Title: Examining Home-Field Advantage
1Examining Home-Field Advantage
- Phil Birnbaum
- www.philbirnbaum.com
2Home Field Advantage (HFA)
- In baseball, home teams generally win 54 of
games - Why?
- Several possible explanations
3Possible causes
- Fan enthusiasm
- Familiarity with park
- Molding team to park
- Travel
- "Home Cooking"
- Umpires
- Batting Last
- Others
4Can eliminate some
- Fan enthusiasm
- Nope. Seems to be no correlation between HFA and
attendance - Familiarity
- Only a little
- Travel
- Nothing significant
- Batting Last
- Not just in close games
- Pitching last also has its advantages
- See "The Diamond Appraised" and "Scorecasting"
5Recently Umpiring
- "Scorecasting," by Tobias Moskowitz and Jon
Wertheim, released early 2011 - Claims refereeing/umpiring is the true cause of
HFA - Lays out some evidence for several sports
6"Scorecasting" on umpiring
- Umpires call more strikes for home team pitchers
than for visiting team pitchers - The higher leverage (clutchier) the situation,
the bigger the effect - Umpires actually favor the visiting team in
less-important situations
7"Scorecasting" on umpiring
- Authors claim umpiring/refereeing accounts for
almost all of HFA - But doesn't mesh with other evidence of the
incidence of HFA
8HFA appears in all situations
- For instance
- When one team is ahead by 4 runs early, that's
low leverage. But HFA remains high
9Home team outscores visitors regardless
Inning Overall When one team has 4 run lead
1 18 more runs
2 10 19
3 11 10
4 8 13
5 10 9
6 8 8
7 7 8
8 6 5
10Umpires and leverage
- Mitchel Lichtman finds some effect of clutchness
on called strike HFA, but less than
"Scorecasting" found - Me too
11Other estimates are lower
- John Walsh, "The Hardball Times Annual 2011"
- Home team favored by 0.8 pitches per game
- Accounts for one-third of HFA
- J-Doug, "Beyond the Box Score"
- Accounts for one-sixth of HFA
- Dan Turkenkopf, "Beyond the Box Score"
- Accounts for one-eighth of HFA
12Not just umpires?
- There might be other things going on, not just
umpires - How can we find out?
- Look at things that don't involve umpires
13Like what?
- Maybe fielding. Once a ball is in play,
umpires don't control whether it's a hit or an
out - If defenses turn more balls into outs at home,
would that show that HFA is more than just
umpiring? - No, not really. Because
14Compensating for umpire bias
- if umpires are more lenient towards home
batters, they get more balls and fewer strikes - More favorable counts
- Better hit balls
- Harder to field those balls
- So it could be umpiring after all!
15Compensating for umpire bias
- Similarly in other sports
- In hockey, the referee's main influence is in
calling penalties - Home teams outscore visiting teams even at full
strength - But, it could be because visiting teams have to
play less aggressively out of fear of referee
sensitivity - Same for soccer, basketball, etc.
16How to tell?
- Need a measure of HFA that is not influenced much
by umpires - How about wild pitches and passed balls?
- Objective decision ball eludes catcher, runners
advance
17WP/PB home field advantage
- For 2000-2009 (God Bless Retrosheet)
- Home teams
- 539 WPPB per 100,000 pitches
- Road teams
- 557 WPPB per 100,000 pitches
- 3.3 percent difference
- Statistically significant (barely)
18WP/PB home field advantage
- On 0-0 counts only
- Home 511 WPPB per 100,000 pitches
- Road 544 WPPB per 100,000 pitches
- Even larger effect
19WP/PB home field advantage
- Overall difference about 5 wins over 10 years
- Works out to .0002 wins per game
- That's 1/200 of HFA
- Runs resulting from WPPB are 1/50 of total runs
- Not perfect, but reasonable
20Basketball
- Free throw shooting percentage is not subject to
referee bias - HFA in foul shooting is about 0.2 percentage
points in favor of the home team - Difference of 120 points a year
- 0.1 points per game
- Overall HFA is 3 points per game
- Again, seems reasonable
21Speed skating
- There is a home-field advantage in speed skating!
- Of course, that can't be because of refereeing
- What could it be?
22Another theory
- For some biological reason, humans just perform
better at home than on the road - Testosterone levels "players may have tapped
into a primal instinct to defend their own
territory." - But, whatever some intrinsic evolutionary reason
is plausible, because - HFA is pervasive and universal
- And none of the other hypotheses have tested out
23Competing guesses on HFA
- "Scorecasting"
- Almost 100 umpires.
- Craig Wright, "The Diamond Appraised" (1989)
- 5 crowd 5 last AB 10 familiarity 10
shaping team to park 30 home cooking 40
umpires. - Me (among others)
- 10 umpires 80 intrinsic/testosterone 10
other.
24Where to go from here?
- Need to come up with ingenious ways to decouple
umpiring from other factors - If you can think of any, let me know
- For now, I think there's good evidence that
umpiring is only a small part of what's going on
25Acknowledgements
- Thanks to readers at my blog for many comments,
suggestions, and references on this topic - Mike Fast was especially helpful, pointing me to
some of the studies mentioned here. Thanks, Mike.