Title: Isotope Hydrology Shortcourse
1Isotope Hydrology Shortcourse
Residence Time Approaches using Isotope Tracers
- Prof. Jeff McDonnell
- Dept. of Forest Engineering
- Oregon State University
2Outline
- Day 1
- Morning Introduction, Isotope Geochemistry
Basics - Afternoon Isotope Geochemistry Basics cont,
Examples - Day 2
- Morning Groundwater Surface Water Interaction,
Hydrograph separation basics, time source
separations, geographic source separations,
practical issues - Afternoon Processes explaining isotope evidence,
groundwater ridging, transmissivity feedback,
subsurface stormflow, saturation overland flow - Day 3
- Morning Mean residence time computation
- Afternoon Stable isotopes in watershed models,
mean residence time and model strcutures, two-box
models with isotope time series, 3-box models and
use of isotope tracers as soft data - Day 4
- Field Trip to Hydrohill or nearby research site
3How these time and space scales relate to what we
have discussed so far
Bloschel et al., 1995
4This section will examine how we make use of
isotopic variability
5Outline
- What is residence time?
- How is it determined? modeling background
- Subsurface transport basics
- Stable isotope dating (18O and 2H)
- Models transfer functions
- Tritium (3H)
- CFCs, 3H/3He, and 85Kr
6Residence Time
- Mean Water Residence Time (aka turnover time,
age of water leaving a system, exit age, mean
transit time, travel time, hydraulic age,
flushing time, or kinematic age) - twVm/Q
- For 1D flow pattern twx/vpw
- where vpw q/f
- Mean Tracer Residence Time
7Why is Residence Time of Interest?
- It tells us something fundamental about the
hydrology of a watershed - Because chemical weathering, denitrification, and
many biogeochemical processes are kinetically
controlled, residence time can be a basis for
comparisons of water chemistry
Vitvar Burns, 2001
8Tracers and Age Ranges
- Environmental tracers
- added (injected) by natural processes, typically
conservative (no losses, e.g., decay, sorption),
or ideal (behaves exactly like traced material)
9Modeling Approach
- Lumped-parameter models (black-box models)
- System is treated as a whole flow pattern is
assumed constant over modeling period - Used to interpret tracer observations in system
outflow (e.g. GW well, stream, lysimeter) - Inverse procedure Mathematical tool
- The convolution integral
10 Convolution
- A convolution is an integral which expresses the
amount of overlap of one function h as it is
shifted over another function x. It therefore
"blends" one function with another - Its frequency filter, i.e., it attenuates
specific frequencies of the input to produce the
result - Calculation methods
- Fourier transformations, power spectra
- Numerical Integration
11The Convolution Theorem
Proof
Trebino, 2002
We will not go through this!!
12Convolution Illustration of how it works
Step
1
2
3
4
13Example Delta Function
- Convolution with a delta function simply centers
the function on the delta-function. - This convolution does not smear out f(t).
- Thus, it can physically represent piston-flow
processes.
