VOIR DIRE CONSIDERATIONS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY CASES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

VOIR DIRE CONSIDERATIONS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY CASES

Description:

VOIR DIRE CONSIDERATIONS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY CASES Theodore G. Karavidas, Esq. Karavidas & Argionis Law Offices, LLP 180 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2105 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:119
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: TheodoreK6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VOIR DIRE CONSIDERATIONS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY CASES


1
VOIR DIRE CONSIDERATIONS IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN
INJURY CASES
  • Theodore G. Karavidas, Esq.
  • Karavidas Argionis Law Offices, LLP
  • 180 North LaSalle Street, Suite 2105
  • Chicago, IL 60601
  • 312-782-4545
  • tkaravidas_at_karavidaslaw.com
  • www.karavidaslaw.com
  • www.illinoisbraininjury.com

2
GOALS OF VOIR DIRE
  • Deselect
  • Deselect those who have negative or inflexible
    attitudes or perceptions.
  • Educate
  • Educate those who are open-minded and want to
    hear the evidence and decide fairly.
  • Endear
  • Endear the jurors to you and your client by being
    polite, sincere, and honest.
  • Elicit information without embarrassing anyone.

3
QUALITIES OF A DESIREABLE JUROR
  • Compassion
  • Educability
  • Cooperativeness
  • Independent Reasonableness

4
COMPASSION
  • Family Involvement
  • Charitable Nature
  • Pets
  • Donations

5
EDUCABILITY
  • Look for jurors who are
  • Educable
  • Open-Minded
  • Willing to be Educated
  • Our goal is to find out which jurors have an
    understanding of TBI issues or are capable and
    willing to accept them
  • Jurors who do not understand significance and
    details of a TBI will not return an adequate
    verdict for the plaintiff

6
COOPERATIVENESS/INDEPENDENT REASONABLENESS
  • Identify jurors who can work with others to
    achieve a goal, reach a consensus
  • Identify potential forepersons
  • Identify those persons who will make independent
    decisions while remaining open to the input of
    others
  • Identify loners and contrarians who will have
    difficulty working with others.

7
GOOD JURORS
  • Those who understand importance of unimpaired
    brain function
  • Well-Educated
  • Executive Positions
  • Decision-Makers
  • Problem-Solvers
  • Multi-Taskers
  • Required to be Precise
  • Those who understand importance of new learning
    capability
  • Educators
  • Trainers
  • Problem-Solvers

8
LESS DESIREABLE JURORS
  • Bad Jurors
  • Those with diminished mental capacities
  • Elderly
  • Difficulty with Attention/Concentration
  • Without Significant Executive Function or
    Problem-Solving Demands
  • Questionable Jurors
  • Those with family members afflicted with
    Alzheimers
  • PRO Understand effects of diminished mental
    capacity
  • CON Possible reduced empathy
  • CON If plaintiff is elderly, defense will argue
    that changes are age-related

9
BRAIN INJURY EXPERIENCE
  • Identify those jurors who have some knowledge or
    personal experience regarding TBI and its
    consequences
  • Identify those jurors who have knowledge
    regarding the effects of diminished cognitive
    abilities due to Alzheimers

10
BRAIN INJURY PERCEPTIONS
  • Identify experience, training in medicine,
    psychology, rehabilitation or counseling
  • Identify misperceptions about the causes,
    manifestations or consequences of TBI
  • Educate jurors about the causes, manifestations,
    and consequences of TBI
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com