802.1Qay PBB-TE Protection Switching Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

802.1Qay PBB-TE Protection Switching Overview

Description:

G.8031/IEEE802.1Qay differences The protected entity is different. G.8031 protection applies to point-to-point VLAN based Ethernet Subnetwork Connections. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: P192
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 802.1Qay PBB-TE Protection Switching Overview


1
802.1Qay PBB-TE Protection Switching Overview
Joint ITU-T/IEEE Workshop on The Future of
Ethernet Transport (Geneva, 28 May 2010)
  • Panagiotis Saltsidis
  • Ericsson

2
What is PBB-TE?
Provisioned Control
Customer Network
Customer Network
  • Provider Backbone Bridges Traffic Engineering
    is the latest development in a series of ongoing
    efforts to enable support for advanced
    connectivity service offerings by a network of
    Bridges.
  • It corresponds to a set of functions that enable
    support for full traffic engineering of paths in
    a bridged network.
  • PBB-TE disables the MSTP control plane for a
    subset of VLANs, using instead either the
    management plane or another (possibly external)
    control plane to populate filtering database
    table entries of related bridges

3
Services in a Bridged Network
  • The main design principle is based on a building
    blocks model where the added functionality is
    mainly confined at the external interfaces
    associated with a specific service demand.
  • The same network is able to offer PBB-TE services
    (Traffic Engineered Service Instances TESIs),
    Provider Backbone Bridged services (B-VLANs) and
    Provider Bridged services (S-VLANs).

4
UNI
4
Geneva, 28 May 2010
5
IEEE802.1Qay Summary
  • Enables construction of point-to-point and
    point-to-multipoint traffic engineered paths
    (TESIs) by splitting of the VID space between
    distributed spanning tree protocols and
    provisioned control.
  • Supports discard of frames with unknown
    destination addresses and disables learning for
    B-VIDs under provisioned control.
  • Supports the operation of Continuity Check,
    Loopback, and Linktrace protocols on
    point-to-point and point-to-multipoint TESIs.
  • Supports 11 protection switching capable of load
    sharing for point-to-point TESIs.
  • Provides required extension to SNMP management by
    SMIv2 MIB modules

6
TESI Definitions
  • Ethernet Switched Path (ESP) A provisioned
    traffic engineered unidirectional connectivity
    path among two or more Customer Backbone Ports
    (CBPs) that extends over a PBBN. An Ethernet
    Switched Path is point-to-point or
    point-to-multipoint.
  • point-to-point TE service instance A TE service
    instance supported by two point-to-point ESPs
    where the ESPs endpoints have the same Customer
    Backbone Port (CBP) MAC addresses.
  • point-to-multipoint TE service instance A TE
    service instance supported by a set of ESPs that
    comprises one point-to-multipoint ESP from the
    root to n leaves plus a point-to-point ESP from
    each of the leaves to the root.

7
802.1Qay - Protection
  • PBB-TE provides end-to-end linear protection for
    point-to-point TESIs, where a dedicated
    protection point-to-point TESI is established for
    one particular working point-to-point TESI, and
    the traffic is automatically switched from the
    working TESI to the protection TESI when a
    failure occurs on the working entity.
  • Failure is detected by the operation of the
    Continuity Check protocol
  • Switching is achieved by changing the Backbone
    Service Instance table B-VID entries on the
    Customer Backbone Ports associated with the TESI
    MEPs.

8
IEEE802.1Qay PS State Machines
  • The local protection commands and protection
    behavior specified by IEEE802.Qay follow the
    architectural model used in ITU-T Recommendation
    G.8031.
  • The priorities associated with the various
    requests in IEEE802.1Qay are in general alignment
    with the corresponding priorities in ITU-T G.8031
    and the corresponding state machine operation in
    IEEE802.Qay is in alignment to the state
    transition tables in G.8031. The only differences
    in the state machine operation are related to the
    inclusion of the MStoWorking request which is
    referred by protection switching documents in
    ITU-T (e.g., G870) but has been dropped by G.8031
    and that the precedence of p.SF and FS are
    inverted since G.8031 relies on an APS protocol
    to be running on the protection path.

9
G.8031/IEEE802.1Qaydifferences
  • The protected entity is different.
  • G.8031 protection applies to point-to-point VLAN
    based Ethernet Subnetwork Connections.
  • IEEE802.1Qay protection applies to a
    point-to-point TESI in a traffic engineered
    region.
  • The protection scope is different.
  • G.8031 supports linear 11 and linear 11
    protection switching architectures.
  • IEEE802.1Qay is required to support 11 path
    protection capable of load sharing.
  • G.8031 specifies an in-band Automatic Protection
    Switching (APS) protocol, whereas signaling in
    IEEE802.1Qay is provided by CCM flags.
  • There are a few specific differences regarding
    the externally observable protection switching
    behavior. In particular, in IEEE802.1Qay
  • The Hold-off function is applied to all SF
    indications,
  • A Manual Switch request is supported to switch
    traffic to the working entity,
  • A Force Switch has precedence over an SF-P,
  • The receiver combines traffic from both the
    working and protected entities,
  • An SF results from any of the following defects
    xconCCMdefect, errorCCMdefect, someRMEPCCMdefect,
    someRDIdefect.

10
TE Protection Groupsand load sharing
  • The protection switching mechanism is capable of
    load sharing as the TE service instances that are
    assigned to a TE protection group can be re-used
    in a number of TE protection groups enabling a
    list of I-SIDs to be distributed among a set of
    interdependent TE protection groups.
  • A set of interdependent TE protection groups
    forms a coordinated protection group.
  • Protection switching requests to interdependent
    TE protection groups must be coordinated for an
    operator to manage the TESIs in a coherent manner
    and to avoid potentially competing requests for
    each TESI.

Protection Group Working TESI Protection TESI Coordinated PGs
PG_A TESI_1 TESI_2 PG_A, PG_C
PG_B TESI_3 TESI_4
PG_C TESI_2 TESI_1 PG_A, PG_C
Backbone Service Instance Protection Group
I-SID_1 PG_A
I-SID_2 No PG
I-SID_3 PG_C
I-SID_4 PG_B
I-SID_5 PG_B
11
Traffic Field in the CCM flags
  • TESI MEPs make use of the Traffic Field in the
    CCM Flags Field in order to identify traffic
    misalignments on point-to-point TESIs

RDI
Traffic Field
CCM Interval
  • The bit is set whenever the BSI instance table
    associated to the TESI MEP has an I-SID entry for
    the monitored TESI

12
Mismatch Defects
  • Mismatch Defects are detected whenever
  • Differences in the Traffic fields of transmitted
    and received CCMs
  • simultaneous settings of the RDI and Traffic
    fields
  • are reported for a specified period of time

13
802.1Qay PS operation summary
  • IEEE802.1Qay follows the architectural model used
    in ITU-T Recommendation G.8031 and the state
    machine operation is similar to the state
    transition tables in G.8031.
  • The main differences are due to the different
    requirements associated with PBB-TE
  • TESIs are provided in a network domain that is
    under the overall control of an external agent
    with high levels of management/control
    requirements
  • The PBB-TE PS operation is capable of load
    sharing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com