Robotic Arms vs. Lifts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Robotic Arms vs. Lifts

Description:

... Maximize segment overlap Stiffness is as important as strength Minimize weight, especially at the top Dupper/2 Hupper Forklift: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:350
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: ChrisH130
Category:
Tags: arms | forklift | lifts | robotic

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robotic Arms vs. Lifts


1
Robotic Arms vs. Lifts
2
What is an Arm?
  • A device for grabbing moving objects using
    members that rotate about their ends

3
What is a Lift?
  • A device for grabbing and moving objects in a
    predominately vertical direction

4
Relative Advantages ofArms Over Lifts
  • Very flexible
  • Can right a flipped robot
  • Can place object in an infinite number of
    positions within reach
  • Minimal height - Great for going under things

5
Relative Advantages ofLifts Over Arms
  • Typically simple to construct
  • Easy to control (dont even need limit switches)
  • Maintain CG in a fixed XY location
  • Dont require complex gear trains

6
Articulating Arm
  • Shoulder
  • Elbow
  • Wrist

7
Arm Forces, Angles, Torque
  • Example Lifting at different angles
  • Torque Force x Distance
  • Same force, different angle, less torque

10 lbs
10 lbs
lt D
8
Arm Power
  • Power Torque / Time
  • OR
  • Power Torque x Rotational Velocity
  • Power (FIRST definition) How fast you can move
    something

9
Arm Power
  • Example Lifting with different power output
  • Same torque with twice the power results in twice
    the speed
  • Power Torque / Time

10 lbs
10 lbs
125 Watts, 100 RPM
250 Watts, 200 RPM
10
Arm Design Considerations
  • Lightweight Materials tubes, thin wall sheet
  • Design-in sensors for feedback control
  • limit switches and potentiometers
  • Linkages help control long arms
  • KISS
  • Less parts to build or break
  • Easier to operate
  • More robust
  • Use off-the-shelf items
  • Counterbalance
  • Spring, weight, pneumatic, etc.

11
Types of Lifts
  • Elevator
  • Forklift
  • Four Bar (can also be considered an Arm)
  • Scissors

12
Elevator
13
Elevator Advantages Disadvantages
  • Advantages
  • Simplest structure
  • On/Off control
  • VERY rigid
  • Can be actuated via screw, cable, or pneumatics
  • Disadvantages
  • Single-stage lift
  • Lift distance limited to maximum robot height
  • Cannot go under obstacles lower than max lift

14
Elevator Design Considerations
  • Should be powered down as well as up
  • Slider needs to move freely
  • Need to be able to adjust cable length--a
    turnbuckle works great
  • Cable can be a loop
  • Drum needs 3-5 turns of excess cable
  • Keep cables or other actuators well protected

15
Elevator Calculations
  • Fobject Weight of Object Weight of Slider
  • Dobject Distance of Object CG
  • Tcable Fobject
  • Mslider Fobject Dobject
  • Fslider1 - Fslider2 Mslider / 2Dslider
  • Fpulley 2 Tcable
  • Fhit (Weight of Object Weight of Slider) G
    value I use .5
  • Mhit Fhit Hslider
  • Mbase Mslider Mhit

Fpulley
Mslider
Fobject
Fslider1
Fhit
Dobject
Dslider
Fslider2
Tcable
Hslider
Mbase
16
Forklift
17
Forklift Examples
18
Forklift Advantages Disadvantages
  • Advantages
  • Can reach higher than you want to go
  • On/Off control
  • Can be rigid if designed correctly
  • Can be actuated via screw, cable, or pneumatics,
    though all involve some cabling
  • Disadvantages
  • Stability issues at extreme heights
  • Cannot go under obstacles lower than retracted
    lift

19
Forklift Design Considerations
  • Should be powered down as well as up
  • Segments need to move freely
  • Need to be able to adjust cable length(s).
  • Two different ways to rig (see later slide)
  • MINIMIZE SLOP
  • Maximize segment overlap
  • Stiffness is as important as strength
  • Minimize weight, especially at the top

20
Forklift Calculations
Mslider
Fobject
Fslider1
Fhit
Dobject
Dslider
Fslider2
  • Fobject Weight of Object Weight of Slider
  • Dobject Distance of Object CG
  • Mslider Fobject Dobject
  • Fslider1 - Fslider2 Mslider / 2Dslider
  • Fhit G value I use .5 (Weight of Object
    Weight of Slider)
  • Mhitlower FhitHlower (Weight of Upper
    Weight of Lower) (Hlower / 2)
  • Flower1 - Flower2 Mslider Mhitlower /
    2Dslider
  • Mhit Fhit Hslider (Weight of Lift G
    value Hslider ) / 2
  • Mbase Mslider Mhit

