MeTA Kyrgyzstan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

MeTA Kyrgyzstan

Description:

Inadequacy of certain legislation (complication of pharmaceutical inspection, law enforcement pressure on pharmacies) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Inventiv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MeTA Kyrgyzstan


1
MeTA Kyrgyzstan
  • Country Overview
  • Public Sector
  • Civil Society

2
Country overview
  • Mariam Djankorozova
  • MeTA Country coordinator

3
Multi-stakeholder process
  • Situation analysis of multi-stakeholders in the
    Country
  • Organization of MeTA Council in Kyrgyzstan
  • Regular meetings engaging multi-stakeholders
  • Formation of MeTA CSOs Coalition
  • Private sector from remote regions of KG more
    interested in MeTA than central regions
  • CSOs was active in dialogues with private and
    government sectors
  • Procurement and availability of medicines is the
    main issues for CS and private sectors
  • Implementation of CS observers in tenders (Gov
    bodies are inviting)
  • Private sector suggested to implement
    E-procurement system in hospitals

4
Major achievements and successes
  • Common forum for discussion on pharmaceutical
    issues
  • Availed platform for Problem solving on
    significant issues in the sector, including
    WEB-site (has launched, content in the process of
    filling)
  • Conduct inter sectoral collaboration via design
    of activities allowing data gathering and
    information
  • Improved communication and awareness of different
    sectors
  • MoH KG
  • Private sector initiated to organise small active
    group on Legislation issues and regular meetings.
  • Capacity building of the CSO Coalition is
    considered as the major success in Kyrgyzstan

5
Overall challenges
  • Current political situation with constrained
    government management (poor transparency and
    accountability)
  • Private sector involvement limited due to
    inadequate information on how to engage in MeTA
    process
  • How to show the benefit of MeTA to every sector
  • Poor leadership of MeTA Council due to conflict
    of interest (Director of DRA is chairman of MeTA
    Council)
  • Overcoming conflict of Interest and engagement
    between sectors (better understanding of each
    other role of each sector in the country)
  • Active promotion of MeTA was not possible
    because of political situation

6
Lessons Learned
  • Different background of MeTA Council Member
    complicate the dialogue
  • Development of Criteria for management of MeTA
    Council requires wider consideration than
    sectoral interest
  • Engagement of Multi stakeholder is a Process and
    takes time
  • Requires skills to engage and manage the
    different sectors (particularly to listen to the
    other sector and increase awareness)
  • MSP requires good facilitation and these skills
    need to be development and learnt
  • Power in numbers (when we are many we are
    stronger)
  • Benefit is important Private sector wants to be
    involved more active in Legislation issues.
  • Media strategy for promoting MeTA it must be at
    the beginning of process

7
Thank you
  • Mariam Djankorozova
  • MeTA Country coordinator
  • Email mariamkad_at_gmail.com
  • Mobile number 996 555 92 94 12
  • Skype mariamdjan1
  • Website www.metakg.org

8
Public SectorExpertise of current
Legislation
  • Djusupova Djanyl
  • Deputy director of NDRA of KG

9
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • Since gaining independence of KG when the
    pharmaceutical sector privatized the legal
    framework corresponding new function requirements
    in drug provision has been established
  • NDRA KG has been established
  • However, regulatory tools lacked to ensure
    transparency and accountability in the
    pharmaceutical sector if basic legislation was
    available
  • Survey objective
  • Analysis of legislation, with emphasis on
    mechanisms of transparency and accountability,
    including an assessment of the law in practice
    and existing contradictions

