Title: GRC
1GRC 07 Highlights
2New Observations and Model Approaches for
Addressing Key Cloud-Precipitation-Climate
Questions
- H2O feedback or -?
- Observations from AIRS,MSU,ERBE/CERES
- Satellite data sources reveal feedback
- Is the hydrological cycle slowing down?
- Yes changes in radiative heating by clouds is an
important factor in the answer - Processes determining vertical structure of
clouds loom as important - Models predict H2O accumulates at a rate gt
ability to precipitate it out gt slowing of
hydrological cycle
3New Observations and Model Approaches for
Addressing Key Cloud-Precipitation-Climate
Questions
- How do aerosols affect the hydrological cycle?
- Arctic warming in summer but cooling in winter
- Long-range transport of SO2 into Arctic
- H2SO4 coating observed on aerosol
- Dehydration-greenhouse feedback
4Cloud Occurrence, Cloud Overlap and Cloud
Microphysics from the First Year of CloudSat and
CALIPSO
- 2006-06 to 2007-03
- CloudSat/CALIPSO Cloud Cover 0.66
- MODIS Clouds Cover 0.63
- Ubiquitous low clouds over southern ocean
- Continents stand out as minima in low cloud cover
- Thickest clouds in western Pacific ( 4 km)
- Large fraction of multilayer clouds ( 40-45)
over tropics
5Cloud Occurrence, Cloud Overlap and Cloud
Microphysics from the First Year of CloudSat and
CALIPSO
- Multilayer clouds mostly cirrus over
stratocumulus (high-based over low-based) - In general
- Atmospheric column contains multiple cloud layers
- Composed of two phases of H2O
- Size distributions that are at least bimodal
- Occur at night more than half the time
- Going beyond occurrence to characterize
properties needs more work
6Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems
- Cloud Feedbacks remain largest source of
uncertainty IPCC, 2007 - (Charney et al., 1979 said same thing!)
- Problem is multiple scales
- Cloud-scale processes relatively well understood
- Translation to global scales requires very
powerful computer - Hence cloud parameterizations
- No GCM has physical parameterization of
convection
7Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems
- Worlds first GCRM
- 3.5 km cell size
- Top at 40 km
- 54 layers
- 15-second time step
- 10 simulated days per day on half of Earth
simulator (2560 CPUs) - Multiscale Modeling Framework (MMF)
- Hundreds of times more expensive than GCM
- Hundreds of times less expensive than GCRM
8Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems
- GCRMs and MMFs make it possible for cloud
observers and GCM developers to compare apples
with apples - When something doesnt work, we can look inside
to see how simulation compares with observations - Focused efforts under way
- To develop improved parameterizations for CRMs
- To develop radically improved second generation
MMF
9Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments
and Platforms What Questions can be Answered by
Combining Different Techniques?
- Problem 1 Measurements of aerosol radiative
forcing of climate - Redemann et al., JGR, 2006
- Ames Airborne Tracking Sunphotometer (AATS) and
Solar Spectral Flux Radiometer (SSFR) - Plots of net spectral irradiance as function of
AOD - Slope gives aerosol radiative forcing efficiency
- Visible wavelength range -45.8 Wm-2 /- 13.1
Wm-2 - Spread probably due to wide range of aerosol
types
10Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments
and Platforms What Questions can be Answered by
Combining Different Techniques?
- Problem 2 Measurements of anthropogenic fraction
of aerosol radiative forcing of climate - Anderson et al., JGR, 110, 2005
- Natural and anthropogenic aerosols distinguished
using fine mode fraction (FMF) of optical depth - Combination of airborne aerosol in-situ
measurements (I) and airborne sunphotometry (SP)
to establish relationship b/w sub-micron fraction
(SMF) of AOD and Angstrom exponent (A) - MODIS FMF has systematic high-bias of 0.2
compared to SMF from I/SP - Definition differences b/w SMF and FMF
- Detector problems
- Assumption of spherical shape for dust
- A might be better retrieval product
- Rigorous validation with existing sun photometer
measurements
11Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments
and Platforms What Questions can be Answered by
Combining Different Techniques?
- Problem 3 Aerosol remote sensing in the vicinity
of clouds - Wen et al., IEEE Geosci. Rem. Sens. Lett.
