Discussion on SRM slag requirement and proposed solution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Discussion on SRM slag requirement and proposed solution

Description:

AP/HMX/HTPB may be one of the candidates, however, if we don t want compromise the specific impulse of the propellant (see table -1), ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: 89366
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Discussion on SRM slag requirement and proposed solution


1
Discussion on SRM slag requirementand proposed
solution
  • ISO/TC20/S14/WG3 ODCWG
  • 2008.10.22

2
1. Requirement and Comments from the world
  • Two major comments have came on the following
    requirement.
  • Solid rocket motor shall be designed to avoid
    into the release into Earth.
  • (1) Comments from Japan _at_ September 2008.
  • It is not feasible to comply with the
    requirement. Unfeasible restriction shall be
    transferred to a Technical Report.
  • (2) Comments from US _at_ September 2008
  • There is great controversy over whether 1 mm is
    feasible or practical or even necessary.
    Recommend making this requirement more generic
    and that ultimate resolution be achieved when the
    supporting standard becomes a work item. (US.DF)
  • Section 6.1.5 is unacceptable to the U.S. since
    none of our solid rocket motors can meet this
    constraint. Note that Reference 13 here is a NASA
    document and is inappropriate to be used in this
    context and should be removed.(US.WA)

3
2. Views on the feasibility of requirements
  • View of Japan
  • There is no practical methods to avoid by
    design, or verify the phenomena on the ground.
  • (2) View of United States
  • There is great controversy over whether 1 mm is
    feasible or practical or even necessary.
  • None of our solid rocket motors can meet this
    constraint
  • (2) View of France
  • There are two way to avoid the slag. see
    detail in 2.1
  • (3) Again, view of Japan
  • Still the slag can not be stopped generating.
    see detail in 2.2
  • The technology for proposed combination of
    propellants have not been matured. see detain in
    2.3

4
2.1 French view in detail
  • Two solutions allow to avoid slag.
  • (1)The nozzle throat should be external, not
    internal (other wording emerged vs. submerged).
  • Slag is produced in the cavity of the SRM when
    the throat is inside.
  • (2)Metal (Aluminum) should be replaced by
    Octogen, Hexogen, HMX or similar by definition
    of these changes, there can be no residual of
    significant size this is very well known and
    qualified. Remember that we talk only of
    particles larger than 1 mm.

5
2.2 Japanese view on nozzle design in detail
  • Adding to the phenomena introduced in NASA
    report, another factor exists.
  • At the end of motor operation, internal pressure
    drops and the combustion of solid propellant goes
    very inactive. In such a region, it is very
    difficult to burn Al particles fully and most of
    Al particles are accumulated at the burning
    surface and form large unburnt particles. We
    always observe many large unburnt Al particles
    inside the rocket motor after the static firing
    tests. They can be ejected outside the motor as
    well as the slag in the cavity you mentioned. It
    is inevitable, and does not depend upon the
    nozzle type.
  • In the space, pressure drops further, and even
    below the PDL (pressure deflagration limit) of
    the propellant, remaining propellant continues
    to decompose mainly with the radiative heat from
    the nozzle throat whose temperature is over
    3000K. Al particles may not burn and form unburnt
    particles, which would be ejected outside the
    motor.
  • The amount of the slag mentioned above is not
    large, however, such a possibility cannot be
    denied and must be considered.
  • depends on the grain design

6
2.3 Japanese view on propellant in detail
  • To replace the current propellant with
    non-metalized solid propellant is possible,
    however, it is not realistic now.
  • AP/HMX/HTPB may be one of the candidates,
    however, if we dont want compromise the specific
    impulse of the propellant (see table -1), the
    concentration of HMX should be high. We can
    measure the burning rate with a strand burner, we
    can burn small motor, however, the application to
    the full-scale motor is another problem.
  • We dont have a good bonding agent effective to
    both of AP and HMX. We have to conduct aging test
    of the propellant itself and the bond line
    between the propellant and insulation with full
    time scale (we dont believe accelerated aging
    test), and so on. We agree with France we should
    continue the discussion of new propellants,
    however, it is not the solution now.

