Title: Hot Topics New Blood and Plasma Issues
1Hot TopicsNew Blood and Plasma Issues
- Barbara Carmichael
- Investigator, U.S. Food Drug Administration
- Florida District - Jacksonville, FL Resident Post
- June 2, 2011
2Lecture Outline
- Clarification of various issues
- Top 10 Biologics Observations
- New Guidance Documents
- NAT Reentry (May 2010)
- Anti-HBc Reentry (May 2010)
- HCV Lookback (December 2010)
- Leukocyte Reduction, Draft ( January 2011)
- CJD/vCJD (May 2010)
- Chagas (December 2010)
- Operations (November 2010)
3Storage of Thawed FFP or PF24 up to 24 hrs -
Requesting a Variance
- Storage of thawed FFP or PF24 _at_ 1-6C for up to
24 hrs as recommended by BPAC, instead of 6
hours (21 CFR 606.122 (m)(3)). Until the
regulation is revised a variance must be
requested. - Written request to
- Director, Div. Blood Applications,
OBRR/CBER/FDA/HFM-370 - c/o Document control Center/HFM-99
- 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N
- Rockville, MD 20852-1448
- Phone no. (301) 827-3543
4MTS Gel Card - Off Label Use
- MTS Anti-IgG Card - states it is for direct and
indirect antiglobulin test - MTS Buffered Gel Card states it is for detection
of antibodies to RBCs - Neither product includes labeling/directions for
use as an immediate spin compatibility test - The card is not a reliable detector of ABO
incompatibilities (which are predominantly IgM)
published studies document reported compatibility
test failures - Discrepancy between AABB Manual device labeling
- Cannot be used as sole cross-match until Ortho
submits data for BLA supplement approval and
labeling change will result in 483 citation
5Overlay Label?
- Can we overlay a Codabar label with an ISBT
label? -
- Can we overlay the whole label when we further
process one of our units (e.g., irradiate)? - Can we overlay the whole label when we further
process a unit from an outside supplier? -
6Overlay Label?FDA Response
- We believe it is acceptable to overlay an
original label provided the current computer
software or recordkeeping system has the
capability to preserve the information on the
original label. If the software or records
cannot record the information from the original
label, then overlaying the whole label is not
permitted. - Original information includes collection
facility, ABO/Rh, special antigen typings,
anticoagulants, etc.
7Top 10 Biologics Observations in 2010 As of
05/31/2011
8Citation 1 Cited 127 times /ID 76
- Written SOPs Not Maintained or Followed or
Accessible - 21 CFR 606.100(b) Written standard operating
procedures including all steps to be followed in
the collection processing compatibility
testing storage distribution of blood and
blood components for homologous transfusion
autologous transfusion further manufacturing
purposes are not always maintained followed
maintained on the premises.
9Citation 2 Cited 49 times /ID 98
- Investigations Not Conducted or Completed
- 21 CFR 606.100(c) Failure to perform a
thorough - investigation make a record of the conclusions
and - follow-up of an unexplained discrepancy a
failure of a - lot or unit to meet any of its specifications.
10Citation 3 Cited 29 times /ID 155
- Failure to Maintain Records
- 21 CFR 606.160(b) Failure to maintain donor
- processing storage and distribution
- compatibility testing quality control
general - Records.
11Citation 4 Cited 29 times /ID 9225
- BPD Reporting
- 21 CFR 606.171 Failure to submit a biological
- product deviation report within 45 days from the
- date you acquired information suggesting that a
- reportable event occurred.
12Citation 5 Cited 29 times /ID 154
- Records Not Concurrent with Performance
- 21 CFR 606.160(a)(1) Records are not
concurrently - maintained with the performance of each
significant step - in the collection processing compatibility
testing - storage distribution of each unit of blood
and blood - components so that all steps can be clearly
traced.
13Citation 6 Cited 28 times /ID 160
- Records Fail to Provide Complete History
- 21 CFR 606.160(a)(1) Records fail to identify
the - person performing the work include dates of the
- various entries show test results include
interpretation - of the results show the expiration date
assigned to - specific products be as detailed as necessary
so as to - provide a complete history of the work performed.
14Citation 7 Cited 21 times /ID 31
- Personnel/Training
- 21 CFR 606.20(b) The personnel responsible for
the collection - processing compatibility testing storage
distribution of - blood or blood components are not adequate in
number - educational background training and
experience, including - professional training as necessary to assure
competent - performance of their assigned functions, and to
ensure that the - final product has the safety, purity, potency,
identity and - effectiveness it purports or is represented to
possess.
15Citation 8 Cited 14 times /ID 4425
- Equipment Not Maintained
- 21 CFR 606.60(a) Equipment used in the
collection - processing compatibility testing storage and
- distribution of blood and blood components is
not - observed standardized calibrated on a
regularly - scheduled basis as prescribed in the SOP Manual.
16Citation 9 Cited 13 times /ID 12202
- Thorough Investigation of Adverse Reaction
- 21 CFR 606.170(a)
- A thorough investigation of each reported
adverse report was not made. - This citation is new to the Top 10 this year
while Records are Illegible fell off the Top 10
list this year.
17Citation 10 Cited 12 times /ID 67
- Supplies Reagents
- 21 CFR 606.65(e) Failure to use supplies and
- reagents in a manner consistent with instructions
- provided by the manufacturer.
