Class 4. Fundamentals of Microfabrication-Some History - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Class 4. Fundamentals of Microfabrication-Some History

Description:

Nature and mankind have developed competitive manufacturing methods on the macro level (e.g., steel versus bone). Biomimetics mostly failed in the larger world ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:236
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: MarcM60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Class 4. Fundamentals of Microfabrication-Some History


1
Class 4. Fundamentals of Microfabrication-Some
History
  • Dr. Marc Madou,
  • 2012 , UCI

http//www.almaden.ibm.com 80/vis/stm/gallery.htm
l
2
From ICs to MEMS and NEMS
http//www.almaden.ibm.com 80/vis/stm/gallery.htm
l
NovaSensor Accelerometer
3
From ICs to MEMS and NEMS
4
From ICs to MEMS and NEMS
  • Todays car differs from those of the immediate
    post-war years on a number of counts.But suppose
    for a moment that the automobile industry had
    developed at the same rate as computers and over
    the same period how much cheaper and more
    efficient would current models be? Today you
    would be able to buy a Rolce-Royce for 2.15, it
    would do three million miles to the gallon, and
    it would deliver enough power to drive the Queen
    Elizabeth II. And if you were interested in
    miniaturization, you could place half a dozen of
    them on a pinhead
  • Christopher Evans, 1979

5
Content
  • Definitions of ICs
  • MEMS
  • Why miniaturization ?
  • Taxonomy of Microfabrication Processes
  • Accuracy/precision
  • Accuracy/precision and standard deviation
  • Relative vs. absolute tolerance in manufacturing
  • Merging of two approaches Top-down and bottom-up
    machining methodologies
  • Biomimetics
  • A few concluding words about manufacturing methods

6
Definitions of ICs
  • The transistor was invented 1948 by three Bell
    Laboratory engineers and physicists. John Bardeen
    was the physicist, Walter Brattain the
    experimentalist, and William Shockley, who became
    involved later in the development, was the
    instigator and idea man. The team won the 1956
    Nobel Prize in physics for their efforts.  The
    transistor demonstrated for the first time that
    amplification in solids was possible.

7
Definitions of ICs
Diodes
8
Definitions of ICs
  • There are many different types of transistors,
    but the basic theory of their operation is all
    the same. The three elements of the two-junction
    transistor are (1) the EMITTER, which gives off,
    or emits," current carriers (electrons or holes)
    (2) the BASE, which controls the flow of current
    carriers and (3) the COLLECTOR, which collects
    the current carriers.

9
Definitions of ICs
  • The arrow always points in the direction of hole
    flow, or from the P to N sections, no matter
    whether the P section is the emitter or base. On
    the other hand, electron flow is always toward or
    against the arrow, just like in the junction
    diode.

10
Definitions of ICs
  • A forward biased PN junction is comparable to a
    low-resistance circuit element because it passes
    a high current for a given voltage. In turn, a
    reverse-biased PN junction is comparable to a
    high-resistance circuit element. By using the
    Ohm's law formula for power (P I2R) and
    assuming current is held constant, you can
    conclude that the power developed across a high
    resistance is greater than that developed across
    a low resistance. Thus, if a crystal were to
    contain two PN junctions (one forward-biased and
    the other reverse-biased), a low-power signal
    could be injected into the forward-biased
    junction and produce a high-power signal at the
    reverse-biased junction. In this manner, a power
    gain would be obtained across the crystal. This
    concept is the basic theory behind how the
    transistor amplifies.

11
Definitions of ICs
12
Definitions of ICs
  • The term transistor is derived from the words
    TRANSfer and resISTOR. This term was adopted
    because it best describes the operation of the
    transistor - the transfer of an input signal
    current from a low-resistance circuit to a
    high-resistance circuit. Basically, the
    transistor is a solid-state device that amplifies
    by controlling the flow of current carriers
    through its semiconductor materials.

13
Definitions of ICs
  • Types of transistors
  • Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT)
  • MOS transistor see Metal Oxide Semiconductor
    (MOS) Capacitor

14
Definitions of ICs
  • A chip or an integrated circuit (IC) is a small
    electronic device made out of a semiconductor
    material. The integrated circuit consists of
    elements inseparably associated and formed on or
    within a single SUBSTRATE (mounting surface). In
    other words, the circuit components and all
    interconnections are formed as a unit. The first
    integrated circuit was developed in the 1950s by
    Jack Kilby of Texas Instruments and Robert Noyce
    of Fairchild Semiconductor.

