Title: Gastric cancer
1Gastric cancer
2CLASSIFICATION
- Adenocarcinoma (95)
- Lymphoma (4)
- Leiomyosarcoma (GIST-malignant gastrointestinal
stromal tumors) - Rare carcinoid, angiosarcoma, squamous cell CA.
- Metastatic lesion of
- Breast,
- Colon,
- Pancreas,
- Melanoma.
3 4Epidemiology
- The second most common fatal malignancy in the
world (after lung cancer) - Incidence
- High in Japan, S.America, Korea, Russia
- Age above 50 years
- Sex M gt F ( 21 )
- Site
- Antrum ( 50 )
- Gastric body ( 20- 30 )
- Cardia ( 20 )
5- Risk Factors for Gastric Adenocarcinoma
- Definite
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) -
Gastric adenoma -
Dysplasia - Helicobacter pylori
infection - Chronic
atrophic gastritis - Intestinal
metaplasia - Hereditary
nonpolyposis - colorectal cancer
(HNPCC) - Postgastrectomy
-
First-degree relative with gastric cancer - Probable Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
- Cigarette
smoking - Low
aspirin intake - High salt
intake - Low intake
of fresh fruits and vegetables - Pernicious
anemia
6- Clinical Manifestation
- Early Gastric Cancer
- Asymptomatic 80
- Advanced Gastric Cancer
- Weight loss ( 62 ) due to anorexia and early
satiety is the most common symptoms - Abdominal pain ( 52) common
- Nausea / vomiting
- Chronic occult blood loss is common
- GIT bleeding (5)
- Dysphagia (cardia involvement)
- Pyloric outlet obstruction ( antrum involment)
7(No Transcript)
8Contd
- 7. Paraneoplastic syndromes
- Thrombophlebitis (trousseaus sign)
- Neuropathies
- Nephrotic syndrome
- DIC
- Acanthosis nigricans
- Seborrheic dermatosis
9Signs
- Cachexia, pallor
- Signs of bowel obstuction
- Hepatomegaly
- Ascites
- Edema of lower extremity
10Sites of Metastatic Spread
- Umblicus ( sister josephs nodule)
- Ovaries ( krukenberg tumor)
- Lt. Supraclavicular lymh node ( virchows node)
- Pouch of douglass (rectal shelf of Blumar)
11Contd
- Target organs
- Liver
- Lung
- Peritoneam
- Bone marrow
- Kidney
- Bladder
- Bone
- Brain
- Thyroid
-
12INVESTIGATIONS
- Labs
- CBC
- LFTS
- Gastric carcinoma-associated Ag
- MG7-Ag
13Imaging Studies
- EGD safe, simple, providing a permanent color
photographic record. - Obtains tissue for diagnosis.
- UGIS detects large tumors, but only occasionally
detects extension into esophagus or duodenum,
especially if small or submucosal.
14(No Transcript)
15Imaging Studies
- CXR done to evaluate for metastases.
- USG
- CT scan or MRI of chest, abdomen, pelvis
evaluate local disease process, and areas of
spread. - PET Scan Whole body
- Tumor cell preferentially accumulate
positron-emitting 18F fluorodeoxyglucose.
