CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE - SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE - SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES

Description:

CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE - SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES Professor Richard Macrory CBE Centre for Law and the Environment, University College London – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: richardm62
Learn more at: https://www.biicl.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE - SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES


1
CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE- SOME INTERNATIONAL
LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
  • Professor Richard Macrory CBECentre for Law and
    the Environment, University College
    LondonClimate Change and Its Challenges for the
  • International Legal System, London 17 Oct 2008

2
(No Transcript)
3
UK Power Station Investments for 2015
Approved applications
Applications in Process
  • 11000MWe of approved applications
  • 7390 MWe CCGT
  • 3690 MWe renewables
  • 10000MWe of applications being processed
  • 7500MWe CCGT
  • 2500MWe renewables

Source BERR
4
London Dumping Convention1972 and London
Protocol 1996
  • Global conventions to regulating dumping of waste
    at sea
  • In March 2006 the London Protocol in force, and
    will eventually supersede the Convention.
  • Both instruments continue to apply in parallel
    until full ratification of Protocol
  • Significance they deal with CCS in different
    ways

5
London ConventionKey Legal Issues Concerning CCS
- I
  • Dumping of CO2 not prohibited as such but general
    permit as wastes or other matter required
  • Jan 1996 industrial waste included in Annex I
    - dumping absolutely prohibited. Defined as waste
    materials generated by manufacturing or
    processing operations
  • No consensus as to inclusion of CO2 within this
    category.

6
London ConventionKey Legal Issues Concerning CCS
- II
  • Exceptions to definition of dumping (Art
    III.1(b))
  • Waste disposed of during normal operations
  • CO2 injection into seabed for Enhanced Oil
    Recovery permissible?
  • Placement for purposes other than mere
    disposal, provided not contrary to aims of
    Convention
  • CO2 injected for EOR or climate change
    mitigation?
  • No consensus
  • Sub-seabed storage of CO2 in any event not
    covered by convention? Sea means all marine
    waters other than internal waters (Art III)

7
London Protocol
  • More clearly applies to sub-sea bed, though still
    arguments as to precise meaning, and note
    exclusion direct from land
  • "Sea" means all marine waters other than the
    internal waters of States, as well as the seabed
    and the subsoil thereof it does not include
    sub-seabed repositories accessed only from land.

8
London ProtocolKey problem concerning CCS
  • More restrictive measures for dumping of waste
  • States required to prohibit dumping of all waste
    save for those listed in Annex 1.
  • Dumping of Annex 1 materials requires permit
    issued in accordance with Annex 2.
  • None of categories originally listed in Annex I
    allowed for CO2 storage

9
Amending the Protocol
  • 2004 UK initiated process. Set up Legal and
    Technical Working Groups to clarify issues and
    areas of doubt
  • 2005 - 27th Consultative Meeting
  • Acknowledges CCS role in abating climate change
    and ocean acidification
  • Recognised differing legal interpretations
  • Agreed London Convention and Protocol has role to
    facilitate and/or regulate commissions working
    groups

10
Process of Amendment
  • April 2006
  • Technical WG Risk Assessment Framework and Waste
    Assessment Guidance
  • Legal WG Options for clarification/amendment
    drafted possible amendment for Annex 1 to include
    CO2..
  • Amendment to Annex 1 formally proposed by
    Australia, co-sponsored by UK, Norway, France
    Spain
  • Nov. 2006 Consultative Meeting
  • Amendment resolution adopted 12 parties in
    favour, 5 abstain, 12 not present

11
London ProtocolTimescale and process of amendment
  • 10 February 2007
  • Amendment enters into force for all Contracting
    Parties to Protocol, save for those sending
    declaration under Article 22 regarding inability
    to accept amendment.

12
London ProtocolEffect of the Amendment to Annex I
  • To allow storage of CO2 in sub-seabed geological
    formations.
  • CO2 streams from CO2 capture processes for
    sequestration only if
  • Into a sub-seabed geological formation
  • Consists overwhelmingly of CO2. May contain
    incidental associated substances derived from the
    source material and capture and sequestration
    processes used
  • No wastes or other matter are added for the
    purpose of disposal.

13
Overwhelmingly
  • Potential political problem
  • Greenpeace International drew attention to risks
    of the integrity of long-term storage
  • Proposed the replacement of the term
    overwhelmingly with a quantitative purity
    limit, recommending 99.9 CO2 as a justifiable
    and achievable limit value.

14
London ProtocolOutstanding issue cross
boundary exportation
  • Article 6 prohibition on the exportation of
    waste
  • February 2008 Legal and Technical WG agree that
    this means transboundary transport of CO2 not
    allowed
  • Amendment proposed.
  • Greenpeace International present as an observer
    and (with Germany and Italy) proposed additional
    condition for CO2 export for storage
  • if disposal of CO2 streams from a particular
    source is not feasible within the State of
    origin
  • Meeting of Contracting Parties to decide on
    Amendment.

15
Some Observations on London Dumping Protocol
  • For an international convention and largely
    unproven technology, very fast process of
    amendment - two years from when issue first
    proposed
  • Although NGO had some involvement, did process
    capture public confidence?

16
Other CCS Issues Need Resolving
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • OSPAR Convention (restrictive)
  • Status of CCS with Emissions Trading under
    Climate Change Convention (enabling)
  • Status of CCS as Clean Development Mechanism
    (enabling)
  • Transboundary movements of waste (restrictive)

17
Regional/ National Level
  • Process permitting regime
  • Transportation
  • Storage licence procedures - environmental
    assessment etc.
  • Length of storage licences and transfer
    provisions back to State
  • Liability regimes

18
International Energy Agency
  • 2008 IEA establishes global network of CCS
    regulators in conjunction with Carbon
    Sequestration Leaders Forum and UCL Centre for
    Law and Environment
  • Ist meeting in Paris in May 2008 - over 150
    participants
  • Further telephonic conferences (transportation,
    pilot demonstration projects)
  • Not aiming for harmonized regime but learning
    from each other

19
UCL Carbon Capture Legal Programme
  • STERN Review calls for free exchange of
    information in relation to CCS
  • Legal contribution to have a open access and
    freely available resource site
  • www.ucl.ac.uk/cclp
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com