Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction

Description:

Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction I. Systematics = Science of biological diversity. Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny (evolutionary history). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: KarlM256
Learn more at: https://science.umd.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction


1
Topic Phylogenetic Reconstruction
  • I. Systematics Science of biological diversity.
    Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny
    (evolutionary history).
  • - Based on cladistic analysis (will define
    shortly)
  • II. Taxonomy identify, name and classify
    organisms.
  • Carl Linneaus (Swedish Prof. 1707-1778)
  • Binomial nomenclature, Genus species

2
III. Hierarchial Taxonomic Grouping Plants
  • Kingdom
  • Phylum
  • Class
  • Order - names end in ales
  • Family - names end in aceae
  • Genus
  • species

3
Table. Classification of Large Ground Finch and
Common Buttercup
4
Figure The connection between classification and
phylogeny
5
IV. Classification and Phylogeny
  • After the publication of Charles Darwins book On
    the Origin of Species (1859) differences and
    similarities among organisms became to be seen as
    the result of their evolutionary history
    phylogeny.
  • Phylogenetic Trees trace evolutionary
    relationships among taxa.
  • taxa (plural) taxon (singular) named taxonomic
    unit at any level.

6
V. Types of Phylogenetic Trees
  • Monophyletic members of taxa result from single
    common ancestor. Only legitimate taxa derived
    from cladograms!
  • Polyphyletic members of taxa result from more
    than one common ancestor.

7
Figure Monophyletic versus and polyphyletic
groups
8
VI. Homology vs. Analogy
  • Homologous Traits Common origin.
  • Similarity in structure reflects common
    ancestry
  • Characters reflect ancestral past.
  • Examples

9
Figure  Homologous structures anatomical signs
of evolution
10
VI. Homology vs. Analogy
  • Analogy similarity in gross appearance and
    function DOES NOT reflect common ancestry.
  • traits or characters exhibit a common
    function BUT different evolutionary origins.
  • Analogy DOES reflect similar selective pressures
    ----gt Convergent Evolution.
  • Ex., bird and insect wings,
  • succulence in plants,
  • Monotremes, marsupial, placental mammals

11
Figure Convergent evolution and analogous
structures cactus and euphorb
12
Three types of Mammals
Monotremes Marsupials Placental
13
VII. Molecular Markers aid Systematics
  • Two Approaches
  • 1) Sequence of amino acids in proteins of human
    genome only 2
  • 2) Sequence of nucleotides in nucleic acids DNA
    and RNA comparisons via sequencing, restriction
    mapping and hybridization.
  • Much data now held in electronic data bases.
  • Goal Identify and compare homologous DNA
    sequences among taxa.

14
How to identifying homologous nucleotide
sequences
  • 1. Select appropriate portion of genome to
    compare.
  • Often mtDNA segments for recently diverged taxa.
  • Often rRNA genes for distantly related taxa
    evolves slowly.
  • Example Aligning segments of DNA
  • Today utilize sophisticated computer programs to
    analyze differences between sequences.

15
Figure Aligning segments of DNA
16
Molecular Clock utility
  • Goal is to provide an independent assessment for
    the origin of taxonomic groups in time.
  • Based on the fact some proteins, cytochrome C
    and some mitochondrial genomes evolve at a
    constant rate of evolution over time.
  • Thus, Molecular clocks are calibrated in actual
    time graphing differences in sequences against
    time.
  • However, some proteins and nucleic acids evolve
    at different rates.
  • Molecular clocks also assume constant Mutation
    Rate?
  • Utility may be minimal

17
Figure Dating the origin of HIV-1 M with a
molecular clock In 2000 estimated invasion of
aids into humans in 1930s. Evidence also for
multiple origins of AIDs invading humans as well.
18
VIII. Science of Phylogentic Systematics B.
Cladistics - uses novel homologies to define
branch points.
  • Location of branch point relative time of
    origin between taxa.
  • Location of branch point extent of divergence
    between branches or how different 2 taxa have
    become since diverging from a common ancestor.
  • Recent branch versus deeper branch

19
VIII. Science of Phylogentic Systematics C.
Cladistic Analysis
  • Clade evolutionary branch
  • Cladistic analysis groups organisms by order in
    time, clades arose along a dichotomous tree.
  • Each branching point indicates a novel homology
    unique to the species on the branch.
  • Uses ONLY homologies to construct trees!!!
  • DOES NOT use level of divergence.

20
Figure Cladistics and taxonomy
21
Figure Constructing a cladogram
22
VIII. Science of Phylogentic Systematics C.
Cladistic Analysis
  • Uses outgroup comparison to recognize primitive
    traits members of the study group AND to
    establish a starting point for the tree.
  • Outgroup Species or a group of species
    relatively closely related to study group BUT
    clearly NOT as related as any study group members
    are to each other.
  • Outgroup study group may share primitive
    characters, likely shared a common ancestor.

23
VIII. Science of Phylogentic Systematics C.
Cladistic Analysis
  • First, outgroup determines shared primitive
    character states.
  • Next, examine synapomorphies shared derived
    character states to construct the tree.
  • Synapomorphies novel homologous traits that
    evolved in an ancestor common to all species on
    ONE branch BUT not on other branch.
  • Parsimony simplest tree using the fewest
    changes to show evolutionary relationships.

24
Figure Constructing a cladogram
25
Figure Parsimony and the analogy-versus-homolog
y pitfall 4 chambered heart is analogous NOT
homologous
26
VIII. Science of Phylogentic Systematics C.
Cladistic Analysis Limitations
  • Since focus solely on phylogenetic branching
    cladistic analysis accepts ONLY monophyletic
    study groups.
  • Preferred approach is to use a combination of
    characters to design trees for study groups
    including molecular, morphological, anatomical,
    ultrastructural, and developmental.

27
Figure When did most major mammalian orders
originate?
28
  • The END FOR NOW
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com