Advanced Integrated Control and Data Systems for Constellation Satellites

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Advanced Integrated Control and Data Systems for Constellation Satellites

Description:

Advanced Integrated Control and Data Systems for Constellation Satellites Dr. Michael Hahn, G nther Elsner Astrium GmbH; 81663 M nchen, Germany –

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: klabsOrgr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advanced Integrated Control and Data Systems for Constellation Satellites


1
Advanced Integrated Control and Data Systems for
Constellation Satellites
  • Dr. Michael Hahn, Günther Elsner
  • Astrium GmbH 81663 München, Germany
  • Phone49 89 607 24280
  • Fax49 89 607 28964
  • Emailmichael.hahn_at_astrium-space.com

2
Content
  • Introduction
  • Market Needs and Supplier Capabilities
    - a never ending conflict.....
  • Existing solutions
  • Gammabus Avionics Improvement

3
Introduction
  • Avionics Division Heritage and Mission
  • experience in avionics since 1970's (as MBB)
  • used to work in close interaction with S/C
    system engineering
  • capabilities for avionics applications
  • AOCS and data handling for
  • commercial telecommunication (Spacebus-Platform)
  • constellation (Globalstar)
  • science missions (SPAS/Artemis/CHAMP/GRACE)
  • specialization on commercial telecommunication
    satellites
  • optimized for low recurring production cost at
    high flexibility and reliability
  • design to cost
  • design for production
  • spin off to one-off type of equipment

4
Market Needs and Supplier Capabilities.....
  • Market demands on Spacecraft computers
  • Long heritage
  • high reliability
  • low price
  • fast, long term availablity
  • high flexibility
  • high mainainability
  • robustness
  • high performance
  • low budgets
  • lead to a......

5
Market Needs and Supplier Capabilities.....
...... lead to a C4? architecture
But there a some realistic measures to merge
those contradictorily demands!
6
Market Needs and Supplier Capabilities.....
  • Improvement capabilities
  • Standardization of building blocks (heritage,
    maintainability, robustness)
  • internal and external interfaces
  • modular design
  • Reduction of components (reliability, cost, lead
    time, budget, availability)
  • higher integration
  • restrictive selection
  • Implementation of redundancy (reliability,
    robustness, maintainability)
  • increased cross coupling
  • cascaded levels of redundancy
  • Design to manufacture and test

7
Existing solutions
Spacebus/Flexbus 16bit Onboard Computers
8
Standard On-Board Computers
  • Architecture
  • Internal cross-strapping for high reliability for
    gt15 years in GEO
  • AOCS, Data Handling and Payload Control
  • 1750 A Microprocessor
  • Reconfiguration Module
  • Packet TM/TC
  • Mass Memory
  • Sensor and Actuator Interfaces
  • Unit Parameters
  • Mass 16 kg
  • Volume 415 x 280 x 215
  • Power 25 W

Globalstar 72 Flight Units
Spacebus 3000B 18 Flight Units
9
Typical OBC Architecture
Sensors
Test I/F
HPC1 out
TC in
TM out
Actuators
unreg. Power
MIL1553Bus
Local Bus
Sensors
Test I/F
HPC1 out
TC in
TM out
Actuators
unreg. Power
MIL1553Bus
10
Architectural Key Features
  • Single point failure free architecture
  • Fully redundant design
  • Internal cross coupling by redundant backplane
    bus
  • Free combination of all modules
  • Independent power supplies
  • Direct cross coupling of most external
    interfaces possible
  • Fault Detection, Isolation and Recovery
    Mechanisms (FDIR)
  • Failure History and Safeguard Storage for fast
    system restart

11
Reconfiguration Capabilities
  • Surveillance of system parameters (e.g.
    filtering, masking)
  • Undervoltages
  • Sun Presence/Earth Presence alarms
  • Thruster-On-Time surveillance
  • Battery Charge
  • Processor health (Watchdog)
  • Ground configurable, autonomous processing of
    alarms
  • Execution and control of reconfiguration
    sequences
  • Additional High Priority Command Interface
  • Build In Test supporting RM tests through PM

12
Operability
  • Ground controlled or autonomous redundancy
    switching
  • Reprogramming during flight
  • RAM/EEPROM contents
  • Reconfiguration parameter (masks and filter
    constants,
  • redundancy switching)
  • External Terminal Interface for HW/SW Test and
    Debugging
  • Build In Test of kernel modules
  • Parallel PM operations (Master/Slave)
  • Testmode for selftest of inactive RM
  • Autonomous failure detection and recovery
    mechanisms
  • continous Normal Mode operation in case of
    failures
  • no Safe Mode required during redundancy
    switching

13
Gammabus Avionics Improvement
Gammabus 32bit Onboard Computer
14
Gammabus On-Board Computer (OBC)
15
Gammabus OBC Improvements
  • Standardization of building blocks (heritage,
    maintainability, robustness)
  • Frequent use of international standards
    (UART/HDLC/1355/1553) or
  • simple analog/digital Inputs/outputs
  • reduction of customized, failure-sensitive
    designs
  • modular design with internal standard interfaces
    (mechanical/electrical/architectural)

16
Gammabus OBC Improvements
  • Reduction of components (reliability, cost, lead
    time, budget, availability)
  • higher integration by increased usage of ASICs
    and FPGA
  • selection of designs wrt. Component reduction
    (type and amount), long-term availability
  • Multiple-usage of Multi-purpose ASIC
    (ParallelSerialInterfaceEngine)
  • strategic mixture between new and traditional
    technologies

17
Gammabus OBC Improvements
  • Implementation of redundancy (reliability,
    robustness, maintainability)
  • increased cross coupling by higher modularity,
    separated building blocks, cold or hot partial
    redundancy
  • Implentation of hidden redundancy resources,
    e.g. second data path, internal spare functions
    (e.g. RAM sections, redundant modes)
  • cascaded levels of redundancy under software
    control for partial failure isolation and
    recovery

18
Gammabus OBC Improvements
  • Design to manufacture and test
  • Standard designs for standard manufacturing
    processes
  • common test approach (e.g. JTAG, standard
    blocks), reduced coupling of functions

19
RTEMS/ERC32 Development Environment (F.A.C.E.)
20
Conclusion
  • Goals (to be) achieved
  • Increased Processing Perfomancegt1000
  • Increased Interfaces/functionsgt100
  • Increased Performance/Power ratio 500
  • Increased Flexibility
  • Increased Operability (tbc by our customers)
  • Decreased size/mass 20
  • Decreased cost 10
  • Decreased Production time 30
  • Stable, high Reliability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com