Research Methodology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 73
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Methodology

Description:

Research Methodology EPH 7112 LECTURE 7: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Contents Synthesis Implement Solution Design Experiments Conduct Experiments Reduce Results Scientific ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:738
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 74
Provided by: Hai66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Methodology


1
Research Methodology
  • EPH 7112
  • LECTURE 7 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

2
Contents
  • Synthesis
  • Implement Solution
  • Design Experiments
  • Conduct Experiments
  • Reduce Results

3
Scientific Method
4
Analysis
5
Hypothesis
  • Specify detail and comprehensive solution
  • Assert expected results
  • Define factors that will be varied
  • Measure against performance metrics

6
Synthesis
  • Implement the solution
  • And experiment
  • To accomplish the goals
  • And validate the hypotheses

7
Synthesis Steps
  • Implement Solution
  • Design Experiments
  • Conduct Experiments
  • Reduce Results

8
Implement Solution
  • Implement solution to test hypotheses
  • Methods
  • Acquire
  • Construct
  • Combination of both

9
Implement Solution
  • Construct
  • Custom made to meet requirements
  • Time consuming
  • Expensive

10
Implement Solution
  • Acquire
  • Quick solution
  • Cheaper
  • May not meet requirements

11
Implement Solution
  • Consider strongly to acquire the solution
  • Even if part of entire solution
  • Consultants acquired solution?

12
Implement Solution
  • Example Optical Amplification in S-band
  • Construct using Thulium doped fiber
  • Problem Fusion Splicing is not possible
  • Solution Use Angled Connectors
  • Issue Not specified during order

13
Implement Solution
  • Is your solution right or is it the right
    solution?
  • Careful implementation
  • Step-by-step
  • Troubleshooting
  • Example Constructing an optical amplifier
  • Problem WDM is faulty

14
Design Experiments
  • To design a series of experiments
  • Results used to estimate how good solution to
    solve problem
  • An experiment acquires data to measure the
    performance of the solution under controlled
    conditions in a laboratory

15
Design Experiments
  • Always good to have a check list
  • Objective
  • Unit under Test
  • Inducers
  • Sensors
  • Supervisor
  • Channels
  • Domain Knowledge
  • Range Knowledge
  • Solution

16
Experiments
  • Is it really necessary?
  • How about theoretical or simulation work?
  • Experiment verification
  • Example Find solution of two-dimensional plane
    that satisfy certain conditions

17
Experiments
  • Simulation and modeling
  • Verify against experimental results
  • Example Modeling of Optical Amplifier
  • Advantages of modeling
  • Optimization
  • Analyzing the physical phenomena

18
Design Experiments
  • Planning
  • Specification Experiment Laboratory
  • Design of experiment blocks
  • Design of protocols
  • Acquiring and managing data

19
Experiment Laboratory
  • Laboratory is where the experiment takes place
  • Large room with test measurement equipments,
    units under test, chemical mechanical
    apparatus, computers

20
Laboratory
  • Experiments can also take place
  • In an office
  • Field
  • Manufacturing Plant

21
Laboratory
  • Depends on the experiment
  • Objective
  • Sample
  • Unit under Test
  • Inducers
  • Sensors
  • Solution

22
Laboratory Safety
  • Watch out for moving or revolving parts (they
    dont like necklaces and neck ties!)
  • Watch out for Electro-Static Sensitive Devices
  • Limit personnel into the laboratory
  • Maintenance and cleaning personnel can cause
    mishaps

23
Design Experiment Block
  • Process that takes place in the laboratory during
    the experiment
  • Important terms
  • Sample
  • Factors (independent variables)
  • Inducers
  • Sensors

24
Sample
  • Task unit consisting of objects, living plants,
    animals, humans that is the subject in the
    experiment

25
Factors
  • Condition or parameter of a task whose value is
    intentionally varied to measure its impact on the
    results of the task

