Operation and Maintenance of Sewer Laterals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 56
About This Presentation
Title:

Operation and Maintenance of Sewer Laterals

Description:

Operation and Maintenance of Sewer Laterals City of Saskatoon City of Saskatoon Public Works Branch SPWA 2002 Comparison of Service Cleaning Frequency PRESENTATION ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: GregCh5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Operation and Maintenance of Sewer Laterals


1
Operation and Maintenance of Sewer Laterals
City of Saskatoon
  • City of Saskatoon
  • Public Works Branch

SPWA 2002
2
Comparison of Service Cleaning Frequency
Number of Blocked Service Connections / 1000
Service Connections
3
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
  • Where do we get our mandate?
  • Determining program demand for cleaning and
    rehabilitation programs
  • Cleaning and rehabilitation strategies
  • Questions

4
(No Transcript)
5
Infrastructure Maintenance Goal
  • Maintain the infrastructure at a defined level
    of service at the minimum long term cost.

?
6
Rules for the Road
  • Urban Municipality Act (Section 188)
  • Public Health Act
  • Saskatchewan Plumbing and Drainage Regulations
  • Canadian Plumbing Code
  • Nuisance and Negligence Jurisprudence
  • Local Bylaws and Policy

7
Urban Municipalities Act
  • The U.M. is responsible to maintain the sewer
    service from the main to the property line
    (188.2)
  • The U.M. may direct the owner to undertake
    repairs from the property line to the building
    (188.3)
  • The U.M. on expiration of the life may repair,
    maintain replace or reconstruct the sewer service
    at the expense of the municipality or owner
    (188.5)

8
Public Health Act Plumbing Code and Regulations
  • The U.M. may regulate the plumbing within the
    building and from the building to the property
    line
  • The U.M. may direct the owner to make repairs,
    alterations or replace the plumbing

9
Set Requirements Around Plumbing Layout
  • Cleanout
  • Cap Size
  • Cleanout Location and Work Space
  • Cleanout and Plumbing Alignment Layout
  • Pipe Size

10
Nuisance
  • The U.M is responsible if a blockage originates
    on City Property or is due to an action by the
    City
  • The owner is responsible if a blockage originates
    on private property or is due to an action by the
    property owner

11
Legislated Policy Options
  • Age of the Connection
  • Physical Location of the Pipe
  • Cause and Location of Obstructions
  • Plumbing Access

12
Other Policy Consideration
  • Coordination with Mainline Rehabilitation
  • Coordination with Water Service Replacement
  • Replacement During Lot Redevelopment
  • Emergency versus Planned

13
Two General Approaches to Connection Programming
  • The Municipality Provides Cleaning and
    Maintenance Programs
  • The Owner is Responsible for Securing a Plumbing
    or Sewer Contractor

14
Policy Should Consider
  • Level of Service
  • Response time
  • Interruption Frequency
  • Obstruction Location
  • Property Side
  • City Side
  • Who Initiates /Undertakes the Work
  • Property Owner
  • Municipality
  • Reimbursement and Service Fee Policy

15
Policy Should Consider
  • Cause of the Blockage
  • Internal Plumbing
  • Private Trees
  • City Trees
  • Both Private and City Trees
  • Pipe Condition (alignment and structural defects)
  • Foreign objects (sand soil, sanitary supplies,
    grease and other materials).
  • Unknown (no City or private trees and no
    structural condition exists)

16
Simple No!
17
Factors Impacting Demand for Cleaning and
Rehabilitation Programs
  • Pipe Condition
  • Inventory
  • Pipe Material, Jointing and Age
  • CCTV Inspection
  • Tree and Shrub Type
  • Root System
  • Tree Location/Proximity to Pipe
  • Seasonal Growth Cycle

18
Know Your Inventory Before You Set Policy

Inventory by Construction Period and Material Type
19
Connection Inventory (City of Saskatoon)
20
Sanitary Connection Pipe Material Type
25141
20616
8604
Total 55,870 connections
21
Cleaning Services by Pipe Type
22
Sewer Blockages by Cause
23
External Site Assessment
  • Location of Sewermain
  • Location of Private Trees (site, adjacent,
    across)
  • Distance (on top, 0-3m, 3-6m, over 6m)
  • Tree type (Cedars, deciduous, Evergreen, hedge)

24
Breakdown Of Tree Root Servicing
25
Sewer Blockages Based On Nuisance
26
Variance in Cleaning Service Demand
  • Demand for cleaning service is highly variable
  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • The time period between taping and Augering
    connections is highly variable.

27
Seasonal Demand for Cleaning Services
28
Cleaning Service Demand by Week
29
Typical Failure on Tile Pipe
  • Root mass at a joint
  • Tap roots at a joint

30
Structural Defects Tile Pipe
  • Broken Pipe at
  • the Elbow

Broken Pipe
31
Structural Failures on Fibre Pipe
  • Deformation
  • Found in Fibre pipe connections

Fibre pipe in good shape
32
Structural Failures Fibre Pipe
  • Fibre Pipe in fair condition

Fibre Pipe in poor condition
33
Alignment/Profile Problems
  • Sagging or heaving connections
  • Wide range of severity

34
Alignment/Profile Problems
  • Large Open Joint

Large Displaced Joint
35
Cleaning Operations
  • Cleaning Average Expected
  • Method Cost Life
  • Sewer Tape 50 7.5 Months
  • Sewer Auger 100 15 Months
  • High Pressure Flusher 62 15 Months
  • (Harben)
  • Herbiciding 170 24-48 Months

36
Connection Preservation
  • Treatment Average Expected
  • Method Cost Life
  • Spot Repairs 2000 Various
  • Lining (Full) 3300 gt 50 years
  • Less Trench Replacement 3200 gt 75 years
  • Open Cut Replacement 4800 gt 75 years
  • Note Replacement costs based on City portion
    only

37
The Replacement Versus the Cleaning Decision
  • Based on economics replace when
  • Three of more auger treatments a year
  • Six or more sewer tapings a year
  • Requires spot repair at the elbow
  • Will economics change?

