ROLE OF MICROBES IN SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

ROLE OF MICROBES IN SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS

Description:

SALINITY A major stress limiting agriculture productivity . APPROACHES TO COMBAT SALINITY: 1)Chemical amendment 2)Development of salt tolerant plants through ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: DrB47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ROLE OF MICROBES IN SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS


1
(No Transcript)
2
ROLE OF MICROBES IN SALT TOLERANCE OF PLANTS
BY PROF. DR. ASGHARI BANO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCES, QUAID-E-AZAM
UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD
3
  • SALINITY
  • A major stress limiting agriculture
    productivity.
  • APPROACHES TO COMBAT SALINITY
  • 1)Chemical amendment
  • 2)Development of salt tolerant plants through
    breeding/genetic engineering.
  • 3)Role of Agrochemical
  • The alternative viable approach use of salt
    tolerant microbes to induce tolerance in
    plants,economical,sustainable environment
    friendly.

4
SALINITY INDUCES SEVERAL PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES
Ionic imbalance
Water stress
Production of reactive oxygen species
Changes in the level of phytohormones
Unavailability of phosphate
5
  • SALT TOLERANCE LIMIT
  • Threshold level of salt tolerance in plants
    varies from 40-200mM NaCl.
  • Tolerance level of PGPR varies from 100-650mM
    NaCl.
  • ROLE OF PGPR
  • a) Better development of root system
  • b)Production of growth promoting hormones in
    addition to stress hormone ABA.
  • c)Solubilization of insoluble phosphate

6
  • Table. 1 LIST OF SOME IMPORTANT MICROBIAL
    SPECIES TOLERANT TO SALT STRESS

MICROBIAL SPECIES REFERENCES CROP STUDIED
Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 Cassan et al (2008) Rice (cv. L-Paso 144)
A. brasilense sp 245 Creus et al (1997) Triticum aestivum (Wheat)
A. brasilense cd Rivarola et al (1998)  
A. brasilense Saleena et al (2002) Rice
A. brasilense Hartman et al (1991)  
A. brasilense cd Fischer et al (2000) Wheat
A. brasilense sp7 Tripathi et al (1998)  
7
MICROBIAL SPECIES REFERENCES CROP STUDIED
A. brasilense Puente et al (1999) Sea water and mangrove seedlings
A. amazonense Tripathi et al (1998)  
A. lipoferum Hartman etal (1991)  
A. lipoferum Saleena et al (2002) Rice
A. lipoferum JA 4 ngfp15 Bacilio et al (2004) Wheat
A. lipoferum Puente et al (1999) Saline paddy soil, sea weeds
A. halopraferans Puente et al (1999) Sea water and mangrove seedlings
A. halopraferans Reinhold Kallar grass
8
MICROBIAL SPECIES REFERENCES CROP STUDIED
A. halopraferans Hartman et al (1991)  
Serratia proteamuculans Hans and lee (2005) Soybean
Bacillus Subtilis GBO3 Zhang et al (2008) Rice
Klebsiella oxytoca Yhe et al (2007)  
Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011 Aydi (2008) Medicago truncatula
B. japanicum Miransari and Smith (2008) Soybean
Pseudomonas sp. Strain ADP Sharper et al (1998)  
P. trivialis Pratibha et al (2009) Cold deserts of trans Himalaya
P. kilonensis   Cold deserts of trans Himalaya
9
MICROBIAL SPECIES REFERENCES CROP STUDIED
P. corrugata   Cold deserts of trans Himalaya
P. jessenic   Cold deserts of trans Himalaya
P. movaviensis   Cold deserts of trans Himalaya
P. flourecens MSP-393 Paul and Nair (2008) Coastal agricultural soil
P. mendocina Naz (2008)  
P. stutzeri Naz (2008)  
Aspergillus flavus Hassan (2002) Faba bean
Aspergillus niger Hassan (2002) Sesame
10
MICROBIAL SPECIES REFERENCES CROP STUDIED
Fusarium oxysperum Hassan (2002) Soybean
Rhizopus stolonifer Hassan (2002) Soybean
Glomus intraradices Kohler et al (2004) Lactuca sativa (L.)
Achramobacter piechandii Mayak et al (2004) Tomato seedlings
R.leguminosarum and Bradyrhizobium sp. Elsiddig and Elsheikh (1998)  
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Vicia 3841 El-Hamdaoui et al (2003) Pea
Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Vicia strain GRA19 Cordovilla et al (1996) Vicia faba
Frankia sp. Reddell et al (1985) Casuarina obsesa
Scytanema hofmanni Rodriguez et al (2006) rice
11
Table 2 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION HAVE BEEN MADE
FOR THE ROLE OF PGPR AND SALICYLIC ACID IN
IMPARTING SALT TOLERANCE TO SUNFLOWER PLANTS (
NAZ AND BANO 2009)
Treatments Symbols
Control C
NaCl (20dsm-1) S
Pseudomonas NaCl PS
Salicylic acid (10-4 M) SAS
Azospirillum NaCl AS
Pseudomonas Salicylic acid NaCl PSAS
Azospirillum Salicylic acid NaCl ASAS
12
MATERIAL AND METHODS
  • The seeds were soaked overnight in cultures of
    Azospirillum and Pseudomonas prior to sowing NaCl
    (20dSm-1)were applied to soil 4 weeks after
    inoculation
  • Aqueous solution of 20dSm-1 NaCl was applied the
    rhizosphere soil of potted plants till saturation
    and watering was made to all the treatments as
    and when required.
  • Salicylic acid (10-4M) foliary applied to plants
    4h after the salt treatment.