26
Inducers
  • A device or mechanism that alters the task unit/
    subject during the experiment

27
Sensors
  • Device that capture the results from the task/
    unit or subject

28
Extent
  • Each factor is assigned a set of values
  • Extent of the factor space is total number of
    unique combination of values that may be assigned
    to each factor
  • FVa number of values for factor a
  • Extent FVa x FVb x FVc

29
Treatment
  • Each one of the unique combination of values that
    may be assigned to every factor is called a
    treatment
  • One instance in the entire factor space

30
Case Study
  • Factors
  • Typeface 2 types (Serif and Sans Serif)
  • Noise Level 12 levels
  • Character 36
  • Extent 36 x 12 x 2 864
  • Each combination treatment

31
Block Design
  • If sample is a single object or device, then all
    the possible treatment must be assigned to it
    during the experiment
  • Example Characterization of a Thulium doped
    Fiber Amplifier for different pump powers and
    wavelengths

32
Block Design
  • If sample is more than one, then the treatments
    may be distributed in some way among the sample
  • Important terms
  • Experiment trial
  • Experiment block

33
Experiment Trial
  • Complete set of treatments applied to a sample
    during the experiment (sample is more than one)
  • Example The combination of typeface serif,
    character ltA, B, Cgt and noise level lt130, 140,
    150gt

34
Experiment Block
  • Set of experiment trials that provides a cover of
    the factor space that is appropriate and adequate
    for achieving the task objective

35
Block Design
  • What is the appropriate set of experiment trials
  • that provides an appropriate cover of the factor
    space
  • for the experiment?

36
Block Design
  • Three basic strategies
  • Enumerated block design
  • Systematic block design
  • Randomized block design

37
Enumerated Block Design
  • Assigns every possible treatment to every sample
  • Obvious strategy if sample 1
  • If sample gt 1, this is not practical
  • Because total number of trials extent of factor
    space x number of sample
  • Too large !!

38
Systematic Block Design
  • Uses a deterministic algorithm to assign
    treatments to different sample in a systematic
    way
  • Eventually covers the entire factor space
  • Problem Unintentional resonance between sample
    and treatment can be sparked

39
Systematic Block Design
  • Example
  • A marketing survey is carried out to every 100th
    telephone number
  • The chances a treatment assigned to, say a number
    03-2698 1100 belonging to a business entity
  • Is higher than say 03-2698 1024
  • A bias towards response of business entity may
    occur in the survey

40
Systematic Block Design
  • This block design should be avoided
  • Unless this bias can be ascertained

41
Randomized Block Design
  • Similar to systematic block design
  • Except that the treatment assigned to the sample
    are sequenced randomly
  • This can also reduce the risk of systematic bias

42
Case Study
  • Enumerated block design is not practical
  • Total trials 864 x 14!
  • Each sample has to respond to 864 treatments!
  • Fatigue
  • Peak Performance

43
Case Study
  • Another disadvantage
  • Humans are smart
  • Easily guess that factor space include 10 decimal
    digits and 26 Latin characters
  • Guess from elimination process
  • Bias the results

44
Case Study
  • Since all the license plate inspectors had same
    recognition skills
  • Not all treatment need to be assigned to every
    sample/ subject
  • Divide 864 treatments equally
  • Reduce time for each subject
  • Can a systematic block design do it?

45
Case Study
  • Systematic block design also has setbacks
  • Subjects can also detect the periodicity
  • Biased improved performance
  • Randomized block design is solution
  • Computer generated pseudo-random assignment of
    treatments

46
Case Study
  • Decide how many and which sets of treatments
    would be randomly assigned to subjects
  • Combined to cover enough sets for each factor
  • To make up set of trials that cover entire factor
    space

47
Representation Factor
  • A factor that is not intended as a basis for
    measuring performance
  • However they are necessary for assigning values
    of a parameter
  • Example
  • Characters

48
Performance factor
  • A factor that is used as a basis for measuring
    performance
  • Example
  • Typeface
  • Noise Level

49
Case Study
  • Either assign each of two typefaces to half the
    subjects
  • Or assign both typefaces to all
  • Former solution better to avoid confusion among
    subject and more realistic