16Contd
- Endoscopic ultrasound becoming extremely useful
as a staging tool, when CT fails to show T3, T4,
or metastatic disease. - Cannot reliably distinguish between tumor and
fibrosis. - Overall staging accuracy of 75
- Poor for T2 lesions (38)
- Better for T1(80), T3 (90)
17Gastric cancer confined to mucosa
18Classification
19Macroscopically
- Borrmans classification
- Type 1 Protruded
- Type 2
- 2a Elevated
- 2b Flat
- 2c Depressed
- Type 3 Excavated
20Macroscopic Subtypes
- Superficial spreading
- Polypoid (well differentiated)
- Fungating
- Ulceration
- linitis plastica
- Leather bottle stomach
- Poor prognosis
- Usually undifferentiated
21microscopically
- WHO Classification
- Adenocarcinoma
- Papillary adenocarcinoma
- Tubular adenocarcinoma
- Mucinous adenocarcinoma
- Signet-ring cell carcinoma
- Adenosquamous carcinoma
- Squamous cell CA
- Small cell CA
- Undifferentiated CA
- Others
- Lauren Classification
- Intestinal type (53)
- Diffuse type (33)
- Unclassified (14)
- Ming Classification
- Expanding type (67)
- Infiltrative type (33)
22Contd
- Intestinal
- Environmental
- Gastric atrophy
- Men gt women
- Increasing vid age
- Gland formation
- Hematogenous spread
- Good Prognosis
23Contd
- Diffuse
- Blood type A
- Women gt men
- Younger age
- Poorly differentiated
- Transmural\lymphatic
- Poor prognosis
-
24 25PRIMARY TUMOR (T) PRIMARY TUMOR (T)
TX Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 No evidence of primary tumor
Tis Carcinoma in situ intraepithelial tumor without invasion of the lamina propria
T1 Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa
T2 Tumor invades muscularis propria or subserosa
T2a Tumor invades muscularis propria
T2b Tumor invades subserosa
T3 Tumor penetrates serosa (visceral peritoneum) without invasion of adjacent structures
T4 Tumor invades adjacent structures
REGIONAL LYMPH NODES (N) REGIONAL LYMPH NODES (N)
NX Regional lymph node(s) cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis in 1 to 6 regional lymph nodes
N2 Metastasis in 7 to 15 regional lymph nodes
N3 Metastasis in more than 15 regional lymph nodes
DISTANT METASTASIS (M) DISTANT METASTASIS (M)
MX Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
26STAGE GROUPING STAGE GROUPING STAGE GROUPING STAGE GROUPING
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0
Stage 1A T1 N0 M0
Stage IB T1 N1 M0
Stage IB T2a/b N0 M0
Stage II T1 N2 M0
Stage II T2a/b N1 M0
Stage II T3 N0 M0
Stage IIIA T2a/b N2 M0
Stage IIIA T3 N1 M0
Stage IIIA T4 N0 M0
Stage IIIB T3 N2 M0
Stage IV T4 N13 M0
Stage IV T13 N3 M0
Stage IV Any T Any N M1
From AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2001. From AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2001. From AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2001. From AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2001.
27Staging
28Prognostic Features
- Depth of invasion through gastric wall, presence
or absence of regional lymph node involvement - The greater number of positive nodes, the greater
the likelihood of local or systemic failure
postoperatively
29- Mode of spread
- Direct
- Lymphatic
- Hematologic
- Transcoelomic route
30Management
- SURGERY
- EMR ..EMD
- PDT
- CHEMOTHERAPY
- RADIATION THERAPY
31Surgery
- The only curative tx for gastric cancer
- Except
- Cant tolerate abdominal surgery
- Overwhelming metastasis
- Palliation is poor with non-resective operations
- GOAL resect all tumors, with negative margins
(5cm) and adequate lymphadenectomy - Enbloc resection of adjacent organ is done if
needed
32Proximal / Cardia
- Proximal Gastrectomy Increased morbidity /
mortality - Buhl, et al.
- Dumping, heartburn, reduced appetite
- Norwegian Stomach Ca Trial
- Prox. gastrectomy morbid / mortal 52 16
- Total gastrectomy morbid / mortal 38 8
- Total gastrectomy considered procedure of choice
for proximal gastric lesions
33Distal Tumors
- Account for 50 of all gastric cancers
- No 5-year survival difference b/w subtotal vs.
total Gastrectomy - Subtotal appropriate if negative margins
- Recurrence vs. nonrecurrence depends on margin of
3.5 cm vs. 6.5 cm
34(No Transcript)
35Residual Disease R Status
- Tumor status following resection.
- Assigned based on pathology of margins.
- R0- no residual gross or microscopic disease.
