SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY

Description:

SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY A situation is described in terms of two states of the world: a signal is present ( – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: LauraM161
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY


1
SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY
  • A situation is described in terms of two states
    of the world
  • a signal is present ("Signal")
  • a signal is absent ("Noise")
  • You have two possible responses
  • the signal is present ("Yes")
  • the signal is absent ("No")

Signal Noise
Response Yes Hit P(H) False Alarm P(FA)
Response No Miss P(M) Correct Rejection P(CR)
2
  • The theory assumes that what you are doing is
  • First, you collect sensory evidence concerning
    the presence or absence of the signal.
  • Next, you decide whether this evidence
    constitutes a signal. This means that you must
    have some criterion C that you use as a "cutoff"
    if the evidence is less than C, you decide "No"
    if the evidence exceeds C, you decide "Yes".

3
Measures of Performance in SDT
  • 1. Response bias (b)
  • We can describe performance in terms of response
    bias you may be prone to say "yes" (which is
    "risky") or you may be prone to say "no" (which
    is "conservative").
  • Response bias the ratio of the heights of the two
    curves at the cutoff point and is measured by the
    quantity
  • P(X/S)
  • ß
  • P(X/N)
  • where X "evidence variable
  • S signal
  • N noise
  • Note your book has a simplified equation
    for representing ?. You may refer to whichever
    best helps you understand the concept of response
    bias.

4
  • Studies of human performance show that humans do
    change ß in response to changes in probabilities
    and payoffs -- but not as much as they should!
  • This phenomenon is called sluggish beta.
  • Note the terms risky and conservativerefer
    only to a persons propensity to say yes
    (signal) or no (noise).
  • Examples
  • radiologists reading x-rays for signs of tumors
  • radar operators on a battle ship looking for
    incoming enemy aircraft
  • scanning a parking lot for a parking space

5
  • The cutoff (C) for determining the presence of a
    signal vs the response bias parameter (ß).
  • Not the same but correlated.
  • Risky strategy ß ? and C ?
  • More conservative both C and ß ?
  • Setting ß
  • Strategy can be affected by relative costs and
    values assigned to outcomes.
  • Examples
  • radiologists reading x-rays for signs of tumors
  • radar operators on a battle ship looking for
    incoming enemy aircraft

6
Measures of Performance in SDT
  • 2. Sensitivity (d)
  • Signal detection theory distinguishes response
    bias from sensitivity
  • a function of the keenness or sensitivity of the
    human's detection mechanisms and the relative
    strength of the signal in noise.
  • For example, a person may be "risky" (i.e., prone
    to say "Yes, I detect a signal") but may have bad
    eyesight (or be looking at a very fuzzy screen)
    and thus may often miss signals because of this
    low sensitivity.
  • Table 4.5 on page 84 of your textbook gives some
    possible values of d corresponding to observed
    P(H) and P(FA). This value may also be
    calculated from the probabilities of a hit and a
    false alarm.

7
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve
  • Plots the probability of a hit against the
    probability of a false alarm.
  • Each curve represents the same sensitivity at
    different levels of response bias.

8
Your Turn .
  • An experiment was performed to determine how
    students who participated in a distance learning
    course responded to a signal from the instructor
    indicating that they had been called on to
    respond to a question. The results for two of the
    students using a particular type of signal and
    with varying feedback (i.e., rewards for
    responding) are given in the table below. Plot
    the results for both students on the same ROC
    curve. Who is more sensitive? Identify risky
    and conservative behavior. Comment on the
    results.

  Feedback P(fa) P(hit)
  Negative 0.1 0.3
Student 1 Neutral 0.33 0.55
  Positive 0.65 0.78
  Negative 0.05 0.33
Student 2 Neutral 0.35 0.68
  Positive 0.7 0.86
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com