Title: New Technologies for Challenging Situations
1New Technologies for Challenging Situations
Perennial and Nursery Crops in California
- S. Schneider, T. Trout, J. Gerik
- USDA ARS, Parlier, CA
- H. Ajwa, B. Westerdahl
- U C, Davis
2Challenging Situations
- Field Nursery Crops
- strict nematode control regulations in California
- efficacy needed to 150 cm
- crop rescue if nematode management fails
3Challenging Situations
- Perennial Crop Replant
- roots from previous crop can harbor nematodes
deep in the soil - management is needed for more than one season
- minor failures compound over the life of the
vineyard or orchard
4Challenging Situations
- Ornamental Crops
- diversity of cropping systems
- 145 crops/grower at one time
- short cropping cycle
- residual activity of pesticides
- proximity to urban areas
5Common Issues
- diversity of soil types
- diversity of climates
- diversity of pests pathogens
- dependence on methyl bromide
6Potential Solutions
- new materials
- new application technologies
- rescue technologies
- site-specific management
- innovative combinations of all tools available
7New Materials
- covered previously by Dr. Rodriquez-Kabana
- Performance in perennial, nursery, and
ornamental systems will be presented
8Application Technologies
- Drip Irrigation Systems as a delivery vehicle
for fumigants - closed system
- use water to move emulsified materials
- adapt to distribution pattern needed
- bed vs. broadcast
- shallow vs. deep
- post-plant applications of supplemental materials
9Optimization of Drip Fumigation
Dr. Husein Ajwa
- application rate minimum efficacious rate for
drip fumigation vs. shank injection - amount of irrigation water needed for optimum
distribution of fumigants in various soils - drip tape configurations (emitter discharge rate,
emitter spacing, and drip tape spacing) - combination of fumigants at reduced rates
- impermeable film (VIF) vs standard PE mulch
- pre-irrigation, initial soil water content
10Drip Application Equipment
Flow meter
Nitrogen cylinder
Injection port
Water meter
Static mixer
11Micro gas chromatograph with a multi-port
sampling valve
12(No Transcript)
13InLine (1,3-dichloropropene chloropicrin)
- Monitor 1,3-D distribution in soil when applied
in different amounts of irrigation water (26, 43,
61 mm) - Monitor 1,3-D distribution when applied under
standard PE mulch and VIF
1430 cm
0 cm
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Metam Sodium (MITC)
- Monitor MITC distribution in soil when applied as
metam sodium using three different drip tape flow
rates - low, lt 0.34 gpm/100 ft
- med, 0.67 gpm/100 ft
- high, gt 1.00 gpm/100 ft
18(No Transcript)
19Recommendations for drip fumigation
- To achieve greater fumigant distribution
- uniformity
- increase the amount of irrigation water
- 1.5-2 inches for loam and sandy loam soils
- 2-2.5 inches for loamy sand and sandy soils
- use medium flow rate drip tape (soil type?)
- 0.5-.67 gpm/100 ft for sandy loamy soils
- use impermeable film
- if it is available or affordable
20Field Trials
Vineyard Replant 3 years after treatment
Grape Nursery
Rose
21Grapevine Nursery Trial - 2001
22The California Code of Regulations
- makes it mandatory that nursery stock for farm
planting be commercially clean with respect to
economically important nematodes.
23Experimental Design
- 85-year-old nematode-infested Thompson Seedless
vineyard - 11 treatments
- 5 replications
24Treatments
- Untreated Control
- Methyl Bromide (448 kg/ha), Treated Control
- Shank Iodomethane Pic (224 224 kg/ha)
- Shank Propargyl Bromide (202 kg/ha)
- Drip Iodomethane Pic (224 224 kg/ha), water
cap - Drip Propargyl Bromide (202 kg/ha), water cap
- Drip InLine (468 L/ha)
- Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
- Drip Pic (448 kg/ha)
- Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap
- Drip Azide (336 kg/ha), tarped
- Drip Azide (336 kg/ha), water cap
- Microspray Metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha)
25Shanked Treatments
- Shanks 45 cm deep
- Shanks 1.8m apart
- tarped
26(No Transcript)
27Drip Treatments
- Broadcast
- Drip tape
- 25 cm deep
- 60 cm apart
- Medium flow
- 90 cm water
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Caps on Drip Treatments
- Applied through microsprays
- 2.4m x 4.6m spacing
- Water (15 cm)
- Metam sodium (Vapam 243 L/ha)
32Nematode Populations at Planting
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36Nematode Populations after One Growing Season
37Thompson Seedless Fall 2001
38Vineyard Replant TrialPlanted 1998
39Experimental Design
- 65 year-old nematode-infested Thompson Seedless
vineyard - Randomized complete block, 5 reps
40Treatments
- Untreated Control
- Methyl Bromide, 448 kg/ha
- Shank Iodomethane, 448 kg/ha
- Drip Telone II EC (327 L/ha in 60 mm water)metam
sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap - Drip Telone II EC (327 L/ha in 100 mm
water)metam sodium (vapam, 243 L/ha) cap - 1-Year Fallow
- 1-Year Fallow sudac cover crop
41Variety/Rootstock
- Thompson Seedless,
- own-rooted
- Merlot on Harmony
- Merlot on Teleki 5C
42 Nematodes 3.5 years after treatment
Shank Treatments applied Apr 1998. Drip
Treatments applied Jan 1998. Samples collected
Oct 2001.