10
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • The new policy reforms aimed at improving the
    business environment by removing administrative
    barriers to business and investment has led to
  • A reduction of 30 of licenses and permissions
    for business activities.
  • Changing the system of control and inspection of
    business.
  • Reduction to 30 of the bodies monitoring
    business.
  • A significant impact on regulation of
    pharmaceutical sector
  • According to advisory group of BEI project
    medicines were considered as an ordinary product
    without regard to their characteristics. The
    adoption of some recommendations could lead to
    deregulation in pharmaceutical sector
  • Activities of wholesalers and manufacturers of
    medicines and pharmacies (except pharmacies
    produced medicines extempore) is no longer
    licensed
  • MoH standards would be voluntary implemented in
    pharmaceutical sector
  • the declaration of compliance with medicines is
    introducing instead of mandatory certification of
    medicines
  • Unilateral recognition of medicine registration
  • Pharmaceutical Inspection has no rights to have
    unexpected visit , even there are public
    complaints

11
Major milestones
  • META initiated a dialogue with the USAID BEI
    project involving private sector, NGOs,
    government and WHO to prevent an imbalance in the
    regulation of the pharmaceutical sector under an
    authoritarian approach and non-transparency of
    the policy
  • Expert group on legislation analysis conducted
    meetings with representatives of different
    sectors
  • - Public sector MoH, MoF, NDRA
  • - CSOs sector
  • - Private sector
  • Identified issues and contraventions in
    legislation were discussed at the Round Table by
    all parties participated
  • E- group involving all stakeholders was created
    to discuss legislation issues

12
Areas of survey
  • 1. The main normative documents governing the
    drug provision in KG
  • 1.1. Effectiveness of legal documents to ensure
    transparency of drug provision in KG
  • 1.2. Legal and regulatory shortcomings and
    contradictions
  • 2. The patients rights on the drug provision
    and their protection
  • 2.1. Information public support on medicine
    issues
  • 2.2. Services on the drug provision
  • 2.3. The possibility of appeal by patients of
    their rights on the drug provision
  • 3. State regulation
  • 3.1. Regulation of licensing issues concerning
    the drug provision
  • 3.2. Bodies authorized to control the drug
    provision
  • 3.3. The system of state control efficiency and
    drug safety
  • 4. Responsibility for the public health

13
Challenges with legislative features
  • 1. Contradictions in certain normative documents
    including differences in terminology
  • 2. It is necessary to improve the regulatory
    framework (conflict of interests of NDRA and
    exclusion of obsolete rules)
  • 3. Medicines included in the scope of the Law "On
    the basis of technical regulation in the Kyrgyz
    Republic
  • 4. New rules of establishment of regulation
    status may lead to the fact that regulations of
    the drug provision will cease to be binding
  • 5. Inadequacy of certain legislation
    (complication of pharmaceutical inspection, law
    enforcement pressure on pharmacies)
  • 6. The lack of legislative mechanisms to ensure
    transparency and accountability in the
    pharmaceutical sector

14
Challenges with executive features
  • 1. Procurement
  • The inaccessibility of information on procurement
    of medicines, except for procurement announcement
  • Violation of procurement procedures
  • 2. Licensing system
  • No transparency in issue of licenses
  • There is no public information on licensed
    pharmacies
  • Lack of information management system in the
    pharmaceutical sector
  • 3. Disciplinary-executive
  • - Competence of documentation requirement by
    certain control agencies (prosecution or other
    fiscal bodies)

15
Recommendations of Stakeholders (1)
  • Increasing the responsibility of officials
    (administrative, criminal, disciplinary)
  • Obligatory support information of patients
    including information on ADR
  • To introduce standards for the number of
    pharmacies in a particular area To attract the
    local government to monitor the activities of
    pharmacies
  • Promotion of ethic code of pharmacist
  • To introduce bar code for medicines
  • To ensure timely review of list of medicines
    reimbursed

16
Recommendations of Stakeholders (2)
  • Tender
  • to implement e-procurement (legalize the flow of
    documents in electronic format).
  • to introduce ethic standards for the members of
    tender commission
  • to introduce criteria for medicine procurement to
    procure quality medicines (price should not be
    sole criterion)
  • Information
  • Increasing public awareness
  • Information on the DRA website
  • Licensed pharmacies ,
  • Certified products,
  • Registered medicines
  • To introduce provisional regulations on period of
    medicine certification

