MSc. Student: RAMONA STAN - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MSc. Student: RAMONA STAN

Description:

academy of economic studies bucharest doctoral school of finance and banking (dofin) dissertation paper monetary conditions index (mci) as a summative information ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: bv48
Category:
Tags: ramona | stan | canada | msc | roots | student

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MSc. Student: RAMONA STAN


1
ACADEMY OF ECONOMIC STUDIES BUCHARESTDOCTORAL
SCHOOL OF FINANCE AND BANKING (DOFIN)
Dissertation paper
  • MONETARY CONDITIONS INDEX (MCI)
  • AS A SUMMATIVE INFORMATION TOOL FOR
    CHARACTERIZING
  • THE MONETARY POLICY STANCE IN ROMANIA (1997
    2005)

BUCHAREST, JULY 2006
2

CONTENTS
  • Objectives
  • What is the Monetary Conditions Index?
  • Theoretic approach
  • Econometric estimation
  • Results
  • Conclusions
  • Bibliography

3
1. OBJECTIVES
  • MCI relevant information tool for
    characterizing the monetary policy stance in
    Romania between 1997-2005
  • Would be worthwhile use a MCI for a better
    representation of monetary policy stance?
  • Do indeed short-term interest rate and exchange
    rate directly influence both stability of the
    prices and aggregate demand?
  • Controlled floating of the exchange rate
  • To which extent tight control exercised by the
    National Bank of Romania (NBR) over the national
    currency depreciation rate influenced stability
    of the prices and real economic growth?
  • Assessment of credibility and increased
    independency of NBR
  • Is inflation rates slow yet continuous decrease
    to be credited only to NBRs quantitative
    approach with exchange rate constraints?
  • What is the real place of the short-term
    interest rate within the monetary policy choices,
    considering it has been used only on short
    periods as operational target?

4
1. OBJECTIVES
Why this historical recourse on monetary policy
choices?
  • 1997
    2005
  • If MCI relevant indicator ? significant
    indication on the success of the monetary policy
    ? better measurement of credibility and
    independency of the National Bank essential
    presumptions on which direct inflation targeting
    is based upon
  • Intuitively higher relative influence of the
    exchange rate both over the prices and aggregate
    demand ? if proved ? clearly better
    representation in the future of the monetary
    policy stance by means of MCI
  • Short-term interest rate inflation rate
    paradox
  • Monetary policy choices throughout the analysis
    period
  • Maastricht convergence criterion to be achieved
  • Less powerful instrument? ? to be accounted for
    in the future

monetary base targeting
direct inflation targeting
5

2. WHAT IS THE MONETARY CONDITIONS INDEX (MCI)?
MCI weighted sum of modifications in the
short-term interest rate and exchange
rate relative to some arbitrary date.
Basic assumption Monetary policy directly
influences inflation through short-term interest
rate and exchange rate.
Appealing operational target for monetary
policy (Ericsson et al., 1997)
Influence over aggregate demand
Controlling for exogenous shocks

Bank of Canada the pioneer in constructing
and using MCI as operational target. MCI used
either as operational target (New Zeeland) or
summative information tool (Norway, Sweden) by
Central Banks. MCI constructed for
international comparisons (IMF, Goldman Sachs, JP
Morgan).
6
2. WHAT IS THE MONETARY CONDITIONS INDEX (MCI)?
  • MCI can be used as
  • Summative information tool
  • Operational target
  • Monetary policy rule
  • Relevance directly depending on the choose of
    underlying model from
  • which the weights are estimated
  • Nominal versus Real MCI
  • Secondary objective
  • Base period closely to the long-run equilibrium
    relationship
  • Econometric estimation
  • Underlying model
  • Choice of the variables
  • Cointegration
  • Stability of the coefficients
  • Weak exogeneity
  • White noise residuals