43Long Term Fallow/ Vineyard Replant TrialPlanted
in 2000
44Experimental Design
- Vines Removed
- Winter 1999 untreated control
- Winter 1998 1 year fallow
- Winter 1997 2 year fallow
- Winter 1996 3 year fallow
- Vines replanted June 2000
45Effect of Long-term Fallow on Rootknot Nematode
in a Vineyard Replant
46Effect of Long-term Fallow on Citrus Nematode in
a Vineyard Replant
47Rose Nursery Field TrialJackson Perkins
- Wasco
- Initiated Fall, 2001
48Rose Nursery Treatments
- Controls
- Untreated control
- Methyl bromide check 392 kg/ha
- Shanked Treatments
- MIDAS - 30 Iodomethane/70chloropicrin, 448
kg/ha - Telone C35 with tarp 449 L/ha
- Telone C35, no tarp 449 L/ha
- Dripped Treatments
- InLine, 468 L/ha
- Telone EC, 327 L/ha
- Chloropicrin high rate, 448 kg/ha
- Chloropicrin low rate, 224 kg/ha
- Chloropicrin, split application - 224 kg/ha 224
kg/ha 7 days later - MIDAS - 30 Iodomethane/70chloropicrin, 448
kg/ha - MIDAS - 50 Iodomethane/50chloropicrin, 336
kg/ha - Metam sodium, drip, 701 L/ha
- Iota (a biological)
49Rose Nursery Trial Soil pH
30
60
90
120
150
50Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes - 0-30 cm
51Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes 60-90 cm
52Rose Nursery Trial Nematodes 120-150 cm
53How do you save the nursery crop if your nematode
management wasnt perfect?
54Rescue Technologies
Dr. Becky Westerdahl
- Hot water dips for dormant perennial and bulb
crops
55HOT WATER TREATMENTS FOR NEMATODE MANAGEMENT IN
FRUIT TREE ROOTSTOCKS
- 1997 - 2001 TREATED 6 ROOTSTOCKS
- MYROBALAN 29C, MARIANNA 2624, LOVELL, NEMAGUARD,
PARADOX, ENGLISH - 5 TEMPERATURES
- 43.3, 46.1, 48.9, 51.7, 54.4 C
- 5 LENGTHS OF TREATMENT PLUS UNTREATED
- 5 REPLICATES
- EVALUATE
- SURVIVAL, VIGOR, TRUNK CIRCUMFERANCE
- PLANTED AT USDA STATION
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
561998 - 2001 TREATMENTS
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
571998 Hot Water Treatment Paradox Walnut
TRUNK DIAMETER INCREASE (INCHES) in 2000
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
58Effect of Hot Water Treatments on Rootknot
Nematode
120
MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA
100
43.3C
80
46.1C
48.9C
60
PERCENT MORTALITY
40
ERROR BARS INDICATE 1 STANDARD ERROR
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
MINUTES
B. Westerdahl, UC Davis
59Conclusions
- Good distribution of effective concentrations of
emulsified formulations of fumigants can be
achieved using drip application technologies
60Conclusions
- Drip applied 1,3-D and shank applied iodomethane
have controlled rootknot nematode as well as
methyl bromide up to 3.5 years after treatment - Efficacy of long term fallow is dependent on the
nematode genera present in the field
61Conclusions
- Efficacy of resistant rootstock depends on the
diversity of the nematode population - Drip application of some currently available
materials and shank and drip application of some
new materials achieved nematode control to a
depth of 150cm - Field conditions at the time of application will
influence efficacy
62Conclusions
- Rescue technologies, such as hot water dips, are
an important tool in the production of clean
planting material from field grown nurseries
63Conclusion
- Integrated management strategies that make use
of innovative technologies, new materials,
resistant rootstocks, cultural practices and
post-plant introductions of beneficial organisms
offer hope for addressing Challenging Situations
64Acknowledgements
- California Fruit Tree, Nut Tree, and Grapevine
Improvement Advisory Board - Sunridge Nursery
- Jackson Perkins Roses
- L.E. Cooke Nursery
- Tri-Cal
- Tomen Agro
- Dow Agro Sciences
- AmVac
- Albemarle
- Cal Agri Products
- HarborChem
65Thank you!