48x48 Poster Template - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

48x48 Poster Template

Description:

Non-authorized printing of this poster template by any commercial printing service other than PosterPresentations.com is strictly prohibited. Non-profit educational ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: A246
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 48x48 Poster Template


1
Lead Contaminated Superfund Sites Sam
Johnson Loyola University Chicago
OPTIONALLOGO HERE
Abstract
The Coeur dAlene Superfund Site
Sites within the United States
The Superfund program was created in 1980 in
response to the Love canal Disaster. The program
was implemented during the Regan administration
and was regulated and enforced by the
Environmental Protection Agency. The main goals
of the program were to identify contaminated
sites, determine the responsible parties, and to
finance the cost of cleanup when the responsible
parties are unknown or unable. Most of the
largest superfund sites are areas where mining
activity was previously high. The former presence
of lead mines in particular pose a very
significant threat to the environment, as the
toxic nature of lead contamination has left a
very detrimental impact in their wake. Since its
formation, the superfund program has drawn much
criticism regarding its effectiveness as a viable
government program. The programs reputation has
been marred by ineffectiveness and problems in
administration. Its critics view it as a largely
bureaucratic process that consumes millions of
dollars each year. Yet, the superfund program has
been an essential concept in the damage control
measures undertaken since the close of many
prominent lead mines.
Below is a map of current superfund sites in the
United States. At present, there are 1,240 sites
listed on the Superfund National Priority List.
  • Coeur dAlene, Idaho is the former site of
    several major lead mines, as well as some
    currently active mines. It has been historically
    known for its abundance of lead and silver and
    has produced very large quantities of each since
    mining began in the late 1800s. The major area
    of mining activity is known as the Bunker Hill
    region.
  • Due to the large amounts of mining, the area has
    given off much pollution that has seeped into the
    Coeur dAlene river valley. An estimated 121
    million tons of metals-enriched mine tailings
    were produced by the mines, with about 62 million
    tons going into the river basins streams.
  • The topography of the region is characterized by
    many rivers, lakes, streams, and wetlands.
    Thousands of acres in the region have been
    contaminated with lead from the mining
    operations. This has had a very detrimental
    impact upon the waterfowl that inhabit the
    region. An estimated 18,000 acres contain lead
    levels that are toxic to waterfowl and other
    animals.
  • In the 1970s blood lead levels in children that
    lived in areas around the bunker hill site were
    elevated. Since the site has closed, blood lead
    levels are now approaching that of same-age
    children in the general U.S. population.
  • The site was placed on the National Priority List
    in 1983. It initially consisted of a 21 square
    mile box around the original smelting site. In
    1998, the EPA began placing superfund
    requirements outside of the box, expanding the
    project site to 1500 square miles. The solution
    to the increased project area was an investment
    of 395 million over a thirty year period.
  • Coeur dAlene poses one of the most significant
    challenges to superfund cleanup. The vast size of
    the area and amount of hazardous material prevent
    traditional cleanup approaches, such as capping
    and removal, from being used. Parts of the
    community infrastructure are built on top and out
    of mining waste. The site encompasses thousands
    of people across several political jurisdictions
    and has proven to be a very complex, extensive,
    and expensive site to cleanup. In addition, the
    responsible parties are either unable or
    unwilling to pay for the remaining cleanup costs.

Superfund Overview
  • - The superfund program was created by the
    government in response to what is known as the
  • Love Canal incident, which consisted of the
    discovery of a large quantity of toxic waste
  • beneath the Love Canal neighborhood in Niagra
    Falls, New York. It was created with the
  • passage of the Comprehensive Environmental
    Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
  • (CERCLA).
  • The program was initially headed by Rita Lavelle,
    a former employee of a company
  • responsible for polluting the environment. Her
    administration imposed many industry favorable
  • policies that prevented significant action from
    taking place.
  • In 1986, Lavelle resigned from her position and
    congress passed the Superfund
  • Amendments and Reauthorization Act, which
    increased the budget to 9 billion and allowed
  • for new technologies and studies to be
    implemented.
  • Superfund is provided broad federal authority in
    the clean up of existing or potential
  • hazardous releases. Currently, the number of
    listed superfund sites is 1,240, with 317 sites
  • recently de-listed and 61 proposed sites.
  • The cost of cleanup is usually deferred on to the
    company responsible for the pollution.

The Implementation of Adaptive Management
  • Adaptive management refers to a six-step process
    for defining and implementing environmental
    management actions in situations of high
    uncertainty regarding the outcome. The process
    consists of these six steps
  • 1) Assessing the Problem This consists of
    determining the scope of the problem and defining
    measurable management objectives as well as
    potential management actions. Key uncertainties
    are also defined in regards to alternate
    management actions.
  • 2) Designing a Management Plan Different types
    of management actions are evaluated in terms of
    their potential effectiveness. A monitoring
    protocol is also developed to specify the types
    and quantities of baseline data. Indicator values
    that may specify a change in management
    actions/objectives are also defined.
  • 3) Implementing the Plan The management plan is
    implemented as specified. Any circumstance that
    requires that the plan deviate from its intended
    course must be identified and understood by all
    stakeholders.
  • 4) Monitoring Implementation monitoring must
    include three parts monitoring for compliance,
    monitoring for effectiveness, and monitoring to
    validate the model parameters and relationships.
  • 5) Evaluating results obtained from monitoring A
    comparison between the evaluations drawn from
    monitoring are compared with those forecasted in
    step one.
  • 6) Adjusting the Management Plan Models involved
    in the initial forecast should be updated and the
    objectives of management should possibly be
    reviewed and revised as necessary.

Restoring Bunker Hill
  • One of the primary ways in which to prevent the
    further spread of contaminants throughout the
    Coeur dAlene river is through ecological
    restoration.
  • Recently, there has been a major project
    involving the revegetation of the soils.
    Revegetation involves using specially designed
    residuals such as biosolids and wood ash in order
    to promote the growth of vegetative ground cover.
  • Phytotoxicity was caused by high concentrations
    of trace metals, low pH, low soil nutrients and
    organic matter, and poor soil physical
    properties. Wood ash contains much calcium
    carbonate, which can resolve soil acidity.
    Biosolids can limit metal toxicity and serve as a
    slow release nutrient source. They can also
    provide organic matter that improves soil tilth.
    The applications of these biosolids and wood ash
    can remedy these problems in the subsoil and
    support vegetative growth.
  • The results of this program were highly
    successful. The researchers were able to
    demonstrate that revegetation can occur reliably
    over the majority of the site area and the plants
    that were grown were very similar in metal
    content to that of plants grown in uncontaminated
    soil.

References
-Barnthouse, L.W., Brierly, C.L., Clark, E.H.,
Ward, C.H. (2007). Superfund and Mining
Megasites. Environmental Science Technology (8)
41. 2667-2672. -Moore, J.W., Nguyen, K.T.,
Rotstein, P.H. (1997). Successful Soil
Stabilization at a Lead Contaminated Superfund
Site. Hazardous Industrial Wastes (29). 165-173.
-Rosen, J.F. (2003). A Critical Evaluation of
Public Health Programs at the Bunker Hill
Superfund Site. Science of the Total Environment
(1-2) 303. 15-23. -Sheldrake, S., Stifelman, M.
(2003). A Case Study of Lead Contamination
Cleanup Effectiveness at Bunker Hill. Science of
the Total Environment (1-2) 303. 105-123.
Hells Half-Acre in Galena, Kansas. Dec. 2006
Two photographs taken from the Bunker Hill site
during the revegetation project.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com