.
7
2. WHAT IS THE MONETARY CONDITIONS INDEX (MCI)?
  • MCI as a summative information tool
  • Disadvantages/Limitations
  • Relative stance of the monetary policy as
    compared to an arbitrarily chosen base period
  • Voluntarily generalizing approach regarding
    transmission mechanism into the real economy
  • Not a fundamental measure of monetary conditions,
    if nothing else, because neither MCI nor
    short-term interest are nominal anchors of the
    system
  • Controlling for validity of hypothesis in
    econometric estimations ?
  • Aggregation problem

other variables insignificant in characterizing
monetary policy stance particular exchange rate
out of many others foreign currencies basket ?
weights estimated from bilateral trade
statistics particular short-term interest rate ?
not accounting for the long-term interest rate
contribution to monetary policy choices
8

3. THEORETIC APPROACH
UNDERLYING MODEL Aggregate demand equation
?y F(?R, ?e, ) Aggregate Phillips equation ?p
F(y-y, ?e, ) where ?y real growth rate
of GDP y-y output gap ?p inflation
rate ?R change in real interest rate ?e
change real exchange rate   and lower cases
express logarithm. The suspension points
replace the variables that are not representative
for monetary policy, thus through which the
influence of taxation and fiscal policy is
transmitted. The interest rate influences
inflation via the real GDP and thus linking the
two equations determines an extremely simplified
model, the so-called reduced-form model ? Bank
of Canadas inspiration for the construction of
MCI
9

3. THEORETIC APPROACH
(0)
Let
Where is the real output
gap y and e logarithm rtf - external interest
rate (exogenous)
(1) (2) (3)
Conditional expectations at t1
(7)
(8)
Substituting in (6) and identifying coefficients
10
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
  • Underlying model
  • In practice, most Central Banks which constructed
    and used MCI have estimated the coefficients only
    from the aggregate demand equation and only in a
    less formal approach, mostly for benchmarking
    purposes, from the prices equation.
  • aggregate demand equation
  • ! prices equation ? first paradox short-term
    interest rate actual place in
  • the monetary policy choices
  • MCI relevant ?
  • Estimation period 1997-2005
  • Base period 2002 (neutral level)

11

4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
  • Choice of variables
  • short-term interest rate BUBOR3M (3
    months-active interest rate)
  • high volatility of the overnight market
  • non-governmental credit high increase (owed also
    to facilities)
  • similar trend of deposit-taking and
    deposit-placing interest rates
  • exchange rate composite index including Euro
    and US Dollar
  • reference foreign currency ? USD (until 2001) ?
    EUR
  • compromise determined by short data series
  • following the footsteps of NBR and IMF ?
    bilateral trade data
  • BASKET 60 EUR 40 USD (1997-2003)
  • 75 EUR 25 USD (2004-2005)
  • prices index Consumer Prices Index (CPI) vs.
    Producer Prices Index (PPI)
  • intimate relationship between exchange rate and
    PPI ? inflation rate
  • final consumption ? 63 of GDP

12
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
Notations bb3m_n annualized nominal interest
rate BUBOR 3M bb3m_r annualized real interest
rate BUBOR3M (Fisher formula) cpi consumer
prices index, fixed base (first quarter
1997) infl_rate inflation rate, fixed base
(first quarter 1997) infl_rate_an annualized
inflation rate, fixed base (first quarter
1997) basket_n/basket_r nominal/real exchange
rate RON/BASKET gdp_n_sa nominal GDP
(de-seasonalized series) gdp_r_sa real GDP
(de-seasonalized series) defl GDP deflator,
fixed base (first quarter 1997)  

All variables expressed in logarithm have been
denoted as l_variable name (with the first
difference d_l_variable name). Tools Excel
(basic calculations), Eviews 4.1.
13
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
TESTING FOR INTEGRATION ORDER
  • all nominal variables integrated of I(1)
  • real GDP ? I(1)
  • real exchange rate ? I(1)
  • real interest rate ? I(0)
  • Nominal MCI ? VEC model
  • Real MCI ? alternative VAR model

