NRIC5, FG4 Report, June 2001 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

NRIC5, FG4 Report, June 2001

Description:

Network Reliability and Interoperability Council V Focus Group 4 Interoperability NRIC V Council Meeting October 30, 2001 Ross Callon Juniper Networks – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: RossC69
Category:
Tags: fg4 | june | juniper | nric5 | report

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NRIC5, FG4 Report, June 2001


1
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council
V
Focus Group 4 Interoperability
NRIC V Council Meeting October 30, 2001
Ross Callon Juniper Networks Scott
Bradner Harvard University Co-chairs, Focus Group
4
2
Outline
  • Charter
  • Membership
  • Progress to date
  • Recommendations / Next Steps

3
Charter
The purpose of Focus Group 4 is to provide
recommendations to the Council that, when
implemented, will facilitate and assure
interoperability of public data networks. The
duties of the Focus Group 4 will be to prepare
studies, reports, and recommendations for
assuring data network interoperability within the
parameters set forth in the NRIC V Charter. Focus
Group 4 will determine what levels of
interoperability are needed. Focus Group 4 will
also monitor future developments to ensure that
interoperability is not at risk. Focus Group 4
will make recommendations with respect to
interoperability issues that may arise from
convergence and digital packet networks. Focus
Group 4 may also make recommendations with
respect to such additional interoperability
issues as the Commission may specify.
4
Active Participants
Equipment Suppliers
Others
Service Providers and/or Network
Operators
ATT Rick Canaday, Randy Bush C W Chris
Liljenstolpe Conxion Jeff Swinton Cox Alex
Best Illuminet Bruce Johnson Genuity Justin
Aborn Level3 Doug Sicker, Todd Branning,
Nasser Elaawar MFN Joseph Malcolm, Qwest
Robert Hubbard Sprint Ted Seely, David
Meyer Verizon Dan Currie Worldcom Craig
Silliman XO John Curran
Cisco Fred Baker Convedia Garland Sharratt
Juniper Ross Callon Lucent Reinhard Metz Karl
Rauscher
FCC Kent Nilsson, Scott Marcus Harvard
U. Scott Bradner Mitretek Guerin
Goldsmith Telcordia Ralph Parker Visa Robert
Neumann
5
Progress To Date
  • Recent Meetings
  • July 24, 2001 (Cisco, San Jose)
  • Sept 13 meeting cancelled (editing moved on-line)
  • Carrier Interconnection
  • Cooperation with 2.A2
  • Testing discussions

6
Carrier Interconnection / Peering Issue
  • We have had discussions on SP interconnection and
    peering at all meetings
  • We have published a short statement encouraging
    service providers to publish their criteria for
    peering
  • Comments discussed at July meeting, issues
    moved to informational paper
  • Completed informational paper on interconnection
  • Has been distributed to Council members
  • Is ready for publication
  • (outline follows)

7
Service Provider Interconnection for Internet
Protocol Best Effort Service NRIC V, Focus Group
4   1. Introduction 1.1 Overview 1.2
Terminology   2. Background 2.1 Basic Data
Connectivity in the Internet 2.2 Overview of
Routing in the Internet 2.3 Asymmetric Traffic
Load 2.4 Public versus Private Interconnect 2.5
Service Provider Interconnection Peering and
Transit 2.6 Flexible Interconnection   3.
Quality of Interconnections 3.1 Performance and
Scalability 3.2 Robustness and Security 3.3
Tools for Measuring Interconnections  
8
Service Provider Interconnection for Internet
Protocol Best Effort Service (continued)     4.
Potential Issues 4.1 Publishing Interconnection
Guidelines 4.2 Issues to be Considered 4.3
Examples of Criteria   5. Summary References
(Includes pointers to interconnection
guidelines by Genuity, Level 3, and
WorldCom)
9
Cooperation with 2.A2
  • FG4 previously reviewed Focus Group 2, working
    group 2.A2, best practices for network
    reliability in data networks
  • We are intending to review interoperability BPs
    in the 2.A2 final report

10
Testing
  • FG4 has had multiple discussions on testing
  • Agreement
  • Strong agreement on importance of testing
  • There are many valid forms of testing
  • There are many organizations involved in testing
  • (including vendors and service providers)
  • FG4 is reluctant to endorse any particular test
    group
  • We have not yet produced formal output in this
    area.
  • We are proposing that future work of FG4 may
    include white paper on testing.

11
Future Meeting Schedule
  • Nov 13 in San Jose, CA (hosted by Cisco)
  • Intend to discuss possible future FG work
  • If necessary, could consider final edits to white
    paper on carrier interconnection
  • Additional meetings depend upon NRIC
    re-chartering
  • Propose to schedule meetings for Jan/Feb, and
    Mar/April, in anticipation of ongoing work.

12
Recommendations / Next Steps
  • Continue to encourage participation
  • Publish informational paper
  • Coordinate with other FGs as appropriate
  • Solicit input on ongoing tasks for FG4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com