Title: University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business
1University of GlamorganFaculty of Business
SocietyFGM Development DayWednesday 18th July
2012
- The UK Quality Code for Higher Education
- A Brief Guide
- Maldwyn Buckland
- QAA Review Coordinator REO, IQER Access to HE
2The UK Quality Code for Higher Education
- The UK Quality Code for Higher Education (the
Quality Code) is used to assure the standards and
quality of higher education in the UK and gives
higher education providers a shared starting
point for - setting maintaining the academic standards of
their programmes - assuring the quality of learning opportunities
provided to students - It is used by individual higher education
providers to ensure students have a high quality
educational experience - It consists of a series of separate Chapters
grouped into three parts - further information www.qaa.ac.uk/assuringstandar
dsandquality/quality-code.
3What are the key features of the Quality Code?
- the Quality Code sets out the formal Expectations
that all UK higher education providers reviewed
by QAA are required to meet - it is the nationally agreed, definitive point of
reference for all those involved in delivering
higher education programmes - all higher education providers reviewed by QAA
must commit to meeting the Expectations that it
sets out - the Quality Code has three Parts (A, B C) on
standards, quality information - these are broken down into a series of Chapters
which cover different aspects of higher education - each Chapter sets out an Expectation for the
topic and a series of Indicators that reflect
sound practice
4How has the Quality Code been developed?
- the Quality Code replaces the Academic
Infrastructure (AI), the previous set of
reference points developed by QAA in partnership
with the higher education sector - during 2009/10, QAA undertook an evaluation of
the AI to reflect on its use, impact and
effectiveness. Details of the evaluation can be
found at www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/eva
luation10findings - in response to findings, QAA developed proposals
for the new Quality Code which were subject to
public consultation from 14th December 2010 to
1st March 2011. Details about to consultation can
be found at www.qaa.ac.uk/news/consultation/AI - the consultation was supported by four round
table discussion events in January 2011.
Consultation responses can be found at
www.qaa.ac.uk/events/roundTable/Jan11.
5What is the purpose of the Quality Code?
- to assure the academic standards of UK higher
education - to assure the quality of the learning
opportunities offered to students - to promote continuous and systematic improvement
in UK higher education - to ensure that information about UK higher
education is publicly available
6How is the Quality Code used?
- Higher Education providers use the Quality Code
to - help them set and maintain the academic
standards of their programmes and awards - assure and enhance the quality of learning
opportunities - provide information about higher education
- Student representatives Students Unions can
- use the code in discussion with their institution
as it sets out the minimum expectations for the
quality of learning opportunities provided - Reviewers carrying out QAA reviews use the code
as a - benchmark for judging whether an individual
institution meets national expectations for
academic standards and the quality of learning
opportunities
7What are Expectations?
- each Chapter of the Quality Code sets out a
specific Expectation. - these express key matters of principle that the
sector has identified as important for assuring
academic standards and quality - they make clear what UK providers are required to
do, what they expect of themselves and each other
and what students and the public can therefore
expect of all of them - individual providers should be able to
demonstrate they are meeting the Expectations
effectively, through their own management and
organisational processes
8What are indicators?
- each Chapter of the Quality Code sets out a
series of Indicators to help higher education
providers meet the relevant Expectations - these are actions or approaches that higher
education providers have agreed reflect sound
practice - each Indicator is accompanied by explanatory text
which shows why it is important and suggests
possible ways in which it might be addressed and
demonstrated
9Chapters Part ASetting and maintaining
threshold academic standards
- These Chapters cover the issues relevant to the
setting and maintaining of academic standards - A1 The national level
- A2 The subject qualification level
- A3The programme level
- A4 Approval and review
- A5 Externality
- A6 Assessment of achievement of learning outcomes
10Chapters Part B Assuring and enhancing academic
quality
- These Chapters cover the issues relevant to
ensuring that the quality of learning
opportunities meets expectations and is
continually being improved - B1 Programme design and approval
- B2 Admissions
- B3 Learning and Teaching
- B4 Student support, learning resources and
careers education, information, advice guidance - B5 Student engagement
- B6 Assessment of students and accreditation of
prior learning - B7 External examining
- B8 Programme monitoring and review
- B9 Complaints and appeals
11Chapters Part C Information about higher
education provision
- This shorter Part is not subdivided into
Chapters. It addresses how providers make
available information that is fit for purpose,
accessible and trustworthy - Chapter B10 Management of collaborative
arrangements - Dates for consultation
- Cardiff Tuesday 2nd October
Marriott Hotel Cardiff - Belfast Thursday 4th October
Queens University Belfast - Manchester Tuesday 9th October
Mercure Hotel Manchester - London Friday 12th October
Woburn House London - Edinburgh Tuesday 16th October
Apex Hotel Edinburgh - m.buckland_at_qaa.ac.uk
12Factors for success in raising standards in
teaching learning
- QAA defines the standards of high education
provision through a series of indicators
including the new Quality Cod, Subject Benchmark
Statements and the Framework for Higher Education
Qualifications (FHEQ) - This triumvirate exists to ensure parity of the
student experience at all levels confirming
generic abilities regardless of the subject area.
For example HNC students should have basic
problem solving skills, while BE students must
demonstrate analytical skills. Likewise, students
studying the same subject must share a core body
of knowledge, which Subject Benchmarks define - In other words, every programme in the UK must
attain minimum standards, however, there are
standards within those standards
13FHEQ
- The FHEQ states that degree programmes must be at
the current boundaries of an academic discipline - When discussing the raising of standards,
enhancement of higher education must focus on the
enrichment of staff as well as the provision - In order to raise standards one has to
- Raise awareness about the minimum standard
- Enable staff to determine where they are in
relation to that minimum and . - Acknowledge the need for, and facilitate staff in
the constant updating of their specialist subject
knowledge
14Teaching Learning
- For tutors to remain at the current boundaries of
knowledge they must be constantly learning, which
in turn, informs their teaching - In the current climate of the student-driven
market, we must all comprehend the breadth of the
educational process and claim ownership - There is little point in identifying the need for
a programme, writing curriculum, devising
assessment and moderating the grades unless one
owns that process. Therefore to raise standards
in Teaching Learning we must ensure that - 1. staff have a complete and intimate knowledge
of the process of teaching and learning so that
they can - 2. apply their knowledge to their teaching
- 3. encourage staff to become learners as well as
tutors to ensure awareness of the student
experience