Brain Interface Design for Asynchronous Control - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Brain Interface Design for Asynchronous Control

Description:

Brain Interface Design for Asynchronous Control I will give the reason of that Asynchronous mode is more natural than synchronous mode in later . – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: 6649292
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Brain Interface Design for Asynchronous Control


1
Brain Interface Designfor Asynchronous Control
2
ASIMO made by HONDA
3
What is Neil Squire Society
The Neil Squire Society is the organization in
Canada that for the past 20 years has used
technology, knowledge and passion to empower
Canadians with physical disabilities
Project Background
  • The long-term objective of the brain interface
    project is to create a multi-position,
    brain-controlled switch that is activated by
    brain signals measured directly from the scalp of
    an individual.
  • They believe that such a switch will allow an
    individual with a severe disability to have
    effective control of devices such as assistive
    appliances, computers

4
Introduction(i)
  • Within the context of general brain interface
    (BI) technology research, The Nail Squire Brain
    lab has focused on BI system design specifically
    for self-paced or asynchronous control
    environments.
  • This asynchronous mode of device is more natural
    than the more commonly studied synchronized
    control mode whereby the system dictates the
    control of the user

5
Introduction(ii)
  • Schemes of Presentation
  • Presentation about an overview of asynchronous
    control.
  • Summary of Neil Squire Societys effort to
    develop asynchronous BI system.
  • Discussion of several major issues that have
    arisen from asynchronous BI development.

6
Which feature is used in BCI systems?
  • In typical BCI based on EEG, the operator
    generates a control signal by consciously
    changing his cognitive state when he wants to
    control device.
  • The change in cognitive state is measured as
    specific temporal patterns, and signal power
    level in the operators EEG activity

7
AsynchronousVs. Synchronous
8
Synchronous Vs. Asynchronous
9
What is the Synchronous mode?
  • Synchronous mode
  • In this system, the system initiates the period
    of control, not the user, and user is expected to
    be consciously controlling the interface during
    the control periods likely fig.

10
What is the Synchronous mode?
  • Drawbacks of the synchronous
  • BI transducer will make a control signal
    regardless of whether the person is actually
    intending control.
  • User cannot make control signal until system
    polling period to occur in order to engage BI
    transducer.

11
What is the Asynchronous mode?
  • Asynchronous mode
  • In this system, which we will call asynchronous
    control applications, are characterized by
    alternating periods of attentive idleness and
    active control as illustrated in Fig.
  • In this system, there are applications that
    require constant users attention and irregular,
    user-initiated control. This system is usually
    not communications applications but control
    applications.

12
Asynchronous Control (i)
  • Asynchronous control refer to the type of control
    where output signals are changed or commands are
    issued only when control is intended.
  • During the no control(NC) state, one would expect
    the system output to remain neutral or unchanged.

13
Asynchronous Control (ii)
  • Examples of asynchronous control
  • turning on lights, changing television channels,
    and interacting with a computer.
  • When you remove your hand from your computer
    mouse, you enter an NC state and the mouse output
    remains stable and unchanged-that is, the mouse
    pointer does not continue to move on the computer
    screen. In other word, The mouse is then
    available for control simply by replacing your
    hand.
  • In short, asynchronous control allows the user to
    define when things happen.
  • According to these points, asynchronous control
    is more characteristic of most real-world control
    applications than synchronous control.

14
Asynchronous Control (iii)
  • System idling
  • The neutral or unchanging system output
    response desired during periods of NC
  • For effective system, we should use the idling
    system to be realized.
  • This system is analogous to car engine.
  • Using FP(false positive) rate measures how well
    BI transducers idle for more complete measure of
    asynchronous control.

15
Classification of EEG Device
  • Idle support indicates if the interface device
    will support idling
  • Available define when the interface device
    allows user control

16
Classification of EEG Device
  • Idle support
  • If control paradigms not support the idling,
    the system produce an unintended action if and
    when the user enters the NC state. (Midas touch
    problem)

17
Control Paradigm
Availability Idle support Idle support
Availability No idle support Idle support
Periodically Synchronous System-paced
Continuously Constantly engaged Asynchronous
  • Constantly engaged mode is impractical operation
    where the user is continuously
  • controlling the interface without a break and
    any NC activity will cause an error.

18
EEG-BasedAsynchronous Brain-Switches
19
Obtaining the EEG signal related movement
  • Obtain the EEG signals when spinal cord injury
    (SCI) people and able-bodied people move their
    finger.
  • The only difference between the people with (SCI)
    and those without are the actual physical
    movements that may or may not occur during their
    attempted finger movement.
  • 10-20 System of Electrode Placement
  • The international 10-20 system of electrode
    placement is the most widely used method to
    describe the placement of electrodes at specific
    intervals along the head.
  • Even numbers refer to the right hemisphere and
    odd numbers refer to the left hemisphere

20
Electrode placement for Experiments
Motor cortex The anatomical region of the
brain known as Area 4 was given the name primary
motor cortex (symbol M1) after Penfield showed
that focal stimulations in this region elicited
highly localized muscle contractions at various
locations in the body.
21
Electrode placement for Experiments
They chose to limit the features to the top six
primarily because these features were the minimal
set that provided uniform coverage of the motor
areas (SMA, MI) of the cortex. The strongest
discriminatory features were found in
autocorrelations within six electrode pairs
F1-FC1, Fz-FCz, F2-FC2, FC1-C1, FCz-Cz, and
FC2-C2 on the 10-20 system for electrode
placement.
22
Asynchronous Brain-Switches
  • For asynchronous control application
  • Idle support
  • Low FP rates

Specific signal processing algorithm
23
Classify NC state and IC state
  • Problems in State Classification.
  • i) This needs an indication of intent in order
    to process the data.
  • ii) It is not case for synchronous
    applications because user intent is assumed
    during the control periods.

24
Classify NC state and IC state
  • Method 1.
  • Subjects to self-report intent during the data
    recording
  • Disadvantage
  • i) Self-report complicates the signal analysis
    because one does not know exactly when the
    movement was made.
  • ii) It is hard to provide the user with any
    form of feedback during these sessions.

25
Classify NC state and IC state
  • What is the Outlier Processing Method?
  • - The outlier processing method (OPM) is
    the only BCI technique that has been designed
    specifically to differentiate idle from active
    EEG in an asynchronous control applications
  • - They use the outlier processing method
    (OPM) for extracting single-trial voluntary
    movement-related potentials(VMRPs) from EEG
    related to finger movement.

26
Classify NC state and IC state
  • Method 2.
  • Separate the VMRP state from NC state via OPM in
    the obtained signal.
  • They find the feature that VMRPs has higher
    relative power than NC state in 1-4Hz bandwidth
    via time-frequency analysis of EEG pattern.
  • Using this feature, they has developed the
    low-frequency asynchronous switch design(LF-ASD)

27
Classify NC state and IC state
  • The BI experiments results by SCI people and
    able-bodied people are same. In other words,
    results by actual physical movements and imagery
    of movements are same.
  • LF-ASD demonstrated TP rates of 30-78 percent
    during IC states in combination with low FP rates
    of 0.5-2 percent during NC. The result is
    independent subjects.
  • When the FP rate is high, the LF-ASD system is
    frustrating to use. Thus, they intentionally
    operated the system in this case.

28
Thank You.
29
  • Feature Extraction Methodology
  • First, signals prefiltered between 1-4Hz and the
    compound feature described by (1)

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com