X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series

Description:

X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series Debasri Chakrabarti debasri _at_ cse.iitb.ac.in CFILT PS rules Phrase Structure Grammar provide rules for three types of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: DebasriCh8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series


1
X-bar SchemaLinguistics lecture series
  • Debasri Chakrabarti
  • debasri _at_ cse.iitb.ac.in
  • CFILT

2
PS rules
  • Phrase Structure Grammar provide rules for three
    types of constituents clauses, phrases and
    words.
  • S ? NP VP
  • VP ? V
  • VP ? V NP
  • VP ? V NP PP
  • NP ? N
  • NP ? Det N
  • NP ? N PP
  • NP ? Det AP N S
  • PP ? P NP

3
Inadequacy of PS rules
  • S NP A boy VP met a girl
  • NP N cows
  • NP Det a N cow
  • VP V reading NP the book
  • VP V reading NP the book PP in the class
  • A phrase may also include one or more phrases or
  • clauses.
  • 6. the girl who came late

4
Need of an Intermediate Constituent
  • Phrase Structure Grammar (PSG) includes two
    levels of categories
  • word-level (N, V, A, P, etc.)
  • phrase-level (NP, AP, VP, PP, etc.)
  • PSG does not include a description for a string
    of words that is neither a full phrase nor a
    word, e.g., prime minister of India
  • Consider, the construction
  • 7. the prime minister of India

5
Need of an Intermediate Constituent
  • to prove that (6) is a constituent following
    tests are made
  • Coordination
  • 8. the prime minister of India and head of the
    ruling party
  • Substitution
  • 9. this prime minister of India is much more
    handsome than the last one
  • these tests prove that the constituent is
  • prime minister of India

6
Need of an Intermediate Constituent
  • prime minister of India is smaller than a clause
  • Determiner the is not included in coordination or
    substitution
  • 10. this prime minister of India is much more
    handsome than the last the prime minister of
    India.
  • Thus there is a need for an intermediate category.

7
X-bar Syntax
  • X-bar is a theory of phrase structure which
    attempts to identify syntactic features common to
    all languages.
  • The theory claims that there are certain
    structural similarities among all phrasal
    categories of all languages.
  • Phrase structure concerns the hierarchical left
    to right relationships between syntactic
    categories.
  • The letter X is used to signify an arbitrary
    lexical category for the head of the phrase in
    order to allow a generic description.

8
X-bar Schema
XP
spec
X?
X?
adjunct
X
complement
9
Features of X-bar Syntax
  • XP is the maximal projection.
  • X? is the intermediate level.
  • XP contains a head type - X
  • There can only be one head .
  • Phrases are projection of their head.

10
Endocentric Construction
  • Phrases are endocentric , i.e., the category of
    the phrase is that of the head.
  • Endocentric construction is a construction that
    contains  a head, which is the single obligatory
    element in the construction, and one or more
    optional elements subordinate to the head.
  • Example
  • a good boy

11
Features of X-bar Syntax
  • This is uniform across languages, i.e.,
  • all phrases are endocentric across all
    categories
  • and across all languages.
  • PS rules have 4 components
  • Specifier
  • Head
  • Complement
  • Adjunct
  • This is language universal

12
Detailed description of Head and Complement
  • Head of a phrase is obligatory
  • Complements and Heads are in sister relation
  • Position of the complements vary from language to
    language, e.g.,
  • English picture of Einstine
  • Hindi????????? ?? ?????

13
Detailed description of Specifier and Adjunct
  • Consider the sentence,
  • their rejection of the agreement last week
  • head complement
  • What is their and last week ?
  • their is the Specifier (spec) and last week is
    the Adjunct.

14
X-bar Schema
  • By assumption X-bar schema is universal across
    languages.
  • In practice all nodes have binary branching.
  • Corollary of Uniformity Across syntactic
    categories comp, spec and adjunct bears the same
    configurational relationship to the head.
  • English VP V eat cake
  • NP N picture of Einstein
  • Hindi VP V ???? ????
  • NP N ?? ????? ?????

15
Position of Complement and Adjunct in X-bar
NP
det
N
N
the
PP
in the cabinet meeting
PP
N
of the cricket match
discussion
The discussion of the cricket match in the
cabinet meeting
16
Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
XP
XP
1.
2.
X
spec
X
X
X
NP cows
NP the boys
17
Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
4.
XP
XP
3.
spec
X
X
X
comp
comp
X
AP fond of sweets
NP a student of NLP
18
Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
XP
5.
X
spec
X
adjunct
X
comp
NP a student of NLP in IIT
19
Lexical Category
  • N, V, A, P are lexical items.
  • In some languages not all the lexical items are
    distinguished fully in both lexicon and syntax.
  • e.g., work/v as in I worked.
  • work/n as in the work.
  • Each lexical category is associated with a
    maximal projection.

20
Functional Category
  • There are some categories in natural languages
    that do not fall into N, V, A, P.
  • Consider, the following sentences
  • English I think that it is your umbrella.
  • It is not difficult for us to
    learn Linguistics.
  • Hindi ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??????
  • Assuming Uniformity these items must be maximal
    projection of some category.

21
Complementizer Phrase
  • These are the clausal complements and the obvious
    candidate for this category is complementizer.
  • The entire phrase is known as Complementizer
    Phrase (CP).
  • Head of the phrase is the Complementizer (C).
  • C is a functional category.

22
Tree diagram
CP
spec
C
C
IP
That
it is your umbrella
23
Exercise-1
  • Identify the lexical and functional heads in the
    following sentences
  • England will go head-to-head with Brazil in the
    final match.
  • The idea that I would go there is absurd.
  • We wonder whether he would come.

24
Exercise 2
  • Identify the specifiers, complements and adjuncts
    in each of the following phrases.
  • the reason that we cant afford it
  • The tall boy
  • John loves Mary deeply.
  • Put the book on the table.
  • those boys in the class

25
Exercise 3
  • Draw Tree diagrams following X-bar schema for the
    following phrases
  • 1. a. the publication of the book
  • b. the publication of the book in Mumbai
  • 2. a. I met the teacher in the library
  • b. I met the teacher in the library after the
    class
  • 3. on the table

26
References
  • Theory of Language- Steven E. Weisler
  • Slavko Milekic
  • Principle and Parameter Theory
  • - Peter
    E. Culicover
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com