Table 1 Degradation of performance in the cases that eliminate Aluminum Table 1 Degradation of performance in the cases that eliminate Aluminum Table 1 Degradation of performance in the cases that eliminate Aluminum Table 1 Degradation of performance in the cases that eliminate Aluminum
Propellant Composition Temperature Isp
Ordinal propellant with Al 20Al 3528.5 331
Case1 Propellant without Al 12HTPB, 88AP 3005.9 304.1
Case2 Replace Al by RDX 12HTPB, 68AP, 20RDX 3061 308.6
Case3 Replace Al by XDX 12HTPB, 68AP, 20HDX 3049.1 307.7
Remark Combustion Pressure 5MPa, Area Ratio 100 Remark Combustion Pressure 5MPa, Area Ratio 100 Remark Combustion Pressure 5MPa, Area Ratio 100 Remark Combustion Pressure 5MPa, Area Ratio 100
7
3. What is the practical threshold to limit using
solid motor? Summary of views
US France Japan
Causes of slag Slag is produced in the cavity of the SRM Slag is produced in the cavity of the SRM Adding to the left, At the end of motor operation, unburn Al particles will be accumulated at the burning surface and form large unburnt particles.
Effective preventive measures The nozzle throat should be external. Metal (Aluminum) should be replaced by Octogen, Hexogen, HMX or similar. The proposed nozzle design can not eliminate slag. Performance of Almi-less propellant will not satisfy us, or any bonding agent is not effective.
Practical actions (Current practice) Making this requirement more generic and that ultimate resolution be achieved when the supporting standard becomes a work item More practical requirement. Detail technical Report to be developed to encourage the awareness of solid motor issue.
Proposed change for description in STD Accretions of solid combustion products be avoided and particle size controlled to avoid further contaminating the near Earth space environment. See Conclusion
8
3. What is the practical threshold to limit using
solid motor? Summary of views
UK other delegations
Causes of slag
Effective preventive measures
Practical actions (Current practice)
Proposed change for description in STD Solid rocket motors shall avoid releasing any products larger than 1 mm in their largest dimension that will remain in the protected regions for more than 25 years. (to be proposed)
9
4. Conclusion 4.1 Summarized situations
  • To limit the generation of slag completely is
    difficult under the current technology level.
  • Some improvement could be possible in future to
    some extent.
  • There are demands to launch payloads by low cost
    solid launch vehicles, and some nations may
    select development of such vehicles in their
    national strategy, or find business chances to
    provide such launching service.
  • ISO shall find the balance point between the
    preservation of the orbital environment and still
    promoting space business without imposing
    excessive burden.
  • But some operational constrains may be necessary.
  • GEO protected region, where natural force to
    clean up the environment can not be expected,
    shall be respected.
  • The risk in LEO is relatively small, because
    small slag tends to re-enter within not so long
    future (ex. 1 cm slag in 800 km altitude will
    re-enter within 25 years), and not all the world
    solid motor stages will not operated in such high
    altitude.
  • It will be agreed for ISO to notify the risk of
    solid motor, and encourage to improve it in
    design or operation manner.

10
4.2 Proposed change Combined description among
US, UK and JPN proposals
  • 6.1.5 Accretions of solid combustion products
    shall be avoided and particle size shall be
    controlled to avoid further contaminating the
    near Earth space environment.
  • Particularly solid rocket motors shall avoid
    releasing products remain in the GEO protected
    regions.
  • Technical report may be developed by experts.
  • Table-4 Decision of each member countries
    (expected to be filled in by members)

Country Decision (comment) Country Decision (comment)
Brazil Japan Agree
Canada Russia
China Ukraine
France United Kingdom
Germany United States
Italy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com