Tier II Reading Intervention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Tier II Reading Intervention

Description:

Tier II Reading Intervention Evelyn Johnson, Ed.D. Margo Healy, M.Ed. Cristianne Lane, M.Ed. Lee Pesky Learning Center Statewide Special Education Technical ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:288
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 68
Provided by: CollegeofE187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tier II Reading Intervention


1
Tier II Reading Intervention
  • Evelyn Johnson, Ed.D.
  • Margo Healy, M.Ed.
  • Cristianne Lane, M.Ed.
  • Lee Pesky Learning Center

2
Agenda
  • Benefits of Strong Tier 1 and Tier 2 Instruction
  • Entry Criteria
  • The Four BIG Questions
  • Identifying the Issues
  • English Language Learners
  • The Journey!

3
What is at stake?
  • What are the benefits to a student, school or
    community when students are proficient readers?

4
  • From the first day of kindergarten tothe last
    day of elementary school, children substantially
    define themselves as readers, and this has
    enormous influence on their development as
    learners and members of society. Those who
    succeed in becoming fluent, strategic, and joyful
    readers are not guaranteed success in school or
    in life, but they are well on their way. However,
    those who do not succeed in reading, or who
    become reluctant readers, face long odds in
    achieving success in school and life
  • Slavin, Lake, Chambers, Cheung Davis, 2009

5
RTI is a System of Instruction
RTI
  • Tier I instruction is strong and
    comprehensive (80 proficient).
  • Tier II interventions focus on specific
    components of reading to respond to the specific
    needs of individual students. Students are
    usually taught in small groups, but identified
    individually by reliable formal and informal
    assessments.

6
The Simple View of Reading
  • Reading comprehension is the product of decoding
    and listening comprehension.
  • Gough and Tunmer

7
Big Picture of Reading
RTI
Cognition Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary De
coding Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness
8
Isolating the Reading Issues
  • Going back to the simple definition of
    reading we can use a series of 4 questions to
    group students and plan interventions.
  • Can the student read grade-level text?
  • Is there a decoding problem?
  • Does the student comprehend text?
  • What if the student is not making progress?

9
Question 1 Does the student read grade-level
text?
Assessment
  • Screeners
  • ISAT reading scores
  • ORF measures
  • IRI measures
  • Oral reading fluency (also known as R-CBM)

10
Reality Check!
  • What do you already know about these students
    (grades, etc.)?
  • What information are you passing to the next
    grade?
  • What is your system for collecting and sharing
    student level data?

11
Normal Distribution Curve
50
25
10
12
AIMSweb
  • AIMSweb National Norm Tables will translate an
    R-CBM score to a percentile rank.
  • For example, a student scoring a 2 on the first
    grade fall IRI (LSF), could be anywhere from the
    20th-48th percentile.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Normal Distribution Curve
50
25
10
15
AIMSweb
Decision Point
  • Average 26th-75th percentile
  • Below Average 11th-25th percentile
  • High risk Below the 11th percentile

16
Take Aways...
  • Regarding resources, our systems must be
    efficient and inform our decisions regarding who
    receives further testing and intervention
    services.

17
Establish a Data Management System
  • At the district level
  • At the school level
  • At the classroom level

18
(No Transcript)
19
Question 1 Can the student read grade level
text?
What are you using for screeners? What is your
criteria for determining which students need
additional assessments?
20
  • Question 1
  • Does the student read grade-level text?

Process
21
Question 2 Is there a decoding problem?
Tools
  • Diagnostic Tools
  • ORF miscue analysis
  • Phonics/decoding surveys (example CORE)
  • San Diego Quick
  • Phonological awareness tests (K-2...)
  • Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way
    spelling inventories)
  • Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.

22
Big Picture of Reading
RTI
Cognition Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary De
coding Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness
23
Simulation 1
  • An oral reading fluency miscue analysis can
    help a teacher better understand a students
    decoding abilities and other skills as well.
  • These can be quite informal... or formal.

24
(No Transcript)
25
Question 2 Is there a decoding problem?
Tools
  • Diagnostic Tools
  • ORF miscue analysis
  • Phonics/decoding surveys (example CORE)
  • San Diego Quick
  • CORE phonological awareness tests (K-2...)
  • Other (program placement tests, Word Their Way
    spelling inventories)
  • Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.

26
CORE Phonics Survey
  • Part A letter names (uppercase)
  • Part B letter names (lowercase)
  • Part C consonant sounds
  • Part D long and short vowel sounds
  • Part E short vowels
  • Part F consonant blends with short vowels
  • Part G short vowels, digraphs, trigraphs

27
  • Part H R-controlled vowels
  • Part I long vowel spellings
  • Part J variant vowels
  • Part K low frequency vowel and consonant
    spellings
  • Part L multisyllabic words

28
Reality Check!
  • Be efficient...
  • What do you already know about this student?
  • What information do you need?

29
Question 2 Is there a decoding problem?
Tools
  • Diagnostic Tools
  • ORF miscue analysis
  • Phonics/decoding surveys (example CORE)
  • San Diego Quick
  • Phonological awareness tests (K-2...)
  • Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way
    spelling inventories)
  • Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.

30
Question 2 Is there a decoding problem?
Tools
  • Diagnostic Tools
  • ORF miscue analysis
  • Phonics/decoding surveys (example CORE)
  • San Diego Quick
  • Phonological awareness tests (K-2...)
  • Other (program placement tests, Words Their Way
    spelling inventories)
  • Consortium on Reading Excellence, Inc.