50
Case Study
  • Noise Level range 130 to 240 with increments of
    10
  • How to distribute the treatment to subjects?
  • Condition
  • Interval must be same
  • Subsets different
  • Same average

51
Case Study
  • Subsets suitable
  • 130, 150, , 210, 230
  • 140, 160, , 220, 240
  • 130, 140, , , 230, 240

52
Case Study
  • How many subjects?
  • Access to 14 trained license plate inspectors
  • 2 for OP Pilot
  • Number of subjects will determine the combination
    of performance factor values

53
Case Study
  • Statisticians require at least 30 responses over
    entire experiment for each typeface and noise
    level combination
  • Characters can be assigned to obtain response
  • Must use whole set (36 characters) or multiple of
    whole set to avoid character bias

54
Case Study
  • Decided
  • 6 subjects for OP Pilot
  • 8 subjects for experiment trial
  • Using block design in column B

55
Control Trial
  • Measures the performance of one set of task in
    the absence of another to isolate the effects of
    the included components on performance

56
Control Trial
  • To identify possible bias in the processes of the
    project task
  • Bias is a consistent tendency to behave in an
    inconsistent way under certain conditions
  • Example
  • A spring loses its memory when elastic limit is
    exceeded

57
Control Trial
  • Case Study
  • The Listening Rat
  • Disabled Power Brakes

58
Control Trial
  • To establish performance baselines for comparison
  • Without baseline, it is impossible to test the
    hypothesis of a solution that suggests a certain
    improvement or behavior
  • Example
  • To test if a new hand lotion is better than not
    using any hand lotion

59
Case Study
  • Two control task was introduced
  • With characters but without noise
  • Without characters, only noise

60
Case Study
  • The first control trial to ensure that each
    subject had sufficient experience with interface
    during practice sessions
  • So that the effects of the learning curve is
    negligible during test trials
  • If learning bias occurs, repeat practice session

61
Case Study
  • Second control trial to measure selection time in
    the absence of any characters
  • Pure guessing
  • The statistics of this selection time used as
    baseline for computing the confidence that
    subject did not purely guess in the test trials

62
Protocols
  • Step-by-step procedure to be followed during
    preparation and conduct of experiment
  • Main purpose
  • To ensure that experiment can be accurately and
    precisely repeated

63
Protocols
  • Check list can help ensure uniformity in
    preparation of lab before experiment trial begins
  • Everyone involved must carry out protocol
    accordingly
  • Pilot trials can be used to plan and debug the
    protocol

64
Protocols
  • Anyone in contact with human subjects in an
    experiment trial should not expose the objective
    of the experiment
  • Protocols can be printed as flowcharts,
    pseudo-code or lists

65
Case Study
  • Characterization of EDFA
  • Steps include
  • Measure input signal
  • Measure output signal
  • OSA will compute Gain, NF, PASE
  • Sequence of measurement is important

66
Data Management
  • Most critical and frustrating task
  • Protect data
  • Maintain logs of data (where it is kept, which
    file is for what)
  • Record ALL experiment data

67
Data Management
  • Do not preprocess the raw experiment data in any
    way before recording it
  • Establish clear organizational and documentation
    conventions for data files
  • Back-up !!

68
Conduct Experiments
  • Time to follow your plans
  • Resist temptation to improvise on the fly
  • If doesnt run well, stop and revise
  • Consider failed experiment as pilot trial

69
Reduce Results
  • Performance values to validate the hypothesis
    cannot be drawn directly from raw results
  • The raw results must be reduced, combined or
    transformed to be meaningful

70
Case Study 1
  • Identify Faster Traffic on Highway
  • Need to measure speed
  • This is not raw results
  • Reduced from compression signals, time two pulses
    occurred

71
Case Study 2
  • Characterization of EDFA
  • Need to measure Gain (dB) and Noise Figure (dB)
  • Not raw results
  • Reduced from among others Input Signal Power
    (dBm), Output Signal Power (dBm), ASE Level (dBm)

72
Reduce Results
  • Data Reduction methods may change
  • Performance metrics may be altered
  • Important to record both raw and reduced results

73
QA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com