Title: Clinical Research on NSV
1Clinical Research on NSV
- Recent Findings
- and
- Programmatic Implications
2Programmatic Implications of Clinical Research
Findings
- New evidence on
- pregnancy rates following vasectomy
- effectiveness of different occlusion methods
- when can men rely on their vasectomy for
contraception - cautery device reuse
3Pregnancy Rates After Vasectomy
Sources Costello et al, Centers for Disease
Control Prevention, unpublished Wang,
Contraception 2002 and Nazerali et al.
Contraception, 2003
4What is the Best Vas Occlusion Technique?
- Recent results based on semen analysis
- Retrospective review
- Clips - 7.1 (103/1453)
- Cautery - 0.09 (1/1165)
- Prospective, non-comparative study
- Ligation excision alone - 11.5 (25/217)
Sources Labrecque et al. J Urol 2002 Barone et
al. J Urol in press, 2003
5Vasectomy Failure and Recanalization Rates
Recanalization based on qualitative assessment by
3 masked reviewers Failure defined as gt 10
million sperm/mL at 12 weeks or later
6When Can Men Rely on Their Vasectomy for
Contraception?
- Ideal is semen analysis to confirm azoospermia
(or severe oligospermia) - Semen analysis unavailable or inaccessible in
many low resource settings - A common recommendation is after 12 weeks or 20
ejaculations
7When Can Men Rely on Their Vasectomy for
Contraception?
azoospermia
lt 3 million / mL
3-20 million/ml.
20 million / mL
Source Barone et al, in press, 2003
8Severe Oligospermia at 12-14 Weeks and 20
Ejaculation After Vasectomy
9Conclusions
- Vasectomy failures may be more common than
generally thought, none the less vasectomy is an
excellent method - Ligation excision without fascial interposition
is an inferior occlusion method - Cautery appears to be better than ligation
excision with fascial interposition - 12 weeks is a better endpoint than 20
ejaculations for when men can rely on their
vasectomy in setting where semen analysis is not
practical