Evercare Quality Improvement Awards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Evercare Quality Improvement Awards

Description:

Evercare Quality Improvement Awards James Collins, M.D. Julie Hayes, R.N. Randy Muenzner * * * * Faculty Disclosures: Dr. Collins Medical Director, Evercare Pfizer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: amdafound
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evercare Quality Improvement Awards


1
Evercare Quality Improvement Awards
  • James Collins, M.D.
  • Julie Hayes, R.N.
  • Randy Muenzner

2
Faculty Disclosures
  • Dr. Collins
  • Medical Director, Evercare
  • Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Speakers Bureau
  • Eisai Pharmaceuticals Speakers Bureau

3
Learning Objectives
  • By the end of the session, participants will be
    able to
  • Understand the need for improved End of Life
    practices in Long Term Care Facilities
  • Identify barriers to End of Life Care
  • Identify end stage disease indicators
  • Understand how the Modified Flacker Mortality
    tool can be incorporated into existing facility
    practices

4
Facility Demographics
  • Elderwood Healthcare at Maplewood
  • Cheektowaga, NY
  • 160 Beds (138 long term/22 subacute)
  • Private Owner

5
Palliative Care Process Improvement
  • Problem
  • Recognition of terminal status for residents with
    chronic illness occurring late in disease
    process.
  • Little or no time for families/residents to make
    informed decisions.
  • Little or no time for staff to plan or implement
    quality palliative interventions.
  • Poor outcomes.

6
Modified Flacker Mortality Scale
  • Objectives
  • Provide nurses/physicians with an accurate,
    objective tool to monitor progression of disease
    process.
  • Provide nurses/physicians and families with time
    to review residents status, advanced directives
    and options for treatment.

7
End Stage Disease Indicators
  • Resident characteristics assessed on Flacker
    Mortality Scale
  • - Functional ability (ADL Score)
  • - Weight Loss
  • - Shortness of Breath
  • -Swallowing Problems
  • - Sex (Male at higher risk)
  • - CHF
  • - Age
  • Found in our study to be an early sign of
    decline.

8
Project Timeline
  • Study began October 2005
  • Funded by Community Health Foundation as a
    collaborative endeavor with Hospice of WNY and
    Elderwood Healthcare at Maplewood.
  • Began on one unit with 40 residents
  • Flacker Tool
  • Later modified to exclude residents with advance
    directives for aggressive care. Subsequently
    identified as the Modified Flacker Tool.
  • Study ended December 2006
  • -Completion of Modified Flacker assessments
    to all long term care residents.
  • January 2008
  • Policy was implemented in all Elderwood Senior
    Care facilities covering over 1300 LTC residents.

9
QI Planning Implementation
  • Leadership
  • Dr. James Collins, Medical Director
  • Julie Hayes, Assistant Director of Nursing
  • Informal weekly meetings from 10/05 to 12/06
  • Facility wide implementation 1/07
  • (4) Unit Managers
  • MDS Coordinators
  • 30 minutes weekly per nurse manager
  • Communication
  • Informal introduction to interdisciplinary staff
    over a period of time.

10
Modified Flacker Assessment
  • How was study conducted?
  • - Formatted Modified Flacker tool into User
    Defined Assessment Software.
  • Issues encountered how they were overcome
  • - Staff resistant to change. Residents
    identified by the tool didnt look like the type
    of End of Life Resident with whom staff were
    familiar.

11
Tools Used to Affect Change
  • Tools used
  • Information obtained from last MDS completed.
  • Assessment schedule follows MDS cycle.
  • Tools created
  • Modified Flacker Form

12
Facility Expenses
  • No significant expenses incurred.
  • After initial education and implementation
    individual nursing time to complete weekly
    assessments is approximately 15 minutes.
  • No additional staff needed.

13
Outcomes
  • Resident Outcomes
  • Facilitates residents to prioritize needs and
    wishes.
  • Advanced directives established.
  • Resident family directed plans of care.
  • Residents family emotionally prepared.
  • Regulatory Outcomes
  • Care plans are accurately prioritized.

14
Outcomes
  • Improved Quality of Service
  • Priority is determined by the residents
    preferences with proper education of possible
    outcomes.
  • More effective Pain Management.
  • Proactive Advance Care Planning eliminates futile
    and inappropriate treatments.
  • Spiritual and Emotional needs of both resident
    and families are identified and addressed by the
    interdisciplinary team including the Chaplain.

15
Outcomes
  • Enhance Staff Performance
  • Early identification of the terminally ill
    resident enables staff to gain more insight into
    the special needs of the resident and family.
  • Improved quality of life at the end of life has
    enhanced job satisfaction.
  • Effect on Staffs every day routine work
  • Created a culture within the building to allow
    for all involved to be comfortable with the dying
    process.

16
Outcomes
  • Improved organization management structure
    systems
  • Modified Flacker Tool is completed at the same
    time an MDS is completed. Staff member
    experiences no additional work load.
  • Clear and timely approach to establishing a
    Palliative Plan of Care.
  • When implementing you are only establishing a
    measurement tool to identify when a Palliative
    Plan of Care should be activated.
  • No change in current Palliative Plan of Care nor
    staffing needs.

17
Outcomes
  • Financial Outcomes
  • Revenue neutral for the facility.
  • Cost savings to the health care industry by
    reduction in unwanted hospitalizations.

18
Closing Thoughts
  • What is the feasibility that this project could
    be implemented at other facilities?
  • Feasibility is simple. Has been implemented in 9
    more facilities.
  • Lessons Learned
  • How easily culture change occurred when this
    process was implemented. There was buy in from
    staff, residents and families.
  • Helpful Tips/Insights
  • One individual can impact an entire facility when
    they bring forth an idea whose time is come.
  • Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com