17
Lessons Learned
  • Working with different sectors revealed a
    significant lack of information in the
    pharmaceutical sector (indicated by all parties)
  • Private sector and NGOs are ready to participate
    in development and enhancement of legislation
    through
  • Establishing working group involving all sectors
    to address specific laws
  • Establishing groups to lobby for promotion of
    certain laws
  • The system of regular meetings, newsletters,
    online forums
  • Involvement of all stakeholders enhances the
    process of improving the legislation and its
    implementation
  • Activities META promote confidence-building
    between the sectors

18
Thank you
  • Djusupova Djanyl
  • Deputy director of NDRA of KG
  • Email ddjanyl_at_gmail.com
  • Mobile number 996 770 221 055
  • Skype
  • Website www.pharm.med.kg

19
MeTA Kyrgyzstan
  • Burul Makenbaeva
  • CSO Coordinator, Kyrgyzstan

20
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • What were the needs and issues in your specific
    sector at the start of MeTA?
  • Mission of Mental Health and Society is the
    return of people with mental disorders into the
    community of closed psychiatric institutions.
    Access to medicines in the community is a main
    matter.
  • Since 2006 Drug Package of SGP for patients with
    mental disorders has been implemented at the
    primary health care level but patients were not
    informed
  • And a high level of mistrust between the sectors,
    the myths and stereotypes from all parties
  • The lack of communication between NGOs and the
    public sector only letters - ineffective
    communicationEverything was a thick and gray
    clouds!

21
Major milestones
  • What milestones have been achieved during the
    MeTA pilot phase?
  • Establishment of CSO Coalition, trainings and
    small grants surveys
  • Studies have begun sowing clouds, the picture
    became more clear, what works and how, and why if
    not working
  • The regular communication is created
  • Building trust and respect

22
Successes
  • What were the successes for your sector during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • NGOs participate in public procurement process at
    the national level
  • The initiative of NGO inclusion comes from
    government
  • All Coalition members have full access to
    information
  • Building trust with the public media, local
    authorities, local community

23
Challenges
  • What challenges has your sector endured during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • Lack of capacity and knowledge on drug
    circulation and lack of legal capacity
  • The diversity of interests and different ideas of
    how to act in coalition
  •  Discussion took a long time and it was a risk to
    lose interest
  • Change Leadership

24
Lessons Learned
  • What are the lessons that your sector has learned
    from MeTA?
  • Identification of interests and motivations
  • Maintaining a balance of interests to develop a
    unified strategy
  • Solidarity and broad cooperation including the
    International MeTA
  • The necessity to react quickly to unforeseen
    difficulties
  • Flexibility
  • Full involvement of stakeholders from the
    beginning

25
Lessons Learned
  • Topics
  • Availability of psychotropic medicine under the
    State Guarantee Program in Bishkek and Osh
    Cities. (PF Public Health in partnership with PF
    New View on Mental Health).
  • Availability of medicine under the State
    Guarantee Program in rural areas based on the
    example of Kochkor District, Naryn Province (PF
    Harmony Plus in partnership with Village Health
    Committee (Kochkor District, Naryn Province), PF
    Etiyat (Issyk-Kul Province) and NGO Door Eli
    (Bishkek).
  • Availability of vitally important medicines in
    childrens residential institutions (League of
    Child Rights Defenders)
  • Study of State Procurement Practice at the
    National Cancer Center (PF People Living with
    Chronic Myeloleukemia)
  • Rationality of medicine use at Bishkek hospitals
    based on the example of Hospitals 1 and 6 (NGO
    For Safe and Rational Use of Medicine)
  • Availability of diabetes medicine in Chui
    Province.

30/10/2013
25
26
(No Transcript)
27
30/10/2013
27
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com