Modified from Trebino, 2002
14Matrix Set-up for Convolution
length(x)length(h)-1
length(x)
S
y(t)
x(t)h
0
15Similar to the Unit Hydrograph
Precipitation
Excess Precipitation
Infiltration Capacity
Excess Precipitation
Time
Tarboton
16Instantaneous Response Function
Unit Response Function U(t)
Excess Precipitation P(t)
Event Response Q(t)
Tarboton
17Subsurface Transport Basics
18Subsurface Transport Processes
- Advection
- Dispersion
- Sorption
- Transformations
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
19Advection
Solute movement with bulk water flow
tt1
t2gtt1
t3gtt2
FLOW
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
20Subsurface Transport Processes
- Advection
- Dispersion
- Sorption
- Transformations
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
21Dispersion
Solute spreading due to flowpath heterogeneity
FLOW
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
22Subsurface Transport Processes
- Advection
- Dispersion
- Sorption
- Transformations
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
23Sorption
Solute interactions with rock matrix
FLOW
t2gtt1
tt1
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
24Subsurface Transport Processes
- Advection
- Dispersion
- Sorption
- Transformations
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
25Transformations
Solute decay due to chemical and biological
reactions
MICROBE
CO2
t2gtt1
tt1
Modified from Neupauer Wilson, 2001
26Stable Isotope Methods
27Stable Isotope Methods
- Seasonal variation of 18O and 2H in precipitation
at temperate latitudes - Variation becomes progressively more muted as
residence time increases - These variations generally fit a model that
incorporates assumptions about subsurface water
flow
Vitvar Burns, 2001
28Seasonal Variation in 18O of Precipitation
Vitvar, 2000
29Seasonality in Stream Water
30Example Sine-wave
Tw-1(B/A)2 1)1/2
31Convolution Movie
32Transfer Functions Used for Residence Time
Distributions
33Common Residence Time Models
34Piston Flow (PFM)
- Assumes all flow paths have transit time
- All water moves with advection
- Represented by a Dirac delta function
-
35Exponential (EM)
- Assumes contribution from all flow paths lengths
and heavy weighting of young portion. - Similar to the concept of a well-mixed system
in a linear reservoir model
36Dispersion (DM)
- Assumes that flow paths are effected by
hydrodynamic dispersion or geomorphological
dispersion - Arises from a solution of the 1-D
advection-dispersion equation
37Exponential-piston Flow (EPM)
- Combination of exponential and piston flow to
allow for a delay of shortest flow paths
for t? T (1-h-1), and g(t)0 for tlt T (1-h-1)
38Heavy-tailed Models
- Gamma
- Exponentials in series
39Exit-age distribution (system response function)
Confined aquifer PFM g(t) ?(t'-T)
Unconfined aquifer EM g(t) 1/T exp(-t/T)
EM
EPM
EM
PFM
PFM
EM
Maloszewski and Zuber
Kendall, 2001
40Exit-age distribution (system response function)
cont
- Partly Confined Aquifer
- EPM g(t) ?/T exp(-?t'/T ?-1) for tT (1
- 1/?) - g(t) 0 for t'lt T (1-1/ ?)
Kendall, 2001
Maloszewski and Zuber
41Dispersion Model Examples
42Residence Time Distributions can be Similar
43Uncertainty
44Identifiable Parameters?
45Review Calculation of Residence Time
- Simulation of the isotope input output
relation - Calibrate the function g(t) by assuming various
distributions of the residence time - Exponential Model
- Piston Flow Model
- Dispersion Model
46Input Functions
- Must represent tracer flux in recharge
- Weighting functions are used to amount-weight
the tracer values according recharge mass
balance!! - Methods
- Winter/summer weighting
- Lysimeter outflow
- General equation
where w(t) recharge weighting function
47Models of Hydrologic Systems
Maloszewski et al., 1983
48Soil Water Residence Time
Stewart McDonnell, 2001
49Example from Rietholzbach
Vitvar, 1998
50Model 3
Stable deep signal
Uhlenbrook et al., 2002
51How residence time scales with basin area
Figure 1
52Contour interval 10 meters
Digital elevation model and stream network
Figure 2
53Figure 3
54K (17 ha)
Bedload (280 ha)
PL14 (17 ha)
M15 (2.6 ha)
Figure 4
55(No Transcript)
56Determining Residence Time of Old(er) Waters
57Whats Old?
- No seasonal variation of stable isotope
concentrations gt4 to 50 years - Methods
- Tritium (3H)
- 3H/3He
- CFCs
- 85Kr
58Tritium
- Historical tracer 1963 bomb peak of 3H in
atmosphere - 1 TU 1 3H per 1018 hydrogen atoms
- Slug-like input
- 36Cl is a similar tracer
- Similar methods to stable isotope models
- Half-life (l) 12.43
Tritium Input
59Tritium (cont)
- Piston flow (decay only)
- tt-17.93ln(C(t)/C0)
- Other flow conditions
Manga, 1999
60Deep Groundwater Residence Time
Spring Stollen t0 8.6 a, PD 0.22
3H-Input
3H-Input-Bruggagebiet
3H TU
3H TU
Time yr.
Time yr.