38
SEWER TAPE
  • Where
  • Soft Blockages
  • Root infiltration
  • Used to get connection running
  • Average Cost 50/con.
  • Production
  • Two Man Operation
  • 12con. /day

39
SEWER AUGER
  • Where
  • Soft Blockages
  • Root infiltration
  • Grease
  • Long runs, bends, elbows
  • Up to 125mm Diam.
  • Average Cost 100/Con.
  • Production
  • Two Person Operation
  • 5 con./day

40
HIGH PRESURE SEWER FLUSHER
  • Where
  • Grease, root infiltration
  • Long runs, bends,elbows
  • Manhole access
  • Can use on gt 125mm
  • Limited use with fibre pipe
  • Average Cost 62/Con.
  • Production
  • One or two person operation
  • 15 to 20 con /day

41
Connection Herbiciding
  • Where
  • Extensive Root Infiltration
  • Cost 170/connection
  • Production Up to 10 connections per day
  • Effective 2-5 years??
  • City of Saskatoon ran a test program in
    2001-2002, 100 connections

42
Vaporooter Herbiciding
  • Roots augered 4-6 weeks prior to treatment.
  • 5 gallon mix water, Vaporooter (1quart).
  • Mini-foamer pumps until solution container is
    empty (10-15min).

43
Vaporooter Herbiciding
  • Homeowner to refrain from using water for at
    least 2 hours after treatment.
  • All foam washed out with commencing normal use of
    water.
  • Restricted use- certification, training and
    licensing required of application personnel.

44
Open Cut Replacement
  • Where
  • Extensive structural problems
  • Alignment Sags and Heaves
  • Where water services must also be upgraded
  • Typical Cost 4,800 per connection
  • Restoration
  • Involves major restoration to road, boulevard,
    sidewalk, property

45
Less Trench Replacement
  • Where Extensive structural problems
  • Cost 3,750 per connection
  • Restoration
  • minimized to one hole at the main and one hole at
    the house
  • additional hole at the property line if water
    line is replaced at same time.

46
Sewer Connection Lining
  • A thermal resin impregnated flexible felt woven
    liner is inserted into the connection
  • Inversion Process
  • Winch in Process
  • Liner is cured by circulating hot water, steam or
    ambient air at a regulated pressure.

47
Sewer Connection Lining
  • Where
  • Minimal structural problems
  • Extensive root infiltration
  • Restoration charges would be expensive
  • Cost 3300 /connection (130/l.m.)
  • Production 4-5 connections/day
  • Restoration
  • Very little disruption to users and existing
    infrastructure

48
Connection Lining (Winch-in Method)
  • No digging.
  • Able to line up to and including 90º long sweep
    bends.
  • Spot repairs possible.
  • 50-year design life.

49
Pull in Connection Lining
  • Wet out procedure- Pre-cut Liner is
    impregnated with resin.
  • Inflatable air bladder exists within the liner.

50
Pull In Connection Lining
  • Liner is winched into thoroughly cleaned
    connection through cleanout, from nearby manhole.
  • Air bladder is inflated and air pressure is
    regulated by an air compressor until liner is
    cured.

51
Connection Lining
  • Bladder is then deflated and removed from the
    connection.
  • Connection is inspected with a small CCTV camera,
    pushed in through the cleanout.

52
Completed Sewer Connection Lining
53
Summary
  • Sewer Lateral policy is not for faint of heart
  • In this day and age of litigation it is probable
    a necessity

54
Questions ?
55
Types of Herbicide
  • Copper Sulfate
  • Only kill roots in the bottom of the pipe
    (transported in flowing water), and not
    acceptable at treatment plant.
  • Corrosive Acids and Bases
  • Only kill roots in the bottom of the pipe (react
    with water to create heat and burn the roots),
    and do not inhibit root growth.
  • Diquat Bromide
  • Not approved in Canada.
  • Dichlobenil
  • Kills the roots, but does not inhibit root
    growth.

56
Metam Sodium / Dichlobenil Mix
  • Kills all roots.
  • Metam is a fumigant that gives the immediate root
    kill.
  • The mix is transported by a foaming agent, such
    that roots in the entire pipe are contacted.
  • Inhibits root growth.
  • Dichlobenil is a herbicide that impregnates the
    surface of the pipe and creates a chemical
    barrier to root growth.
  • Diluted quantities acceptable at treatment plant.
  • Degradation process with metam and adsorption
    process with dichlobenil work to minimize adverse
    effects at WWTP.
  • Non-systemic.
  • Will not harm the tree(s) causing the root
    problem.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com