Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level

Description:

Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: louisvill4
Learn more at: https://louisville.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level


1
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions
Elementary Level
  • Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn
  • Project ABRI
  • University of Louisville

2
ABRI Defined
  • ABRI Academic and Behavior Response to
    Intervention
  • Pilot program involving 3 districts and
    representing elementary, middle and high school
    levels
  • In partnership with the Kentucky Department of
    Education
  • To promote both academic and behavior responses
    in schools

3
ABRI Process
4
Where can I find academic data at the elementary
school level?
  • State wide assessment results
  • Screening results
  • District administered standardized assessment
  • Grade level equivalents
  • Teacher administered formative assessment
  • Teacher administered summative assessment

5
Data Examples per Tier
6
Webinar Offerings
  • 3 Tier Model Academic and Behavior
    Interventions
  • Analysis of Behavior Data
  • Using Academic Data to Make Decisions (elementary
    and secondary)
  • Classroom Management
  • Reading and Math Instruction (Universal
    Strategies)
  • Targeted Interventions Behavior, Reading and Math

7
Critical to the ABRI Process
8
Academic DataReading and Mathematics
9
Reading
  • Collection
  • Compilation
  • Reformatting
  • Charts
  • Graphs
  • Questioning

10
Common Assessments (examples)
  • Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
  • Reading Inventory
  • Developmental Reading Assessment
  • AimsWeb
  • PAS
  • MAP
  • GRADE

11
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills
(DIBELS)
  • Subtests
  • Initial Sound Fluency
  • Skill(s) measured phonological/phonemic
    awareness
  • Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
  • Skill(s) measured phonological/phonemic
    awareness
  • Nonsense Word Fluency
  • Skill(s) measured phonics
  • Oral Reading Fluency
  • Skill(s) measured reading fluency

12
Eckwall/Shanker Reading Inventory
  • Subtests
  • Phonemic Awareness
  • Skill(s) measured Phonemic awareness
  • Sight Vocabulary Word List
  • Skill(s) measured Word recognition
  • Phonics Structural Analysis
  • Skill(s) measured Phonics
  • Oral and Silent Reading
  • Skill(s) measured Reading connected text
  • Listening and Reading Comprehension
  • Skill(s) measured Understanding connected text

13
Qualitative Reading Inventory
  • Word List
  • Skill(s) measured Word recognition
  • Oral and Silent Reading
  • Skill(s) measured Reading connected text
  • Listening and Reading Comprehension
  • Skill(s) measured Understanding connected text

14
Developmental Reading Assessment
  • Oral Reading
  • Skill(s) measured reading fluency
  • Oral Retell, Prompts, and Questions
  • Skill(s) measured Understanding connected text

15
Second Grade Class
16
(No Transcript)
17
Students who Score Below Benchmark
  • In phonemic awareness
  • practice with rhyming, discriminating, blending,
    and segmenting
  • In phonics or word recognition
  • practice with letter/sound correspondence,
    blending, word families, and multisyllabic words
  • In reading fluency or reading connected text
  • practice with letter recognition, letter/sound
    correspondence, high frequency words, oral
    reading
  • In comprehension
  • practice with preparation, organization,
    elaboration, and metacognition, text structures,

18
Forming Groups Based on Assessment Data
  • Review data sources
  • Standardized measures
  • Curriculum-based measures
  • Progress monitoring
  • Informal information (classroom data,
    observations)
  • Identify at-risk students using data
  • Determine targeted areas for instruction
  • Students may have multiple areas of need

19
Group 1
Student ORF NWF
Allison 26 37
Meagan 30 32
Matt 47 45
  • Central Foci Should Be Phonics and reading
    fluency
  • Rationale?
  • Possible activity
  • Word work
  • Manipulate words at the onset/rime and phoneme
    levels incorporate nonsense words
  • E.g., pop-top-lop-lap-cap-tap-hap
  • Materials manipulative letters, dry erase
    boards, letter tiles

20
Available Data Academic Year in Review
(Reading)
Elementary Grade 1 Students per Intervention
Category
21
Available Data Academic Year in Review
(Reading)
22
Fall Reading Assessment Kindergarten
n69
23
Spring Reading Assessment Kindergarten
n66
24
Fall Reading Assessment Grade 3
n55
25
Spring Reading Assessment Grade 3
n57
26
Mathematics
  • Collection
  • Compilation
  • Reformatting
  • Charts
  • Graphs
  • Questioning

27
Common Assessments
  • Fluency Assessments One Minute Timings
  • Diagnostic Interviews
  • Error Analysis
  • Benchmarking software programs

28
Fluency Assessments
  • One minute timings of basic math facts
  • Screening tool

29
Diagnostic Interviews in Mathematics
  • Diagnostic interviews are a means of getting
    in-depth information about an individual
    students knowledge and mental strategies about
    the concept under investigation. A student is
    given a problem and asked to verbalize his or her
    thinking at points in the process for solving the
    problem.

30
Error Analysis of Student Work
  • Problem completion analysis
  • Think Aloud with error analysis
  • Conceptual vs. procedural error analysis

31
Benchmarking Software Programs
  • Computer software programs that identify specific
    goals based on student responses

32
Students who Score Below Benchmark
  • In mathematics fluency
  • In conceptual understanding
  • In mathematics procedures within word problems
  • In application of authentic problems

33
Sample Intervention with Results Intervention
with 28 Students
  • Computation Practice Only
  • One day per week 5/28 Probe 10 4/5 met
    benchmark 80
  • 2 days per week 4/28 Probe 10 4/4 met
    benchmark 100

34
Sample Intervention with Results
  • Great Leaps Math
  • 2 days per week 4/28 Pro be 10 4/4 met
    benchmark 100
  • 3 days per week 7/28 Probe 10 6/7 met
    benchmark 86

35
Sample Intervention with Results
  • Computation practice and Great Leaps Math
  • 3 days of intervention 2/28 Probe 10 2/2 met
    benchmark 100
  • 4 days of intervention 5/28 Probe 10 4/5 met
    benchmark 80
  • 5 days of intervention 2/28 Probe 10 2/2 met
    benchmark 100
  • Students below Fall benchmark -- Probe 10
  • 2/33 6

36
Fall Assessment Results
37
Fall Assessment Results
38
Fall Assessment Results
39
ABRI Process Decision making
40
The University of Louisville
Amy Lingo Assistant Professor, Special
Education College of Education and Human
DevelopmentUniversity of Louisville Louisville,
KY 40292 Amy.Lingo_at_louisville.edu (502) 852-0563
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com