13
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
  • Young and fully expanded leaves were collected
    around 1000h-1200h to analyze the relative
    water content, osmotic potential, carotenoid
    content, proline, antioxidants and hormones 7d
    after the induction of salt treatment.
  • Relative water content of second leaf from the
    top of the plants was determined following the
    method given by Gupta (1995).
  • The osmotic potential of the cell sap was
    measured leaves with a freezing point osmometer
    according the method of Capell and
    Doerffling(1993).
  • Carotenoid content was estimated according to the
    method of Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983).
  • Proline content of young leaves was estimated by
    using the following method of Bates et al. (1973).

14
  • SAMPLING PROCEDURE
  • SOD of fresh plant tissues was determined
    following the method of Beauchamp and Frodovich
    (1971).
  • POD activity of fresh plant tissues was measured
    by the method of Vetter et al. (1958) as modified
    by Gorin and Heidema (1976).
  • The extraction and purification of ABA was made
    following the method of Kettner and Droffling,
    (1995).
  • The extraction and purification of ABA was made
    following the method of Kettner and Doerffling,
    (1995).
  • Salicylic acid was extracted and purified
    according to the method of Enyedi et al., 1992
    and Seskar et al., (1998) with some
    modifications.

15
Table 3 Effect of Azospirillum, Pseudomonas and
Salicylic acid on soil moisture content of two
cultivars (cvv. Hy-sun par-sun) under salt
stress.
Soil moisture content (age) Soil moisture content (age) Soil moisture content (age)
Treatments Hy-sun Par-sun
C 14.00b 24.50b
S 32.47a 34.37a
PS 28.00a 19.90b
SAS 18.97b 19.67b
AS 19.30b 20.20b
PSAS 17.10b 18.63b
ASAS 16.80b 18.53b
16
Table 4 Effect of Azospirillium, Pseudomonas and
Salicylic Acid on Relative Water Content (age)
and Osmotic Potential (-MPa) of two Sunflower
cultivators Hy-sun Par-sun) under salt stress.
Treatments Hy-sun Hy-sun Par-sun Par-sun
RWC () OP(-MPa) RWC () OP(-MPa)
C 50.03ab 1.113a 50.47a 1.175a
S 46.07b 0.674b 40.60b 0.722c
PS 45.73b 1.023a 47.57ab 1.052ab
SAS 46.40b 1.086a 50.07a 1.023ab
AS 41.13b 0.988a 47.57ab 0.893bc
PSAS 57.57a 1.080a 55.53a 1.042ab
ASAS 41.97b 1.106a 48.37ab 1.007ab
17
Table 5 EFFECT OF AZOSPIRILLUM, PSEUDOMONAS AND
SALICYLIC ACID ON CAROTENOID CONTENT OF TWO
SUNFLOWER CULTIVARS UNDER SALT STRESS
Treatments Hy-sun Par-sun
Treatments Carotenoid (mg/g) Carotenoid (mg/g)
Control 2.26 a 2.150 a
Salt treated 0.60 c 1.440 b
PseudomonasSalt 1.81 ab 1.743 ab
Salicylic acidSalt 2.17 a 1.960 a
AzospirillumSalt 1.15 bc 1.423 b
PseudomonasSalicylic acidSalt 2.15 a 1.700 ab
AzospirillumSalicylic acidSalt 1.60 ab 1.843 ab
LSD value 0.959 0.4567
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
  • DISCUSSION
  • Proline content and superoxide dismutase activity
    may be used as physiological markers of salt
    tolerance as they showed more increase in salt
    tolerant Hy-Sun 33.
  • Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria
  • (e.g. Azospirillum and Pseudomonas) receiving
    the foliar spray of SA and SA application alone
    may have a role in up-regulating antioxidant
    enzymes.

26
(No Transcript)
27
  • CONCLUSION
  • The possible difference between microbes
    (PGPR) induced salt tolerance and hormone induced
    salt tolerance can be summarized as follows
  • Microbes are sustainable source of ABA production
    along with other growth promoting hormones IAA,
    GA and t-zr whereas, ABA applied exogenously to
    combat salt stress decreases the endogenous level
    of IAA, GA and t-zr. ABA is a growth inhibitory
    compound and under normal condition its level
    should remain low to keep pace with growth and
    development.
  • Particularly in sensitive varieties, it has been
    reported that on return to normal condition the
    decline in stress induced ABA level was delayed
    and magnitude of decrease was also less. (Iqbal
    and Bano 2009)

28
  • Microbes can also produce other bioactive
    metabolites e.g. polyamines (Putrescine,
    cadavarine etc) which further improve the plant
    resistance to disease and salt.
  • Microbes assist in solubilization of P and make
    them available to plant which is an additional
    effect not the case in ABA-induced salt tolerance
    .
  • Microbes are economical and environmental
    friendly whereas, ABA is rather expensive and may
    have adverse effects on soil microbiota.

29
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com