Flood Risk management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Flood Risk management

Description:

Flood Risk management History/Mission/Policies Flood Control vs. Flood Risk Management Floods have occurred throughout time, and are not necessarily damaging Early ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:680
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Charl125
Learn more at: http://wleb.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Flood Risk management


1
Flood Risk management
  • History/Mission/Policies

2
Flood Control vs. Flood Risk Management
  • Floods have occurred throughout time, and are not
    necessarily damaging
  • Early legislation authorized flood control in
    response to devastating losses
  • We cant really control floods, but we can modify
    water flows in space and time
  • Corps mission is to assist with and provide
    leadership in managing flood risk this includes
    making Federal investments for reducing damages
    from floods, hence FDR

3
Flood Risk Management Plan
  • A complete description of a plan includes all
    structural, nonstructural, legal, and
    institutional features, both proposed and
    existing, that contribute to the intended flood
    control outputs. EP 1165-2-1 30 Jul 99, 13-8.

4
Flood Risk Management Beginnings
  • Swamp Acts 1849, 1850
  • Mississippi River Commission 1879
  • California Debris Commission 1893
  • Flood Control Act of 1917
  • Flood Control Act of 1936

5
Federal Interest Development
  • Flood Control Act (FCA) of 1944
  • Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960
  • Executive Order 11988
  • Section 73 of Public Law 93-251 (FCA 74)
  • Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of
    1986

6
Nonstructural Highlights
  • FCA 1938land acquisition approved
  • National Flood Insurance Act (1968)
  • PS (1973)planning process to include
    nonstructural
  • Sec. 73 WRDA 1974required consideration of
    nonstructural measures for flood control

7
Nonstructural Highlights
  • EO 11988 (1977)agency role in flood plain
    management
  • Revisions to PS (1979)nonstructural plan
    required
  • Principles and Guidelines (1983)

8
Nonstructural Highlights
  • WRDA 1986 Established local cost sharing
    advantages over structural
  • WRDA 1986 Section 402, requires local
    participation in NFIP for Corps flood projects
  • WRDA 1986 Section 905, requires that
    feasibility reports include a description of a
    nonstructural alternative to the recommended plan
    when such plan does not contain significant
    nonstructural features
  • WRDA 1999 - Section 219, changes benefit
    computation

9
Corps Programs for Flood Risk Management
  • General Investigations
  • Continuing Authorities
  • Section 14 - Emergency Streambank and Shoreline
    Protection (1946)
  • Section 205 - Flood Damage Reduction (1948)
  • Section 208 - Snagging and Clearing (1937)
  • Operation and Maintenance
  • Section 216 - Review of Completed Projects (1970)

10
Evolution of Flood Risk Management Authorities
and Policies
  • Flood Control to Flood Damage Reduction
  • Limited measures to a broad array
  • Local projects to Nationwide programs
  • Single purpose to multi-purpose
  • Growing emphasis on non-structural and flood
    plain management for comprehensive flood risk
    management

11
Policies You Need To Know
  • Considered local drainage issue unless
  • 800 cfs at the 10 year event, unless
  • 100-year gt 1,800 cfs
  • 1-1/2 square miles drainage basin
  • Land development benefits cant be claimed for
    structural projects, however non-structural
    evacuation projects may claim benefits for new
    uses of evacuated floodplain
  • Risk-based analytical framework to be used

12
Policies You Need To Know (cont.)
  • Cost sharing for flood damage reduction
  • Cost sharing advantages for nonstructural
  • Flood Plain Management Plans requirement for
    locals
  • Section 308, WRDA 1990 New structures built
    after June 1991 must have first floor above
    100-year flood elevation, or cannot be included
    in benefit calculations

13
Flood Risk Management Cost Sharing
  • Non-structural
  • Local sponsor must provide 35 of total project
    costs
  • Structural
  • Local Sponsor must provide 5 up front in cash
  • Local Sponsor must provide LERRD
  • Local Sponsor must provide additional cash to
    bring the local share up to 35 of the total
    project cost
  • Local Sponsors share is limited to 50

14
For Further Information
  • Contact the National Planning Center of
    Expertise for Flood Risk Management at CESPD
  • Attend other Flood Risk Management PROSPECT
    Course
  • Check the IWR Planning References CD
  • Visit the FRM PCX Website at www.spd.usace.army.m
    il/frm-pcx

15
Flood Risk Management Planning Center of
Expertise (FRM PCX)
  • Director SPD Planning CoP POC
  • Dan Sulzer (Acting)
  • Program Manager
  • Eric Thaut
  • Core team composed of ERDC, HEC, IWR, LRD, MVD,
    NFPC, NWD, and SPD technical leaders members
  • Virtual regional and national resources

16
Take Away Points
  • The perception of what we do has changed from
    Flood Control to Flood Damage Reduction and is
    now moving towards Flood Risk Management (FRM)
  • There has been a growing emphasis on
    non-structural solutions and flood plain
    management
  • There are several policies that are critical to
    plan formulation of flood damage reduction
    measures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com