- Study of the aerosol-cloud boundary essential
for - Understanding appropriate cloud screening methods
in aerosol remote sensing - Investigating aerosol indirect effect on climate
- Field study of suborbital AOD data near cloud
edges - In 75 of the cases there was an increase of
5-25 in AOD in the closest 2 km near the clouds - MODIS-observed mid-visible reflectances in the
vicinity - Also show an increase with decreasing distance to
cloud edge - May be because of 3-D effects, or increased
aerosol concentration or size near clouds as
indicated by suborbital observations
12Passive Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Aerosols
- Accurate determination of aerosol optical depth
and microphysical properties necessary to
evaluate aerosol radiative forcing - Polarimetry useful because
- It contains more information about microphysics
- Relative (rather than absolute) radiometric
calibration necessary to give highly accurate
aerosol retrievals - Polarized radiances have contributions from
surface and atmosphere - Effects of surface need to be understood
13Passive Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Aerosols
- Ocean reflectance low away from sun glint
- L-M algorithm used to retrieve aerosol
- Polarization of land surfaces generated at
surface interface - Refractive index of natural targets varies little
within typical spectral domains - Surface polarized reflectance spectrally grey
- Measurement at 2250 nm (where aerosol load is
low) used to characterize and correct for surface
effects - Shorter wavelengths used to retrieve aerosol load
and microphysical properties
14Predicting Chemical Weather Improvements Through
Advanced Methods to Integrate Models and
Measurements
- Chemical Transport Models (CTMs) poorly
constrained primarily due to uncertain emission
estimates - Improvements in analysis capability require
integration of models and measurements - Extension of formal data assimilation techniques
to aerosols needed to help reduce uncertainties - Aerosol radiative effects substantially different
when using observations as opposed to
parameterizations (Bates et al., ACP, 2006) - Intensive field experiments (e.g. ICARTT) provide
our best efforts to comprehensively observe a
region
15Aerosol Indirect Effects The Importance of Cloud
Physics and Feedbacks
- Aerosols can influence Earths radiation budget
by - Direct interaction with sunlight direct effect
- Altering cloud radiative properties indirect
effect (AIE) - Useful to divide AIE into two types
- Primary or quasi-instantaneous effects (e.g.
Twomey effect, dispersion effect) - Effects that require understanding of the
systems feedbacks - Twomeys hypothesis (first indirect effect)
- ? aerosol particles ? ? conc of cloud droplets
Nd - For given LWC, greater Nd gt smaller droplets
- ? Nd gt ? total surface area gt clouds reflect
more solar radiation
16Aerosol Indirect Effects The Importance of Cloud
Physics and Feedbacks
- Albrechts hypothesis (second indirect effect)
- ? Nd ? ? precipitation (coalescence efficiency of
cloud droplets ? strongly with droplet size) ? ?
cloud thickness, LWC, coverage ? more reflective
clouds - Model estimates of the two major AIEs
- Pincus and Baker (1994)
- 1st and 2nd AIEs comparable
- GCMs (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005)
- 1st AIE -0.5 to -1.9 Wm-2
- 2nd AIE -0.3 to -1.4 Wm-2
- Relatively limited investigation of factors
controlling relative importance of the two AIEs
17Aerosol Indirect Effects The Importance of Cloud
Physics and Feedbacks
- Relative strength of 2nd AIE largely determined
by balance between - Moistening/cooling due to suppression of
precipitation - Drying/warming due to enhanced entrainment of
overlying air
18How can In-Situ Observations Constrain and
Improve Modeling of Aerosol Indirect Effects?
- AIE one of the most uncertain components of
climate change - Uncertainty originates from complex and
multi-scale nature of aerosol-cloud interactions - Forces climate models to use empirical approaches
- Incorporate as much physics as possible, with
appropriate simplifications - Dynamics updraft velocity, thermodynamics
- Particle characteristics size, concentration,
chemical composition - Cloud processes droplet formation, drizzle
formation, chemistry inside cloud droplets
19How can In-Situ Observations Constrain and
Improve Modeling of Aerosol Indirect Effects?
- Challenges
- Representing cumulative effect of organics on
cloud formation in simple and realistic way - Use in-situ observations to constrain
state-of-the-art droplet parameterizations in GCMs
20Is Arctic Sea-Ice Melting Stimulated by
Aerosol-Cloud-Radiative Interactions?
- Arctic warming at a rate 2 x rest of the world
- Thinning of Arctic sea-ice Lindsay and Zhang, J.
Climate, 2005 - Ice-albedo feedback traditionally thought to be
cause - Garrett and Zhao, Nature, 2006 Ice-infrared
feedback primarily responsible - Between winter and early spring, Arctic
characterized by widespread pollution called
Arctic haze - Polluted air transport from mid-latitude Eurasia
and N America - Because of low precipitation, pollution
accumulates - Increased surface warming from aerosol
modifications to cloud LW emissivity
21Observational Constraints on Climate-Carbon Cycle
Feedbacks
- 11 coupled climate-carbon models used to simulate
21st century climate and CO2 under similar
scenarios - All agree that ? CO2 ? global warming
- However, they disagree in the magnitude
- CO2 increase alone will tend to enhance carbon
storage by both land and ocean - Climate change alone will tend to release land
and ocean carbon to atmosphere
22Observational Constraints on Climate-Carbon Cycle
Feedbacks
- Magnitude of increase in anthropogenic CO2
emissions remaining in the atmosphere uncertain
(8-52 ppmv extra CO2/K of global warming) - Observations can be used to constrain models to
reduce uncertainties - Major uncertainties in land-use emissions