spellings of words
4Two Ways to read words
- DECODING MEMORY
- rume ocean
- rane iron
- taik yacht
- gote tongue
- yung sugar
- interpossism
- subharkible
- contorrention
-
5Ways to Read Words
- UNFAMILIAR WORDS
- By Decoding
- Graphemes -gt Phonemes
- Larger units spelling patterns for syllables or
morphemes - FAMILIAR WORDS
- By Memory or Sight
- Note All words when practiced become read from
memory
6Reading Words from Memory
- Process of forming connections
- Spelling
- Meaning
- glue
- Pronunciation
-
- Knowledge of the grapheme-phoneme system provides
the glue connecting spellings to pronunciations
in memory
7Examples of connections for regularly spelled
words
- S T O P CH E CK
- /s/-/t/-/a/-/p/ /c/-/E/-/k/
- G I GG LE B IR D
- /g/-/I/-/g/-/L/ /b/-/r/-/d/
8Examples of connections for irregularly spelled
words
- I S L A N D S W O R D
- /ay/-/L/-/ae/-/n/-/d/ /s/ - /o/ - /r/ - /d/
- L I S T E N S I G N
- /L/-/I/-/s/-/t/-/e/-/n/ /s/ - /I/ - /n/
9Knowledge needed to form connections
- Phoneme segmentation
- To analyze pronunciations into phonemes
- Grapheme-phoneme correspondences
- To access constituents of the writing system (the
glue) - Grapho-phonemic matching
- To connect graphemes to phonemes within specific
words
10Connections for Specific Words are Learned Quickly
- Reitsma (1983)
- - Taught 1st graders to read words
- - Minimum of 4 practice trials to read words from
memory - Share (2004) self teaching mechanism
- - 1 exposure to words in text for 3rd graders
- - Memory for letters persisted one month
11Application to Vocabulary Learning
- Examined connection forming process as it
contributes to vocabulary learning - Explicit Word Learning Task
- Students rehearsed pronunciations and meanings of
new words over several trials - Procedure
- Initial study trial words and meanings were
introduced - Pictures and defining sentences
- Several test trials with feedback followed
- Experimental Manipulation
- Treatment condition spellings of words were
shown during study and feedback periods but NOT
when recall of words was tested - Control condition same except spellings of words
were not shown
12Hypothesis and Explanation
- Hypothesis Students will learn the
pronunciations and meanings of words more readily
when they are exposed to spellings of the words
during study periods than when they are not
exposed to spellings. - Explanation Grapheme-phoneme connections are
activated by spellings and will better secure the
words in memory.
13First Experiment
- N 20 2nd graders, Mean age 7yrs. 7 months
- Pretests
- Woodcock word identification M 2.2
grade-equivalent - CVC nonword reading (M55) and spelling (M53)
- Word Learning Conditions
- They were taught two sets of 6 concrete nouns and
their meanings - One set spellings of words accompanied learning
- The other set spellings did not accompany
learning - Counterbalancing
- Examples
- Gam family of whales
- Cur a homeless dog
- Sod wet, grassy ground
- Fet big, fun party
- Nib tip of a pen
- Yag fake jewelry
14Spelling Seen ConditionInitial study trial
Student hears each word and a defining sentence,
sees picture and written word, repeats word and
sentence
(picture) gam
yag
(picture)
sod
(picture)
fet
(picture)
(picture) nib
(picture) yag
15Nib
An example
16Spelling Seen ConditionWord Recall Test Trial
Student sees each picture and recalls word. Then
word is seen, pronounced, and heard in a
sentence. Students repeats the word and its
sentence.
(picture)
(picture)
(picture)
(picture)
(picture)
(picture)
17Spelling Seen ConditionDefinition Recall Test
Trial Student hears and sees each word and
recalls its meaning. Then meaning is given, and
student repeats the word and its meaning.
sod
nib
gam
cur
fet
yag
18No-Spelling Condition
- Procedures are the same as in the Spelling
Condition - Except
- Spellings of words are never shown
- Students pronounce the words extra times
19Summary of word learning events
- Each child learns one set of vocabulary words
with spellings and another set without spellings - One initial study trial to introduce words
- Followed by trials to test recall of words and
definitions - Word recall trials are interleaved with
definition recall trials - Maximum of 9 trials are provided to learn words
and meanings - Note Spellings of words are not shown when words
are tested, so recall depends upon having the
spellings of words in memory.
20 (Study with 2nd graders)
Recall
Definitions / spell seen
Definitions / spell not seen
Words / spell seen
Words /spell not seen
Recall of words and definitions during the
learning trials
21Recall Measure
22Posttest Measures
23Conclusion and explanation
- Conclusion 2nd graders learned vocabulary words
and their meanings better when they were exposed
to spellings of the words than when they only
practiced speaking the words - Explanation
- Pronunciations were unfamiliar.
- Grapho-phonemic connections better secured their
representations in memory - Stronger base for attaching meanings
24Second Experiment
- N 32 5th graders, Mean age 10 yrs. 11 months
- Pretests
- Reading words and nonwords spelling words
vocabulary test - Reader Ability Groups (word reading task)
- Higher Readers (7.3 GE) vs. Lower Readers (4.6
GE) - Word Learning Conditions
- They were taught two sets of 10 concrete nouns
and their meanings - One set spellings accompanied word learning
- One set spellings did not accompany word
learning - Maximum of 8 trials to achieve 3 perfect
successive trials - Examples
- Barrow a small hill
- Tandem a horse-drawn carriage
- Fribble a foolish shallow person
- Tamarack a big tree found all over America
- Proboscis a really big nose
25Word-recall training/feedback card in the
spellings present vs. spellings absent conditions.
Tamarack
26Hypotheses
- Spellings will help 5th graders learn the
pronunciations and meanings of new vocabulary
words - Students with stronger orthographic knowledge (hi
readers) will benefit more from spellings than
students with weaker orthographic knowledge (lo
readers)
27Recall of Words by 5th Graders (10 max)
Hi Readers, Spell seen
Lo Readers, Spell seen
Hi Readers, Spell not seen
Lo Readers, Spell not seen
Hi Readers Lo Readers
28Recall of Definitions by 5th graders (10 max)
Spell seen
Hi Readers Lo Readers
Spell not seen
29(No Transcript)
30Recall Words
Write Spellings
Fill Cloze Sentences
31Conclusions
- Seeing spellings helped 5th graders learn the
pronunciations and meanings of new vocabulary
words more than not seeing spellings. - Students with strong orthographic knowledge
benefited more from seeing spellings than
students with weak orthographic knowledge - Matthew Effect rich getting richer over time
- Explanation grapho-phonemic connections better
secured pronunciations of words in memory better
specified pronunciations provided a stronger base
for learning meanings. - Effect incidental no attention directed at
spellings no instruction to decode words
automatic activation of mapping relations
32Implications for Vocabulary Instruction and
Learning
- Grapho-phonemic instruction
- - It is important for students to acquire strong
orthographic knowledge as they learn to read - Strategy instruction
- When students encounter new vocabulary words,
they should be taught to examine the spellings of
the words as they pronounce them aloud or as they
listen to someone else pronounce them
33The End