15
Definitions of ICs
  • Integrated circuits are often classified by the
    number of transistors and other electronic
    components they contain
  • SSI (small-scale integration) Up to 100
    electronic components per chip
  • MSI (medium-scale integration) From 100 to 3,000
    electronic components per chip
  • LSI (large-scale integration) From 3,000 to
    100,000 electronic components per chip
  • VLSI (very large-scale integration) From 100,000
    to 1,000,000 electronic components per chip
  • ULSI (ultra large-scale integration) More than 1
    million electronic components per chip

16
Definition of MEMS
Sandia, Poly-Si steam engine
  • Micro electromechanical systems (MEMS), or
    micromachining (also micro-manufacturing and
    microfabrication), in the narrow sense, comprises
    the use of a set of manufacturing tools based on
    batch thin and thick film fabrication techniques
    commonly used in the integrated circuit industry
    or IC industry. This involved originally mainly
    Si based mechanical devices.

17
Definition of MEMS
  • MEMS Micro electro mechanical systems. In recent
    years, it has become obvious that Si is not
    always the right substrate, that batch is often
    not good enough and that a modular approach is
    sometimes better than an integrated one. This
    has especially become clear in the case of
    biomedical applications (see BIOMEMS course). The
    science of miniaturization has become a much
    more appropriate name than MEMS and it involves a
    good understanding of the intended application,
    scaling laws, different manufacturing methods and
    materials .

18
Definition of MEMS
Isometric Scaling
LIGA
19
Why miniaturization?
  • Minimizing energy and materials use in
    manufacturing
  • Redundancy and arrays
  • Integration with electronics, simplifying systems
    (e.g., single point vs. multipoint measurement)
  • Reduction of power budget
  • Faster devices
  • Increased selectivity and sensitivity
  • Wider dynamic range
  • Exploitation of new effects through the breakdown
    of continuum theory in the microdomain

20
Why miniaturization?
  • Cost/performance advantages
  • Improved reproducibility (batch concept)
  • Improved accuracy and reliability
  • Minimal invasive ( e.g. mosquito project)
  • Do we have a choice? (see next viewgraph- - the
    Law of Accelerating Returns)

21
Why miniaturization?
  • Evolution (sophistication) of life-forms or
    technology speeds up because they are build on
    their own recorded degree of order. Ray Kurzweil
    calls this The Law of Accelerating Returns
  • This Law of Accelerating Returns gave us ever
    greater order in technology which led to
    computation -- the essence of order.
  • For life-forms DNA provides the record. In the
    case of technology it is the ever improving
    methods to record information.
  • Ray Kurzweil in The Age of Spiritual
  • Machines

22
Why miniaturization?
23
Why miniaturization?
  • Moores law (based on a temporary methodology
    i.e., lithography) is only an example of the Law
    of Accelerating Returns. Beyond lithography we
    may expect further progress in miniaturization
    based on DNA, quantum devices, AFM lithography,
    nanotubes, etc.

24
Why miniaturization?
  • Moores Law The amounts of information
    storable on a given amount of silicon roughly
    doubled every year since the technology was
    invented. This relation, first mentioned in 1964
    by semiconductor engineer Gordon Moore (who
    co-founded Intel four years later) held until the
    late 1970s, at which point the doubling period
    slowed to 18 months. The doubling period remained
    at that value up to late 1999. Moore's Law is
    apparently self-fulfilling.

25
Why miniaturization?
26
Taxonomy of Microfabrication Processes
27
Accuracy /precision
  • Accuracy is the degree of correctness with which
    a measuring system yields the true value of a
    measured quantity (e.g. bulls eye).
  • Accuracy is typically described in terms of a
    maximum percentage of deviation expected based on
    a full-scale reading.

http//ull.chemistry.uakron. edu/analytical/animat
ions/
28
Accuracy/precision
  • Precision is the difference between the
    instruments reported values during repeated
    measurements of the same quantity
  • Precision is typically determined by statistical
    analysis of repeated measurements

http//ull.chemistry.uakron. edu/analytical/animat
ions/
29
Accuracy/precision
30
Accuracy, precision and standard deviation
  • A measurement can be precise, but may not not be
    accurate.
  • The standard deviation (s) is a statistical
    measure of the precision in a series of
    repetitive measurements (also often given as ??
    with N the number of data, xi is each individual
    measurement, and x the mean of all
    measurements.
  • The value xi - is called the residual for each
    measurement.

31
Relative vs. absolute tolerance in manufacturing
  • Lithography is excellent for achieving small
    absolute tolerances - - we can make much smaller
    devices with lithography than with mechanical
    machining. The relative tolerance on those
    dimensions though is not so good on a 100 µm
    line we might perhaps achieve 1 . In mechanical
    machining terms this does not even qualify as
    precision machining !
  • For a small relative tolerance, ultra-fine
    diamond milling is better. Can be better than
    0.01 . Of course we cannot make things as small
    as we can with lithography.
  • The above argument might decide your choice of
    machining approach or decide the size of the
    device you want to make.

