Title: Coral/algal Reefs III
1Coral/algal Reefs III
2Utilitarian justification for reef conservation
- Therapeutic compounds from marine species
- Anti-virals from sponges, seagrass
- Anti-tumor compounds from tunicate, dogfish,
bryozoan, sea hares, cyanobacteria, sponge - Compounds to promote bone grafts from stony
corals - Tourism
- Food
- Impact on global climate, carbon exchange
- Models for scientific study
3Processes important in reef dynamics what
maintains the reef structure?
- Symbiotic mutualism (and dissolution of
associations) - Competition
- Predation and grazing
- Disturbance recovery
4Questions
- Are symbiotic relationships increasingly
disrupted? - What are the consequences?
- How are organisms linked through symbiosis?
- Are changes reversible?
5Coral bleaching (Hoegh-Guldberg)
6Coral bleaching dissolution of symbiosis
- zooxanthellae expelled from tissue
- polyp can persist for a while
- new associations can be formed
- responses to stresses
7A general introduction to symbiosis
- De Bary (1850s) The living together of
different species for an extended period of
time. - Proximity, not outcomes, define symbiosis
- Variation in characterizing some associations,
e.g., pollination
8Symbiosis has many dimensions
- Form of physical association
- Types of organisms involved
- Nature of the exchange or influence
- Outcomes of the interaction (, 0, -)
- Degree of dependence
- Evolutionary derivation of the association
9Physical nature of the association
- Close proximity, but physically independent
- External contact
- Internal
10What taxa are associated?
- Algae-invertebrate
- Among animals
- Bacteria/archaea - animals
11What is exchanged?
Capability Donor Recipient
photosynthesis algae, bacteria protists, inverts
chemosynthesis bacteria invertebrates
added nutrients bacteria many animals
methanogenesis bacteria, protists anaerobic protists
cellulose digestion bacteria, protists herbivores (terrest.)
luminescence Vibrio, Photobact. molluscs, fish
protection cnidaria fish
12What are the outcomes of symbiotic associations?
- 0
-
0 amensalism commensal
parasitism mutualism
13Outcomes nutrient exchange
- What is the evidence for exchange with
endosymbiotic dinoflagellates? - Experiment remove zooxanthellae
- ammonium content of polyp rises
- For Tridacna clams
- experimentally enrich with ammonium
- algal symbiont increases in density
14What is the degree of dependence?
- Facultative
- Obligate (often has very specialized morphology
and life history) - Symmetry is not necessarily found
15What is the evolutionary origin of the
association?
- Parasite-host may evolve to be mutualistic
- Predator-prey (coral/dinoflagellate)
- Close proximity may lead to coevolved relationship
16How can we evaluate importance?
- Removal experiments, e.g., cleaner fish
- Alter background conditions Chlorella/Hydra
experiment
17Bleaching occurs with high SST
18How does heat ( light) disrupt mutualism?
- Symbiodinium is damaged by oxidative stress
19Coral Responses
- Polyp responds immunologically
- Apoptosis autophagy
- Zooxanthellae can be expelled
- Polyp switches to heterotrophy
- This is a short-term strategy
20Sensitivity to SST varies
- Among genotypes of Symbiodinium
- Among colonies within coral species
- Between different coral species
- Geographically for the same coral species
21Variation in Florida Keys corals, 2005
22Brandt, M. E. 2009. The effect of species and
colony size on the bleaching response of
reef-building corals in the Florida Keys during
the 2005 mass bleaching event. Coral Reefs
28911-924.
- Background
- Summer fall, 2005 high SST in ne Caribbean
- Mass bleaching documented
- Methods
- Monitor corals for 191 colonies in permanent
quadrats
23Bleaching was correlated with heating
24Bleaching prevalence varied among spp
25Bleaching incidence varied with colony size
26Why and whats next?
- Symbiont clades vary genetically
- Corals can switch
- Symbiodinium communities can vary across
environmental gradients - Degree of flexibility is debated
- Hosts (corals) also vary
- Different fluorescent proteins for protection
- Different abilities in heterotrophy
- Coral structure affects the light environment
27Competitive dynamics
- Exploitation competition (for light)
- Upright, branching corals can shade massive
corals - Encrusting algae can spread over corals
- Interference competition (for space)
- External digestion by some corals
- Sweeper tentacles for some species
- Hierarchy of competitive dominance
- Algae easily overgrow most corals
- Among corals Pocillopora is nastiest
28Dynamics of predation on coral reef species
- Coral-feeding fish are present but usually not
devastating - Territorial damselfish create safe zones (up to
60 of surface area) - Coral-feeders have their own predators
- Starfish, such as Crown-of-Thorns can be
problematic - Population outbreaks can damage living corals
29Dynamics of grazing on algal reef species
- Urchins are major consumers (e.g., Diadema
antillarum) - Grazing by herbivorous fish can be specialized on
algae (more impact than fish feeding on corals) - Grazing can suppress competitively dominant algae
- Indirect effects can become important