31
Evidence-based Intervention Model
Instruction
  • Direct, systematic, explicit decoding
    instruction
  • What is the recipe?
  • Resources
  • IES Practice Guides on Reading (WWC)
  • CORE Manual

32
Simulation 2
  • )
  • (
  • w

33
Example
  • Lesson Examples

34
Progress Monitoring
Definitions
  • Progress monitoring (R-CBM)
  • Progress monitoring is a scientifically based
    practice that is used to assess a students
    academic performance and evaluate the
    effectiveness of instruction.
  • Progress monitoring can be used at the district,
    school, classroom and student level.
  • Program measures are assessments that teachers
    use to assess skills taught in the intervention
    program.
  • Growth charts are graphs or charts that document
    progress relative to the exit criteria (the
    target).

35
Question 2 Is there a decoding problem?
What is your system for identifying students with
decoding problems? What is the plan once
students are identified?
36
Big Picture of Reading
RTI
Cognition Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary De
coding Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness
37
Process
  • 1. Can the student read grade-level text?

38
Question 3 Does the student comprehend the
text?
Assessment
  • Possible indicators that students are struggling
  • Miscue analysis/ errors when reading
  • Low R-CBM and/or inaccurate R-CBM
  • Low standardized test scores
  • Poor ISAT reading scores
  • Low grades
  • Poor performance on assignments
  • Observations
  • Low language skills
  • Misbehavior
  • Low MAZE scores

39
Simulation 3
Example
  • How do you know when students cant comprehend?
  • What dont/cant they do?

40
Evidence-based Intervention Model
Instruction
  • Direct, explicit instruction in vocabulary
  • Direct, explicit instruction in comprehension
    strategies

41
Vocabulary Recommendations(www.LPLearningCenter.o
rg)
Instruction
  • 1. Select vocabulary wisely (Beck and McKeown)
  • 2. Explicitly teach vocabulary (Beck, Marzano,
    CORE)
  • 3. Teach students strategies for unlocking
    unfamiliar words (Graves)

42
The simple view of strategies!
Instruction
  • 1. Look within the word (word parts)
  • 2. Look around the word (use context)
  • Look to what you already know (background
    knowledge)
  • 4. Look for resources (people, resources)

43
Reciprocal Teaching Model
Instruction
  • RT is widely used as a Tier I comprehension
    model.
  • It is also an effective, powerful instructional
    strategy for Tier II intervention with a strong
    evidence base (WWC).

44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
Model, Guided Practice, Independent Practice
47
Video Clip Middle School
  • Video Clip Summarization 6 Reciprocal Teaching
    Part 1

48
Progress Monitoring
System
  • Back to the indicators
  • Program measures
  • R-CBM (with high accuracy)
  • Unprompted retells

49
Question 3 Does the student comprehend?
What is your system for identifying students with
comprehension problems? What is the plan once
students are identified?
50
Big Picture of Reading
RTI
Cognition Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary De
coding Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness
51
  • Can the student read grade-level text?

52
Extra Time on Text
Instruction
  • If decoding, comprehension and vocabulary have
    been eliminated, then the student mostly likely
    needs fluency practice.

53
Intervention Models
Instruction
  • Repeated readings (with comprehension checks)
  • Partner reading
  • (Timothy Rasinski)

54
Progress Monitoring
  • R-CBM
  • Rubrics

Read at a good pace Made few mistakes Attended
to punctuation Read smoothly
55
Question 3, Part 2 Fluency Practice
What is your system for identifying students with
fluency problems? What is the plan once students
are identified?
56
Process
  • 1. Can the student read grade-level text?

4. What if the student is not making progress?
57
Question 4 What if the student is not making
progress?
58
Question 4 What if the student is not making
progress?
  • Examine Tier I instruction
  • Review the components of strong Tier 2
    instruction (strong/weak chart from first
    training)
  • Consider attendance
  • Solicit help from parents
  • Consider how peers are progressing
  • Eliminate physical problems
  • Document behaviors/strategies that may impact
    progress

59
  • Recommendations for English Language Learners

60
Big Picture of Reading
RTI
Cognition Thinking Comprehension Vocabulary De
coding Reading Words Phonics Phonemic Awareness
61
ELL Evidence-based Recommendations
  • Provide focused, intensive small-group
    interventions for English learners determined to
    be at risk for reading problems. Although the
    amount of time in small-group instruction and the
    intensity of this instruction should reflect the
    degree of risk, determined by reading assessment
    data and other indicators, the interventions
    should include the five core reading elements
    (phonological awareness, phonics, reading
    fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension).
    Explicit, direct instruction should be the
    primary means of instructional delivery.
  • IES Practice Guide (What Works Clearinghouse)

62
Continued
  • Provide high-quality vocabulary instruction
    throughout the day. Teach essential content words
    in depth. In addition, use instructional time to
    address the meanings of common words, phrases,
    and expressions not yet learned.

63
Continued
  • Ensure that teachers of English learners devote
    approximately 90 minutes a week to instructional
    activities in which pairs of students at
    different ability levels or different English
    language proficiencies work together on academic
    tasks in a structured fashion. These activities
    should practice and extend material already
    taught.

64
Wrap-Up
  • What did todays training validate for you?
  • With your group, identify your next steps in this
    important journey...

65
Thank You!
  • Contact
  • Dr. Evelyn Johnson
  • ejohnson_at_lplearningcenter.org
  • Cristianne Lane
  • clane_at_lplearningcenter.org

66
Statewide Special Education Technical Assistance
(SESTA)
  • Gina Hopper,
  • Director
  • 208.426.4363
  • ginahopper_at_boisestate.edu
  • Katie Bubak,
  • Statewide Consultant
  • 208.426.3257
  • katiebubak_at_boisestate.edu

Training materials can be found at
www.idahotc.com
67
Project Sponsor
Idaho Department of Education Special Education
Division Richard Henderson, Director rhenderson_at_sd
e.idaho.gov
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com