A Beacon-Less Location Discovery Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks

About This Presentation
Title:

A Beacon-Less Location Discovery Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks

Description:

... (Maximum Likelihood Estimation ... Pr (X1=an | ) L( ) = log fn ... Security High Low Device Cost Low High Computation Cost Low Low ... –

Number of Views:231
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: W865
Learn more at: https://web.ecs.syr.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Beacon-Less Location Discovery Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks


1
A Beacon-Less Location Discovery Scheme for
Wireless Sensor Networks
  • Lei Fang (Syracuse)
  • Wenliang (Kevin) Du (Syracuse)
  • Peng Ning (North Carolina State)

2
Location Discovery in WSN
  • Sensor nodes need to find their locations
  • Rescue missions
  • Geographic routing protocols
  • Many other applications
  • Constraints
  • No GPS on sensors
  • Cost must be low

3
Existing Positioning Schemes
Beacon Nodes
4
Two Important Elements
  • Reference points
  • They must know their locations.
  • e.g. beacon nodes, satellites.
  • Relationship between nodes and reference points
  • Distance
  • Angle of arrival
  • Time of arrival
  • Time difference of arrival

5
The Beacon-Less Scheme
  • Without using beacon nodes
  • Beacon nodes are more expensive
  • They can be the main target of attacks
  • Nonetheless, we still have to find reference
    points and the corresponding relationships.
  • Remember the locations of the reference points
    must be known.

6
A Group-Based Deployment Scheme
7
A Group-Based Deployment Scheme
8
Modeling of The Group-Based Deployment Scheme
Deployment Points Their locations are known.
We still need another important element The
relationship between nodes and reference points.
9
The Relationships
A
10
The Relationships
A
B
11
Modeling of the Deployment Distribution
  • Using pdf function to model the node
    distribution.
  • Example two-dimensional Gaussian Distribution.
  • Other distribution can also be used.

12
The Idea
  • Observation at location O
  • See more nodes from A and D than from H and I.
  • Observation at location P
  • Quit different from location O.
  • See more nodes from H and I than from A and D.
  • Given a location, we can derive the observation.
  • Given the observation, can we derive the
    location?

13
The Problem Formulation
Observation a (a1, a2, an)
Location Estimation
Location ? (x, y)
14
A Geometric Approach
  • Pick the three nearest deployment points (the
    three highest ai values).
  • Estimate the distance between the sensor and
    these points.
  • MLE (Maximum Likelihood Estimation)
  • f (Xi ai Z) The probability of
    observing ai nodes from Group i when
    the distance is Z.
  • Find Z, such that f (Xi ai Z) is maximized.

15
A More General Solution
  • Instead of considering only three groups, we
    consider all the groups.
  • a (a1, a2, an) The observation.
  • fn(a ?) The probability of observing a at
    location ?.
  • MLE Principle find ?, such that fn(a ?) is
    maximized.

16
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
  • Likelihood Function
  • fn(a ?) Pr (X1a1, , Xnan ?)
  • Pr (X1a1 ?) Pr (X1an
    ?)
  • L(?) log fn(a ?)
  • Find ?

17
Finding ?
  • Brute-Force Search search all possible ?.
  • Small Area Search
  • Find an initial point (accuracy can be low).
  • Conduct brute-force search around the initial
    point.
  • Gradient Descent A standard solution.

18
Gradient Descent
  • A 2-dimensional function is represented as a
    surface in a 3-dimensional space
  • The maximum point (peak) holds a zero gradient
  • Find the shortest path to reach the peak.
  • Could be expensive

19
Evaluation
  • Setup
  • A square plane 1000 meters by 1000 meters
  • 10 by 10 grids (each is 100m X 100m)
  • s 50 (Gaussian Distribution)
  • What to evaluate?
  • Accuracy vs. Density
  • Accuracy vs. Transmission Range
  • Boundary Effects
  • Computation Costs.

20
Effect of Density m
An Improvement Dummy Nodes
m number of sensors in each group
21
Effect of Transmission Range R
22
Effect of Boundary
23
Comparing the Three Numeric Approaches (Cost)
24
Comparing the Three Numeric Approaches (Accuracy)
25
Comparisons
Beacon-Less Beacon-Based
Communication Overhead Low Low
Computation Cost High Low
Device Cost Low High
Robustness/Security High Low
Mobility None Good
26
Conclusion and Future Work
  • Beacon-Less Location Discovery
  • Formulate the location discovery problem as an
    estimation problem
  • Use the Maximum Likelihood Estimation to solve
    the estimation problem
  • Future work
  • How the inaccuracy of the deployment model affect
    the result?
  • Resilience and Security
  • IPDPS05 paper (Best Paper Award in the Algorithm
    Track)
  • Google Wenliang Du can get the paper.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com