- R1- microscopic disease only.
- R2- gross residual disease.
- Long term survival only in R0 resection.
36D Nomenclature
- Describes extent of resection and
lymphadenectomy. - D1- removes all nodes within 3cm of tumor.
- D2- D1 plus hepatic, splenic, celiac, and left
gastric nodes. - D3- D2 plus omentectomy, splenectomy, distal
pancreatectomy, clearance of porta hepatis nodes. - Current standards include a D1 dissection only.
37- Radical subtotal gastrectomy
- D1 resection (standard in USA)
- Removes tumor and N1
- D2 resection(standard in Asia)
- Gastrectomy and N1 and N2 removal
- Removes the peritoneal layer over the pancreas
and anterior mesocolon - Removes LN along hepatic splenic
- Splenectomy and distal pancreatectromy not
routinely removed due to higher morbidity postop.
38Radical subtotal Gastrectomy
- D1 resection (standard in USA)
- Removes tumor and N1
- D2 resection(standard in Asia)
- Gastrectomy and N1 and N2 removal
- Removes the peritoneal layer over the pancreas
and anterior mesocolon - Removes LN along hepatic splenic
- Splenectomy and distal pancreatectromy not
routinely removed due to higher morbidity postop.
39Outcome
- 5-year survival for a curative resection is
30-50 for stage II disease, 10-25 for stage III
disease. - Adjuvant therapy because of high incidence of
local and systemic failure. - A recent Intergroup 0116 randomized study offers
evidence of a survival benefit associated with
postoperative chemoradiotherapy
40Outcomes
41Complications
- Mortality 1-2
- Anastamotic leak, bleeding, ileus, transit
failure, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, pulmonary
infections, and thromboembolism. - Late complications include dumping syndrome,
vitamin B-12 deficiency, reflux esophagitis,
osteoporosis.
42Palliation
- 20 30 of gastric cancer presents with stage IV
disease - Relief of symptoms with minimal morbidity
- Surgical palliation eg. GOO
- Percutaneous, endoscopic, radiotherapuetic
techniques
43- Nonoperative tx
- Laser recanalization
- Endoscopic dilatation
- Metalic stenting
44Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Carcinoma
- Criteria
- Tumor lt 2cm in size
- No lymph node involved
- Tumor confined on the mucosa
- No mucosal ulceration
- No lymphatic invasions
- Intestinal type
- No evidence of multiple gastric cancers
45Photodynamic therapy
- Reject surgical intervention
- Comorbid condtions render risk of surgical
intervention - Complete remission
- Early intestinal type (80)
- Limited diffuse type (50)
46Adjuvant Treatment for Gastric Carcinoma
- Chemotherapy
- 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin, cisplatin, doxorubicin
and methotrexate - Can not prolong survival in unresectable,
metastatic or recurrent diseases - Radiation
- Effective in palliation for pain and bleeding
- Studies show improved survival, lower rates of
local recurrence when compared to surgery alone.
