- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

The interaction of a giant planet with a disc with MHD turbulence II: The interaction of the planet with the disc Papaloizou & Nelson 2003, MNRAS 339 (4), 993 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: BrianG161
Learn more at: https://www.asu.edu
Category:
Tags: giant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
The interaction of a giant planet with a disc
with MHD turbulence IIThe interaction of the
planet with the discPapaloizou Nelson 2003,
MNRAS 339 (4), 993
  • Brian Gleim
  • March 23rd, 2006
  • AST 591
  • Instructor Rolf Jansen

2
Introduction
  • Discovery of giant planets close to their star
    has led to the idea that they migrated inwards
    due to gravitational interaction with the gaseous
    disc

3
Causes of Migration
  • Standard picture involves torques between a
    laminar viscous disc and a Jovian protoplanet
    exciting spiral waves, producing an inward
    migration
  • Massive protoplanet can open an annular gap in
    disc
  • Form of gap gas accretion rate function of
    visc., planet mass, height

4
Causes of Migration
  • Protoplanet orbits in gap, interacts with outer
    disc
  • Leads to inward migration 105 yr
  • Balbus Hawley (1991) angular momentum
    transport, inward migration also originates from
    magnetorotational instability (MRI)

5
Paper I Turbulent Discs
  • Focused on turbulent disc models prior to
    introducing a perturbing protoplanet
  • Cylindrical disc models no vertical
    stratification
  • Assume disc is adequately ionized for ideal MHD
    conditions consider models with no net magnetic
    flux
  • Now on to planet-disc interaction...

6
Planet-Disc Model
  • From paper I H/r 0.1
  • Stress Parameter a 5x10-3
  • Stellar Mass 1 Msolar
  • Planet Mass must be gt3 Jupiter masses consider 5
    MJupiter
  • Thinner discs and less massive planets are more
    desirable H/r 0.05 /1 MJupiter
  • Both are computationally impossible now

7
Initial Model Setup
8
Protoplanet Model
  • Modeled as Hill sphere _at_ r 2.2
  • Roche lobe atmosphere around planet before gap
    construction complete
  • Not accretion directly onto planet

9
Protoplanet Model
  • Nelson et al. (2000) matter accretes from
    atmosphere onto planet
  • Cannot simulate that here effect on mag. field
    difficult
  • Atmosphere gains matter, not planet

10
Another Problem
  • Directly imbedding planet into disc produces no
    gap
  • NP carve out small gap _at_ r 2.2
  • Justifed because magnetic energy and stress
    remain same

11
Numerical Results
  • Continuity Eq. for disc surface density
  • Equation of Motion
  • Indentical to Viscous Disc Theory

12
Time Evolution of Model
  • Simulation ran for 100 planetary orbits
  • Initial gap deepened
  • Accretion onto central parts produced something
    like central cavity

13
Time Evolution of Model
  • Magnetic Energy value maintained throughout
    simulation
  • Protoplanetary perturbations do not have strong
    global effect on the dynamo

14
Time Evolution of Model
  • However, planet effects turbulence locally
  • Planet creates an ordered field where material
    passes through spiral shocks

15
Protoplanet in Disc Gap
16
Magnetic Field in Disc Gap
17
Stress Parameter vs. Time
  • Magnetic stress is same as without the planet
  • Total stress peaks due to spiral waves launched
    by protoplanet

18
Stress vs. Radius
  • Total stress and magnetic component become large
    around planet
  • Further out, value is similar to disc w/o planet

19
Angular Momentum Flux
  • High Reynolds stress immediately outside gap
  • High Magnetic stress at large radii
  • Magnetic stress is non-zero through gap,
    transferring L without tidal torque

20
Angular Momentum Flux
  • Flux Profile at later time
  • Same characteristics stable pattern of behavior
    has been established quickly
  • Inward migration results 104 orbits

21
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc
  • Spiral waves sharper in viscous disc

22
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc
  • Little circular flow around protoplanet
  • Turbulence could effect accretion rate

23
Turbulent vs. Viscous Disc
  • Turbulent disc appears to have smaller stress
    parameter a
  • Could be artifact of simulation OR magnetic
    communication across the gap

24
Conclusions
  • Demonstrated many of phenomena seen in laminar
    viscous disc
  • Planet launched spiral waves that transport
    angular momentum
  • Turbulent disc has smaller a
  • Mag. fields transport L across the gap
  • Magnetic breaking around planet
  • Might slow mass accretion rate

25
References
  • The interaction of a giant planet with a disc
    with MHD turbulence IIThe interaction of the
    planet with the discPapaloizou Nelson 2003,
    MNRAS 339 (4), 993-1005
  • The interaction of a giant planet with a disc
    with MHD turbulence IThe initial turbulent disc
    modelsPapaloizou Nelson 2003a, MNRAS 339, 923
  • Images from
  • http//astron.berkeley.edu/gmarcy/0398marcybox4.h
    tml
  • http//www.sns.ias.edu/dejan/CCS/work/SciArt/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com