Uhlenbrook et al., 2002
lumped parameter models
613He/3H
- As 3H enters groundwater and radioactively
decays, the noble gas 3He is produced - Once in GW, concentrations of 3He increase as GW
gets older - If 3H and 3He are determined together, an
apparent age can be determined
62Determination of Tritiogenic He
- Other sources of 3He
- Atmospheric solubility (temp dependent)
- Trapped air during recharge
- Radiogenic production (a decay of U/Th-series
elements) - Determined by measuring 4He and other noble gases
63Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
- CFC-11 (CFCL3), CFC-12 (CF2Cl2), CFC-13
(C2F3Cl3) long atm residence time (44, 180, 85
yrs) - Concentrations are uniform over large areas and
atm concentration are steadily increasing - Apparent age CFC conc in GW to equivalent atm
conc at recharge time using solubility
relationships
6485Kr
- Radioactive inert gas, present is atm from
fission reaction (reactors) - Concentrations are increasing world-wide
- Half-life 10.76 useful for young dating too
- Groundwater ages are obtained by correcting the
measured 85Kr activity in GW for radioactive
decay until a point on the atm input curve is
reached
6585Kr (cont)
- Independent of recharge temp and trapped air
- Little source/sink in subsurface
- Requires large volumes of water sampled by vacuum
extraction (100 L)
66Model 3
Uhlenbrook et al., 2002
67Large-scale Basins
68Notes on Residence Time Estimation
- 18O and 2H variations show mean residence times
up to 4 years only older waters dated through
other tracers (CFC, 85Kr, 4He/3H, etc.) - Need at least 1 year sampling record of
isotopes in the input (precip) and output
(stream, borehole, lysimeter, etc.) - Isotope record in precipitation must be
adjusted to groundwater recharge if groundwater
age is estimated
69Class exerciseftp//ftp.fsl.orst.edu/pub/mcguirek
/rt_lecture
- Hydrograph separation
- Convolution
- FLOWPC
- Show your results graphically (one or several
models) and provide a short write-up that
includes - Parameter identifiability/uncertainty
- Interpretation of your residence time
distribution in terms of the flow system
70References
- Cook, P.G. and Solomon, D.K., 1997. Recent
advances in dating young groundwater
chlorofluorocarbons, 3H/3He and 85Kr. Journal of
Hydrology, 191245-265. - Duffy, C.J. and Gelhar, L.W., 1985. Frequency
Domain Approach to Water Quality Modeling in
Groundwater Theory. Water Resources Research,
21(8) 1175-1184. - Kirchner, J.W., Feng, X. and Neal, C., 2000.
Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for
contaminant transport in catchments. Nature,
403(6769) 524-527. - Maloszewski, P. and Zuber, A., 1982. Determining
the turnover time of groundwater systems with the
aid of environmental tracers. 1. models and their
applicability. Journal of Hydrology, 57 207-231. - Maloszewski, P. and Zuber, A., 1993. Principles
and practice of calibration and validation of
mathematical models for the interpretation of
environmental tracer data. Advances in Water
Resources, 16 173-190. - Turner, J.V. and Barnes, C.J., 1998. Modeling of
isotopes and hydrochemical responses in catchment
hydrology. In C. Kendall and J.J. McDonnell
(Editors), Isotope tracers in catchment
hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 723-760. - Zuber, A. and Maloszewski, P., 2000. Lumped
parameter models. In W.G. Mook (Editor),
Environmental Isotopes in the Hydrological Cycle
Principles and Applications. IAEA and UNESCO,
Vienna, pp. 5-35. Available http//www.iaea.or.at
/programmes/ripc/ih/volumes/vol_six/chvi_02.pdf
71Outline
- Day 1
- Morning Introduction, Isotope Geochemistry
Basics - Afternoon Isotope Geochemistry Basics cont,
Examples - Day 2
- Morning Groundwater Surface Water Interaction,
Hydrograph separation basics, time source
separations, geographic source separations,
practical issues - Afternoon Processes explaining isotope evidence,
groundwater ridging, transmissivity feedback,
subsurface stormflow, saturation overland flow - Day 3
- Morning Mean residence time computation
- Afternoon Stable isotopes in watershed models,
mean residence time and model strcutures, two-box
models with isotope time series, 3-box models and
use of isotope tracers as soft data - Day 4
- Field Trip to Hydrohill or nearby research site