14
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
  • Nominal MCI ? VEC model
  • EC(E,1) 2 2 4 4 L_GDP_N_SA BB3M_N L_BASKET_N
  • cointegration test ? (5) intercept and trend in
    CE deterministic trend in VAR
  • adjustment speed ? -0.837
  • stability of the coefficients ? roots of
    characteristic polynomial lt 0.8795
  • weak exogeneity ? A(2,1)0, A(3,1)0,
    accumulated probability 0.1211
  • residual tests
  • no serial correlation (12 lags tested)
  • normality (p-value 0.1093 to Jarque-Bera)
  • homoschedasticity (0.2373 to Chi-sq)

15
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
Estimation of the weights
  • Accumulated response over a year
  • accounts for weak exogeneity
  • NBRs projections do not go further that one
    year time horizon
  • Period L_GDP_N_SA BB3M_N L_BASKET_N
  • 1 0.015094 -0.006521 -0.003309
  • 2 0.020505 -0.013666 0.001235
  • 3 0.022820 -0.014561 0.012770
  • 4 0.023901 -0.016247 0.025115
  • Generalized Impulse

16
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
  • Real MCI ? VAR model
  • LS 1 2 D_L_GDP_R_SA BB3M_R D_L_BASKET_R
    _at_ C
  • acceptable compromise, provided VAR is stable
    and the other hypothesis are tested.
  • quasi-elasticity of GDP to the changes of the
    exchange rate
  • how GDP changes if short-term interest rate
    changes by one percentage point?
  • Controlling for relevancy of the model
  • cointegration test (performed for the levels of
    the data) ? (1) / (5)
  • stability of the coefficients ? roots of
    characteristic polynomial lt 0.8762
  • weak exogeneity ? hypothesis rejected for the
    long-run equilibrium relationship
  • residual tests
  • no serial correlation (12 lags tested)
  • normality (p-value 0.1983 to Jarque-Bera)
  • homoschedasticity (p-value 0.0368 to Chi-sq)

17
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
Estimation of the weights
Period D_L_GDP_R_SA BB3M_R D_L_BASKET_R
1 0.021869 0.001525 0.002641
(0.00269) (0.00380) (0.00379) 2
0.014706 -0.001073 0.002787
(0.00435) (0.00458) (0.00466) 3
0.017028 -0.007088 0.009022
(0.00478) (0.00531) (0.00587) 4
0.017572 -0.006921 0.010883 (0.00529)
(0.00677) (0.00693) Generalized
Impulse Standard Errors Analytic
18
4. ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION
Controlled floating ? direct influence over the
aggregate demand?
LS 1 2 4 4 L_GDP_N_SA D_L_BASKET_N BB3M_N _at_ C
  • Controlling for relevancy of the model
  • cointegration test
  • stability of the coefficients ? one root of
    characteristic polynomial gt 0.97 ?!
  • weak exogeneity ? hypothesis rejected
  • residual tests
  • no serial correlation (12 lags tested) ? at lag
    4 (p-value 0.0597)
  • normality (p-value 0.0781 to Jarque-Bera)
  • homoschedasticity (p-value 0.5726 to Chi-sq)

19
5. RESULTS
Notations MCI_2002_RFREE_BB3M ? Real
MCI MCI_2002_NFREE_BB3M ? Nominal
MCI MCI_2002_GDP2002_N_BB3M ? Nominal MCI
(controlled floating)
20
5. RESULTS
  • Nominal MCI ? ease of monetary conditions
  • Real MCI ? tightening of monetary conditions

?
  • high inflation rate throughout the period
  • controlled floating ? appreciation in real terms
    of the
  • national currency

2004-2005 preparation for direct inflation
targeting ease of control exercised over the
exchange rate appreciation both in real and
nominal terms Tighter than intended monetary
conditions !
1997-1999 difficult times for Romania three
years of real negative growth of GDP peaks of
foreign debt service almost financial crisis
in 1999
21
5. RESULTS
Positive signal regarding NBR credibility and
independency
  • fairly accurate representation of monetary
    policy success in controlling stability of the
    prices ? after 2002
  • high minimum mandatory reserves ? allowed for
    decrease of the interest rate
  • other external shocks to the inflation

