Significant New - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Significant New

Description:

24621.00 6267.00 12428.00 2750.00 781.00 1520.00 875.00 1.20 438.00 0.30 1.02 6.90 5/24/1983. 35492.00 10511.00 18465.00 3053.00 964.00 1940.00 559.00 0.17 558.00 0 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ValuedGate691
Category:
Tags: new | significant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Significant New


1
Significant New Learnings From An Integrated
Study Of An Old Field, Foster/South Cowden Field
(Grayburg San Andres), Ector County, Texas.
  • Robert C. Trentham, DGS
  • Center for Energy and Economic Diversification
  • University of Texas of the Permian Basin

2
Project Results
  • 290,000 BO Incremental Production 1996 to present
  • gt650,000 BO Incremental Reserves
  • 3 Re-entries
  • 4 New Drills
  • gt12 Workovers
  • Economic life of field extended from 9 to 16 years

3
Sec 36 Production 1977 to 1993
4
Bottom Line
5
Learnings Came in All Areas
  • Reservoir Characterization
  • Well Testing
  • Re-completions
  • Production

6
INTEGATED STUDY
  • GEOLOGICAL MODEL
  • 3D SEISMIC / INVERSION MODELING
  • FLOW MODELING
  • HISTORY MATCH
  • SIMULATION
  • WELL WORK, TESTING, AND MONITORING

7
PROCEEDURES
  • PRODUCTION TESTING
  • PRESSURE TRANSIENT TESTING
  • WATER CHEMISTRY
  • WELL WORK

8
Type Log
  • Queen
  • Upper Grayburg Main Pay
  • Lower Grayburg Minor Pay
  • San Andres Large OOIP

9
FOSTER FIELD
10
INTEGATED STUDY
Problems
Solutions
  • GEOLOGICAL MODEL
  • 3D SEISMIC / INVERSION MODELING
  • FLOW MODELING
  • HISTORY MATCH
  • SIMULATION
  • TESTING, WELL WORK, MONITORING
  • OLD WATERFLOOD
  • CROSS FLOW BETWEEN ZONES
  • NO FRACTURE STIMULATIONS
  • BHP DISCREPANCIES
  • LOW PERMEABILLLTY
  • WHERE DID THE OIL COME FROM AND WHERE DID THE
    WATER GO?
  • OPEN HOLES / CASED HOLES

11
  • Discovered 1939
  • 40 Acre spacing
  • Nitro Open Holes
  • Waterflood 1962
  • 20 Acres 1979
  • Laguna 1992
  • DOE 1994
  • Oxy 2002

12
(No Transcript)
13
Reservoir Characterization
  • San Andres Reservoir Over Estimates and Under
    Achievement
  • Barriers to vertical flow
  • Inversion Modeling to porosity maps
  • Seismic Velocity related to Neutron Density
    Porosity

14
Porosity vs. Permeability
15
(No Transcript)
16
Seismic Inversion Modeling
17
(No Transcript)
18
Porosity - Inversion vs. log
Seismic Inversion
Well Log
19
Well Testing
  • Water Chemistry
  • Inefficient sweep
  • Backup for well testing workover results
  • Carryover and Makeup water
  • Bottom Hole Pressure Test results
  • Complex layering of reservoir
  • Cross flow
  • Low permeability Longer test duration
  • Production tests
  • 3 day minimum

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
History Match
1939 Discovery
1961 Waterflood
25
1979 20 Acre Infill
1996 Simulation
26
BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE TESTINGAND THE IMPACT OF
PERMEABILITY ON PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
27
Upper Grayburg wells 1320 apart
2124
544
1534
955
28
Dual Zone Test
29
After CIBP
30
Same Well After Re-frac
31
Recompletions/Workovers
  • 1955 to 1982 Fracture Stimulation are closed,
    healed or scaled over
  • Acid Stimulations unsuccessful in contacting
    reservoir
  • Success rate can be estimated and candidates
    ranked by Bottom Hole Pressure, Water Chemistry
    and Production Tests

32
Brock Lease Workover Results
Well Work Date BOPD MCFPD BWPD
BR 5 Re-Frac 8/98 58.5 6 1 6
Post-Frac 72 10 200
6/02 13 3 71
BR6 Re-Frac 8/98 68.6 3 1 9
Post-Frac 38 10 220
6/02 9 2 62
BR7 Re-Frac 8/98 77.2 6 2 5
Post-Frac 44 6 242
6/02 15 5 178
33
Production
  • Outcome of fracture stimulation is proportional
    to bottom hole pressure and Oil/Water production
    rates prior to treatment
  • Flowing water recoveries do not condemn a well.
    Some wells produce many times load and have to
    have fluid level drop below 1000 from surface
    before producing OIL!

34
Bottom Line
35
ucceful Project?
  • PRODUCTION BEFORE WELL WORK (UPPER
    GRAYBURG ONLY)
    37 BO, 9 MCF, 181 BW
  • INITIAL PRODUCTION AFTER WORK 467
    BO, 145 MCF, 3167 BW
  • CURRENT PRODUCTION RATE
    280 BO, 65 MCF, 2323 BW

36
Acknowledgements
  • Dick Weinbrandt
  • Bill Robinson
  • DOE Tulsa office
  • The Staff of Laguna Petroleum
  • Baker-Hughes (previously Scientific Software
    Intercorp)
  • Paul Laverty
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com