Hupper
Fupper1
Mupper
Dupper
Hlower
Dupper/2
Fupper2
Hslider
Flower1
Mlower
Dlower
Dlower/2
Flower2
Mbase
21
Forklift Rigging
Cascade
Continuous
22
Forklift Rigging (Continuous)
  • Cable goes same speed for up and down
  • Intermediate sections often jam
  • Low cable tension
  • More complex cable routing
  • Final stage moves up first and down last
  • Tcable Weight of Object Weight of Lift
    Components Supported by Cable

23
Forklift Rigging (Cascade)
  • Up-going and down-going cables have
    different speeds
  • Different cable speeds can be handled with
    different drum diameters or multiple pulleys
  • Intermediate sections dont jam
  • Very fast
  • Tcable3 Weight of Object Weight of Slider
  • Tcable2 2Tcable3 Weight of Stage2
  • Tcable1 2Tcable2 Weight of Stage1
  • Much more tension on the lower stage cables
  • Needs lower gearing to deal with higher forces

Tcable3
Slider (Stage3)
Tcable2
Stage2
Stage1
Tcable1
Base
24
Four Bar
25
Four Bar Examples
26
Four Bar Advantages Disadvantages
  • Advantages
  • Great for fixed heights
  • On/off control
  • Lift can be counter-balanced or spring-loaded to
    reduce the load on actuator
  • Good candidate for pneumatic or screw actuation
  • Disadvantages
  • Need clearance in front during lift
  • Cant go under obstacles lower than retracted
    lift
  • Have to watch CG
  • If pneumatic, only two positions (up down)

27
Four Bar Design Considerations
  • Pin Loadings can be very high
  • Watch for buckling in lower member
  • Counterbalance if you can
  • Keep CG back
  • Limit rotation
  • Keep gripper on known location

28
Four Bar Calculations
Mgripper
Fobject
Fhit
Dobject
Dgripper
Fgripper1
  • Under Construction Check Back Later

Llink
Fgripper2
Flink1
Flink2
Dlink
Mlink
Hgripper
Dlower/2
Mbase
29
Scissors
30
Scissors Example
31
Scissors Advantages Disadvantages
  • Advantages
  • Minimum retracted height
  • Disadvantages
  • Tends to be heavy
  • High CG
  • Doesnt deal well with side loads
  • Must be built precisely
  • Loads very high on pins at beginning of travel

32
Scissors Design Considerations
  • Members must be good in both bending and torsion
  • Joints must move in only one direction
  • The greater the separation between pivot and
    actuator line of action, the lower the initial
    load on actuator
  • Best if it is directly under load
  • Do you really want to do this?

33
Scissors Calculations
  • I dont want to go there
  • THIS IS NOT RECOMMENDED

34
Arm vs. Lift Summary
Feature Arm Lift
Reach over object Yes No
Fall over, get up Yes, if strong enough No
Go under barriers Yes, fold down Maybe, lift height may be limited
Center of gravity (CG) Not centralized Centralized mass
Small space operation No, needs room to swing Yes
How high? More articulations, more height (difficult) More lift sections, more height (easier)
Complexity Moderate High
Powerful lift Moderate High
Combination Insert 1-stage lift at bottom of arm Insert 1-stage lift at bottom of arm
35
WARNING Engineering informationbeyond this
pointProceed with cautionif afraid of math
36
Stress Calculations
  • It all boils down to 3 equations

BENDING
TENSILE
SHEAR
Where ? Bending Stress M Moment (calculated
earlier) I Moment of Inertia of Section c
distance from Central Axis
Where ? Tensile Stress Ftens Tensile Force A
Area of Section
Where ? Shear Stress Fshear Shear Force A
Area of Section
37
Stress Calculations (cont.)
  • A, c and I for Rectangular and Circular Sections

38
Stress Calculations (cont.)
  • A, c and I for T-Sections

X
39
Stress Calculations (cont.)
  • A, c and I for C-Sections (Assumes Equal Legs)

Y
cy
cx1
h1
b1
X
h2
cx2
b2
40
Stress Calculations (cont.)
  • A, c and I for L-Angles

Y
cy1
cy2
cx1
h1
b1
X
h2
cx2
b2
41
Allowable Stresses
  • ?allowable ?yeild / Safety Factor
  • For the FIRST competition, try to use a Static
    Safety Factor of 4.
  • While on the high side it allows for unknowns and
    dynamic loads
  • Havent had anything break yet!

42
Allowable Stresses
  • Here are some properties for typical robot
    materials

Material Desig Temper Yield Tensile Shear Modulus
(ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (msi) Alum 6061 O 8 18 12 1
0 Alum 6061 T6 40 45 30 10 Brass C36000 18-45 4
9-68 30-38 14 Copper C17000 135-165? 165-200? 1
9 Mild Steel 1015-22 HR 48 65 30 PVC Rigid 6-8
0.3-1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com