18New Guidance Documents
19NAT HIV-1 HCV Reentry
- May 2010 Guidance (finalizes draft dated July
2005) - 4 new simplified algorithms for reentry
- Retests - should use the same test as that used
for the original reactive sample if not
available use one of same or greater sensitivity
(e.g. HIV-1 Group O) - SOP Revisions will be considered minor change
to an approved license so date of SOP
implementation should be reported in Annual
Report
20- HIV-1 Donor Re-entry Algorithm
21HCV Donor Re-entry Algorithm
22Anti-HBc Reentry if tested RR on gt1 occasion
- May 2010 Guidance finalizes draft from 2008.
- Change due to availability of FDA-licensed HBV
NAT improved specificity of anti-HBc assays - Obtain a new pre-donation blood sample after a
minimum of 8 wks following last RR anti-HBc test - Must be Neg. for HBsAg, anti-HBc AND HBV by NAT
- If f/u medical testing done during this 8 week
period, any reactive/positive results would make
the donor NOT eligible for reentry and indefinite
deferral is recommended. - If implement this method then report in Annual
Report. If want to use an alternate method,
licensed establishments must submit a supplement
for prior approval
23Lookback for HCV Guidance was updated December
2010 orig. 2007
- Reflects new anti-HCV testing technologies
- Changes to make guidance consistent with regs,
e.g. - 21 CFR 610.48 - One time review of historical HCV
testing records, requires completion of actions
specified by 2/19/09 - Asked to go back to Jan 1988, but are aware that
prior to implementation the requirement for
record retention was 5 years - notification by the transfusion service was
expanded to include a recipients physician of
record within the specified time frame 3 days
after becoming aware of test results
24Pre-Storage Leukoreduction
- Draft Guidance January 2011 (replacing 2001
draft) - Recommendations for validation and QC for
monitoring the process, including an algorithm
for sample size calculation - Testing of donors for traits that affect the
process, such as hemoglobin S - Use of mixing devices during collection
- Option for supplemental labeling of components
with low WBC count - Calculation of RBC recovery by RBC mass
25CJD/vCJD
- Guidance for Industry
- Revised Preventative Measures to Reduce the
Possible Risk of Transmission of
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) and Variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) by Blood and
Blood Products - May 2010
- (Implement by January 2011)
26CJD/vCJD (cont.)
- No changes in CJD deferral policies
- Blood and plasma donors who have received a blood
component transfusion in France since 1980 are
deferred indefinitely for vCJD risk - Recognized the AABB full-length DHQ materials
(v.1.3) as an acceptable mechanism to screen
blood donors - DHQ contains transfusion in France question
- Guidance advises licensed firms how to report if
using AABB DHQ (v.1.3)
27Chagas
- Guidance for Industry
- Use of Serological Tests to Reduce the Risk of
Transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in
Whole Blood and Blood Components Intended for
Transfusion - December 2010
- (Implement by December 2011)
28Chagas (cont.)
- Only applies to blood components for transfusion
(not to Source Plasma) - Includes question to ask all donors at each
donation if they ever had Chagas disease - Recommends one-time (selective) testing of
allogeneic donors and autologous donors whose
units will be crossed over - Nonreactive donors do not need to be tested again
at subsequent donations - Blood banks should have records for testing
history - Reactive donors or donors with history of Chagas
are indefinitely deferred
29Chagas (cont.)
- No donor re-entry at this time
- Disposition of reactive units
- Destroy reactive donations
- Can be used for research or plasma used for
noninjectable reagents - Autologous use only
- Lookback of units from reactive donor
- Statement in Circular that blood is from donors
tested for T. cruzi on at least one donation - Advises licensed firms on how to report changes
to FDA
30Operational Procedures
- Guidance for Industry
- Recommendations for Blood Establishments
Training of Back-up Personnel, Assessment of
Blood Donor Suitability and Reporting Certain
Changes to an Approved Application - November 2010
- (Implement immediately)
31Operational Procedures (cont.)
- Replaces November 2009 draft H1N1 guidance
document - Removed reference to H1N1 since pandemic is over,
but retained those provisions with general
applicability - Training of Back-up Personnel
- Have adequate trained back-up personnel in the
event of personnel shortages (e.g., pandemics,
natural disasters, bioterrorism) - Use existing training program recommend train
more than 1 back-up person for each critical
function - And of course...Document training
32Operational Procedures (cont.)
- Donor Suitability 24 Hours to Clarify
- 640.3(a) and 640.63(a) determine donor
suitability on day of collection regs dont
define day of collection - Firm may clarify a donors response to a question
or obtain omitted responses within 24 hours of
the time of collection - Does not apply to missing/unacceptable vital
signs or hgb/hct - Licensed firms must have CBER approved SOPs for
this, including contacting donor, determine
donors identity and if in confidential setting - Should be handled as deviation included in QA
tracking and investigation procedures
33Operational Procedures (cont.)
- Reporting certain changes to FDA as Changes Being
Effected (CBE) under 601.12(c)(5) - Changes were previously reported as CBE-30
- Using a different registered outside/contract
testing lab to perform donor testing - However, submit as PAS if using lab not
registered for donor screening - Implementation of written or audio/visual methods
to self-administer your currently approved donor
history questionnaire - Supersedes July 2003 Guidance for
self-administered questionnaire that required a
CBE-30 - Still follow CCPs described in the July 2003
Guidance - Computer-Assisted DHQ process is still a CBE-30
34Where can I find the guidances?
- CBER website
- Click on Vaccine, Blood Biologics link
- Scroll down to Forms and Regulatory Information
- Click on Blood Guidances
- http//www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidanc
eComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Blood/d
efault.htm
35- THANK YOU!
- Enjoy the rest of your day!