Regulation of Media Industries

1
Regulation of Media Industries
2
Regulation

• Generally speaking, why does the government
  regulate businesses and industries?
• Ensure free markets

3
Regulation of media

• How are media regulations different from those of
  most other businesses?
• Public interest provisions

4
Early Regulation

• Radio Act of 1927
• Created Federal Radio Commission (FRC) with power
  to grant federal licenses to stations for
  broadcasting over airwaves
• Required stations to serve the public interest,
  convenience and necessity
• Licenses given to for-profit broadcasters (not
  educational institutions)

5
FRC continued

• FRC classified stations assigned frequencies
• made rules to prevent interference
• established power and location of transmitters
• established coverage areas

6
Communications Act of 1934

• Created Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
  to replace FRC
• Recodified many features of earlier radio act
• Left public interest undefined
• Directed FCC to provide
• rapid, efficient communication service
• adequate facilities at reasonable charges
• distribution of service to all states and
  communities

7

• 1983 new section encouraged provision of new
  technologies and favoring more competition in the
  marketplace to serve the public good

8
Examples of Media Regulation

• Anti-trust action FTC, Justice Department, FCC
  e.g. break up of motion picture monopoly in the
  1940s
• Fairness Doctrine (1949-1987) required
  commitment to different opposing positions on
  public issues of interest and importance
• Provision of childrens programming
• Fin-syn rules (1970-1993) prevented
  television stations owning their own programming

9
Key concepts

• common carrier
• natural monopoly
• public interest regulation

10
Common Carrier

• Akin to a public utility
• access to communication should be
  non-discriminatory
• rates should be just and reasonable

11
Natural Monopoly

• One firm can provide product/service at lower
  cost than 2 or more
• A result of
• economies of scale
• single technology specifications
• cheaper to achieve universal service

12
Problems with Natural Monopoly

• Rural areas often served by small independents,
  which lose access
• Natural monopoly often outcome of special
  interest predatory policies
• 1880s Western Union Bell
• 1926 ATT General Electric, Western Union etc.

13
Public interest

• Vaguely defined by regulators
• Over time, increasingly defined, informally, as
  economic interest
• E.g., whats good for media industries is good
  for the public

14
1996 Telecommunication Act

• BROADCAST
• Broadcasters may add to existing licensed
  spectrum to develop digital service,
• Spectrum taken away from low-power TV license
  holders, land mobile services and other small
  broadcasters.
• Broadcasters get their additional spectrum for
  free. But have to spend millions to outfit for
  digital
• Analog spectrum must eventually be returned.

15
Radio

• All national ownership restrictions removed
• Local ownership restrictions relaxed according to
  the size of the market
• One owner cannot own more than half the local
  radio spectrum

16
TV

• Single owner may buy stations that reach up to
  35 of the national audience
• In 50 largest markets
• may own more than one TV station or a radio and a
  TV station
• may own a TV station and a cable TV system in the
  same place
• may own more than one network (except biggest
  existing networks).

17
Cable

• Incentives for establishing cross-platform
  competition among services
• e.g. cable into telephony, phone companies into
  video service
• All rate regulation for non-basic tier services
  is abolished
• This benefits large existing cable companies.
• Encourages competition among existing large
  players does not encourage entrants.

18

• Cable still has public interest obligations
• required local carriage of local broadcast
  signals
• franchise obligations imposed by local
  authorities.

19
Some Outcomes

• Local telephone markets quickly consolidated from
  7 to only 4
• E.g., CA has only 2 major providers of local
  land lines SBC and Verizon
• Little choice of cable provider
• Cable rates have increased significantly faster
  than consumer price index
• Satellite still controls only a small segment of
  the market
• Satellite by only 2 companies, one of which is
  News Corp.

20
Outcomes cont.

• Triggered a wave of mergers, mainly to protect
  against competition
• Greater concentration in radio
• In cable, the top 10 account for 75 of the
  industry

21

• Greater commercialism many radio stations offer
  no local news at all.
• In some markets not a single station offers
  public affairs programming
• Overall, public affairs programming accounts for
  far less than 1 of content.
• Decline in minority ownership by 15

22
June 2003 FCC ruling

• Regulations Relaxed
• Newspaper/television Cross-Ownership
• Natl television Ownership Cap (35 to 45)
• 2003 changes currently on hold
• Citizen complaints
• Congressional scrutiny
• Cases currently in the courts

23
Concerns about recent FCC rulings

• Lead to greater consolidation
• Monopolies non-competitive
• Mergers limit number of independent voices in
  media
• Localism community
• Corporate accountability
• Facilitates censorship

24
Public Concerns About FCC

• Public input into FCC decisions generally lacking
• Few public hearings, poorly advertised
• Current controversy over hidden reports
  packed meetings
• Activist groups continue to pressure Congress and
  FCC