Winery Emission Control Project Santa Barbara County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Winery Emission Control Project Santa Barbara County

Description:

WINERY EMISSION CONTROL PROJECT SANTA BARBARA COUNTY TODAY S PRESENTATION Emission control project at a winery in Santa Barbara County Discuss the emissions profile ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:170
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Micha295
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Winery Emission Control Project Santa Barbara County


1
Winery Emission Control ProjectSanta Barbara
County
2
Todays Presentation
  • Emission control project at a winery in Santa
    Barbara County
  • Discuss the emissions profile and calculations
  • How local regulations impacted the project (NSR)
  • BACT control options reviewed
  • Decisions made by the applicant
  • Overview of the control system installed
  • Test results
  • References / Links

3
Terravant Wine Center
  • Located in the Santa Ynez Valley (wine country)
  • New facility approved by City of Buellton in
    2007. Multi-Phase project.
  • What is a wine center?
  • Total AQ operational emissions 171 lb/day, 12
    tpy VOCs (uncontrolled)
  • Phase I Completed. Produce 1.0 million gal
    wine per year (473,000 cases).
  • Phase II Future. Produce 1.7 million gal wine
    per year (800,000 cases).

4
(No Transcript)
5
emissions profile and calculations
  • Emissions profile is unique. Two distinct
    processes.
  • Fermentation Large short term emissions from
    September to November (10 weeks)
  • Aging High long term emissions year round from
    oak barrel storage (mostly reds)
  • Emission Factors
  • Fermentation from ARB 2005 inventory guideline
    (not AP-42)
  • Aging mass balance based. Key assumption
    Wine Loss
  • Reasonable worst case daily emissions. Averaging
    does not work for fermentation.
  • 25 over a 10 day period, 50 over y 3 weeks.
  • Wine Loss
  • 1 5 is typical. Temperature and relative
    humidity control are key.
  • GHG emissions (800-900 lb/1000 gal). For TWC gt
    650 tpy CO2e

6
Regulatory applicability
  • City of Buellton Lead agency
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration
  • AQ significance threshold 240 lb/day
  • Odor monitoring plan required (on site water
    treatment plant)
  • APCD Permit
  • Authority to Construct
  • BACT threshold exceeded (25 lb/day)
  • Offset threshold exceeded (55 lb/day, 10 tpy)
  • Separate permits for 1 MW DICE E/S Genset and
    Small Boilers

7
BACT control options reviewed
  • Application, SJVAPCD 2007 Ozone Plan App. K
    Winery RACT Analysis, SJVAPCD Rule 4694 (Wine
    Fermentation Storage Tanks) and SJVAPCD Rule
    4695 (Brandy Aging and Wine Aging Operations)
  • Technologies Evaluated
  • Catalytic Oxidation
  • Condensation
  • Carbon Adsorption
  • Wet Scrubber
  • None were cost effective using traditional CE
    criteria (over 40,000/ton)

8
Decisions made by the applicant
  • Applicant decision to install emission controls
  • Absorption control using wet scrubber selected
  • Avoided costs of offsets (over 50,000/ton then,
    now 75,000/ton)
  • Allowed applicant to retain control of current
    and future production plans. Eliminated
    uncertainty regarding cost and availability of
    ERCs
  • Can promote as green business

9
Control System Overview
  • Packed bed counter-current water scrubber design
    for 90 EtOH removal
  • System Fan. For both fermentation and barrel
    storage rooms.
  • Capture. Building design is key. Building under
    negative pressure.
  • Scrubbing water loop
  • Treating the scrubbing water. Hydrogen peroxide
    and UV accelerator.
  • Alarms.
  • Low Duct Draft Negative Pressure
  • Low Liquid Flow to Scrubber
  • Low Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration (ORP)
  • Safety concerns. CO2 Emergency Relief Exhaust
    System.
  • Costs

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Test results
  • Source Test Results 91 ethanol removal
    efficiency (mass)
  • EtOH Inlet 96 ppmv (5.8 lb/hr)
  • EtOH Outlet 8 ppmv (0.5 lb/hr)
  • Testing required every two years

17
References / links
  • SBCAPCD Winery Webpage http//www.sbcapcd.org/eng
    /winery/winery.htm
  • Terravant Wine Company http//terravant.com
  • Brady Consulting, Inc. http//bradyconsultinginc.
    com/
  • ARB Fermentation EFs http//www.arb.ca.gov/ei/ar
    easrc/fullpdf/full5-1.pdf
  • SBCAPCD Aging EFs http//www.sbcapcd.org/eng/win
    ery/Winery Calculations (ver 2.4).xls
  • SBCAPCD GHG EFs http//www.sbcapcd.org/eng/winer
    y/WineryCO2Calcs.pdf
  • SJVAPCD Rule 4694 Wine Fermentation Storage
    Tanks (12/15/05)
  • SJVAPCD Rule 4695 Brandy Aging and Wine Aging
    Operations (9/17/09)
  • SJVAPCD 2007 Ozone Plan Appendix K RACT
    Analysis for Wine
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com