32
Relative vs. absolute tolerance in manufacturing
  • Lithography (e.g. Si-micromachining) is excellent
    for small absolute tolerances
  • For relative tolerances, ultra-fine diamond
    milling is better
  • In some cases we might want to keep our
    micromachine somewhat larger to optimize relative
    tolerances (see Mass Spectrometer example)

33
Relative vs. absolute tolerance in manufacturing
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL),
    at one point used LIGA to make the next
    generation mass spectrometer
  • The picture below shows an array of holes in
    PMMA to electroplate Ni posts (poles)
  • The diameter of each hole is 40 µm !!
  • A larger mass spectrometer is machined with
    traditional ultra fine diamond milling at JPL
  • Relative tolerance is better than with the LIGA
    machined one, so its performance is better

34
Relative vs. absolute tolerance in manufacturing
35
Merging of two approaches Top-down and
bottom-up machining methodologies
  • Most human manufacturing methods of small devices
    involve top-down approaches. Starting from larger
    blocks of material we make smaller and smaller
    things. Nature works the other way, i.e., from
    the bottom-up. All living things are made atom by
    atom , molecule by molecule from the small to
    the large. As manufacturing of very small things
    with top-down techniques (NEMS or nano
    mechanical devices) become too expensive or hit
    other barriers we are looking at nature for
    guidance (biomimetics).
  • Nature and mankind have developed competitive
    manufacturing methods on the macro level (e.g.,
    steel versus bone). Biomimetics mostly failed in
    the larger world (see Icarus). Background
    reading Cats Paws and Catapults by Steven Vogel
    (Efficiency of mechanical systems in biology and
    human engineering in the macro-world).

36
Merging of two approaches Top-down and
bottom-up machining methodologies
  • On the nanoscale nature is outperforming us by
    far (perhaps because nature has had more time
    working towards biological molecules/ cells than
    towards making larger organisms such as trees and
    us).
  • Further miniaturization might be inspired by
    biology but will most likely be different again
    from nature -- the drivers for human and
    natural manufacturing techniques are very
    different.

37
Merging of two approaches Top-down and
bottom-up machining methodologies
38
Merging of two approaches Top-down and
bottom-up machining methodologies --NEMS
  • MEMS little brother is NEMS, the top-down
    approach to nano devices. This biomimetic
    approach to nano devices I like to call
    nanochemistry. To succeed in the latter we will
    need
  • self-assembly and directed assembly (e.,g, using
    electrical fields -see next viewgraph)
  • massive parallelism
  • understanding of molecular mechanisms --
    chemomechanics
  • engineers/scientists who understand wet and
    dry disciplines

Seeman
Montemagno
39
Merging of two approaches Top-down and bottom-up
machining methodologies --NEMS
  • Example nano chemistry approaches
  • Natural polymers e.g., NAs and proteins not only
    as sensors but also as actuators and building
    blocks (Genetic engineer NAs and proteins-rely
    on extremophiles for guidance)
  • Mechanosynthesis
  • NEMS/biology hybrids --to learn only

40
Biomimetics
  • Bimimetics
  • Many examples in nature provide hints for future
    manufacturing methods but as stated earlier the
    purpose for their development is different from
    the reasons for human manufacturing methods
    (e.g., teeth and sea shells might be excellent
    strong building materials but their growth is
    typically way too slow to be attractive for human
    manufacturing)

41
A few concluding words about manufacturing
methods
  • Serial versus batch versus continuous
    manufacturing methods
  • Projected versus truly 3D
  • Additive process versus subtractive process
  • Top-down versus bottom-up

42
Something to think about
  • Looking back at the worst times, it always seems
    that they were times in which there were people
    who believed with absolute faith and absolute
    dogmatism in something. And they were so serious
    in this matter that they insisted that the rest
    of the world agree with them. And then they would
    do things that were directly inconsistent with
    their own beliefs in order to maintain that what
    they said was true.
  • From Richard P. Feynman in The Meaning of it All.
  • If in the course of these lectures I can make you
    doubt most of the things you have come to
    believe then I probably put you on the path of
    becoming a true scientist/engineer.

43
Something to think about
44
Homework
  • Describe to a 12 year old, in the shortest and
    clearest fashion how a transistor works and why
    it is so important in applications all around us
    (figure is ok but words are required).
  • Characterize using the following criteria
  • projected versus 3D,
  • serial, batch or continuous
  • top-down versus bottom-up
  • Laser machining
  • Mechanical machining
  • E-beam machining and plastic molding.
  • Calculate the number atoms in a 100 µm long Ag
    line (1 µm wide and 1 µm heigh). If we put one
    atom down per second (e.g., using an STM) how
    long will it take to finish this Ag line ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com