22
6. CONCLUSIONS
  • the relative influence of the exchange rate and
    short-term interest rate
  • 1.551 (1.571 in real terms)
  • SUCCESS OF DIRECT INFLATION TARGETING ? MCIs
    LESSONS
  • lower power of the short-term interest rate to
    induce changes of aggregate demand
  • matter of concern for future monetary policy
    choices
  • proven importance of the exchange rate
    (stability of the prices, economic growth)
  • better measurement of monetary conditions with
    MCI
  • need to pay attention still for the monetary
    base growth rate
  • motivation of quantitative approach (taking also
    into account real facts)

23
6. CONCLUSIONS
  • LIMITATIONS OF MCI
  • interest rate inflation paradox ? MCI might
    not be a relevant indicator of the monetary
    policy stance
  • need to construct an alternative MCI including
    all monetary variables of importance in achieving
    final inflation target
  • relevancy of coefficients
  • short time series (Bank of Canada calculations
    on MCI cover 1980-2006!!)
  • relative importance of the shocks induced to
    aggregate demand (based on the impulse-response
    functions) are acceptable to the limit
  • aggregation problem ? the way the basket was
    constructed

24
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Balázs Égert, László Halpern (2005), Equilibrium
Exchange Rates in Central and Eastern Europe A
Meta-Regression Analysis, William Davidson
Institute Working Paper no. 769 Batini,
Nicoletta. Turnbull, Kenny (2000) Monetary
Conditions Indices for the UK A Survey.,
External MPC Unit Discussion Paper No. 1 Bank
of England Benoit, Anne (2000), Indicators of
Monetary policy orientation Monetary conditions
(MCI) and the Taylor rule, Erste Bank. Botel,
Cezar (2002), Determinants of inflation in
Romania. June 1997 August 2001. Analysis based
on Structural VAR, National Bank of Romania
(Studies Series, no. 11. June 2002) Coetzee, C.E.
(2001), Monetary Conditions and stock returns a
South African case study De Wet, W. (2002),
Coping with the Inflation and Exchange Rate
Shocks in the South African Economy, The South
African Journal of Economics, 70(1)78-94 Eika,
K.H., N.R. Erricsson si R. Nymoen (1996),
Hazards in Implementing a Monetary Conditions
Index, Federal Reserve System IFD Paper No.
568. Ericsson, Neil R., Jansen, Eilev S.,
Kerbeshian, Neva A., Nymoen, Ragnar. (1997),
Understanding a Monetary Conditions Index,
Federal Reserve System. Freedman, Charles (1994),
The Use of indicators and of Monetary Conditions
Index in Canada, Policy Issues and Country
Experience, 458-476, IMF, Washington ,
D.C. Freedman, Charles (1995), The Role of
monetary conditions and the monetary conditions
index in the conduct of policy., Excerpts from
remarks made to the Conference on International
Developments and Economic Outlook for Canada.
Guender Alfred V. Troy D. Matheson. (1997),
Design Flaws in the Construction of Monetary
Conditions Indices A cautionary note.,
Department of Economics University of Canterbury
New Zeeland. Kesrizeli, M., Kokcaker, I. (1999),
Monetary Conditions Index A monetary Policy
Indicator for Turkey, Discussion Paper No. 9908,
The Central Bank Of The Republic of Turkey.
NBR Policy Regulations and Investments in
Romania, presentation made by the Deputy
Governor of NBR at the British-Romanian Chamber
of Commerce Business Breakfast (Bucharest, April
2005), www.bnro.ro  Medium term objectives
of the monetary policy and exchange rate,
presentation made by the Governor of NBR,
Pre-Ascension Economic Program, Ed.2005,
www.bnro.ro   International Monetary Fund
(FMI). Romania, Selected Issues. www.imf.ofg  
Romanian National Institute of Statistics (INSS),
data series, press releases. www.insse.ro
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com