Title: Seasonal adjustment with Demetra
1Seasonal adjustment with Demetra
- Ajalov Toghrul,
- State Statistical Committee of the
- Republic of Azerbaijan
2Check the original time series
- The duration of the time series (1/2000 -
12/2010) - Time series used were retail trade indices
- Base year 2005 100
3Original data in graphs
- The original data includes seasonality
4The choice of approach and predictors
- Method used, TRAMO/SEATS
- National holidays were defined
- Selected specification was RSA 5
5The model applied
- Pretreatment
- Estimation span (1-200012-2010)
- The effect of operating days is not observed
- 6 outliers identified
- Innovation
- Trend - innovation variance 0.0024
- Seasonal - innovation variance 0.4094
- Irregular - innovation variance 0.0254
- Type of model used ARIMA (2,1,0) (1,1,0)
- Deviating values
Value Std error T-Stat P-value
AO12-2007 -0,0348 0,0038 -9,14 0,0000
AO4-2009 -0,0367 0,0038 -9,68 0,0000
AO7-2005 -0,0258 0,0035 -7,30 0,0000
AO10-2001 -0,0209 0,0039 -5,36 0,0000
LS1-2009 -0,0199 0,0043 -4,66 0,0000
AO11-2002 -0,0131 0,0036 -3,60 0,0005
6Graphs of the results
- Seasonal component is not lost in the irregular
component
7Check for a sliding seasonal factor
- In December, highly volatile seasonal variation
present
8The main quality diagnostic
- Referring to the estimated values ??of we can
determine the quality of the results - The overall summary quality diagnostics are good
9Residual seasonal factors
- There are no peaks in the seasonal and trading
day frequencies, this indicates that there is no
residual seasonality in the results
10Model stability
- Regardless the four points beyond the red line
you can come to the conclusion that the model is
stable
11Residuals
- The residuals are
- distributed
- as random,
- normal and
- independent
12Questions
- Innovation
- Trend - innovation variance 0.0024
- Seasonal - innovation variance 0.4094
- Irregular - innovation variance 0.0254
- The innovation variance of the irregular
component is lower than the variance of the
seasonal component, in this case are the results
questionable?
13Questions
Why indicators of kurtosis and normality are
highlighted in yellow? Does it mean that there is
an asymmetry in the distribution of residual
values???
14Questions
- What if I get undefined, erroneous diagnosis or
severe final result? In this case, should we
revise source data series or what can be done? - Do diverging values influence the final results?
15- Thank you for your attention!