Title: CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE - SOME INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
1CARBON CAPTURE and STORAGE- SOME INTERNATIONAL
LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
- Professor Richard Macrory CBECentre for Law and
the Environment, University College
LondonClimate Change and Its Challenges for the
- International Legal System, London 17 Oct 2008
2(No Transcript)
3UK Power Station Investments for 2015
Approved applications
Applications in Process
- 11000MWe of approved applications
- 7390 MWe CCGT
- 3690 MWe renewables
- 10000MWe of applications being processed
- 7500MWe CCGT
- 2500MWe renewables
Source BERR
4London Dumping Convention1972 and London
Protocol 1996
- Global conventions to regulating dumping of waste
at sea - In March 2006 the London Protocol in force, and
will eventually supersede the Convention. - Both instruments continue to apply in parallel
until full ratification of Protocol - Significance they deal with CCS in different
ways
5London ConventionKey Legal Issues Concerning CCS
- I
- Dumping of CO2 not prohibited as such but general
permit as wastes or other matter required - Jan 1996 industrial waste included in Annex I
- dumping absolutely prohibited. Defined as waste
materials generated by manufacturing or
processing operations - No consensus as to inclusion of CO2 within this
category.
6London ConventionKey Legal Issues Concerning CCS
- II
- Exceptions to definition of dumping (Art
III.1(b)) - Waste disposed of during normal operations
- CO2 injection into seabed for Enhanced Oil
Recovery permissible? - Placement for purposes other than mere
disposal, provided not contrary to aims of
Convention - CO2 injected for EOR or climate change
mitigation? - No consensus
- Sub-seabed storage of CO2 in any event not
covered by convention? Sea means all marine
waters other than internal waters (Art III)
7London Protocol
- More clearly applies to sub-sea bed, though still
arguments as to precise meaning, and note
exclusion direct from land -
- "Sea" means all marine waters other than the
internal waters of States, as well as the seabed
and the subsoil thereof it does not include
sub-seabed repositories accessed only from land.
8London ProtocolKey problem concerning CCS
- More restrictive measures for dumping of waste
- States required to prohibit dumping of all waste
save for those listed in Annex 1. - Dumping of Annex 1 materials requires permit
issued in accordance with Annex 2. - None of categories originally listed in Annex I
allowed for CO2 storage
9Amending the Protocol
- 2004 UK initiated process. Set up Legal and
Technical Working Groups to clarify issues and
areas of doubt - 2005 - 27th Consultative Meeting
- Acknowledges CCS role in abating climate change
and ocean acidification - Recognised differing legal interpretations
- Agreed London Convention and Protocol has role to
facilitate and/or regulate commissions working
groups
10Process of Amendment
- April 2006
- Technical WG Risk Assessment Framework and Waste
Assessment Guidance - Legal WG Options for clarification/amendment
drafted possible amendment for Annex 1 to include
CO2.. - Amendment to Annex 1 formally proposed by
Australia, co-sponsored by UK, Norway, France
Spain - Nov. 2006 Consultative Meeting
- Amendment resolution adopted 12 parties in
favour, 5 abstain, 12 not present
11London ProtocolTimescale and process of amendment
- 10 February 2007
- Amendment enters into force for all Contracting
Parties to Protocol, save for those sending
declaration under Article 22 regarding inability
to accept amendment.
12London ProtocolEffect of the Amendment to Annex I
- To allow storage of CO2 in sub-seabed geological
formations. - CO2 streams from CO2 capture processes for
sequestration only if - Into a sub-seabed geological formation
- Consists overwhelmingly of CO2. May contain
incidental associated substances derived from the
source material and capture and sequestration
processes used - No wastes or other matter are added for the
purpose of disposal.
13Overwhelmingly
- Potential political problem
- Greenpeace International drew attention to risks
of the integrity of long-term storage - Proposed the replacement of the term
overwhelmingly with a quantitative purity
limit, recommending 99.9 CO2 as a justifiable
and achievable limit value.
14London ProtocolOutstanding issue cross
boundary exportation
- Article 6 prohibition on the exportation of
waste - February 2008 Legal and Technical WG agree that
this means transboundary transport of CO2 not
allowed - Amendment proposed.
- Greenpeace International present as an observer
and (with Germany and Italy) proposed additional
condition for CO2 export for storage - if disposal of CO2 streams from a particular
source is not feasible within the State of
origin - Meeting of Contracting Parties to decide on
Amendment.
15Some Observations on London Dumping Protocol
- For an international convention and largely
unproven technology, very fast process of
amendment - two years from when issue first
proposed - Although NGO had some involvement, did process
capture public confidence?
16Other CCS Issues Need Resolving
- INTERNATIONAL
- OSPAR Convention (restrictive)
- Status of CCS with Emissions Trading under
Climate Change Convention (enabling) - Status of CCS as Clean Development Mechanism
(enabling) - Transboundary movements of waste (restrictive)
17Regional/ National Level
- Process permitting regime
- Transportation
- Storage licence procedures - environmental
assessment etc. - Length of storage licences and transfer
provisions back to State - Liability regimes
18International Energy Agency
- 2008 IEA establishes global network of CCS
regulators in conjunction with Carbon
Sequestration Leaders Forum and UCL Centre for
Law and Environment - Ist meeting in Paris in May 2008 - over 150
participants - Further telephonic conferences (transportation,
pilot demonstration projects) - Not aiming for harmonized regime but learning
from each other
19UCL Carbon Capture Legal Programme
- STERN Review calls for free exchange of
information in relation to CCS - Legal contribution to have a open access and
freely available resource site - www.ucl.ac.uk/cclp