47Recurrence
- After Gastrectomy quite high
- 40 80
- Most occur within first 3 years
- Locoregional failure 38 45
- Anastomosis, gastric bed and regional nodes
- Peritoneal dissemination 54
48Surveillance
- Recurrence high first 3 years
- Complete HP Examination every 4 moths for 1
year - Then every 6 moths for 2 years
- Annually after
- CBC, LFT , as clinically indicated
- CXR, CT abdomen/pelvis- ? Routinely
- Annual Endoscopy for subtotal Gastrectomy
49Screening of Gastric Cancer
- Patients at risk for Gastric CA should undergo
yearly endoscopy and biopsy - Familial adenomatous polyposis
- Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
- Gastric adenomas
- Intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia
- Remote gastrectomy or gastrojejunostomy
50Prevention
- Eradication of H. Pylori
- Supplementation with Antioxidants
- Aspirin and NSAID
- Green tea
51 52Epidemiology
- Stomach most common site for lymphomas in GI
system - Primary gastric lymphoma uncommon
- 5 of gastric cancer, 2 of lymphomas
- Vague symptoms
- Epigastric pain, early satiety and fatigue
- Bleeding uncommon
- 50 have anemia on presentation
- 6th and 7th decade (MF is 21)
- Most commonly in antrum
53Pathology
- Multiple classification systems
- Most common diffuse large B cell 55
- Marginal B cell lymphoma of MALT type 40
- Uncommon types
54Pathology
- Diffuse large B-cell
- Usually primary
- May occur from progression of less aggressive
lymphomas (chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small
lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphoma or
MALT) - Risk factors
- Immunodeficiency's, H. pylori
55Gastric MALT extranodal marginal zone lymphomas
of MALT type
- Commonly preceded by H. pylori associated
gastritis - Predicts responsiveness to tx by H. pylori
eradication
56Treatment
- Multimodality early stage
- Resection controversial
- Chemo/rads alone
- Perforation w/ chemo 5
- CHOP cyclophosphamide, hydroxy- doxorubicin,
oncovin, predinose) - Anti CD20 monoclonal Ab, rituximab
- 5 year survival
- Sx/Chemo/Rad 82
- Chemo/Rad 84.4
57Treatment
- Radiation
- Limited in large tumors
- Local control 100 lt 3 cm
- 60 70 if gt 6 cm
- Risk of complications 30 at 10 years
58Treatment
- Late-stage
- Not amenable to surgery chemo
- MALT/very limited diffuse large B-cell
- H. pylori eradication alone
- 75
- Repeat endoscopy in 2 moths biannual endoscopy
for 3 years - Failure of above increased if
- Transmural, node
59 60Epidemiology
- Arise from mesenchymal components of gastric wall
- 3 of all gastric CA
- GIST most common
- Stomach (60-70)
- After 4th decade
- Mean age 60
61GIST - Pathology
- Initially thought to arise from smooth muscle
cells previously classified as leiomyoma /
leiomyosarcoma - Histotology
- Muscularis propria likely from cells of Cajal
- GIST
- Cellular
- Spindle cell
- Pleomorphic mesenchymal tumors
62- No current system for staging
- Prognosis
- Mitotic frequency
- Low benign
- High malignant
- Other signs of malignancy
- Size gt 5 cm
- Cellular atypia,
- Necrosis or local invasion.
63Clinical
- Most common presentation
- GI bleeding, pain abdomen, dyspepsia
- Endoscopy first diagnostic test
- With biopsy 50
- CT Abdomen best , since neoplasm grows
intramurally - Double-contrast UGI smooth edged filling defect
64Treatment
- Surgery
- Negative margin (en-bloc if adjacent organs)
- Avoid rupture of tumor to prevent peritoneal
seeding - LN mets rare (lt10) no added benefit
- Most recurrences in first 2 years
- Local disease with associated. liver mets
- 5 year survival 48 (19 56)
- Adjuvant tx
- Radiation no proven benefit
- 5 respond to doxorubicin
- Imatinib (Gleevec) 54 partial response
- unrespectable GIST, mets
65GASRTIC CARCINOID TUMORS
- O.3 Gastric neoplasm
- Mean Age 62
- Sex M F 11
- Risk factors
- Pernicious anemia
- Chronic atrophic gastritis
- Hypergastrinemia
- Zollinger Ellison syndrome
66CLINICAL
- Asymptomatic ,dyspepsia
- EGD Irregularly shaped erythematous dimple in
the centre of submucosal mass - EUS
- Depth of invasion
- Submucosal biopsy
- CT And MRI Hepatic involvement
67MANAGMENT
- Controversial
- Secondary Carcinoid
- EMR small tumor
- Surgical resection large tumor esp. involvement
of Muscularis propria - Sporadic Carcinoid
- Surgical resection with lymph node sampling
- Survival Five years
- Nonmetastatic disease gt 95
- Metastases gt 50
68