Title: X-bar Schema Linguistics lecture series
1X-bar SchemaLinguistics lecture series
- Debasri Chakrabarti
- debasri _at_ cse.iitb.ac.in
- CFILT
2PS rules
- Phrase Structure Grammar provide rules for three
types of constituents clauses, phrases and
words. - S ? NP VP
- VP ? V
- VP ? V NP
- VP ? V NP PP
- NP ? N
- NP ? Det N
- NP ? N PP
- NP ? Det AP N S
- PP ? P NP
3Inadequacy of PS rules
- S NP A boy VP met a girl
- NP N cows
- NP Det a N cow
- VP V reading NP the book
- VP V reading NP the book PP in the class
- A phrase may also include one or more phrases or
- clauses.
- 6. the girl who came late
4Need of an Intermediate Constituent
- Phrase Structure Grammar (PSG) includes two
levels of categories - word-level (N, V, A, P, etc.)
- phrase-level (NP, AP, VP, PP, etc.)
- PSG does not include a description for a string
of words that is neither a full phrase nor a
word, e.g., prime minister of India - Consider, the construction
- 7. the prime minister of India
5Need of an Intermediate Constituent
- to prove that (6) is a constituent following
tests are made - Coordination
- 8. the prime minister of India and head of the
ruling party - Substitution
- 9. this prime minister of India is much more
handsome than the last one - these tests prove that the constituent is
- prime minister of India
6Need of an Intermediate Constituent
- prime minister of India is smaller than a clause
- Determiner the is not included in coordination or
substitution - 10. this prime minister of India is much more
handsome than the last the prime minister of
India. - Thus there is a need for an intermediate category.
7X-bar Syntax
- X-bar is a theory of phrase structure which
attempts to identify syntactic features common to
all languages. - The theory claims that there are certain
structural similarities among all phrasal
categories of all languages. - Phrase structure concerns the hierarchical left
to right relationships between syntactic
categories. - The letter X is used to signify an arbitrary
lexical category for the head of the phrase in
order to allow a generic description.
8X-bar Schema
XP
spec
X?
X?
adjunct
X
complement
9Features of X-bar Syntax
- XP is the maximal projection.
- X? is the intermediate level.
- XP contains a head type - X
- There can only be one head .
- Phrases are projection of their head.
10Endocentric Construction
- Phrases are endocentric , i.e., the category of
the phrase is that of the head. - Endocentric construction is a construction that
contains a head, which is the single obligatory
element in the construction, and one or more
optional elements subordinate to the head. - Example
- a good boy
11Features of X-bar Syntax
- This is uniform across languages, i.e.,
- all phrases are endocentric across all
categories - and across all languages.
- PS rules have 4 components
- Specifier
- Head
- Complement
- Adjunct
- This is language universal
-
12Detailed description of Head and Complement
- Head of a phrase is obligatory
- Complements and Heads are in sister relation
- Position of the complements vary from language to
language, e.g., - English picture of Einstine
- Hindi????????? ?? ?????
13Detailed description of Specifier and Adjunct
- Consider the sentence,
- their rejection of the agreement last week
-
- head complement
- What is their and last week ?
- their is the Specifier (spec) and last week is
the Adjunct.
14X-bar Schema
- By assumption X-bar schema is universal across
languages. - In practice all nodes have binary branching.
- Corollary of Uniformity Across syntactic
categories comp, spec and adjunct bears the same
configurational relationship to the head. - English VP V eat cake
- NP N picture of Einstein
- Hindi VP V ???? ????
- NP N ?? ????? ?????
15Position of Complement and Adjunct in X-bar
NP
det
N
N
the
PP
in the cabinet meeting
PP
N
of the cricket match
discussion
The discussion of the cricket match in the
cabinet meeting
16Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
XP
XP
1.
2.
X
spec
X
X
X
NP cows
NP the boys
17Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
4.
XP
XP
3.
spec
X
X
X
comp
comp
X
AP fond of sweets
NP a student of NLP
18Logical Possibilities of Phrase Structure
XP
5.
X
spec
X
adjunct
X
comp
NP a student of NLP in IIT
19Lexical Category
- N, V, A, P are lexical items.
- In some languages not all the lexical items are
distinguished fully in both lexicon and syntax. - e.g., work/v as in I worked.
- work/n as in the work.
- Each lexical category is associated with a
maximal projection.
20Functional Category
- There are some categories in natural languages
that do not fall into N, V, A, P. - Consider, the following sentences
- English I think that it is your umbrella.
- It is not difficult for us to
learn Linguistics. - Hindi ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??????
- Assuming Uniformity these items must be maximal
projection of some category.
21Complementizer Phrase
- These are the clausal complements and the obvious
candidate for this category is complementizer. - The entire phrase is known as Complementizer
Phrase (CP). - Head of the phrase is the Complementizer (C).
- C is a functional category.
22Tree diagram
CP
spec
C
C
IP
That
it is your umbrella
23Exercise-1
- Identify the lexical and functional heads in the
following sentences - England will go head-to-head with Brazil in the
final match. - The idea that I would go there is absurd.
- We wonder whether he would come.
24Exercise 2
- Identify the specifiers, complements and adjuncts
in each of the following phrases. - the reason that we cant afford it
- The tall boy
- John loves Mary deeply.
- Put the book on the table.
- those boys in the class
25Exercise 3
- Draw Tree diagrams following X-bar schema for the
following phrases - 1. a. the publication of the book
- b. the publication of the book in Mumbai
- 2. a. I met the teacher in the library
- b. I met the teacher in the library after the
class - 3. on the table
26References
- Theory of Language- Steven E. Weisler
- Slavko Milekic
- Principle and Parameter Theory
- - Peter
E. Culicover